On Mon, Oct 13, 2008, Daniel Dalton wrote: > > I agree that it's not a good idea. By including them in SVN we, directly > > or indirectly, suggest that we provide support for these patches. They > > Couldn't we say "Some uneficial accessibility patches are in > trunk/accessibility please report bugs on the tracker, but this is not > yet efficially part of rockbox."
What about maintaining this compilation of patches on a forum thread or on a bug tracker entry, instead of the SVN repository ? -- Rafaël Carré