On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 00:20, Kevin Donnelly wrote: > On Thursday 06 May 2004 4:24 pm, Craig Bradney wrote: > > Scribus works with either po or ts. If you look in the dirs you will see > > both types of files. TS just seems to be easier to work with for more > > people. There was no decision to switch. Note, you can use kbabel with > > TS files. I have more recently done the en_GB translations and used > > kbabel with ts files as I find it easier to work with than Qt Linguist. > > Yes, after the last run through with Linguist I will be using KBabel. As > regards the switch, I emailed Franz a couple of months ago about updating the > Welsh translation, and he replied on 13 Feb: > "There is no .pot file anymore, instead there is a Scribus.pro file now. Use > "lupdate Scribus.pro" to generate a scribus.ts file in scribus/po. This > scribus.ts file is meant for Trolltech's Linguist as an input." > Perhaps wrongly, I took this to mean that using ts files was the new policy.
Err.. yes.. ok.. that was said, but I guess what I meant was, we still support po files, in that there are still po files being updated. We prefer ts/qm. > > Set your language in the Scribus.pro file at the end. > > Run lupdate Scribus.pro > > Yes, OK - except you need to copy the existing ts file into that dir in order > to have it updated ....
