Y2K bug in glibc 2.0?! (was: cnet picks Corel as #1 over Red Hat & Caldera)

[Thomas Ribbrock \(Design/DEG\)]

On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 05:40:58PM +0100, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
[...]
> in bind, two more in proftpd]), not Y2K save (they're still using glibc
> 2.0, which has a known Y2K bug), buggy, and nonstandard (why did they
[...]

Wait a minute - RHL 5.2 is using glibc 2.0 as well, isn't it? Why has
there never been any mention of this by Red Hat - if not a fix?

Could you supply more info or maybe a pointer to more info?

Thanks in advance,

Thomas
-- 
             "Look, Ma, no obsolete quotes and plain text only!"

     Thomas Ribbrock | http://www.bigfoot.com/~kaytan | ICQ#: 15839919
   "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!"


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.