On Wed, Dec 7, 2016, Richard Smith <rich...@indigo3.com> wrote: >On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 at 04:19 Daniele Procida <dani...@vurt.org> wrote: > >> It wasn't spam. We have discussed several times whether recruitment >> messages are welcome here. To date, we've not come to any consensus that >> they are not. >> > >Ok, lets take the position it wasn't spam.
Actually, *your* reply did go into my spam folder, and it was a while before I even found it. >If you received the OPs email, >directly, would you require a little more information in the post other >than a technology stack and a carrot on a stick? > >Is this now the minimum people accept for employment opportunities and >recruitment messages? > >I'm sorry but: > >a) I don't want to have to email a recruitment agent and beg for more info >b) email recruitment agent only to be put on yet another mailing list to >get more spam Your wants and mine are not the issue here. >> This is rudeness bordering on abuse, and it's definitely not acceptable on >> this email list. > > >What was rude about it? Referring to a person as a "lazy recruitment agent" is rude. >Sophie is >going to have to prove that she can be a trusted agent. Sophie doesn't have to prove anything. All she has to do is use the list in accordance with its agreed purposes, politely. Daniele _______________________________________________ python-uk mailing list python-uk@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk