** Reply to message from Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 25 Mar 2003 
01:13:40 -0700

> On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 19:50, Jack Bowling wrote:
> > ** Reply to message from Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 24 Mar 2003 
> > 19:27:20 -0700
> > 
> > <snip>
> > > That said, RH is already beginning to differentiate between Enterprise
> > > and non-enterprise. Since the "personal" is the base for sales (as in:
> > > the "smallest" one), that would be a good start, IMO. Personally, I
> > > install much more like a cross between server/workstation as personal,
> > > but that's me. <snip>
> > 
> > And this would be a mistaken assumption. They plan on making their money on the 
> > Enterprise version, not the desktop version.
> > 
> 
> How is what you said different? I said perosna was the base, the
> smallest one. You said they make their money elsewhere. I do not see the
> two as mutually exclusive. Indeed, it was not an assumption.

Sorry, Bill, I thought you meant base as in "base for their money-making proposition", 
not base as in core set.

jb



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to