On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, David Fisher wrote:

> > > > Gee. With NT, this would have been child's play!
> > >
> >         Yea, but with NT, it would'a screwed up after a day or two, and
> > cost you thousands in unnecessery support calls, crashes, downtime, etc,
> > etc...
> 
> How, then, do you account for the existence of all those NT
> installations in which the system runs without crashing, functions
> without support calls, and has virtually 100% uptime? Such
> installations do exist, and not only in our plant.
> 
> Or, perhaps, you are such a Linux devotee that you cannot see anything
> beyond your own prejudices?
> 
> Might it not be time for the Linux community to grow up and stop these
> incessant, childish, and largely unrewarding anti-NT tantrums? Just a
> thought...

Then why, oh why, are you baiting us??!!  It's because of postings like
yours that these pointless, off-topic religious arguments get started in
the first place.  This is a Linux list--do expect us NOT to defend it?

As I said before, let's keep it off this list!

[Sorry for throwing fuel on the fire.  We now return you to our regularly
scheduled list...] 

==========================
Mike Edwards, MIS
Edwards Graphic Arts, Inc.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
         To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
                       "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Reply via email to