Re: Nullifying RLUIPA

[Hamilton02]

I'm just curious if anyone in the ivory tower believes that an inmate's dietary demands, based on religion, can ever be denied under RLUIPA?  (And set aside the games-playing CONS and their steak and sherry-- I am talking about sincere religious believers making a variety of dietary demands.)   So far, it doesn't sound like it.     Marci   In a message dated 6/1/2005 5:08:52 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It may be a legal question, but the answer is not necessarily to draw a line somewhere.   The problem has to be managed, and I suspect that standards and balancing tests, rather than bright-line rules are likely to be the sum and substance of the answer.  You wouldn’t say that a functionalist approach is political, but not legal, would you?

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.