On 07/12/16 04:20, Richard Smith wrote:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 at 14:59 Steve Holden <st...@holdenweb.com
<mailto:st...@holdenweb.com>> wrote:
    +1
    A little innocent fun is OK, but when it runs the risk of being
    hurtful it's probably gone far enough. It would be horrible if the
    Python community got a name for being snide.

 +1

While I didn't post, I considered making something of a contribution,
which was, in hindsight not going to be a positive contribution.

However, lets not forget what the original post was, which is spam. I
object to having that kind of content in my mailbox (have subsequently
added the OP to my shitlist in GApps).

Dyslexia or not, the content of the opportunities that was advertised
were not of acceptable standard:

 - no salary definitions
 - no explanation of benefits
 - nothing but a technology stack as way of skills requirements which is
next to pointless
 - no info on precise location in London
 - naught but a slightly vague title
 - a salary carrot on a long stick (the "up to £95k").

It was clear from the OPs post that no thought was put into making the
post and that her intention was simply to float it out there to get some
fish biting.

Had Sophie made an effort, perhaps I might have been more accommodating.
As it stands, I've no interest in dealing with lazy recruitment agents.


I join the sardonic amusement.

Despite Steve's (all too correct) sympathy expressed, I'm still on the 'disappointed' side of the ledger because almost any 'advice' one reads for applicants writing/responding to agencies and potential employers includes stern (or lofty) advice about spell-checking, grammar-checking, sanity-checking, etc, etc. Do as I say, and not as I do?

Respect to the OP for responding in civil fashion!

Marks-off for not addressing the (above) list specifications (which again, given that you wouldn't want a non-Python person applying for such tasks and would immediately question if (s)he had read the advert properly?) Et tu Brute?

Strike three, as my American friends would say, was that said-reply will not be threaded with the rest of the email conversation. Any more than the OP is likely to connect an application entitled "Programmer skilled in interfacing C++ to COBOL" with these positions...


Sophie: you won't make these mistakes again, but I hope you will return with news of future opportunities. Meantime, how about reading-up on the technical aspects (per above), and then seeking to rebuild relationships by offering to host a local Python gathering, sponsor pizza at the next Python dojo, or similar?
(yes, we're that simple/easy to please!)


--
Regards,
=dn
_______________________________________________
python-uk mailing list
python-uk@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk

Reply via email to