On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Paul McNett <[email protected]> wrote:

> I use VNC over OpenVPN tunnel.

I've always meant to get around to trying out OpenVPN. It's easy
enough for me to set up PuTTY and VNC and get it working, but it's not
something to hand to a civilian. A VPN (Virtual Private Network) means
that your machine effectively is attached to the remote network as if
it was physically plugged in. There are some real security
implications: a firewall set up as a perimeter defense doesn't work
for the remote LAN, and your own machine needs to be protected from
whatever is roaming around the client's LAN. (I had a client a few
years ago who experimented with some extremely dangerous technologies;
occasionally something would get loose on their LAN. I declined their
invitation to set up a VPN connection ;)

That can be a problem with clients "dialing-in" (who has a dial, any
more?) from home: their machine at home is now plugged into the office
LAN. The home PC is often shared among the family, and the chances
that it's well maintained and free of malware is a real concern.

The disadvantage is an advantage, too: if you're using the Windows LAN
Manager protocols, you can search out their file servers and printer
and access the local resources you need in-house.

Ideally, I'm looking for a secure tunnel, then a screen-scraping
program from there.

Is anyone using Remote Desktop or whatever they call RDP in this version?

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to