On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 13:00, Rick Johnson wrote: > Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: > >>>Allow me to pass along an "official" correction from an insider - this is > >>>Red Hat 9, not Red Hat 9.0. Surely it would be 8.1 if binary > >>>compatability was maintained. > > [...] > > > > >>From the link here (posted on this list earlier): > > http://www.matrixlist.com/pipermail/leaplist/2003-March/029108.html > > > > "Starting with Red Hat Linux 9 the numbering system for > > the consumer release will be stated only as an integer. The Red Hat > > Enterprise Linux AS/ES/WS product line will retain traditional decimal > > release numbering." > > > > Hm... this will confuse me. I fail to see the reason RH changes the numbering > > scheme. > > > Three guesses: > > 1. Marketing? > 2. To get rid of the .0 stigma? > 3. To drive people to the Enterprise Linux Product? >
How 'bout 4. All of the above Bret -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
