On May 26, 9:17 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote:
> whereas the sage site has 14 errors. to my defese, two of them are not really valid errors and should be warnings and the remaining 12 are the snippet from mailhide.recaptcha.net .. obviously they provided an erroneous code. i fixed that. http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fsagemath.org if someone finds something odd on any of the other pages, please tell me. the main reason for using xhtml 1 transitional is, that it can be made valid (in contrast to xhtml 1 strict) and at the same time be used across all browsers and rendered correctly! > > The one uses transitional 4.01 and the other XHTML 1.0 Transitional, in > neither case is it clear what they are transitioning from. err, transitioning from what? that's a doctype after the era of html4. non transitional things never worked out in ie6 since it always fell back to quicks mode. on pages where this happens, ie6+7 renders the sage page without a background and using the full width... (ignoring much of the css code) Kwankyu: > I wish someone artistic (not me) redesign the Sage logo. well, someone artistic has already redesigned the logo ... and i don't think it makes any sense to change it again. i really would wish someone would write me some text for the tour pages, just like the statements Kirkby about engineering and things like that. I'm really bad and way to slow in writing things that sound good on a website. I can also help with a html template and everything else on the technical side + proofreading. h --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
