Marci asks:
 
Given that the Court has given prison authorities great deference and seems to say that only "exceptional" burdens must be accommodated, where is the line now drawn?    
 
 
Perhaps the persn who answers this question can go on to indicate the similarly "exceptional" circumstances that will justify a Democratic filibuster of judicial nominees  :)
 
sandy 
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to