So let me get this straight (no pun intended.... if she has her hair
straightened on relaxed she is a sell out???  if  I decide at the end of
the summer that I am tired of wearing a fro and i want to get a relaxer,
I'm a sell out too?  Seems to me that are some pretty superficial
criteria for selling out.

Tracey
>> When you guys see her dressed up with pressed hair like Condoleeza
>> Rice you will know you heard it from me first.
>>
>> --- In SciFiNoir_Lit@yahoogroups.com, "sancochojo" <mccartjf@>
>> wrote:
>>    
>>> I was debating on if I should stand up in my office cube and
>>>      
>> applause.
>>    
>>> I could not have said it better.
>>>
>>> You know the old street cliche, "if you have something to say, say
>>>      
>> it
>>    
>>> to my face." 
>>>
>>> Her blog gives everyone the opportunity to challenge her, but to
>>>      
>> cower
>>    
>>> away and say "I don't feel like it, blah blah" when asked to write
>>>      
>> the
>>    
>>> author back and challenge her yet have all the energy to write
>>>      
>> about 6
>>    
>>> or seven post here to talk junk about her, says a lot.
>>>
>>> Nora, it isn't crabs in the barrel, its big giant lobster claws in
>>>      
>> a
>>    
>>> barrel.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --- In SciFiNoir_Lit@yahoogroups.com, "Nora" <njem@> wrote:
>>>      
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: SciFiNoir_Lit@yahoogroups.com
>>>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
>>>>>          
>> Hayden
>>    
>>>>> <<Hopkinson seems to be disowning Afrofuturism, a movement,
>>>>>          
>> genre,
>>    
>>>>> thang that she helped start.  One reason why she could be
>>>>>          
>> doing this
>>    
>>>>> is because she is going to sell out--
>>>>>          
>>>> a) You're presupposing that Afrofuturism *is* a movement.  That
>>>>        
>>> doesn't seem
>>>      
>>>> to be a settled debate yet.  b) Maybe she's disowning it because
>>>>        
>> she
>>    
>>>> *didn't* help start it.  If she had, I don't think she'd have
>>>>        
>> been so
>>    
>>>> surprised to suddenly find the label applied to her.  And c)
>>>>        
>>> "sellout" is
>>>      
>>>> right up there with "nigger" and "bitch" in my book -- it's a
>>>>        
>> dire,
>>    
>>>> them's-fightin'-words insult.  I don't know about you, but I
>>>>        
>> didn't join
>>    
>>>> this community to insult my favorite authors.
>>>>
>>>> Citing your own post with the definition from the Afrofuturism
>>>>        
>> listserv,
>>    
>>>> Afrofuturism or Afro-futurism is an African American and African
>>>>        
>>>>> Diaspora subculture whose thinkers and artists see technology
>>>>>          
>> and
>>    
>>>>> science fiction as a means of exploring the Black experience
>>>>>          
>> and
>>    
>>>>> finding new strategies to overcome racism and classism.
>>>>>          
>>>> By this definition, Afrofuturism is meant to be an *intentional*
>>>>        
>>> thing.  Its
>>>      
>>>> members must *see* tech and SF as a means of blah blah blah.  If
>>>>        
>> you
>>    
>>> don't
>>>      
>>>> write SF with the intention of exploring the Black experience and
>>>>        
>>> combatting
>>>      
>>>> racism/classism, then you shouldn't be counted as part of the
>>>>        
>> movement.
>>    
>>>> It's not just being a black person writing SF that qualifies
>>>>        
>> you.
>>    
>>> Heck, by
>>>      
>>>> this definition, you don't even have to be black -- you just
>>>>        
>> have to
>>    
>>> have
>>>      
>>>> that exploratory, developmental purpose in mind.
>>>>
>>>> I *am* black, and it permeates everything I do, but I'll be
>>>>        
>> frank:
>>    
>>>> "exploring the Black experience" is the furthest thing from my
>>>>        
>> mind
>>    
>>> when I
>>>      
>>>> write most of my stuff, even when I'm writing about black
>>>>        
>> people.
>>    
>>> I'm not
>>>      
>>>> trying to combat racism, I'm just trying to have fun telling a
>>>>        
>>> story.  So if
>>>      
>>>> someone tried to stick the Afrofuturism label on me, I would
>>>>        
>>> probably react
>>>      
>>>> in much the same way as Nalo.  "Afro whatism?  *Me*?  Huh?"
>>>>
>>>> I think it's a disservice, both to authors and to this nascent
>>>>        
>>> movement, to
>>>      
>>>> hijack people into it.  A movement doesn't *need* to go hunting
>>>>        
>> for
>>    
>>> members,
>>>      
>>>> if it has the ideological strength to grow and develop on its
>>>>        
>> own; its
>>    
>>>> members will find it, because it serves a need.  But when people
>>>>        
>> declare
>>    
>>>> that so-and-so's work *must* be Afrofuturism, whether that person
>>>>        
>>> intended
>>>      
>>>> it that way or not, they're trying to bogart her into it.  The
>>>>        
>> thing
>>    
>>> is, by
>>>      
>>>> doing this they make the movement, if indeed it is a movement,
>>>>        
>> look
>>    
>>> too weak
>>>      
>>>> to stand on its own.  It has to coerce its most prominent
>>>>        
>> members to
>>    
>>> join?
>>>      
>>>> That's not a movement, that's Scientology.
>>>>
>>>> Even worse, by insinuating that she's a sellout if she doesn't,
>>>>        
>> any
>>    
>>>> Afrofuturists trying to claim Nalo may effectively achieve the
>>>>        
>> complete
>>    
>>>> opposite effect, and send her running for the hills. 
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>> <<It is not clear what she is saying.  First she says it isn't
>>>>>          
>> a
>>    
>>>>> movement.  Then if it is she doesn't have anything to do with
>>>>>          
>> it. 
>>    
>>>>> Then she admits that she helped start it--whatever it is. 
>>>>>          
>> There is a
>>    
>>>>> lot of confusion here that is open to interpretation.
>>>>> She is in the public eye.  She will be classified,
>>>>>          
>> catgegorized,
>>    
>>>>> turned into a brand folded spindled and mutilated just like
>>>>>          
>> all the
>>    
>>>>> rest, from Plato to Oprah--
>>>>> It's part of the game--
>>>>>          
>>>> Bullshit.  It's one thing to discuss the probable intentions of
>>>>        
>> an
>>    
>>> author
>>>      
>>>> who's dead, or impossible (for us) to contact, a la Octavia
>>>>        
>> Butler.
>>    
>>>  But to
>>>      
>>>> do this to a woman who's alive, when **you've got her blog right
>>>>        
>>> there** and
>>>      
>>>> you can talk to her directly, and to do it with this deliberately
>>>>        
>>> insulting
>>>      
>>>> polemic, smacks of whispering behind your hand to me.  It's
>>>>        
>>> disrespectful
>>>      
>>>> and cowardly, not to mention catty as hell. 
>>>>
>>>> You defeat your own purpose by doing this, Chris.  You're
>>>>        
>> reenacting
>>    
>>>> crabs-in-a-barrell syndrome all over again, sniping at someone
>>>>        
>> who's
>>    
>>>> successful and trying to make them look bad.  I find that to be
>>>>        
>> far more
>>    
>>>> "sellout"-ish behavior than anything NH could do by refusing to
>>>>        
>>> accept some
>>>      
>>>> random label.
>>>>
>>>> If you want to know what she means, post something in her blog
>>>>        
>> and
>>    
>>> ask her.
>>>      
>>>> Nora
>>>>
>>>>        
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Community email addresses:
> Post message: SciFiNoir_Lit@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe Digest Mode: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SciFiNoir_Lit/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

>
>
>
>
>
>  


Community email addresses:
Post message: SciFiNoir_Lit@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe Digest Mode: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SciFiNoir_Lit/




SPONSORED LINKS
Science fiction and fantasy


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to