Well no – AACR2 has spent about 10 years being revised, ending up with 
something I know I’m not especially happy with, and I’m under the general 
impression has a lukewarm reception at the best of times... so maybe that’s 
part of the problem!

Martin

From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Moore, Richard
Sent: 24 October 2012 11:35
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Additional work required by RDA

I don't think AACR2 used to be revised through populist revolutions either ...

________________________________
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Kelleher, Martin
Sent: 24 October 2012 10:37
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Additional work required by RDA
Hi Richard

Well, can’t help but think that this looks like the Cataloguing worlds 
equivalent of burying under bureaucracy..... I was hoping for a populist 
revolution via the RDA list! Ah, well, I guess I’ll go for it.

And maybe if a few others do the same, who knows? Maybe things can change at 
the 11th hour....

Martin Kelleher
Electronic Resources/Bibliographic Services Librarian
University of Liverpool

From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Moore, Richard
Sent: 24 October 2012 10:18
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Additional work required by RDA

Martin

There is a revision process for RDA:

http://www.rda-jsc.org/revision.html

If you wanted to submit a proposal yourself, you would need to discuss doing it 
through CILIP, as the relevant member body of JSC.

That's the way RDA gets revised.


Regards
Richard

_________________________
Richard Moore
Authority Control Team Manager
The British Library

Tel.: +44 (0)1937 546806
E-mail: richard.mo...@bl.uk<mailto:richard.mo...@bl.uk>


________________________________
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Kelleher, Martin
Sent: 24 October 2012 10:02
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Additional work required by RDA
Well, there does seem to be  a large amount of discontent, if not widespread 
rejection of the 330s replacing the GMD. And I see a few others were using 
similarly user friendly (DVD, book on CD) terms to us, perhaps similarly hoping 
as we were that this would be the direction things would go in. But is there 
anything we can actually do about it? Or would that be another 10 year+ 
revisionary process??

Martin Kelleher
Electronic Resources/Bibliographic Services Librarian
University of Liverpool



Reply via email to