ratso;612355 Wrote: > thanx for all the suggestions guys, i appreciate it - really i do. but > that's not the point. i already fixed the cd in question with multiple > fiddling with the tags and repeated re-scans and it only took 3 hours > (!). the point is why? why could i pull up the EXACT SAME FILE in > question and have it read perfectly fine by other (and i would guess > less sophisticated) source like subsonic, bliss, etc. they could read > the tags no problem. why is it so much damn effort to get tags straight > on only my touch when i have zero problems with any other source out > there that reads the exact same tags? i mean, if the tags are so > screwed up that they need endless fooling with for squeezebox to > correctly read them shouldn't they be screwed up in say winamp also?tell us > what you fixed and we'll tell you why...
-- audiomuze *'Linux finally gets a great audio tagger' (http://www.ubuntugeek.com/linux-finally-gets-a-great-audio-tagger.html): 'puddletag' (http://puddletag.sourceforge.net/)* ------------------------------------------------------------------------ audiomuze's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=33613 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=85771 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/ripping
