I'm not even sure the necessary change would require an Act of Congress.
Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think a statute's codification
in the US Code is generally a part of the bill enacted by Congress. If you
look at the Statutes at Large, you'll see the future codification in the
margin,
not in the text. I think codification is just an administrative function.
And I assume it would be sufficient for the father here if 42 USC § 666 were
changed to 42 USC § 665a, so it wouldn't even have to be moved to a different
position in the books.
Art Spitzer
ACLU
Washington DC
In a message dated 8/1/08 1:19:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Here, by comparison, the change is high-level (it requires a Congressional
> act) but otherwise relatively cheap: Copy 42 USC 666 to 42 USC 777.
>
**************
Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget?
Read reviews on AOL Autos.
(http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00050000000017
)
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
messages to others.
