On Apr 20, 10:20 am, RegB <2regburg...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Perhaps even farther off topic;
> I doubt that Cygwin (Cygwin/X) is in any case a good path for many/
> most MS_Windows
> folk - from THEIR point of view.
> The path to getting Cygwin/X up and running "usefully" on a MS_Windows
> platform
> is long and arduous for the naive user, e.g. it was so for me.
>
> Oracle (Sun) VM_VirtualBox  installs as a MS_Windows program.
> It is "culturally compatible" with everything the user is used to.
> The learning curve to then install a standard Linux distro, e.g.
> Ubuntu or Debian, then Sage within that is quite trivial.
> VMware is another possibility, although I think that isn't "free".
>
> For Sage to be adopted WIDELY by windows users the path
> to getting it up and running needs to be simple and reasonably quick.
> Cygwin /X does not (yet) offer that.

My understanding is that the previous Cygwin-cum-Sage behavior was
that you downloaded one installer, and that this then would
essentially be a double-click to the Sage command line.  At any rate,
it is intended to be packaged as one file to download, which is then
opened - not a multi-step process, which is just how one needs to do
it now because it doesn't work fully yet without some massaging which
is in various tickets.

- kcrisman

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to