On Tuesday 25 March 2003 01:20 pm, Bill Anderson wrote: > On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 08:17, Rick Johnson wrote:
<snip> > > Allow me to pass along an "official" correction from an insider - this is > > Red Hat 9, not Red Hat 9.0. Surely it would be 8.1 if binary > > compatability was maintained. > > > > -Rick > > And that changes what, exactly? > > Seriously, if it is not a 9.0, that would imply there will be no 9.1? > Does this represent a change to just 9 -> 10 -> 11 -> 12? >From the link here (posted on this list earlier): http://www.matrixlist.com/pipermail/leaplist/2003-March/029108.html "Starting with Red Hat Linux 9 the numbering system for the consumer release will be stated only as an integer. The Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS/ES/WS product line will retain traditional decimal release numbering." Hm... this will confuse me. I fail to see the reason RH changes the numbering scheme. RDB -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
