After a trial-error approach, I set mine to 400. Maybe in better hardware is too
high, but's been working fine in my old server.
I found out this helped when I got dups with large attachments.
Sergio

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kyle Quillen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 3:33 PM
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Load balancing
> 
> 
> What would you suggest moving this setting to?
> 
> thanks
> q
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 15:11 -0300, Sergio Minini {NETKEY} wrote:
> > Kyle,
> > Maybe you could try raising the idle-timeout-secs value.
> > 
> > \Sergio
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kyle Quillen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 2:50 PM
> > > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Load balancing
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > My spamdyke.conf is below along with my package versions.
> > > 
> > > Dups seem to be slowing down but then my load averages are
> > > coming down as well
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Spamdyke.conf
> > > 
> > > check-dnsrbl=zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> > > check-dnsrbl=dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net check-dnsrbl=bogons.cymru.com
> > > check-dnsrbl=zen.spamhaus.org
> > > check-dnsrbl=bl.spamcop.net
> > > check-dnsrbl=list.dsbl.org
> > > graylist-dir=/var/spamdyke/graylist
> > > graylist-max-secs=2678400
> > > graylist-min-secs=80
> > > greeting-delay-secs=5
> > > idle-timeout-secs=60 ip-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_ip
> > > ip-in-rdns-keyword-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_keywords
> > > ip-whitelist-file=/etc/spamdyke/whitelist_ip
> > > local-domains-file=/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
> > > log-level=2
> > > log-target=0
> > > max-recipients=25
> > > #policy-url=http://my.policy.explanation.url/
> > > rdns-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_rdns
> > > rdns-whitelist-file=/etc/spamdyke/whitelist_rdns
> > > recipient-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_recipients
> > > reject-empty-rdns
> > > reject-ip-in-cc-rdns
> > > reject-missing-sender-mx
> > > reject-unresolvable-rdns 
> > > sender-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_senders
> > > tls-certificate-file=/var/qmail/control/servercert.pem
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > qtp-whatami v0.3
> > > DISTRO=CentOS
> > > OSVER=5
> > > QTARCH=i686
> > > BUILD_DIST=cnt50
> > > BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat
> > > This machine's OS is supported, but this version/arch has not
> > > been tested.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > average scan times seem to be 2.1-2.7
> > > 
> > > My packages are all current except for clamav
> > > 
> > > Thanks
> > > q
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 10:20 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
> > > > The dups are understandable. I'm guessing that the smtp
> > > sessions are
> > > > timing out because the load is high and subsequently scanning is
> > > > taking a long time. How long are scans taking typically?
> > > > 
> > > > Please post your spamdyke.conf file.
> > > > 
> > > > What toaster package versions are you running?
> > > > 
> > > > Are you seeing clamav eating your cpu?
> > > > 
> > > > Kyle Quillen wrote:
> > > > > Spamdyke is installed and has been for about a week It
> > > has seemed to
> > > > > help but my loads are still staying around 3.5-4.5
> > > > > 
> > > > > The largest problem that I have right now is that users
> > > are getting
> > > > > duplicate emails and I can't figure out how to stop it.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Since I implemented the greylisting things seem to be 
> calming a
> > > > > little bit but the dups are still coming in. I have 
> > > gotten multiple
> > > > > copies of emails that were sent yesterday  at like 
> 1030 in the 
> > > > > am
> > > > > and i did get them.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Suggestions?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > thanks
> > > > > q
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 08:51 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
> > > > >> Kyle Quillen wrote:
> > > > >>> All,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Does anyone have any resources that I can pull from 
> that will
> > > > >>> point me in the direction of setting up load 
> balancing with the 
> > > > >>> toaster?  I want to keep using this mail server but I 
> > > have to find
> > > > >>> a way to deal with the large amount of mail that I 
> am having 
> > > > >>> to
> > > > >>> process.  It is mostly spam so maybe what I am looking 
> > > for is a spam scanning system.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thoughts?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >> Spamdyke.
> > > > >> Do it.
> > > > >>
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kyle Quillen
> > > Lightspeed Wireless
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 330.473.1231 ext.202
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >      QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> > > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >      QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Kyle Quillen
> Lightspeed Wireless
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 330.473.1231 ext.202
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>      QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
     QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to