On 2015-02-11, Paul <tik-...@bodosom.net> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Harlan Stenn <st...@ntp.org> wrote: > >> There are times "repair" is perfectly acceptable, and we do that. >> >> There are times "replace" is better, and we do that. >> > > My point is a long drawn-out discussion of changes to the core of ntp seem > less than productive when the announced way forward is Ntimed (despite > mentions of NTP5). Another way of looking at this is that it's time for > nomail@example and unruh@invalid to start complaining about Ntimed rather > than ntpd.
It is hard to complain about a non-existant product. And I have also let my opinions on the way ntpd works be known, and would have expected ntimed to either consider them or ignore them a long time ago. > > I certainly expect patches to continue for the NTP v4 branch. I do agree that this is more than patches. It goes to the design philosophy of ntp, which is not going to be handled by patches. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
