Bedros Hanounik wrote: > David, > > I appreciate your criticism, but we're not in a flame war. I never > claimed to be an FS expert. Take it easy; you don't have to beat my > suggestion to death. There's no perfect solution, and all feedbacks, no > matter how idiotic or simple may seem, help making a better final solution.
I didn't mean this to be a personal attack, or a flame. I was trying to be thorough, not confrontational. You did actually have a good idea -- the '.rev' -- but I just wanted to make sure that if it was done, it would be done right. Notice also that my last paragraph on that topic was how I think it should be done right -- which isn't that different than your idea. > Again, I'm > not the FS expert here. Nor am I. Just a fan, really.
