On Sep 28, 2010, at 19:34, Lindsay Holmwood <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29 September 2010 07:27, Luke Kanies <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sep 28, 2010, at 8:41, James Turnbull <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> 1. Scrap webrick as base server and replace with xxxx - >>> mongrel/passenger/other? >> >> Webrick sucks but it's the only option that doesn't induce more >> dependencies, right? > > Unfortunately yes, however most Linux distros have native packages for > Mongrel or Passenger these days. Bit more difficult for BSD users. > > It's a nasty option, but how about vendoring Mongrel? Isn't Mongrel compiled? And largely abandoned? And not recommended anyway? I actually think Webrick should work for most cases, it's the http vs bus I'm concerned about. -- Luke Kanies | +1-615-594-8199 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
