On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 5:04 PM Cristian Paslaru <cryst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Corect, dar daca trimiti normal ca pe vremuri prin sendmai -t sau ceva de
> genul, se prinde ca nu este authenticated, si nu il accepta.
>
> Vroiam doar sa mentionez ca nu mai este de ajuns SPF pentru gmail, asa a
> inceput thread-ul ;)
>
>
>
Citez bucata relevanta din headerele din mailul ala:

ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
       dkim=pass header.i=@badici.ro header.s=dkim header.b=gXMEtzLi;
       dkim=pass header.i=@badici.ro header.s=dkim header.b=gXMEtzLi;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of mi...@badici.ro designates
86.121.235.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mi...@badici.ro;
       dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=badici.ro
Return-Path: <mi...@badici.ro>
Received: from mail.machinet.ro (mail.machinet.ro. [86.121.235.42])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
d19-20020a05600c34d300b004166b86088fsi2720466wmq.134.2024.04.09.05.41.54
        for <rpe...@gmail.com>
        (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
        Tue, 09 Apr 2024 05:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mi...@badici.ro designates
86.121.235.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=86.121.235.42;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       dkim=pass header.i=@badici.ro header.s=dkim header.b=gXMEtzLi;
       dkim=pass header.i=@badici.ro header.s=dkim header.b=gXMEtzLi;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of mi...@badici.ro designates
86.121.235.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mi...@badici.ro;
       dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=badici.ro
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.machinet.ro
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE2B3B2004B; Tue,
  9 Apr 2024 15:41:53 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=badici.ro;
s=dkim; t=1712666513; bh=laxP/m9pM8pyi+5sb+/sxbjyYkD06WkvV7bjUjhZlAs=;
h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
b=gXMEtzLiiF/5qQ2A3GEUQA/ZWqVRuxd1x/7MdFZFJC6jtj/VxfanrQ6s/bYpQ0JcD
         T+WN/F3rGeAtFm0CO1H7aL9Cdq5T2XlP6XMz1sTmCnaOxvTH0PGGmV9BuJhVwSNMQ4
         etY1XoDysfNREgCbLTiCWlDJmGuBTCtjCjfYpmxI27eBgL/lTAzxqGqNjM4Bg+LmCm
         H8nm2SIOlMgGLJixvqIYuASl9Tg50YHfuupK0uZAcLw56n6XHd7G/tqnHiHnmoNMzP
         89e2tMGKJdyvCQTGWagXUGAxE5Y6DWnrYZEqO1fgY4Y+/s0sDarp1TrOmqBZU+E2xV
         xFRCntmGnmKXw==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.machinet.ro

Pare sa aiba de toate, nu inteleg problema. Si daca nu de badici.ro
discutam, de ce era asta in linkul la care se minuna in primul mail?  :)


(ok, a raspuns in alt mail in timp ce scriam aici, dau oricum send)

Ca sa nu raspund si la ala: Mihai, verifica ce ttl au recordurile alea cu
spf si dkim si verifica dupa ce a trecut timpul ala dupa schimbare. Pana
atunci, 200 de "tatal nostru" si invatat sa faci intai schimbarile in dns
si sa astepti sa se propage :)

-- 
P.
_______________________________________________
RLUG mailing list
RLUG@lists.lug.ro
http://lists.lug.ro/mailman/listinfo/rlug_lists.lug.ro

Raspunde prin e-mail lui