Well, the user base has a lot to do with that. The learning curve for
facebook (and it’s games) is minimal. Second Life is still  disorienting for
all but the most enthusiastic adopters. As immersive websites become more
prevalent, virtual worlds will become more mainstream. 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
David Henn
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 8:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Av Rights

 

At least one reason for this is that facebook and Zynga are making gobs of
money, whereas Second Life has seen its revenues plummet and has had to
close three of its endeavors. Money talks, and all.


David

On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 23:06 -0500, Sal Armoniac wrote:



Just goes to show you that Face Book is taken more seriously than Second
Life. ;)

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Pat Rapp <[email protected]> wrote: 

Interesting …

 

http://bit.ly/8ZRbw5

 

“Under Italian law the virtual burglar's actions are considered "aggravated
entry" and can draw penalties of up to five years in prison.”

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Alicia Henn
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 5:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Av Rights



 

 

http://www.jmir.org/2010/3/e28/

This is an interesting article on rights for avatars. It seems reasonable
and yet ludicrous at the same time. My officemate and I have had a great
time expanding on it. -  Alicia



Get Your Paws off of My Pixels: Personal Identity and Avatars as Self

Mark Alan Graber1,2, MD; Abraham David Graber3, BA

ABSTRACT

There is an astounding silence in the peer-reviewed literature regarding
what rights a person ought to expect to retain when being represented by an
avatar rather than a biological body. Before one can have meaningful ethical
discussions about informed consent in virtual worlds, avatar bodily
integrity, and so on, the status of avatars vis-à-vis the self must first be
decided. We argue that as another manifestation of the individual, an
individual’s avatar should have rights analogous to those of a biological
body. Our strategy will be to show that (1) possessing a physical body is
not a necessary condition for possessing rights; (2) rights are already
extended to representations of a person to which no biological consciousness
is attached; and (3) when imbued with intentionality, some prostheses become
“self.” We will then argue that avatars meet all of the conditions necessary
to be protected by rights similar to those enjoyed by a biological body. The
structure of our argument will take the form of a conditional. We will argue
that if a user considers an avatar an extension of the self, then the avatar
has rights analogous to the rights of the user. Finally, we will discuss and
resolve some of the objections to our position including conflicts that may
arise when more than one individual considers an avatar to be part of the
self.

(J Med Internet Res 2010;12(3):e28)
doi:10.2196/jmir.1299



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:r-spec%[email protected]> .
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en.



 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:r-spec%[email protected]> .
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en.

Reply via email to