While Alex was trying to avoid build breakages, that recent incident with his deletion of functions does highlight quite nicely why rbuild needs to be put down.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Timo Kreuzer <timo.kreu...@web.de> wrote: > Am 22.07.2011 00:38, schrieb cae...@myopera.com: > > CMake wont get ANY wider usage, if its going to be broken all the time. To >> prevent that, we need either to slow down development in any other areas, or >> stop it completely, as we are basically doubling the work. >> > Its really not that bad. Its only few cases (like 1 out of 30 commits) that > changes rbuild/cmake files, so only in those cases it would be neccessary to > do additional work and check if it builds. If you only change source files, > its very unlikely to break build. > So for now until kdbg is fixed and hopefully everyone knows how to use > cmake, I'd appreciate if you would take the extra efford in these cases (it > won't be that way forever!) and also fix the cmake files. This way you will > also learn how to work with cmake files. Thanks to Alex for at least trying > to not break cmake builds, Ged, your "the cmake people will manage that" > approach is disapproved :) > > Thanks, > Timo > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev@reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/**mailman/listinfo/ros-dev<http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev> >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
