On 29 September 2010 13:04, Luke Kanies <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 28, 2010, at 19:34, Lindsay Holmwood <[email protected]> wrote: >> It's a nasty option, but how about vendoring Mongrel? > > Isn't Mongrel compiled? And largely abandoned? And not recommended anyway? > > I actually think Webrick should work for most cases, it's the http vs > bus I'm concerned about. >
Yep, you're absolutely right, there is a compiled C extension. Mongrel is being maintained, but not in active development. Lots of people still use it, but my thinking was to have something better than Webrick for out-of-the-box use (I have enough problems with Webrick in even small setups that Passenger is the only sane option). Lindsay -- w: http://holmwood.id.au/~lindsay/ t: @auxesis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
