At 02:05 μμ 3/10/2001 -0400, you wrote: >On 10/3/01 at 12:36 PM Phoebus Dokos wrote: > > > SB being a Server Side Script language is feasible now with UN*X > > systems running uQLx.... And a QL specific web server is relatively > > easy to implement once the TCP/IP stack is stable and complete. > > Xitami for example (www.imatix.com) is an ideal candidate for that > > reason... > >There is absolutely no reason why SBasic couldn't be used as a SSSL. All it >would need is some sort of CGI (or whatever) interface implemented in the >web server. >As for Xitami, I have been using it for over a year now and although it is >simple and relatively powerfull, it also has, at least on the PC some odd >problems. For instance, sending the wrong files (for instance, it's >supposed to give you file xxx.gif, it sends yyy.gif - every time, >consistently, but even the log says it's sending xxx.gif), acting as a >memory leak, suddenly crashing when attempts to resume transfer are >detected, having problems with ftp transfers, etc. It would need a lot of >work to get it right. As a matter of fact, I would greatly apreciate if >someone could tell me about a small, simple and _reliable_ web server to >work under W98... (I know, I know, off topic...) > >Nasta
Actually it's not Xitami's fault. I suspect you are using the NT version which tends to have such behaviour under Win9x. There is a SPECIFIC version for Win 9x... Identical filename and filesize with the NT/2000 version but totally different. The linux version is even smaller :-) (Of course ;-)
