** Reply to message from Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 25 Mar 2003 01:13:40 -0700
> On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 19:50, Jack Bowling wrote: > > ** Reply to message from Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 24 Mar 2003 > > 19:27:20 -0700 > > > > <snip> > > > That said, RH is already beginning to differentiate between Enterprise > > > and non-enterprise. Since the "personal" is the base for sales (as in: > > > the "smallest" one), that would be a good start, IMO. Personally, I > > > install much more like a cross between server/workstation as personal, > > > but that's me. <snip> > > > > And this would be a mistaken assumption. They plan on making their money on the > > Enterprise version, not the desktop version. > > > > How is what you said different? I said perosna was the base, the > smallest one. You said they make their money elsewhere. I do not see the > two as mutually exclusive. Indeed, it was not an assumption. Sorry, Bill, I thought you meant base as in "base for their money-making proposition", not base as in core set. jb -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list