I vote to leave it alone. Let the configuring individual invoke
/bin/sh in QMAILQUEUE herself if she understands and still wants to
make that particular convenience vs. overhead tradeoff.
Valued at $0.02,
JS
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 10:26:28PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
>
> I've been contemplating rewriting the patch to do an exec of
> { "/bin/sh", "-c", $QMAILQUEUE } instead of exec'ing $QMAILQUEUE as-is.
> This would allow for putting the contents of the script named by
> $QMAILQUEUE (which is frequently a one-line shell script anyways) into
> the variable itself. Are there any downsides to this approach other
> than the obvious overhead of adding /bin/sh to the execution path? Is
> this overhead significant enough to make such a modification a bad idea?
> --
> Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://em.ca/~bruceg/ http://untroubled.org/
> OpenPGP key: 699980E8 / D0B7 C8DD 365D A395 29DA 2E2A E96F B2DC 6999 80E8
