On 24 August 2010 23:48, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote:
>> You could make it more complex if you wanted, but then you would need >> to consider exceptions like ATLAS, for the reasons I stated. > > I wasn't proposing a rule, just a rule of thumb. And I did mean OR. If > a package took 5 seconds to build, then 30 seconds to test, that would > not be an issue for me, as relative to the total build time it's still > negligible. OTOH, I wouldn't want to rule out a more expensive test > for a more significant chunk spkg just because it broke the 30 second > limit. Essentially what I'm saying is that, within reason, I'd be > willing to give slightly more time to larger packages than smaller > ones. ATLAS is a clear exception to the 25% idea, and I'm sure not the > only one. > > - Robert Fair enough. What you are proposing seems perfectly logical. Dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
