On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 at 14:59 Steve Holden <st...@holdenweb.com> wrote:
> +1 > > A little innocent fun is OK, but when it runs the risk of being hurtful > it's probably gone far enough. It would be horrible if the Python community > got a name for being snide. > +1 While I didn't post, I considered making something of a contribution, which was, in hindsight not going to be a positive contribution. However, lets not forget what the original post was, which is spam. I object to having that kind of content in my mailbox (have subsequently added the OP to my shitlist in GApps). Dyslexia or not, the content of the opportunities that was advertised were not of acceptable standard: - no salary definitions - no explanation of benefits - nothing but a technology stack as way of skills requirements which is next to pointless - no info on precise location in London - naught but a slightly vague title - a salary carrot on a long stick (the "up to £95k"). It was clear from the OPs post that no thought was put into making the post and that her intention was simply to float it out there to get some fish biting. Had Sophie made an effort, perhaps I might have been more accommodating. As it stands, I've no interest in dealing with lazy recruitment agents. ~ Rich
_______________________________________________ python-uk mailing list python-uk@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
