"Thomas Ribbrock \(Design/DEG\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Ok, I've found a bit more about this:
>
>According to Red Hat's own Y2K pages
>(http://www.redhat.com/legal/y2k_statement.html) or more specifically, the
>report done for Red Hat by "The Software Laboratory" (never heard of
>them before - report URL: http://www.redhat.com/legal/test_report.pdf)
>both Red Hat Linux 5.2 and 6.0 were tested "OK". However, on *both*
>systems libc was found to have a "non-Y2K related date issue in strptime".
>There was a second date problem, also non-Y2K related mentioned in another
>program.
>Still, if anybody knows even more wrt libc, I'd appreciate some comment.
Well, that makes me feel somewhat better. I may still throw a 5.2 box
together and test it a little, time permitting.
-Eric
Eric Sisler
Library Computer Technician
Westminster Public Library
Westminster, CO, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux - don't fear the Penguin.
Want to know what we use Linux for?
Visit http://gromit.westminster.lib.co.us/linux
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
