On Thu 22. Jun - 15:47:43, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Le jeudi 22 juin 2006 11:01, Holger Macht a écrit :
> > On Thu 22. Jun - 09:59:32, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > > The proposed DBus interface looks fine for the average desktop
> > > application needs, but this way we would keep the Solid::PowerManager
> > > class available for special applications that don't care about the policy
> > > implemented in kpowersave and would need finer grained information (like
> > > desktop applets).
> >
> > What do you mean with "desktop applets" here? Which application may need
> > finer grainted power management related information than kpowersace (which
> > is a desktop applet ;-)
>
> Ok, I had in mind the desktop toys and this kind of gadgets users love to
> have
> on their desktop nowadays. Generally, the more fine grained information they
> can get, the more they do fancy stuff (people have quite some imagination for
> this ;-) ).
Yes, agreed.
>
> > What I actually also don't want is that the Solid part duplicates stuff
> > which is in this library. But I don't think you want kdelibs depend on an
> > external library, right? So I'm not yet sure how to mary those two
> > approaches.
>
> Well, it already happens, qt-dbus is such a library for example. We have the
> kdesupport to host some of those libraries, maybe it could be dropped there
> after all?
Yes, I think that would be ok.
Regards,
Holger
_______________________________________________
powersave-devel mailing list
powersave-devel@forge.novell.com
http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/powersave-devel
