Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > than the obvious overhead of adding /bin/sh to the execution path? Is > this overhead significant enough to make such a modification a bad idea? Are there quoting problems to expect? If yes, I would leave the patch the way it is now. Regards, Frank
- QMAILQUEUE patch for qmail-1.03 Bruce Guenter
- Re: QMAILQUEUE patch for qmail-1.03 Bruce Guenter
- newbie question (it's an easy one i'm sure, but... Frank Tegtmeyer
- newbie question (it's an easy one i'm sure,... John Wolford
- Re: newbie question (it's an easy one i... David Talkington
- Re: newbie question (it's an easy ... Nick (Keith) Fish
- Re: QMAILQUEUE patch for qmail-1.03 Bruce Guenter
- Re: QMAILQUEUE patch for qmail-1.03 Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: QMAILQUEUE patch for qmail-1.03 Jason Haar
- Re: QMAILQUEUE patch for qmail-1.03 Jim Steele
- Hahaha (hybris) clobber perl script... Roger Merchberger
- QMAILQUEUE Patch for qmail-1.03 Juan E Suris
