On Sep 28, 2010, at 8:41, James Turnbull <[email protected]> wrote:
> Brice Figureau wrote: >> >> I think my reluctancy comes from adding a new dependency to the whole >> chain (both the stomp client library on every clients _and_ something >> like ActiveMQ somewhere). As long we still support HTTP with no extra >> dependency then I think we're fine. > > This is always one of my concerns. Actually what'd it be great to align > to (albeit I am not sure how feasible it is) would be: > > 1. Scrap webrick as base server and replace with xxxx - > mongrel/passenger/other? Webrick sucks but it's the only option that doesn't induce more dependencies, right? > 2. Have async queued mode as the scaling mode I might rather say 'production' than scaling, but that's my basic goal. However, I don't think itMs quite that simple; at least, we've still got some complexity around adding async to the indirector, and only when we've kind of sorted that can the story become clear. > This would mean rather than people going from webrick (which sucks > obviously), to passenger/mongrel and then potentially to a queuing model > we'd only have two modes - normal and "wow you've got a lot of > nodes/configuration". -- Luke Kanies | +1-615-594-8199 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
