On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Luke Kanies <[email protected]> wrote:
> That being said, after talking with RI about buses last night.... I'm > becoming more and more convinced that all of the effort I put into the > indirector could have been solved in far less effort with buses. > I'm interested in hearing more about this. It seems to me that some of the things we use the indirector for would work really well in a queue environment (e.g. node announces its presence and uploads facts, master responds with a catalog, node responds with a report), whereas others seem more synchronous in nature (e.g. client pulling files and SSL certificates from the server). > > >> * I'd hoped to have an option that had the client still speaking > >> http to the server and the server doing all of the async bits, so you > >> wouldn't need to upgrade your client to get this functionality, but I > >> did not succeed. I think I could do it now, though. > I like the sound of this. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
