Hi Nate,

 

Can't members of the club be held liable as well as officers?

 

73

Gary  K4FMX

 

  _____  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 8:31 PM
To: Repeater Builder List
Cc: <repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Site Insurance Vendors

 

Yeah I know.  I just didn't want to depress people further. 

 

If you have "considerable assets", of any kind -- being a club leader is
inherently a very risky position to put yourself in, financially -- now that
corporate rules regarding liability of organizations have been eviscerated. 

 

Thank Enron and Qwest leadership for the motivation to change the law the
next time you see them.  

 

ARRL says little about this.  They have a whole organization dedicated to
clubs that never says a word in any publication about how to properly set up
Amateur organizations from a liability standpoint. 

 

At least my AOPA membership means they lobby for product liability changes
in aviation. If ARRL ever starts fighting for liability limits for volunteer
organizations in The Beltway instead of the never-ending BPL fight, I'll be
pretty impressed. 

 

--

Nate Duehr

Sent from my iPhone


On Jan 26, 2009, at 17:49, Butch Kanvick <hot...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Usually when some one signs a waiver letter, it is not worth the ink that it
is written with.
You cannot assign your rights away before something happens, it usually
means you have just admitted liability with them signing the letter.
It might slow down litigation by about 5 minutes, but does not mean
anything. It is feel good measure, but good luck when it is used against
you.
 
Butch, KE7FEL/r




  _____  



To:  <mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
From:  <mailto:n...@natetech.com> n...@natetech.com
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:12:39 -0700
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Site Insurance Vendors



Check to see if they can later subrogate in cases of negligence or gross
negligence in your state. In California, I think it's gross negligence, but
I'd have to check.

Sure they have to defend you, but if they lose... then they can usually turn
around and sue you.

And... this becomes a conflict of interest, because in States where they can
subrogate only in cases of GROSS negligence (you have to get the difference
between negligence and gross negligence here...), they're motivated to
provide you with a really shoddy defense.

Basically the old adage comes true again -- any lawyer you're not paying out
of your pocket, isn't looking out for your best interests, they're looking
to the best interests of their CLIENT. In this case, the insurance company.

Let's use a real-world example: Someone falls off a tower and is hurt.
It'd be REALLY easy for any lawyer involved to prove GROSS negligence today
if everyone climbing didn' t have FORMAL OSHA-Approved climbing training.

Send one guy up the tower who VOLUNTEERS to do so without modern training,
and he falls, and you don't have a signed waiver from him -- if you're an
officer of the organization, be prepared to lose your house to his widow.

This is the kind of stuff that keeps club Presidents and officers awake at
night when it's time to replace antennas. 

Nate 

-----Original Message-----
From: Repeater-Builder@ <mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@ <mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dave Gomberg
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 3:06 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@ <mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Site Insurance Vendors

At 13:34 1/26/2009, Nate Duehr wrote:
>Also consider that most of your Bo ard and Officers will be bankrupt from
>paying for the lawyers to defend themselves (let alone the organization)
>long before the insurance kicks in... Nate

You picked a bad state, Nate. In California, an insurance company 
has a duty to defend, even if they think the suit is baseless or not 
covered by your policy (they must defend to ensure that they get that 
ruling). And they pay for the defense.

FWIW, I am not a lawyer nor do I play one on TV, this is NOT legal advice.

>

-- 
Dave Gomberg, San Francisco NE5EE gomberg1 at wcf dot com
All addresses, phones, etc. at  <http://www.wcf.com/ham/info.html>
http://www.wcf.com/ham/info.html
---------------------------------------------------------- 

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links



 

Reply via email to