Brice Figureau wrote: > > I think my reluctancy comes from adding a new dependency to the whole > chain (both the stomp client library on every clients _and_ something > like ActiveMQ somewhere). As long we still support HTTP with no extra > dependency then I think we're fine.
This is always one of my concerns. Actually what'd it be great to align to (albeit I am not sure how feasible it is) would be: 1. Scrap webrick as base server and replace with xxxx - mongrel/passenger/other? 2. Have async queued mode as the scaling mode This would mean rather than people going from webrick (which sucks obviously), to passenger/mongrel and then potentially to a queuing model we'd only have two modes - normal and "wow you've got a lot of nodes/configuration". James -- Puppet Labs - http://www.puppetlabs.com C: 503-734-8571 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
