Hi, On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Jason Grout <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote: >> Jason: I was wondering whether you have opened any >> ticket on this issue? If not, then I will try it myself. > > I don't think I opened any tickets on this.
OK, I will do it. >> Should I submit patches for each of these functions >> separately? > > I think one patch covering all of the functions would be fine. It's one > logical issue. Thanks! I have now implemented four functions "diff", "integrate", "conjugate" and "limit". They seem to cover most of the situations where maxima is being called for typesetting. Now I am having an issue on choosing conventions for integral. Which one is preferred for "integrate(f(x), x)" ? (1) \int dx f(x) (2) \int f(x) dx The first one looks better for nested integrals. Screenshot of both cases are attached. Here is a link to another screenshot showing all new typesetting for symbolic functions in action. http://www.math.unb.ca/~ghossain/latex-for-symbolics.jpg Cheers, Golam --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
<<inline: integrate1.jpg>>
<<inline: integrate2.jpg>>
