On Sunday 23 November 2014 08:35:13 am Jim Hartranft wrote: > I didn't mean to start an argument but...
*I* can appreciate that. If we all always agreed on everything all the time, we would have never advanced beyond the Neanderthal. While Neanderthal had a 1/2 billion year run, their technology never really advanced very far. > In my opinion, and probably many of yours too, Rivendell is #1 out of the > top 6 radio automation systems. Some of us do hold that opinion. ;) > 4 out of the 5 other systems have this > feature. Understood, however we do need to understand that Fred's position is valid. > Whether or not it gets used is different, it would just be nice to > have the feature for those who want to use it. And in a round-a-bout way, you do, by calling an external editor such as Audacity, from within the library pages, to handle content modification. > Maybe this is all irrelevant, but to me it's a good idea. Yes, and to me, *not* having made some changes along the way, so that Rivendell could handle video in addition to or instead of audio as originally envisioned, was a good idea too. But alas, there is no "all things to all people all of the time" regardless of what the politicians like to say. OTOH, the "Open Source" argument is also valid. You ( or anyone for that matter ) is certainly free to add the feature, and once so added, might even be incorporated into the "official" source. -- Cowboy http://cowboy.cwf1.com Some people live life in the fast lane. You're in oncoming traffic. _______________________________________________ Rivendell-dev mailing list Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
