scheme-reports  

Messages by Thread

• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #456: Adoption of R6RS John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #455 (also known as #454): What is a dynamic environment? John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #440: Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #439: Bidirectional ports and port-open? John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #438 (also known as #437): Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #434: List of named characters is incomplete John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #430: clarify library loading rules John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #424: Add write-string procedure to (scheme base) John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #423: When does eqv? return #t for procedures? John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] let*-values' definition Jean-Michel HUFFLEN
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] let*-values' definition Arthur A. Gleckler
• [Scheme-reports] Suggestion to put display and newline in the same library Christian Stigen Larsen
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Suggestion to put display and newline in the same library Alex Shinn
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Literal string not quoted speech Alex Shinn
• [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Shiro Kawai
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Shiro Kawai
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Ray Dillinger
• [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Helmut Eller
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Vassil Nikolov
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Helmut Eller
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Noah Lavine
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Vassil Nikolov
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Helmut Eller
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Noah Lavine
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Alex Shinn
• [Scheme-reports] Signaled errors need not raise error objects Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Signaled errors need not raise error objects John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Name supported? Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Name supported? Arthur A. Gleckler
• [Scheme-reports] Beta reduction Helmut Eller
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Beta reduction Alex Shinn
• [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Marc Feeley
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Marc Feeley
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Alex Shinn
  • [Scheme-reports] equal? Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] equal? Jim Rees
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] equal? John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] equal? Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] equal? Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Shiro Kawai
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Marc Feeley
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Andy Wingo
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Alaric Snell-Pym
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Stefan Edwards
• [Scheme-reports] Test suite Helmut Eller
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Test suite Alex Shinn
• [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Arthur Smyles
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Arthur Smyles
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Aaron W. Hsu
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Arthur Smyles
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Arthur Smyles
• [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy? Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy? Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy? Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy? John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Comment on draft 7 regarding <non-digit> David Adler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Comment on draft 7 regarding <non-digit> Alex Shinn
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
  • [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Noah Lavine
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Vassil Nikolov
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Marijn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted Takashi Kato
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted Takashi Kato
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Missing # Takashi Kato
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Missing # Arthur A. Gleckler
• [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier Arthur A. Gleckler
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier Per Bothner
• [Scheme-reports] the features function Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] the features function John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] editorial: missing index entry and cross-reference for import Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial: missing index entry and cross-reference for import Arthur A. Gleckler
• [Scheme-reports] Comment on R7RS draft 7 Anders Östlund
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Comment on R7RS draft 7 John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Takashi Kato
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Takashi Kato
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Ray Dillinger
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available Alan Watson
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available John Cowan
• [Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function Per Bothner
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function Alex Shinn
• Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot Takashi Kato
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot John Cowan
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot Alex Shinn
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot Takashi Kato
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot Alex Shinn
• [Scheme-reports] set! and imported identifiers Marc Feeley
  • Re: [Scheme-reports] set! and imported identifiers Jim Rees

• Earlier messages
• Later messages