Re: Benefits of BGP holding the routing tables [7:70788]
Unless you have multiple egress points from your network to the Internet (IOW Load Balancing) there is really not a compelling reason to recieve full BGP routes, just have your ISP send you defaults via BGP, or even simpler set your default to your ISP facing interface. HTH Robert Perez wrote: Could anyone explain the benefit of using BGP and holding the routing tables on your router versus having the ISP hold the tables and you just receive a default-route? Thanks. -- Thomas Crowe Senior Engineer / Senior Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master+ Operator CTS Professional Services, Atlanta Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70791t=70788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STP problem [7:70797]
Sorry, I should have done the search first. Came up first link in google... padding padding padding http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/archive/bugtraq/2001/07/msg00605.html Christopher Dumais wrote: Hi all, We are having an STP problem where we think a user with an integrated wireless and LAN NIC is creating a bridge loop and bringing down the entire network. The problem occurs then goes away after 20 or so minutes unless we can narrow down which closet it is coming from and reboot the switch. All of our management tools die during the outage. Does anyone have any ideas on how we might prevent this from happening or track down the offender? We have 6509's in our Core and a mix of 3548's and 3550-SMI. Any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks! Chris Dumais, CCNP, CNA Sr. Network Administrator NSS Customer and Desktop Services Team Maine Medical Center (207)871-6940 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Thomas Crowe Senior Engineer / Senior Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master+ Operator CTS Professional Services, Atlanta Office Phone: 770-664-3900 Cell Phone: 678-521-0360 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70831t=70797 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STP problem [7:70797]
I seem to recall a similar problem when MS released one of the first beta versions of XP. I don't recall the exact details right off but I know it involved a laptop (generally) with a wireless NIC and Windows XP, resulting in the catastropic meltdown of Cisco switched networks. I will see if I can locate some more details, but it may be something to look into. HTH Christopher Dumais wrote: Hi all, We are having an STP problem where we think a user with an integrated wireless and LAN NIC is creating a bridge loop and bringing down the entire network. The problem occurs then goes away after 20 or so minutes unless we can narrow down which closet it is coming from and reboot the switch. All of our management tools die during the outage. Does anyone have any ideas on how we might prevent this from happening or track down the offender? We have 6509's in our Core and a mix of 3548's and 3550-SMI. Any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks! Chris Dumais, CCNP, CNA Sr. Network Administrator NSS Customer and Desktop Services Team Maine Medical Center (207)871-6940 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Thomas Crowe Senior Engineer / Senior Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master+ Operator CTS Professional Services, Atlanta Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70830t=70797 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tunnel interface Problem [7:70590]
Try this URL pad pad pad http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk827/tk369/tech_protocol_family_home.html Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote: Hi all I am trying to bring up a tunnel interface, I get up and up, but the folowing statement is shown when i do a show int tunnel Tunnel protocol/transport uninitialized and I can not get any traffic to flow through the tunnel, any thoughts ? -- Thomas Crowe Senior Engineer / Senior Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master+ Operator CTS Professional Services, Atlanta Office Phone: 770-664-3900 Cell Phone: 678-521-0360 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70630t=70590 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tunnel interface Problem [7:70590]
If you could post your configuration, it would be a lot easier for us to help you troubleshoot the problem. Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote: Hi all I am trying to bring up a tunnel interface, I get up and up, but the folowing statement is shown when i do a show int tunnel Tunnel protocol/transport uninitialized and I can not get any traffic to flow through the tunnel, any thoughts ? -- Thomas Crowe Senior Engineer / Senior Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master+ Operator CTS Professional Services, Atlanta Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70593t=70590 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482]
Wow!, what is that about? While my personal experience conflicts with the content of the email, ( I have never had reliable sucess with auto-negotiation in a server or workstation environment) that is no reason to be so fundamentaly rude towards the sender. Peri pointed out that they use very specific cards and drivers in their environment, therefore he may very well have sucess with the Autonegotiation *feature*. Ron Beasley wrote: YOU NEED TO TELL SISCO TO GET YOUR ASS OFF MY EMAIL LIST NOW1 Peri Sophos wrote:hI Mike, my opinion is that a server should be forced to 100mb full duplex and on the switch side 100mb full duplex ONLY for servers though. On the wkst side and switch side things should be left on auto auto. I do this in my company , we have around 3000 users in the building , I don't have a problem at all. We have a standard on Intel cards through out the network.Comapaq cards sometimes seem to give a little bit more trouble when it comes to forcing the cards to 100mb full duplex . this only really happens when the drives for the cards are not of the latest. Thanks -Original Message- From: Mike Momb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 5:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 10 half or 100 full [7:64482] To all, I know this subject has been talked about on a workstation level but I want to ask it on a network level. We recently replaced our Nortel network with Cisco switches and we seem to have a slowness level across the network at certain times. We have a raging debate on what speed to set the NIC cards and switches. Some folks say set the switches and PCs at 10mb half duplex and others say set them at 100mb full duplex and still others say auto on both ends should work. It has been my experience that auto has never worked very well. My question is this, what has been this groups experience on how to set the ports for the maximum bandwith. We are using a combination of Cat 5 Cat 3 cables. Any advice would be appreciated. thanks Mike NOTICE - This message contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, copying, disclosure or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by person or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete this message. This message should not be copied or used for any purpose other than intended, nor should it be disclosed to any other person. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of Investec Group, its subsidiaries or associates. The Investec Group is not liable for the security of information sent by e-mail at your request, nor for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in the communication nor for any delay in its receipt. Please note that the recipient must scan this e-mail and any attached files for viruses and the like. The Investec Group accepts no liability of whatever nature for any loss, liability, damage or expense resulting directly or indirectly from the access of any files which are attached to this message. Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more -- Thomas Crowe Senior Engineer / Senior Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master Operator CTS Professional Services, Atlanta Yahoo IM: thomas_crowe MS Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64834t=64482 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Configuring CIR on a cisco 2522 FR switch [7:64187]
Remember though, that when a sender exceeds the CIR, the frame switch only marks the packet's DE flag. So if the frame switch is not congested, then none of the packets will be discarded. HTH John Tafasi wrote: Hi group, I have a cisco 2522 router that is configured as a frame relay switch. I am trying to configure CIR on serial 4 so that if the router connected to s4 is sending more traffic than the configured CIR, packets will be dropped at fhe frame relay switch. I configured the CIR on the switch but it seems that the router connected to s4 can still send traffic at rates exceeding the CIR, and the FR switch will not drop any packet. Can some one give an advice here? Below is the configuration of the frame relay switch. Frame_Relay_Switch#show run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 11.2 no service password-encryption no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname Frame_Relay_Switch ! enable secret 5 $1$dzof$Eb3uuMoHCj2x4/dCZFZ5T. ! frame-relay switching ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial2 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 104 interface Serial4 401 frame-relay route 105 interface Serial5 501 frame-relay route 106 interface Serial6 601 ! interface Serial3 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial4 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay class para frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 401 interface Serial2 104 frame-relay route 405 interface Serial5 504 frame-relay route 406 interface Serial6 604 ! interface Serial5 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 501 interface Serial2 105 frame-relay route 504 interface Serial4 405 frame-relay route 506 interface Serial6 605 ! interface Serial6 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay clockrate 64000 frame-relay intf-type dce frame-relay route 601 interface Serial2 106 frame-relay route 604 interface Serial4 406 frame-relay route 605 interface Serial5 506 ! interface Serial7 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial8 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial9 no ip address shutdown ! interface BRI0 no ip address shutdown ! no ip classless ! map-class frame-relay parameters frame-relay cir 300 ! map-class frame-relay para frame-relay traffic-rate 1000 frame-relay cir 1000 frame-relay bc 1000 ! line con 0 exec-timeout 3 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end Frame_Relay_Switch# -- Thomas Crowe Senior Engineer / Senior Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master Architect EMC Proven Professional, Master Operator CTS Professional Services, Atlanta Yahoo IM: thomas_crowe MS Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64378t=64187 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Graphical Bandwidth Utilization [7:58819]
MRTG would be by far the easiest, and you can't beat the price ;-) http://www.google.com/search?hl=enie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8q=MRTG __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Senior Architect EMC Proven Master Architect EMC Proven Master Operator CTS Professional Services - Atlanta Yahoo IM: thomas_crowe MSN IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Graphical Bandwidth Utilization [7:58819] Does anyone have any sugestions for how I can monitor the port on my router that is connected to my Internet T1 in a way that I can generate a graphical representation of the bandwidth utilization through out a normal business day?? [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58831t=58819 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would this break the NDA [7:55799]
I remember a while back I had the question of which terminal emulator is being used for the CCIE lab. Well after taking the Lab (and yes I was honored with an invitation to come back and try again one day soon :-o ) I now definitively know the answer to this question. As I recall others also had this question, in trying to avoid a flaming war, what is the group's consensus on this. Do you feel that it would violate the NDA to disclose this information, it doesn't address any of the technical content of the lab (and NO I will not disclose any of those, so please do not ask) so I don't feel that it would. This is simply an effort to help out some people with their studying efforts so that they are not wasting time getting accustomed to a new and totally different terminal emulator. __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Senior Architect EMC Proven Master Architect EMC Proven Master Operator CTS Professional Services - Atlanta __ [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55799t=55799 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Given some config-register value cannot goto c [7:55798]
If you send what you set the config register to, someone on the list, or myself can decode it and tell you what to set hyperterm (or better yet CRT :-D ) to. HTH __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Senior Architect EMC Proven Master Architect EMC Proven Master Operator CTS Professional Services - Atlanta __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody;groupstudy.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 5:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Given some config-register value cannot goto conso [7:55791] Hi Friends In my mc3810 router I changed config-register value to some thing. After rebooting, in the hyper terminal console I did not get even a single character. Then tried to find the baud rate. Its 1200. But after setting to this baud rate 1200 I can see only junk characters in the console. Router is working fine. I can ping the interfaces. BGP and OSPF is working fine. Because I did not set enable password I cannot enter the enable mode through AUX port. Friends please help me. thanks in advance jagan [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55798t=55798 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EIGRP Neighbor issue [7:47030]
On p2p frame-relay interfaces, you have to set an interface DLCI. That should resolve your neighbor problem. HTH __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Senior Architect EMC Proven Master Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: EIGRP Neighbor issue [7:47030] My understanding of P2P Frame-Relay is that you do NOT need map statements. Unless I'm following an olders IOS behavior as outlined in Caslow, please correct me if I'm wrong. - Original Message - From: Kelly Cobean To: Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 11:27 PM Subject: FW: EIGRP Neighbor issue [7:47030] Hey all, I'm probably missing some fairly simple concept here, but for some reason, I cannot get two routers to establish a neighborship over a frame-relay link without manually specifying each as the other's neighbor in the eigrp configuration on each router. Both routers have frame-relay map statements that include the broadcast keyword. The spoke router has another router connected to it via Ethernet. It dynamically discovers this other router and establishes adjacency without manual configuration. Here's the basics of the config: Hub# int s0.300 multipoint ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 192.168.1.3 301 broadcast frame-relay map ip 192.168.1.2 302 broadcast router eigrp 100 no auto-summary network 192.168.1.0 __ Spoke# int s0.103 point-to-point ip address 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0 frame-relay map ip 192.168.1.1 103 broadcast router eigrp 100 no auto-summary network 192.168.1.0 __ Unless I add the line neighbor 192.168.1.3 and neighbor 192.168.1.1 to each router respectively, the adjacency fails. My impression of the broadcast keyword in the frame-relay map statement was that it would cause the interface to pass broad/multicasts. So what am I missing? There is nothing in my BSCN book about this (unless I'm blind) and I've had a hard time finding anything on Cisco's site about it. Any input is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Kelly [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47094t=47030 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496]
Could you post the output from a 'debug dialer events' command. Then we can see the reason that routerB initiates the call. __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Senior Architect EMC Proven Master Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 6:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN -- challenge! [7:46496] Router A and Router B are connected to an Atlas 550 via BRI interfaces Router A ATLAS --- ROUTER B Both router are configured with DDR Dialer maps so that Router A can call router B or vice-versa (basic stuff). When Router A is called by Router B, Router A answers normally and the link goes up, but then (surprisingly), Router A attempts to initiate a connection to Router B . This connection fails because I only configured the phone number for one channel (Isdn error 17: User is busy). Is this calling of Router A a normal behavior? (I don't think so!) I fixed the problem by simpling removing the phone number from the map statement of Router A. I am posting here the debug before and after I removed the phone number on A. The debug where captured on Router A. I have spent the day on the apparently trivial question: why is Router A calling Router B when I have no call back of any sort. Still no light ... Want to step up to the challenge? :) Before: 00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: RX on B1 at 64 Kb/s 00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Accepting the call id 0xD 00:32:193273528320: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up 01:51:113824615516: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up 00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x84 00:32:45: Channel ID i = 0x89 00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x84 00:32:45: Channel ID i = 0x89 00:32:45: ISDN BR0/0: RX SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x09 00:32:47: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 00:32:47: Channel ID i = 0x83 00:32:47: Keypad Facility i = '555' 00:32:47: ISDN BR0/0: RX RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x09 00:32:47: ISDN BR0/0: RX SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0A 00:32:49: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 00:32:49: Channel ID i = 0x83 00:32:49: Keypad Facility i = '555' 00:32:49: ISDN BR0/0: RX RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x0A 00:32:49: ISDN BR0/0: RX SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0B 00:32:51: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 00:32:51: Channel ID i = 0x83 00:32:51: Keypad Facility i = '555' 00:32:51: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to isdn3 00:32:51: ISDN BR0/0: RX RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x0B 00:32:51: ISDN BR0/0: RX SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0C 00:32:53: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 00:32:53: Channel ID i = 0x83 00:32:53: Keypad Facility i = '555' 00:32:53: ISDN BR0/0: RX RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x0C 00:32:53: ISDN BR0/0: RX on B1 at 64 Kb/s 00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: Event: Accepting the call id 0x10 00:41:227633266688: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up 02:00:14602128: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to 5551234 00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x85 00:41:53: Channel ID i = 0x89 00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: TX - CONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x85 00:41:53: Channel ID i = 0x89 00:41:53: ISDN BR0/0: RX - CONNECT_ACK pd = 8 callref = 0x05.. 02:00:37: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up 00:41:56: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up. 02:00:40: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to 5551234 isdn1 00:41:59: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now connected to isdn3.. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46564t=46496 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public BGP Peering [7:43175]
Is anyone on the list interested in setting up public BGP sessions, for training purposes? __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Senior Architect EMC Proven Master Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta __ [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43175t=43175 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote access [7:42310]
Do the users *have* to dial-in or would it be possible for them to use a VPN connection from any internet dial-up account? I just did a presentation to a customer comparing the costs associated with a dial-in pool vs. VPN. The price differences are staggering. I would really look at a VPN solution if that would be possible. __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Senior Architect EMC Proven Master Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 8:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Remote access [7:42310] We are starting a new company and will have 500 dial in remote users. Any thoughts in the best way to handle this. We are considering ATT or Earthlink or getting an access server box and doing it ourselves. Thanks = Spencer Plantier Internet Solutions Engineer Cell 919-696-8848 __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/ [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42315t=42310 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Need blank plates for Catalyst 5505 [7:41635]
Sorry for the off topic post, but does anyone have a power supply and 2 line card blank cover plates for a catalyst 5505 at a reasonable price? Thanks! __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Senior Architect EMC Proven Master Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta __ [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41635t=41635 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Very Weird Frame Relay Issue [7:36736]
If you just deleted the sub-interface the router retains the interface configurations. for example if you recreate the interface, all of your configs will be there. I would recreate the deleted interface, do a 'no ip address x.x.x.x y.y.y.y' then delete the sub-interface, and see if that clears up the problem. HTH __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 6:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Very Weird Frame Relay Issue [7:36736] I'm starting to think this might be a bug in 12.2(3). I brought up a new PVC from our hub router to one of our branches. I was noticing really high round trip times, usually over one second when it should be averaging 10ms. After playing around for a while I noticed that I was only having problems with _every other_ packet. If I only sent one ping it would succeed in about 12 ms. The second ping would get dropped. The third ping would succeed, the fourth would get dropped. To completely bake your noodle, I'll include the output of debug ip packet detail: RNRTH#ping 10.12.10.70 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.12.10.70, timeout is 2 seconds: !.!.! Success rate is 60 percent (3/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 12/12/12 ms RNRTH#un all All possible debugging has been turned off RNRTH#sho log Syslog logging: enabled (0 messages dropped, 0 messages rate-limited, 0 flushes, 0 overruns) Console logging: disabled Monitor logging: level debugging, 67 messages logged Buffer logging: level debugging, 539 messages logged Logging Exception size (4096 bytes) Trap logging: level informational, 283 message lines logged Log Buffer (15000 bytes): 6w5d: IP: s=10.12.10.75 (local), d=10.12.10.70 (Serial0/0.19), len 100, sending 6w5d: ICMP type=8, code=0 6w5d: IP: s=10.12.10.70 (Serial0/0.19), d=10.12.10.75 (Serial0/0.19), len 100, rcvd 3 6w5d: ICMP type=0, code=0 6w5d: IP: s=10.12.10.75 (local), d=10.12.10.70 (Serial0/0.19), len 100, sending 6w5d: ICMP type=8, code=0 6w5d: IP: s=10.12.10.75 (Serial0/0.19), d=10.12.10.70 (Serial0/0.19), len 100, rcvd local pkt 6w5d: ICMP type=8, code=0 6w5d: IP: s=10.12.10.75 (local), d=10.12.10.70 (Serial0/0.19), len 100, sending 6w5d: ICMP type=8, code=0 6w5d: IP: s=10.12.10.70 (Serial0/0.19), d=10.12.10.75 (Serial0/0.19), len 100, rcvd 3 6w5d: ICMP type=0, code=0 6w5d: IP: s=10.12.10.75 (local), d=10.12.10.70 (Serial0/0.19), len 100, sending 6w5d: ICMP type=8, code=0 6w5d: IP: s=10.12.10.75 (Serial0/0.19), d=10.12.10.70 (Serial0/0.19), len 100, rcvd local pkt 6w5d: ICMP type=8, code=0 6w5d: IP: s=10.12.10.75 (local), d=10.12.10.70 (Serial0/0.19), len 100, sending 6w5d: ICMP type=8, code=0 6w5d: IP: s=10.12.10.70 (Serial0/0.19), d=10.12.10.75 (Serial0/0.19), len 100, rcvd 3 6w5d: ICMP type=0, code=0 As you can see, the first ping succeeds as you'd expect. But the weird thing is that the next packet we received *is* the packet we just sent! Basically, it appears that somehow, somewhere in the frame cloud my router is having _every other_ packet looped back to itself. Is that not one of the weirdest things you've ever seen?? I'm awaiting a call back from Qwest. They probably won't believe me. I asked someone else here who is more senior than I and he said he's never seen anything like this either. The reason I think it might be a bug is that the local IP address--10.12.10.75--was originally on a different subinterface. I deleted that subinterface and put the IP address on the new interface. I'm wondering if internally it is confused. I'm tempted to reboot it just to find out but I'd really rather not since it's a production router. Okay, back to work. I'll let you all know what I find out. John [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36747t=36736 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Teltone setup/NT1 setup question... [7:35439]
Actually the Teltone connections are for S/T interfaces. So you can remove the Adtran ACEs and plug your routers directly into the Teltone. The ACE's are just to convert the U interface to a S/T interface. __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 4:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Teltone setup/NT1 setup question... [7:35439] Hello everyone... Okay this is the first time I've setup ISDN simulator so bare with me. I basically have TWO cisco routers. A 2503 and a 2522 both of which have a BRI. I also have two Adtran NT1's ACE..on the back of these...there are TWO S/T(Local) ports and to the right of it there is a Network U port. On the side of it there are two LOCAL BUS switches. On one switch it says configuration and switch options are: SHORT and LONG...and the other switch is the Termination: Options are NONE...50100. Im assuming the NT1 setup should be like this, but I'm not sure: On the Teltone Simulator: PORT 1 goes to NETWORK port on Adtran ...and then from Adtran S/T port to the BRI port on the Routerhowever what would be the setup on the adtrans since I get an illuminated ERROR light with the READY light blinking once every second. If anyone knows please let me know thank you [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35512t=35439 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco web product catalog [7:33926]
The part number that ends with the = is s 'spare' part. IOW if you are ordering a configured Cat8510MSR, and you specify all = P/N's you will get many little boxes for you to put together, whereas *typically* if you order the P/N's without the = Cisco will ship you an integrated box. Also some of the = have a different price structure, because they are meant to be 'spare' parts that will be sitting on a shelf, and not in a network. __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco web product catalog [7:33926] Hi All , In the Cisco web site product catalog there are two identical entry for each and every part # / description, namely the first one without = sign and the second one with = sign.What exactly id the differnence between those two ?? For instance for 3620 IOS IP has the following two entries ?? Cisco 3620 Series IOS IP S362C-12104 Cisco 3620 Series IOS IP S362C-12104= Thanks, Muthu [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33965t=33926 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]
Does anyone know what telnet client you get to use in the lab? That could make a BIG difference in how well you are able to work? __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] I had asked for some honest advice as to what router models I needed to 'simulate' the actual lab at home but alas...some people seem to have wasted their time in replying some irrelevant answers. Sad.. From: Louie Belt Reply-To: Louie Belt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:57:21 -0500 You'll go blind if you touch your flux capacitor too much. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of c1sc0k1d Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 6:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] I saw my gear in RTP as well. Except in RTP they said not to touch the flux capacitor as the proctor already calibrated it before the lab started. Hire, Ejay wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm surprised. In san Jose, they are in big red/orange cabinets next to the cubicle you work in. You have to go over to the rack to check dial tone/ring on your VoIp Phone... and to align the flux capacitor. -Ejay -Original Message- From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] I never actually saw any equipment just a monitor and keyboard. I could hazzard a guess though that most of the equipment was Cisco. ;- -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2002 19:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] Hello, Has anyone is this group taken the new one-day lab recently? Wanted to know what kind of routers did you see, I mean is it now more than 6 routers or still just 6? What models? Is it 2 2513's or 2 2504's etc? And the switch, is it still the Cat5? Just wanted to gather this info. to build a lab and work on it..visualize that I am actually working on the real lab and busting my brains. Thank you Cisco :-) Thanks! _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33690t=33592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592]
Several, working on routers, servers, etc every day I have come to really appreciate a good telnet client! Some clients have better scroll back buffers, better aesthetics, adjustable fonts and sizes, etc etc. I could easily see that having a 25% affect in the time it takes to complete some tasks. I base that on how long it takes me to do things using my preferred client vs. CLI telnet or for console access Hyperterm (yuck yuck). Now that the lab is only one day, time is critical! __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 *** Note New Cell Number *** Cell: 678-521-0360 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] idle curiousity - in what way(s) would you expect that the telnet client would effect your work in the lab? Chuck Thomas Crowe wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Does anyone know what telnet client you get to use in the lab? That could make a BIG difference in how well you are able to work? __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] I had asked for some honest advice as to what router models I needed to 'simulate' the actual lab at home but alas...some people seem to have wasted their time in replying some irrelevant answers. Sad.. From: Louie Belt Reply-To: Louie Belt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:57:21 -0500 You'll go blind if you touch your flux capacitor too much. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of c1sc0k1d Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 6:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] I saw my gear in RTP as well. Except in RTP they said not to touch the flux capacitor as the proctor already calibrated it before the lab started. Hire, Ejay wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I'm surprised. In san Jose, they are in big red/orange cabinets next to the cubicle you work in. You have to go over to the rack to check dial tone/ring on your VoIp Phone... and to align the flux capacitor. -Ejay -Original Message- From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] I never actually saw any equipment just a monitor and keyboard. I could hazzard a guess though that most of the equipment was Cisco. ;- -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2002 19:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Recent One-Day Lab Takers?? [7:33592] Hello, Has anyone is this group taken the new one-day lab recently? Wanted to know what kind of routers did you see, I mean is it now more than 6 routers or still just 6? What models? Is it 2 2513's or 2 2504's etc? And the switch, is it still the Cat5? Just wanted to gather this info. to build a lab and work on it..visualize that I am actually working on the real lab and busting my brains. Thank you Cisco :-) Thanks! _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33767t=33592 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP and one backup link [7:33433]
Why not just use floating static routes? With only one active exit point, I don't see the reason for burdening your router with the BGP routing table, unless you are just receiving aggregates from your provider. Even then the floating static's should work. __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP and one backup link [7:33433] Hi all, I have a BGP question. In this moment we have one Internet link with just one provider, now, we have got a second link just for backup. I mean, we can only use it for 180 hrs per month. I can easily manage my outgoing traffic (using local preferece or weight), however the incomming traffic in more difficult. I added many prepends (9) in the publication of the second link but there still few traffic on it. There is not IBGP between my two providers. Any ideas? Thks in advanced. Alejandro Acosta [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33449t=33433 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2926 VS 5500 Teletone VS Adtran 500 [7:32966]
When I was putting together my lab, I tried to figure out what would be the best device for ISDN, and maybe voice. I chose the Adtran Atlas 550 even though right now it is the most expensive part of my lab ;-) The advantages of it are: 4 Port ISDN BRI 4 Port FXS 2 port V.35 1 port T-1 The best part is it acts as a CO in a box. Complete with dial plans and everything. It will also function as a Frame Relay switch, and router. __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 *** Note New Cell Number *** Cell: 678-521-0360 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2926 VS 5500 Teletone VS Adtran 500 [7:32966] Just want some opinions on equipment purchases. Is there any real difference as far a lab practice goes between the 2926 and 5500 switches? I know they run the same IOS I am just not sure what supervisor capability is necessary for the CCIE lab. Also is the Adtran 500 better/worse than the Teletone? How about a POTS simulator? Do any of these do both ISDN and POTS. I also read in some posts that one of the IBM token Ring switches(8270?) can actually run the Cisco 3920 IOS.Thanks in advance. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33160t=32966 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What frame format used by TCP/IP? [7:25924]
TCP/IP doesn't use a frame type per se. Frame types are set at the Data Link Layer (Layer 2). For example TCP/IP can run over Token Ring (802.5), FDDI, Fast Ethernet, etc etc, and all of these Link Layer topologies each have their own frame type. HTH __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: What frame format used by TCP/IP? [7:25924] Compared with IPX/SPX, what type of frames does TCP/IP use? Thanks @ Regards to all _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=25977t=25924 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Auto sensing mode... [7:24375]
You need to first set the speed to 100 vs. auto-neg. set port xx speed 100 Then you will be able to force the duplex setting. __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 8:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Auto sensing mode... [7:24375] Have discovered some packet loss on our network and figured it out to a duplex setting mismatch between two FE ports on Catalyst 5500 and a 7206. The 5500 is set to auto mode for both the duplex and speed. The speed is ok but it autoed to half instead of full. When I try to put the port in full duplex I get this: Cisco 5500 (enable) set port duplex 10/11 full Port 10/11 is in auto-sensing mode. The port is in use obviously. How to pull this FE port from auto into manual settings? Ive looked the set port commands but none seem to relate to autosensing. Thanks, Keith [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24385t=24375 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: which layer do the ospf bgp rip work on [7:20953]
Priscilla; Couldn't it be argued that the *act* of routing is actually a layer 3 activity, however the routing protocols actually reside at the application layer. My reasoning for this, is if you look at the various routing protocols, their function is to exchange information, and it is a different process that actually forwards the packets. For example, you can configure a cisco router with static routes to build its routing table *or* you can configure OSPF, RIP, EIGRP, etc. Which results in new process running on the router to manage the information exchange, yet the actual routing of the packets are still managed by the same process that static routes uses. I am not necessarily disagreeing with you, just trying to start some conversation on the subject. Thanks __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 *** Note New Cell Number *** Cell: 678-521-0360 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 11:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: which layer do the ospf bgp rip work on [7:20953] Network layer. Routing is a fundamental component of the network layer. At 10:14 PM 9/24/01, lhill peng wrote: which layer do the routing protocol such as ospf rip bgp eigrp work on? sb said that they are on application, others on network what is the right answer?? Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20990t=20953 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SecureID on Cisco [7:20438]
I don't know of a way to directly configure a cisco device to authenticate against a SecureID server, however SecureID integrates very well with most RADIUS implementations. Once that is configured, you can then configure AAA on your cisco device to authenticate against your RADIUS server. HTH __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 Cell: 404-277-4089 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SecureID on Cisco [7:20438] Greetings all, Looking for reference/ideas on how to configure RSA SecureID on Cisco's routers. Any ideas would be great. Thanks..Nabil [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20545t=20438 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: catalyst 6000 [7:20244]
This sounds like a classical auto-negotiation issue. If the server is capable of supporting 100FDX then hard code it as well as the Catalyst, and the messages should stop. Another thing to look at, is the port counters, if you see lots of FCS errors, that is usually a tell-tell sign. HTH __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 Cell: 404-277-4089 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ndabarasa michel Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 3:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: catalyst 6000 [7:20244] hello, i need a help from the list. i have a switch (catalyst6000) as a central node in a physical star topology. the other nodes are three catalyst2948. they are connected to the central catalyst6000 with optic fiber. i have spanning tree disabled cause we don't have redundancy links yet,thus no loops. now one server connected with optic fiber is periodically unreachable(every 2 minutes). i log into the console and i found this error message PAGP-5-PORTTOSTP : port 2/4 left bridge port 2/4 PAGP-5-PORTTOSTP : port 2/4 joined bridge port 2/4 does it have anything to do with STP ? who can help ? /'^ ^'\ ((o)-(o)) |oOOO--(_)--OOOo--|-|- | Ndabarasa Michel... | | CCNA,CCAI.. | | cell (+250)08510951..| | .oooO | | ( )Oooo. | |---\ (--- ( )---|-| \_) ) /|-| (_/ -- FREE! The Best in Rwanda Email Address @mail.rw Reserve your name right now at http://mail.rw [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20258t=20244 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Access lists or inbound/outbound statements [7:20250]
I just did a PIX install, and I don't recall the inbound / outbound statements, I do recall applying the ACL's with an inbound statement. I even remember that ACL's can only be applied inbound, which I thought of as a limitation, though I can't come up with a scenario off the top of my head to support my position ;-. The PIX with the last couple of code rev's is moving (well pushing) towards the use of ACL's vs. the legacy conduit statements. Once you have the NAT concepts nailed, setting up the ACL's on the PIX is pretty much like doing it in Cisco IOS. HTH __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 Cell: 404-277-4089 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Langa Kentane Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 6:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Access lists or inbound/outbound statements [7:20250] Greetz, I am new to the world of Pix firewalls. I would just like to get your opinion on which is better to use, normal extended access lists or inbound/outbound statements. I have experience with extended access lists on cisco routers but I only just got to know about inbound/outbound statements... What does the list recommend and why! [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20260t=20250 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Memory Need for GSR's [7:20233]
Tony; One possible point could be; I would assume that you would be using CEF, for the best forwarding performance. With that said, CEF maintains the FIB which can use a sizable amount of memory. Also, assuming that they are wanting to traffic engineer the multiple OC-12's (even if they don't plan on it now, they will), they will need to run MPLS (tag switching) on top of CEF, even more memory demands. Their possible comebacks could be that these are just core routers that will be acting as BGP route reflectors, and so all they have to do is route traffic based on the current BGP table. If this is the case then they could have tremendous performance gains by not running BGP in the core, and simply let MPLS handle the switching. This has a net result of simplifying the configuration, improving performance, and reducing memory requirements. HTH __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 Cell: 404-277-4089 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Medeiros Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Memory Need for GSR's [7:20233] Hello everybody, I have to spec. a few 12008's for a customer. When I configured them, I maxed out the memory for the GRP and the line cards at 256 meg. The customer would like to know why I am doing this as the memory for the puppy's is gawd awful expensive. The router will be doing BGP and has a lot of OC-12 interfaces. Question: Can any of you Provider gurus recommend the correct memory for the current BGP table. Is 256 too much? Is 128 going to be too small soon? Thanks in advance and GOD BLESS AMERICA ! Tony M. #6172 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20261t=20233 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Serial is reset? [7:20255]
Are you by chance running channelized T-1's. That looks like a channel configuration mis-match between the ends of the T-1 (i.e. site a is configured to use channels 1-23 and site b is only configured to use channels 1-22)? HTH __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 Cell: 404-277-4089 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ouellette, Tim Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Serial is reset? [7:20255] After look at some of the t1's in one of my boxes. I see the following Serial2/0:23 is reset, line protocol is down After looking on cisco, I couldn't find an exact description of what this means. Can anyone provide some insight? May god have mercy on the souls of those who betray him. Tim [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20264t=20255 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to NAT [7:17499]
Hi, one problem with the config that you listed below, is that you have 2 different interface in the same subnet as far as the Cisco goes. Unless your doing IRB and the interfaces share the same bridge-group, you cannot have multiple interfaces in the same subnet. Another problem that you will run into is routing, You can only have one path to a subnet (with obvious exceptions being made with certain routing protocols) in the config that you listed, the Cisco will have what looks (to the cisco) like 2 paths to the same subnet. For this to work IMHO , you actually need to put at one intermediary router to do the NAT for one of the 10.1.3.0/24 networks. HTH __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS Professional Services - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 Cell: 404-277-4089 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nelluri Reddy Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How to NAT [7:17499] I hope that some one out there can help me with a NAT problem 1) The router has a FA0/0 which connects to my internal network using 10.0.0.0/8 2) It has a s0/0 interface connecting to Minot, which has PC's on 10.1.3.0/24 3) It has s0/1 interface connecting to Bismarck, which also has PC's on 10.1.3.0/24 Both sets of PC's need to connect to servers on my internal network which uses 10.1.3.0/24 as well. Luckily the servers are not on 10.1.3.0/24, but on 10.104.243.0/24 inside my network. So I have to use NAT. So far I have come up with the following. int fa0/0 ip address 10.121.5.135 255.255.255.240 (part of a vlan) ip nat inside int s0/0 ip address 10.121.40.1 255.255.255.252 ip nat outside ip access-group minot in int s0/1 ip address 10.121.40.5 255.255.255.252 ip nat outside ip access-group bismarck in ip nat pool minot 10.121.52.1 10.121.52.127 255.255.255.128 ip nat pool bismarck 10.121.52.129 10.121.52.254 255.255.255.128 ip nat outside source list minot pool minot ip nat outside source list bismarck pool bismarck ip access-list extended minot permit ip 10.1.3.0 255.255.255.0 10.104.243.0 255.255.255.0 ip access-list extended bismarck permit ip 10.1.3.0 255.255.255.0 10.104.243.0 255.255.255.0 ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.121.5.142 (towards my internal network) ip route 10.121.52.0 255.255.255.128 int s0/0 ip route 10.121.52.128 255.255.255.128 int s0/1 First, this won't work because the two access lists are the same. How about the IP ROUTE statements for the serial interfaces? Do I use real addresses or translated addresses? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in anticipation. Nelluri [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17502t=17499 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: High FCS errors on cat5505 [7:15885]
Check for a duplex mis-match on the interface. It is a fairly well know issue that Sun and Cisco's don't auto negotiate well. Hard code the speed and duplex on preferably both sides, and you should the FCS errors go away. __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 Cell: 404-277-4089 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Eitel Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 1:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: High FCS errors on cat5505 [7:15885] Thanks Frank. You wouldn't happen to have sun boxes giving you problems? -Original Message- From: David Eitel Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 12:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: High FCS errors on cat5505 [7:15885] Hello. I'm experiencing huge amounts of fcs errors on my switch. 3/1 91521 fcs errors 3/2 28078 fcs errors These counters were cleared Friday. I understand that these errors are usually media related. I've swapped cables so far which has not seemed to help. I can tell you there is a sun e450 and e250 attached to these ports. Do you know of any interoperability issues with the cat 5505 and sun NICS? Thanks In Advance, Dave [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15920t=15885 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IBM printer question [7:13992]
You might want to check is the port is going into errordisable mode. Usually when this happens, the switch is either set to or detecting full-duplex, when in fact the printer is only working in half-duplex. That could explain the reset when you log into the switch. I have seen this A LOT with HP printers and Catalyst switches. HTH __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 Cell: 404-277-4089 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sites, Bob Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 2:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IBM printer question [7:13992] Question for all you IBM printer gurus. I have the following small office connected to my hospital. HOSPITAL-AIRONET340OFFICE-AIRONET340---C1924IBM AFP Printer. Here is the problem. After about 15-30 minutes the printer is no longer visible or pingable from the network. It seems to time out from the switch connection. If I log into the switch and ping this printer it comes back up and is then visible on the network again, until it times out? Any known conflicts with the C1900's or the Aironets and this particular printer? Anyone know of any timeout parameter changes that might take care of this? There isn't a whole lot of commands on the 1900 to use. Bob Sites System Engineer Valley Health System, IS Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13994t=13992 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: RE: Net Appliance vs. Cisco [7:11831]
Ok, I don't want to start a flame war here, but. Firstly, NetApp's are not SAN, they are NAS. They are good at NFS, when I was using them the CIFS was pretty weak. Very similar to SunOS (Yes SunOS not Solaris, there is a difference) but that is because the lead engineers were former Sun Fellows. Secondly, EMC being cost effective?? Ok, don't get me wrong, EMC makes the best storage array out there, and they pretty good at SAN and NAS too. But cost effective they are not. Generally they have the highest ticket price of any solution in the industry. The EMC SAN (They call it an ESN) solution is very strong! There NAS offering (The Celerra) is pretty good too. Apparently it outperforms the NetApp for NFS and CIFS, but it also costs allot more. Finally, the SN5420 is an IP Storage Router, it is for bridging SANs with NAS. Basically it is the first Cisco offering out of the IETF IPS (IP Storage) working group. aka: iSCSI If anyone would like to discuss the SN5420 and its completers, I would love to. __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 ext 45 Cell: 404-277-4089 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Frank Kim Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 7:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Net Appliance vs. Cisco [7:11831] I used to deploy massive F760 netapps. They were great for NFSing; but they were also very heat-sensitive. You may check your datacenter/computer room to make sure it provides enough cooling before throwing those netapps in there. As far as pricing for netapps, they are 'expensive'. For SAN solution, I would look at EMC/Storagetek because it is more cost efficient compared to netapps. -Frank On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Cisco Skin wrote: Anyone have any experience/recommendations setting up a Net Appliance SAN using the F800 Filer? The reason I'm asking is that we're getting ready to purchase one from Net App and my boss just showed me the new Cisco SN 5420. Just want to get some input from anyone who's using either of these. Thanks [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11847t=11831 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342]
Yes, I have that configuration at a customer's site that I configured. (Dual MSFC's in a HSRP pair on Cat 6509's) It has been working well. Let me know what your questions are, and maybe I can help. __ Thomas Crowe Senior Systems Engineer / Architect CTS - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 ext 45 Cell: 404-277-4089 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lopez, Robert Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 12:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342] Has anyone configured dual MSFC's on a 6509 with HA, HSRP capabilities with success. I'm reading through this document... http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sft_6_1/configgd /redund.htm#49378 It seems somewhat straight forward. Any opinions Robert -Original Message- From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342] Yeah Jen is staying!!! Now could someone please give me some tips on how to take my two 4006 with RSM and make them as close to redundant as possible. I need to run HSRP on the RSM if possible. Thanks, Steve -Original Message- From: Jennifer Cribbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 10:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342] I have worked so hard studying and have loved all the wonderful contributions from the people that make this site special. But I am not a thief Phil...I really am not. We bought the disk..We didn't steal it. We all paid money that we had saved so we could study and pass our tests. We had a wonderful instructor that cared about us and helped us. They had special group studies on varied topics that people could participate in if they chose. We had dinners together. We were all involved together on a common mission of getting through our classes and passing our first cert together. I was not trying to implicate anything or anybody. Academically, it was a great environment and too bad more aren't the same and are conductive to learning. Since those times are past, this group, without it being a formal classroom is the closest thing I have to college. And right now, I am just discouraged... It is greatly distracting me from what my goals are. I do not mind a debate but over pertinent issues that matter in the long run from a 'cert viewpoint' but this is not one of those issues, but it is, like I said, very distracting for me from a personal standpoint regarding my studying. I have never even read one of Howards, Priscilla's or Tom's books, but I bet they are good. Of course, I am only assuming that based on the answers I have seen posted by them on this site and the 'free' study material compiled by them posted on certificationzone.com that is available on a monthly basis that I have read. Those people are why I stayed, because you can learn from them. But I have not stolen anything from them Phil as was implied by Wigle. And you are right..this is ridiculousI enjoy this site too much for one Wigle to run me off. I guess I will just wait for the dark blue sedan to pull up with all the haggling lawyers Jenn 7/9/2001 9:30:48 AM, Circusnuts wrote: What !!! Now this is ridiculous Jennifer- unless you're getting hate mail the rest us are not seeing, no one else on this list cares. I enjoy you posts am surprised Kevin has carried things this far... Phil - Original Message - From: Jennifer Cribbs To: Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 10:18 AM Subject: Re: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342] Rational or otherwise, an already convicted thief or not, I have withdrawn my subscription from groupstudy.. 7/9/2001 8:42:33 AM, Kevin Wigle wrote: Jennifer, I'm not condemning you. I've read your posts and I thought you a rational person. But just read this We couldn't afford it otherwise. None of us. We all copied it to use from our school burner. It was registered in a co-instructors name. It was all about wanting to pass and learning and him helping us. Not cheating or pirating. Right or wrong, that's what we did. Can't get much closer to a confession than that. We normally includes the person talking but I'll let the lawyers haggle that one. Anyway, think of all the people on this list that make this list such a great place for learning. Howard Berkowitz, Author and Instructor Tom Lisa, Author and Instructor Priscilla Oppenheimer, Author and Instructor Not to mention the many CCIE's on the list. They give their time freely to the list which is as good as it gets. On the other hand, some people still want to steal from them and others. I just can't seem to reconcile how anybody can steal their work and then post to a mailing list where they contribute freely. The Transcenders are not their work but the pricipal is the same
RE: Access list problem [7:9939]
If you are trying to let everyone out to surf the web, and assuming that you ACL is applied to inbound traffic on your internet facing interface. You are missing a rule to allow established tcp sessions back in: permit tcp any any eq estab Since this will probably be the rule that gets the most matches I would place it as rule 1. Let me know if this works for you. __ Thomas Crowe Technical Director Research Development CTS - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 ext 45 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Brandis Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 4:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Access list problem [7:9939] Hi All, I thought I was on top of access lists, until today. When ever I apply this particualr access list in IOS 11.2 , nothing on the network can view internet pages. They can ping no problem but nothing else. Please advise if you can, on which line the error is. Thanks all, I appreciate it. Extended IP access list 110 deny tcp any any eq 139 permit udp any any eq domain permit tcp any any eq domain permit icmp any any permit tcp any host 203.111.42.200 eq ftp-data permit tcp any host 203.111.42.200 eq ftp permit tcp any host 203.111.42.200 eq 22 permit tcp any host 203.111.42.204 eq ftp-data permit tcp any host 203.111.42.204 eq ftp permit tcp any host 203.111.42.204 eq www permit tcp any host 203.111.42.204 eq 3389 permit tcp any host 203.111.42.215 eq smtp permit tcp any host 203.111.42.215 eq www permit tcp any host 203.111.42.215 eq 3389 permit ip host 203.111.42.224 any permit ip host 203.111.42.225 any permit ip host 203.111.42.226 any [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10049t=9939 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE lab prep. Is there a syllabus? [7:8385]
I have this book, and I confess that I have not totaly picked through it yet. What errors are you referring to? __ Thomas Crowe Technical Director Research Development CTS - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 ext 45 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 6:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE lab prep. Is there a syllabus? [7:8385] This is a very good book for lab practise, however understand there are alot of errors in the book. Check out: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/007212766X/groupstudycom This book gives detailed CCIE practice labs and more importantly, also offers an analysis of the solution. $47.99 from Amazon.com Take care, [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8943t=8385 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to know the duplex and speed setting of Solaris NIC?? [7:4633]
That setting can be done 2 different ways (which both end up doing the same thing) On demand you can issue a 'ndd' command against the NIC driver (i.e. /dev/hme or /dev/qfe) like so: ndd /dev/qfe -set adv_autoneg_cap=0 ndd /dev/qfe -set adv_100fdx_cap=1 ndd /dev/qfe -set adv_100hdx_cap=1 ndd /dev/qfe -set adv_10fdx_cap=1 ndd /dev/qfe -set adv_10hdx_cap=1 The first ndd command turns off autonegotiation, this is needed Then you would enter ONE of the following commands to set the hard coded settings (100Full-Duplex, 100Half-duplex etc) This helps for the immediate but not on subsequent reboots, to fix that you need to a set of similar lines to your /etc/system file like so: set qfe:qfe_adv_autoneg_cap = 0 set qfe:qfe_adv_100fdx_cap = 1 set qfe:qfe_adv_100hdx_cap = 0 set qfe:qfe_adv_10fdx_cap = 0 set qfe:qfe_adv_10hdx_cap = 0 I always put all of these entries in my /etc/system. Doing the HME interfaces are very similar, just replace the qfe with hme. Also note this changes ALL instances of the driver type (i.e. all 4 ports on a qfe, or every hme interface in a box) Hope this help. __ Thomas Crowe Technical Director Research Development CTS - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 ext 45 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 9:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How to know the duplex and speed setting of Solaris NIC?? [7:4626] Hi.. How to know the duplex and speed setting of Solaris NIC?? Many thanks Tong == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=4633t=4633 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Download new image [7:2120]
You need to format the flash card. On the 6500 you do it with format:x where x is the location of the flash card (i.e. format:flash to format the internal flash card and format:slot0 to format the flash card in slot 0) __ Thomas Crowe Technical Director Research Development CTS - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 ext 45 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 11:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Download new image [7:2120] Hello, I'am presently working on a Cisco 4500 router. I want to download a new image the router. But the image size is larger than the size on the flash memory card. So I bought new flash memory cards. I inserted the new falsh (empty) cards on the router and now I can't download the image . I get an error not valid magic number???. Can somebody tell me how I can proceed to succeed?. All suggestions are welcome. Rock BASSOLE Til: +33 (0) 1 45 96 22 03 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=2160t=2120 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: trunking [7:1098]
I would look at the spannig tree state when the 2nd Linux server comes up. I am not a Linux expert, but it sounds like it may be running spanning tree instance that is causing the 3512's gig port to go into blocking mode. Does the Linux server have more than one NIC? Just a thought. __ Thomas Crowe Technical Director Research Development CTS - Atlanta Phone: 770-664-3900 ext 45 __ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 11:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: trunking [7:1098] We have a 3512 switching dot1q trunking to a 5500. The 3512 has a linux server attached to the 3512 on a vlan. We have another linux server attached to the 5500 on the same vlan. The linux server on then 5500 works fine until the 3512 linux server comes up and then we lose connectivity to 5500 linux server. We cannot ping either box when they are both connected. In a quick fix we took off the trunking and put both gig port on the same vlan and now it works fine. Any thoughts why trunking causes a problem. Thanks Wm. Spencer Plantier LAN Engineer (919) 474-1300 ext 0873 Office (919) 474-1056 Fax (919)696-8848 Cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Thomas Crowe.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1122t=1098 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
