repo-criteria-discuss
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
Re: The "GNU Ethical Repository Criteria Evaluations" should consider add sourcehut and codeberg
Greg Farough
Re: The "GNU Ethical Repository Criteria Evaluations" should consider add sourcehut and codeberg
Craig Topham
Gitlab C2
Pedram Ashofteh Ardakani
Re: Gitlab C2
bill-auger
Re: Gitlab C2
Svetlana Tkachenko
Re: Gitlab C2
bill-auger
Re: Gitlab C2
Greg Farough
Re: Gitlab C2
Richard Stallman
Re: Gitlab C2
Svetlana Tkachenko
Re: Gitlab C2
Richard Stallman
Re: Gitlab C2
Marcos Marado
Re: Gitlab C2
bill-auger
Re: Gitlab C2
bill-auger
Re: Gitlab C2
Richard Stallman
Re: Gitlab C2
Richard Stallman
Re: Gitlab C2
Svetlana Tkachenko
Re: Gitlab C2
bill-auger
Re: Gitlab C2
Pedram Ashofteh Ardakani
Re: Gitlab C2
Richard Stallman
Re: Gitlab C2
bill-auger
Ethical repository criteria rating for Sourcehut
Ricardo
Re: Ethical repository criteria rating for Sourcehut
bill-auger
Re: Ethical repository criteria rating for Sourcehut
Richard Stallman
Re: Ethical repository criteria rating for Sourcehut
Yuchen Pei
Re: Ethical repository criteria rating for Sourcehut
Yuchen Pei
Re: Ethical repository criteria rating for Sourcehut
bill-auger
Re: Ethical repository criteria rating for Sourcehut
Greg Farough
how much of a forge is SaaSS?
bill-auger
Re: how much of a forge is SaaSS?
Yuchen Pei
Re: how much of a forge is SaaSS?
Richard Stallman
Re: how much of a forge is SaaSS?
bill-auger
Re: how much of a forge is SaaSS?
Yuchen Pei
at which level, is adequate licensing documentation required?
bill-auger
Re: at which level, is adequate licensing documentation required?
bill-auger
Re: at which level, is adequate licensing documentation required?
bill-auger
Re: at which level, is adequate licensing documentation required?
Richard Stallman
Re: at which level, is adequate licensing documentation required?
bill-auger
Re: at which level, is adequate licensing documentation required?
bill-auger
Re: at which level, is adequate licensing documentation required?
Richard Stallman
Re: at which level, is adequate licensing documentation required?
Richard Stallman
Re: at which level, is adequate licensing documentation required?
bill-auger
Re: at which level, is adequate licensing documentation required?
Richard Stallman
[PATCH]: domain names note
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: domain names note
Richard Stallman
Re: [PATCH]: domain names note
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: domain names note
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: domain names note
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: domain names note
Richard Stallman
[PATCH]: add new criteria A+7
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria A+7
Richard Stallman
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria A+7
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria A+7
Greg Farough
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria A+7
Richard Stallman
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria A+7
Greg Farough
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria A+7
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria A+7
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria A+7
Yuchen Pei
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria A+7
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria A+7
Richard Stallman
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria A+7
Yuchen Pei
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria A+7
Richard Stallman
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria A+7
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria A+7
hi
[PATCH]: add new criteria A+6
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria A+6
Richard Stallman
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria A+6
bill-auger
[PATCH]: criteria A+1
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A+1
Richard Stallman
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A+1
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A+1
Richard Stallman
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A+1
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A+1
Richard Stallman
[PATCH]: criteria A4
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A4
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A4
Richard Stallman
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A4
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A4
hi
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A4
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A4
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A4
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A4
Richard Stallman
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A4
Richard Stallman
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A4
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A4
bill-auger
[PATCH]: criteria A3
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A3
Richard Stallman
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A3
bill-auger
[PATCH]: criteria A2
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A2
Richard Stallman
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A2
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: criteria A2
Greg Farough
[PATCH]: add new criteria B2.1
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria B2.1
Richard Stallman
Re: [PATCH]: add new criteria B2.1
bill-auger
[PATCH]: criteria C5
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: criteria C5
Richard Stallman
Re: [PATCH]: criteria C5
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: criteria C5
bill-auger
Re: Need for some guidelines to improve participation
bill-auger
Re: Need for some guidelines to improve participation
Yuchen Pei
Re: Need for some guidelines to improve participation
Svetlana Tkachenko
Re: Need for some guidelines to improve participation
Richard Stallman
Re: Need for some guidelines to improve participation
bill-auger
Re: Need for some guidelines to improve participation
Richard Stallman
[PATCH]: refer to hosts by their domain name
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: refer to hosts by their domain name
Yuchen Pei
Re: [PATCH]: refer to hosts by their domain name
Richard Stallman
Re: [PATCH]: refer to hosts by their domain name
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: refer to hosts by their domain name
Richard Stallman
Substantive changes in repo-criteria.html
Richard Stallman
Re: Substantive changes in repo-criteria.html
bill-auger
Re: Substantive changes in repo-criteria.html
Richard Stallman
Summary of repo-criteria changes
bill-auger
Re: Summary of repo-criteria changes
Greg Farough
Re: Summary of repo-criteria changes
bill-auger
Re: Summary of repo-criteria changes
bill-auger
Re: Summary of repo-criteria changes
Richard Stallman
Re: Summary of repo-criteria changes
bill-auger
Re: Summary of repo-criteria changes
Richard Stallman
[PATCH]: add sr.ht and notabug.org
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: add sr.ht and notabug.org
Yuchen Pei
Re: [PATCH]: add sr.ht and notabug.org
Richard Stallman
[PATCH]: update gitlab.com C0
bill-auger
Re: [PATCH]: update gitlab.com C0
Richard Stallman
Re: [PATCH]: update gitlab.com C0
bill-auger
{PATCH}: update github.com C2,C5
bill-auger
Re: {PATCH}: update github.com C2,C5
Richard Stallman
Re: {PATCH}: update github.com C2,C5
bill-auger
repo criteria changes
Richard Stallman
Re: repo criteria changes
Ian Kelling
Re: repo criteria changes
Richard Stallman
Re: repo criteria changes
bill-auger
Re: repo criteria changes
John Sullivan
Re: repo criteria changes
bill-auger
Re: repo criteria changes
Richard Stallman
Re: repo criteria changes
Yuchen Pei
Re: repo criteria changes
Richard Stallman
Re: repo criteria changes
bill-auger
Re: repo criteria changes
Richard Stallman
Re: repo criteria changes
bill-auger
Re: repo criteria changes
bill-auger
Re: repo criteria changes
hi
Re: repo criteria changes
bill-auger
Re: repo criteria changes
bill-auger
Re: repo criteria changes
Richard Stallman
Re: repo criteria changes
Richard Stallman
Re: repo criteria changes
Richard Stallman
Re: repo criteria changes
bill-auger
Please review codeberg.org
Adam Faiz
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Richard Stallman
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Adam Faiz
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Yuchen Pei
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Richard Stallman
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Yuchen Pei
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Richard Stallman
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Richard Stallman
Re: Re: Please review codeberg.org
Richard Stallman
Re: Re: Re: Please review codeberg.org
Adam Faiz
Re: Re: Re: Please review codeberg.org
Adam Faiz
a LICENSE file does not necessarily apply to everything in a repo
bill-auger
Re: a LICENSE file does not necessarily apply to everything in a repo
Richard Stallman
Re: a LICENSE file does not necessarily apply to everything in a repo
Richard Stallman
Re: a LICENSE file does not necessarily apply to everything in a repo
bill-auger
Re: a LICENSE file does not necessarily apply to everything in a repo
Richard Stallman
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Adam Faiz
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Adam Faiz
Re: Re: Please review codeberg.org
Richard Stallman
Re: Re: Please review codeberg.org
Adam Faiz
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Richard Stallman
Re: Re: Please review codeberg.org
Richard Stallman
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Yuchen Pei
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Adam Faiz
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Richard Stallman
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Richard Stallman
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Yuchen Pei
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Yuchen Pei
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Yuchen Pei
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Yuchen Pei
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Yuchen Pei
Re: Please review codeberg.org
bill-auger
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Yuchen Pei
Re: Please review codeberg.org
bill-auger
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Yuchen Pei
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Richard Stallman
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Yuchen Pei
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Yuchen Pei
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Richard Stallman
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Richard Stallman
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Adam Faiz
Re: Please review codeberg.org
bill-auger
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Richard Stallman
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Yuchen Pei
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Richard Stallman
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Yuchen Pei
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Richard Stallman
Re: Please review codeberg.org
bill-auger
Re: Please review codeberg.org
Richard Stallman
Re: Please review codeberg.org
bill-auger
Re: Please review codeberg.org
bill-auger
Earlier messages
Later messages