Kyle,
Maybe you could try raising the idle-timeout-secs value.

\Sergio

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kyle Quillen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 2:50 PM
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Load balancing
> 
> 
> 
> My spamdyke.conf is below along with my package versions.
> 
> Dups seem to be slowing down but then my load averages are 
> coming down as well
> 
> 
> Spamdyke.conf
> 
> check-dnsrbl=zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> check-dnsrbl=dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> check-dnsrbl=bogons.cymru.com
> check-dnsrbl=zen.spamhaus.org
> check-dnsrbl=bl.spamcop.net
> check-dnsrbl=list.dsbl.org
> graylist-dir=/var/spamdyke/graylist
> graylist-max-secs=2678400
> graylist-min-secs=80
> greeting-delay-secs=5
> idle-timeout-secs=60 ip-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_ip
> ip-in-rdns-keyword-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_keywords
> ip-whitelist-file=/etc/spamdyke/whitelist_ip
> local-domains-file=/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
> log-level=2
> log-target=0
> max-recipients=25
> #policy-url=http://my.policy.explanation.url/
> rdns-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_rdns
> rdns-whitelist-file=/etc/spamdyke/whitelist_rdns
> recipient-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_recipients
> reject-empty-rdns
> reject-ip-in-cc-rdns
> reject-missing-sender-mx
> reject-unresolvable-rdns 
> sender-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_senders
> tls-certificate-file=/var/qmail/control/servercert.pem
> 
> 
> 
> qtp-whatami v0.3
> DISTRO=CentOS
> OSVER=5
> QTARCH=i686
> BUILD_DIST=cnt50
> BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat
> This machine's OS is supported, but this version/arch has not 
> been tested.
> 
> 
> average scan times seem to be 2.1-2.7
> 
> My packages are all current except for clamav
> 
> Thanks
> q
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 10:20 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
> > The dups are understandable. I'm guessing that the smtp 
> sessions are 
> > timing out because the load is high and subsequently scanning is 
> > taking a long time. How long are scans taking typically?
> > 
> > Please post your spamdyke.conf file.
> > 
> > What toaster package versions are you running?
> > 
> > Are you seeing clamav eating your cpu?
> > 
> > Kyle Quillen wrote:
> > > Spamdyke is installed and has been for about a week It 
> has seemed to 
> > > help but my loads are still staying around 3.5-4.5
> > > 
> > > The largest problem that I have right now is that users 
> are getting 
> > > duplicate emails and I can't figure out how to stop it.
> > > 
> > > Since I implemented the greylisting things seem to be calming a 
> > > little bit but the dups are still coming in. I have 
> gotten multiple 
> > > copies of emails that were sent yesterday  at like 1030 in the am 
> > > and i did get them.
> > > 
> > > Suggestions?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > thanks
> > > q
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 08:51 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
> > >> Kyle Quillen wrote:
> > >>> All,
> > >>>
> > >>> Does anyone have any resources that I can pull from that will 
> > >>> point me in the direction of setting up load balancing with the 
> > >>> toaster?  I want to keep using this mail server but I 
> have to find 
> > >>> a way to deal with the large amount of mail that I am having to 
> > >>> process.  It is mostly spam so maybe what I am looking 
> for is a spam scanning system.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thoughts?
> > >>>
> > >> Spamdyke.
> > >> Do it.
> > >>
> > 
> > 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Kyle Quillen
> Lightspeed Wireless
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 330.473.1231 ext.202
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>      QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
     QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to