Good taste, by the way. Your Chumba is designed to accommodate a suspension fork, right? That's probably why it feels so high. It needs to have bb clearance even when the fork is compressed. For a brief moment, I thought the Clem you're looking at was my old one (same size, color, fenders). I was about to call the friend I gave it to and say "Hold up...."
On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 4:09:53 PM UTC-6 iamkeith wrote: > On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 10:46:15 AM UTC-6 fra...@gmail.com wrote: > >> Interesting Keith! I definitely plan to use a Clem as my main commuter to >> haul groceries and my daughter around. I absolutely love my Susie but hate >> leaving it locked up outside when we are going in anywhere for more than a >> few minutes. Do you find the Susie BB too high? It is low to me coming from >> a Chumba Ursa. The Susie is like riding a wet noodle, in a good way without >> much of a load. I imagine the Clem would be quite a different bike. >> >> > I don't think you can say that any bb is too high or too low - it just > depends on what the bike is intended for and how you have it set up. The > distinction between bottom bracket "drop" - or distance below the axles of > the wheels - and the finished "height" - or ground clearance - both matter > equally, and it's hard to know what is making the difference for me since > different tire diameters make it an apples-to-oranges comparison. > > When I got my bought my Clem, I had visions of using it as a mountain > bike. That's how the model was originally conceived, in fact. It really > didn't work for me that way because I didn't have enough standover > clearance and I would regularly high-center on obstacles, so it kind of > organically evolved into more of a road-ish, town-ish, smooth trail-ish, > super-fast pathway cruiser. It was fantastically comfortable - largely > because of the generous, rivendell-typical bottom bracket drop - and it > quickly became one of two bikes I ever wanted to ride. Just not as a > mountain bike. Prior to that, I hadn't known I NEEDED a bike like that. > > When I got my Susie, it was with the intention of incrementally improving > on my Clem, but keeping it for the same type of riding. In other words, > that same every-day bike I hadn't previously known I needed. However, > this model was ALSO very much conceived as a mountain (hill) bike and, in > this case, Grant and crew consciously made it more purposeful... and used a > higher bottom bracket / less drop. Presumably for clearance to avoid pedal > strikes. > > Combined with my ginormous tires, I can't under-emphasize how much I feel > the difference between the two bikes. That's my main point - not that one > is bad or one is good. I feel like I'm perched on top of the Susie, while > I rode inside of the Clem. > > The low, stable feel of the Clem is what made it and many other Rivendell > models feel so comfortable and stable. If you're coming from "normal" > brands' bikes or older norba-era mountain bikes, the Susie will still feel > low and great. In my case, it so happens that my 3 other > regularly-ridden, true "mountain bikes" all have even lower bottom brackets > than the Susie. Like the Susie, they also have much slacker seat tube > angles than is vogue for most mountain bikes these days. But they're not > typical. Those models and my own tastes were both influenced by > appreciation/preference for Rivendell's design philosophy. So ironically, > this personal experience makes my Susie feel high too. > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/51903b13-b7b5-46f4-8d68-6e67c9b05aabn%40googlegroups.com.
