Michael Pavling wrote in post #1036562: > On 13 December 2011 17:56, John Doe <[email protected]> wrote: >> Suffice it to say that I am bound by corporate policy which is now >> committed to Microsoft technology. > > Well, then you won't be using Rails, as it's not MS technology, and > you would be breaching your corporate policy if you did.
Well, let's just say that Ruby/Rails appears to be the natural way to move on from Perl, but that's another argument.... > As opposed to quirky closed source things that pose security risks?! But at least we have Windows Update Services which ticks the relevant box niceley.... > Sounds like you have a management-education problem ;-) Its an all eggs in one basket contract leading to a management-brainwash problem ;-) -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
