RE: Entourage crashes when updating

[Jimmy Tran]

Yes, I even tried to create a new profile on a different Mac and same
issue.

 

From: Andrew Laya [mailto:andrew.l...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 1:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Entourage crashes when updating

 

Have you tried deleting her profile within Entourage and setting up a
new one from scratch?



On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Jimmy Tran  wrote:

I have a Mac user using Entourage 2004 (updated) connecting to an
Exchange 2003 server.  Upon launching Entourage, it hangs when update
contacts.  Sometimes it hangs at other stages but it has come to a point
where she can't use Entourage at all.  I loaded her profile in Outlook
2007 and everything updated just fine.  Not sure what to do next...

 

Thanks,

 

-Jimmy

 

Re: Entourage crashes when updating

[Andrew Laya]

Have you tried deleting her profile within Entourage and setting up a new
one from scratch?


On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Jimmy Tran  wrote:

>  I have a Mac user using Entourage 2004 (updated) connecting to an
> Exchange 2003 server.  Upon launching Entourage, it hangs when update
> contacts.  Sometimes it hangs at other stages but it has come to a point
> where she can’t use Entourage at all.  I loaded her profile in Outlook 2007
> and everything updated just fine.  Not sure what to do next…
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> -Jimmy
>

Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Jonathan Link]

Or a membership list is compromised.

If you lose a device that's connected to your network, the burden of proof
becomes what was on that device.  Since you're no longer in possession of
said device, one can only assume that any information that your organization
has at its disposal may be on the device.  Do you have names of members,
addresses of members?  Are these members younger than 18?  Could a predator
get ahold of a list and use it for his own twisted desires?

It is a very tough battle to fight.  It's taken two years of me extolling
the risks of thumb drives to our organization.  The light went off when a
combination of events took place.  The first event is that a local
competitor had a notebook stolen out of their car, which contained social
security numbers of thousands of state employees.  Their assurance is that
the notebook was password protected.  I and my supervising partner both knew
that was useless in the hands of a semi-knowledgable and motivated
individual (Nordahl's password reset anyone?).  We used this loss by our
competitor to push the adoption of whole disk encryption.  Now that we have
our hard drives encrypted and the partners understand the risks, banning
flash drives is beginning to make some sense.

IF what you're doing can capitalize on current events, you'll find that a
lot of your education problems will diminish.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Senter, John wrote:

>  This is a Powershell command, I pieced together.  If you know PS I am
> sure there is a better way:
>
>
>
>  Create a report of ActiveSync devices
>
> Get-Mailbox -ResultSize:Unlimited | ForEach {Get-ActiveSyncDeviceStatistics
> -Mailbox:$_.Identity} | Sort-Object -Property DeviceType,Identity |
> Select-Object
> @{name="EmailAddress";expression={$_.Identity.ToString().Split("\")[0]}},DeviceType,DeviceUserAgent
> | Export-Csv -Path:"C:\Temp\MobileDevices.csv"
>
>
>
> Well when it comes to management and lock down policies I am sure it will
> stay that way until a device is stolen and someone get confidential data
> leaked or they send a series of virus’ or vulgar e-mail to the company.
>
>
>
> Geez how bad would it look for the Girlscouts if a exec’s device is lost
> and someone was to send out a picture of child porn from that device to the
> employees or worse a news company.  That would be a huge black eye for the
> organization.  And that is what I would pose the management.  I use to work
> for a very large children’s hospital and those kind of scare tactics would
> really open their eyes.
>
>
>
> *From:* Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:52 AM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>
>
> John, I would agree with you on the entire statement, but at the org I work
> at they do as they please. I have tried numerous times on writing several
> policies and explaining the importance of utilizing these policies from hand
> held to network protocols.
>
>
>
> Then I receive that deer in the headlight look and they say ok, but it’s
> been 3 years and till this day not one of those policies has been presented
> to the directors or the board for approval. Yes the policies have been
> submitted to HR but they do not conform or even read them. The primary
> mission at the org is MEMBERSHIP. (vent)
>
>
>
> Also, you stated you run a device report; which report is that? A custom
> report or some type of third party?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Thomas
>
> *From:* Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:41 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>  --
>
> *From:* Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:38 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>
>
> Well the only thing with ActiveSync is you cannot restrict what devices
> connect.  So say you supply a employee with a iphone or windows mobile
> device.  You enable ActiveySync for them, then they can go out and connect
> as many devices they want and you have no control.  We have had users break
> or lose the device and they get it replace and reconnect without telling
> us.  So when I run the device report I see they have multiple devices.
>
>
>
> This is why I like the Blackberry or Good approach to device.  You must
> have the company add you and then only 1 device per person.  ActiveSync is
> free so it is limited to what it can and can’t do.  If MS really wants this
> to be a way to take Blackberry or Good out, they need to put a lot more
> control on the interface.  The other thing that really sucks is ActiveSync
> is enabled, by default, for every Exchange user.  There is no way to change
> the default setting so we run script every few days to change anyon

RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Senter, John]

This is a Powershell command, I pieced together.  If you know PS I am sure 
there is a better way:

 Create a report of ActiveSync devices
Get-Mailbox -ResultSize:Unlimited | ForEach {Get-ActiveSyncDeviceStatistics 
-Mailbox:$_.Identity} | Sort-Object -Property DeviceType,Identity | 
Select-Object 
@{name="EmailAddress";expression={$_.Identity.ToString().Split("\")[0]}},DeviceType,DeviceUserAgent
 | Export-Csv -Path:"C:\Temp\MobileDevices.csv"

Well when it comes to management and lock down policies I am sure it will stay 
that way until a device is stolen and someone get confidential data leaked or 
they send a series of virus' or vulgar e-mail to the company.

Geez how bad would it look for the Girlscouts if a exec's device is lost and 
someone was to send out a picture of child porn from that device to the 
employees or worse a news company.  That would be a huge black eye for the 
organization.  And that is what I would pose the management.  I use to work for 
a very large children's hospital and those kind of scare tactics would really 
open their eyes.

From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

John, I would agree with you on the entire statement, but at the org I work at 
they do as they please. I have tried numerous times on writing several policies 
and explaining the importance of utilizing these policies from hand held to 
network protocols.

Then I receive that deer in the headlight look and they say ok, but it's been 3 
years and till this day not one of those policies has been presented to the 
directors or the board for approval. Yes the policies have been submitted to HR 
but they do not conform or even read them. The primary mission at the org is 
MEMBERSHIP. (vent)

Also, you stated you run a device report; which report is that? A custom report 
or some type of third party?



Thanks

Thomas
From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

+1


From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

Well the only thing with ActiveSync is you cannot restrict what devices 
connect.  So say you supply a employee with a iphone or windows mobile device.  
You enable ActiveySync for them, then they can go out and connect as many 
devices they want and you have no control.  We have had users break or lose the 
device and they get it replace and reconnect without telling us.  So when I run 
the device report I see they have multiple devices.

This is why I like the Blackberry or Good approach to device.  You must have 
the company add you and then only 1 device per person.  ActiveSync is free so 
it is limited to what it can and can't do.  If MS really wants this to be a way 
to take Blackberry or Good out, they need to put a lot more control on the 
interface.  The other thing that really sucks is ActiveSync is enabled, by 
default, for every Exchange user.  There is no way to change the default 
setting so we run script every few days to change anyone that has the default 
setting of "not set" to disable.  If a user wants to use ActiveSync they have 
to get approval then we enable the account.

From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

The other alternative is to not allow non company supplied hardware to connect 
to the corporate network.


From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
Sent: 30 September 2009 16:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
If a user leaves the company I would hope you disable the account if not delete 
it.  If the account is disabled it will not sync.  If I remember correctly on 
the restore, it does not restore the data just the setup information so if a 
device is wiped and a user does a restore, if the account is disabled/deleted, 
it will error on the connection and there will be nothing on the device.

From: Kat Collins [mailto:messagel...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

However, the other reason for a wipe is when a user leaves a company, has a 
personal iPhone that has been connected to corporate resources, and you now 
want to wipe and clear the device.  I don't want that user to EVER be able to 
reconnect and resync that device, thus the change of the password on AD and 
some other steps that can be taken to block reconnection to Ex

Entourage crashes when updating

[Jimmy Tran]

I have a Mac user using Entourage 2004 (updated) connecting to an
Exchange 2003 server.  Upon launching Entourage, it hangs when update
contacts.  Sometimes it hangs at other stages but it has come to a point
where she can't use Entourage at all.  I loaded her profile in Outlook
2007 and everything updated just fine.  Not sure what to do next...

 

Thanks,

 

-Jimmy

RE: Blacklisted out of the blue

[Chris Drobny]

Thank you guys for all your help.  I shoulda called Barracuda first.
Had one setting that was a "little" unsecure and that's why the bastards
were flagging me.  I think it is beer thirty even though it is 1:00

 

Chris Drobny

Network/System Administrator

LMS Intellibound, Inc.

office 770.724.0562

cell 404.797.9710

cdro...@lmsintellibound.com

 

From: King's Kid [mailto:kingskid1002...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Blacklisted out of the blue

 

Could it be a bot?  We were recently blacklisted.  After doing some
digging I found that one of our machines had a spambot on it that was
causing the problem. 
 

BJ 

 

No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large number
of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. 

 

 



From: Chris Drobny 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Sent: Wed, September 30, 2009 10:01:42 AM
Subject: RE: Blacklisted out of the blue

Currently my people using email do have to VPN in so that isn't a
problem.  The barracuda is just for filtering spam coming in I don't
think I have it relaying mail out. But maybe I am confused. Again
nothing has changed in 3 years and I am just getting these open relay
messages now.  I fought this when I first put the box up and thought I
had closed everything off.

Chris Drobny
Network/System Administrator
LMS Intellibound, Inc.
office 770.724.0562
cell 404.797.9710
cdro...@lmsintellibound.com

-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blacklisted out of the blue

> Ok so we are having trouble emailing some of our customers so I do a
> quick check to find out why.  Seems http://njabl.org/ is saying we are
an
> open relay which I had thought I had closed up years ago.

Looks like you should go through those barracuda settings again because
spammers are likely abusing your public service.  If you need to have
mobile users relay mail from the field, you need to enable and require
some kind of LDAP/AD authentication for all senders.  If the barracuda
doesn't support authenticated relaying via AD you will have to turn off
all relaying except from your exchange server.  In this case, the remote
users will have to use a vpn of some sort in order to send mail as
though
they were in the office


220 barracuda.mail.lmsintellibound.com
  ESMTP Service ready
helo lmsintellibound.com  
250 Requested mail action okay, completed
mail from: administra...@lmsintellibound.com
250 Requested mail action okay, completed
rcpt to: x...@gmail.com
250 Requested mail action okay, completed
data
354 Start mail input; end with .
To: x...@gmail.com
From: administra...@lmsintellibound.com
Subject: Sent from an open relay

Testing out the body
cheers
.
250 Requested mail action okay, completed
quit


Found in a mailbox moments later...woops


Delivered-To: x...@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.16.65 with SMTP id n1cs224076iba;
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.8.136 with SMTP id h8mr5707464qah.25.1254320534533;
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: 
Received: from barracuda.mail.lmsintellibound.com
(mail.lmsintellibound.com 
[66.64.158.244])
by mx.google.com   with ESMTP id
27si8524489ywh.104.2009.09.30.07.22.14;
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com  : best guess record
for domain of
administra...@lmsintellibound.com designates 66.64.158.244 as permitted
sender) client-ip=66.64.158.244;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess
record for domain of administra...@lmsintellibound.com designates
66.64.158.244 as permitted sender)
smtp.mail=administra...@lmsintellibound.com
To: x...@gmail.com
From: administra...@lmsintellibound.com
Subject: Sent from an open relay
Message-Id:
<20090930142153.4f3d923b...@barracuda.mail.lmsintellibound.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:21:53 -0400 (EDT)

Testing out the body
cheers



What's really bad here is that all the spam comes from your IP and the
sender is also spoofed as you since you have locked down relaying from
senders with a domain other than yours.  Some chickenboner has probably
discovered your service lately...

~JasonG





 

Re: 5.7.1 smtp;550 5.7.1 Requested action not taken: message refused

[Stephan Barr]

Resolved. Turns out it was a FQDN instead of a NETBIOS domain name was used.
Changed to NETBIOS domain name and worked fine.

CHeers.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Steve Szabo  wrote:

>  Are you getting an NDR, or is the client just not receiving the message?
> Is the message leaving your device? Is it hung at your server?
>
>
>
> \\Steve//
>
>
>
> *From:* Stephan Barr [mailto:stephanbarr.li...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 29, 2009 3:30 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* 5.7.1 smtp;550 5.7.1 Requested action not taken: message
> refused
>
>
>
> Hey all.
>
>
>
> In the last few days I've been unable to send email, from my Verizon PDA
> (Motorola (9Q with Windows Mobile 6 Standard) to one of the clients I
> administer.  The client has Windows 2003 AD with Exchange 2003 fully
> patched. I can send email from my domain and Outlook client just not my cell
> phone which of course is the same email address as my Outlook client.
>
>
>
> · IMF is configured
>
> · No connection filtering
>
> · no firewall denys
>
>
>
> Any ideas?
>

Re: Blacklisted out of the blue

[King's Kid]

Could it be a bot?  We were recently blacklisted.  After doing some digging I 
found that one of our machines had a spambot on it that was causing the 
problem. 
 BJ 


No trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large number of 
electrons were terribly inconvenienced. 





From: Chris Drobny 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Sent: Wed, September 30, 2009 10:01:42 AM
Subject: RE: Blacklisted out of the blue

Currently my people using email do have to VPN in so that isn't a
problem.  The barracuda is just for filtering spam coming in I don't
think I have it relaying mail out. But maybe I am confused. Again
nothing has changed in 3 years and I am just getting these open relay
messages now.  I fought this when I first put the box up and thought I
had closed everything off.

Chris Drobny
Network/System Administrator
LMS Intellibound, Inc.
office 770.724.0562
cell 404.797.9710
cdro...@lmsintellibound.com

-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blacklisted out of the blue

> Ok so we are having trouble emailing some of our customers so I do a
> quick check to find out why.  Seems http://njabl.org/ is saying we are
an
> open relay which I had thought I had closed up years ago.

Looks like you should go through those barracuda settings again because
spammers are likely abusing your public service.  If you need to have
mobile users relay mail from the field, you need to enable and require
some kind of LDAP/AD authentication for all senders.  If the barracuda
doesn't support authenticated relaying via AD you will have to turn off
all relaying except from your exchange server.  In this case, the remote
users will have to use a vpn of some sort in order to send mail as
though
they were in the office


220 barracuda.mail.lmsintellibound.com ESMTP Service ready
helo lmsintellibound.com
250 Requested mail action okay, completed
mail from: administra...@lmsintellibound.com
250 Requested mail action okay, completed
rcpt to: x...@gmail.com
250 Requested mail action okay, completed
data
354 Start mail input; end with .
To: x...@gmail.com
From: administra...@lmsintellibound.com
Subject: Sent from an open relay

Testing out the body
cheers
.
250 Requested mail action okay, completed
quit


Found in a mailbox moments later...woops


Delivered-To: x...@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.16.65 with SMTP id n1cs224076iba;
        Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.8.136 with SMTP id h8mr5707464qah.25.1254320534533;
        Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: 
Received: from barracuda.mail.lmsintellibound.com
(mail.lmsintellibound.com [66.64.158.244])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id
27si8524489ywh.104.2009.09.30.07.22.14;
        Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of
administra...@lmsintellibound.com designates 66.64.158.244 as permitted
sender) client-ip=66.64.158.244;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess
record for domain of administra...@lmsintellibound.com designates
66.64.158.244 as permitted sender)
smtp.mail=administra...@lmsintellibound.com
To: x...@gmail.com
From: administra...@lmsintellibound.com
Subject: Sent from an open relay
Message-Id:
<20090930142153.4f3d923b...@barracuda.mail.lmsintellibound.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:21:53 -0400 (EDT)

Testing out the body
cheers



What's really bad here is that all the spam comes from your IP and the
sender is also spoofed as you since you have locked down relaying from
senders with a domain other than yours.  Some chickenboner has probably
discovered your service lately...

~JasonG


  

RE: Blacklisted out of the blue

[Jason Gurtz]

> Currently my people using email do have to VPN in so that isn't a
> problem.

That's great, all you have to do is disable anonymous relaying

>  The barracuda is just for filtering spam coming in I don't
> think I have it relaying mail out.

Maybe you don't use it for relaying, but it clearly does support it (with
the only stipulation being that the envelope from must include
@lmsintellibound.com).  How else could I have just sent a mail through
your server to an arbitrary recipient?  There's clearly no check on the
senders IP address or any lookup beyond the domain to see if a sender is
authorized to relay.

Show the below to your barracuda support channel and they should be able
to tell you how to prevent that.  While you're at it make sure your
barracuda is not configured to backscatter (this was default in older
models).  From another mailing list:

On the Barracuda Spam Firewall, the option to turn
spam bouncing off can be found in the Basic Tab under
Spam Scoring. Near the bottom there is a check box
for "Send Bounce." This is checked by default and
should be unchecked.

> 
> 220 barracuda.mail.lmsintellibound.com ESMTP Service ready
> helo lmsintellibound.com
> 250 Requested mail action okay, completed
> mail from: administra...@lmsintellibound.com
> 250 Requested mail action okay, completed
> rcpt to: x...@gmail.com
> 250 Requested mail action okay, completed
> data
> 354 Start mail input; end with .
> To: x...@gmail.com
> From: administra...@lmsintellibound.com
> Subject: Sent from an open relay
> 
> Testing out the body
> cheers
> .
> 250 Requested mail action okay, completed
> quit
> 
> 
> Found in a mailbox moments later...woops
> 
> 
> Delivered-To: x...@gmail.com
> Received: by 10.231.16.65 with SMTP id n1cs224076iba;
> Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.224.8.136 with SMTP id h8mr5707464qah.25.1254320534533;
> Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
> Return-Path: 
> Received: from barracuda.mail.lmsintellibound.com
> (mail.lmsintellibound.com [66.64.158.244])
> by mx.google.com with ESMTP id
> 27si8524489ywh.104.2009.09.30.07.22.14;
> Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of
> administra...@lmsintellibound.com designates 66.64.158.244 as permitted
> sender) client-ip=66.64.158.244;
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess
> record for domain of administra...@lmsintellibound.com designates
> 66.64.158.244 as permitted sender)
> smtp.mail=administra...@lmsintellibound.com
> To: x...@gmail.com
> From: administra...@lmsintellibound.com
> Subject: Sent from an open relay
> Message-Id:
> <20090930142153.4f3d923b...@barracuda.mail.lmsintellibound.com>
> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:21:53 -0400 (EDT)
> 
> Testing out the body
> cheers
> 

~JasonG

Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Micheal Espinola Jr]

Ahh, I miss being a network admin for the Girl Scouts...  those were the
days!
PS:  Venting publicly about your employer with your real name and email is
not a good practice to become casually familiar with.  These lists are
archived.

--
ME2


On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Gonzalez <
tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org> wrote:

>  John, I would agree with you on the entire statement, but at the org I
> work at they do as they please. I have tried numerous times on writing
> several policies and explaining the importance of utilizing these policies
> from hand held to network protocols.
>
>
>
> Then I receive that deer in the headlight look and they say ok, but it’s
> been 3 years and till this day not one of those policies has been presented
> to the directors or the board for approval. Yes the policies have been
> submitted to HR but they do not conform or even read them. The primary
> mission at the org is MEMBERSHIP. (vent)
>
>
>
> Also, you stated you run a device report; which report is that? A custom
> report or some type of third party?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Thomas
>
> *From:* Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:41 AM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>  --
>
> *From:* Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:38 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>
>
> Well the only thing with ActiveSync is you cannot restrict what devices
> connect.  So say you supply a employee with a iphone or windows mobile
> device.  You enable ActiveySync for them, then they can go out and connect
> as many devices they want and you have no control.  We have had users break
> or lose the device and they get it replace and reconnect without telling
> us.  So when I run the device report I see they have multiple devices.
>
>
>
> This is why I like the Blackberry or Good approach to device.  You must
> have the company add you and then only 1 device per person.  ActiveSync is
> free so it is limited to what it can and can’t do.  If MS really wants this
> to be a way to take Blackberry or Good out, they need to put a lot more
> control on the interface.  The other thing that really sucks is ActiveSync
> is enabled, by default, for every Exchange user.  There is no way to change
> the default setting so we run script every few days to change anyone that
> has the default setting of “not set” to disable.  If a user wants to use
> ActiveSync they have to get approval then we enable the account.
>
>
>
> *From:* Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:29 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>
>
> The other alternative is to not allow non company supplied hardware to
> connect to the corporate network.
>
>
>  --
>
> *From:* Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
> *Sent:* 30 September 2009 16:26
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
> If a user leaves the company I would hope you disable the account if not
> delete it.  If the account is disabled it will not sync.  If I remember
> correctly on the restore, it does not restore the data just the setup
> information so if a device is wiped and a user does a restore, if the
> account is disabled/deleted, it will error on the connection and there will
> be nothing on the device.
>
>
>
> *From:* Kat Collins [mailto:messagel...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:19 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>
>
> However, the other reason for a wipe is when a user leaves a company, has a
> personal iPhone that has been connected to corporate resources, and you now
> want to wipe and clear the device.  I don't want that user to EVER be able
> to reconnect and resync that device, thus the change of the password on AD
> and some other steps that can be taken to block reconnection to Exchange...
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Thomas Gonzalez <
> tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org> wrote:
>
> So John, if I interpret your comment, the THIEF would have to be on the
> mac/pc that has the backup for the iPhone device to be succesful? I ask
> since I’m not a fan of Apple and I have very little time to test this out,
> since I’m a one person IT shop.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:06 AM
>
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>
>
> This is why you force a password lock on the device, with a bad password
> attempt limit so the device will auto erase after x attemp

RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Thomas Gonzalez]

John, I would agree with you on the entire statement, but at the org I
work at they do as they please. I have tried numerous times on writing
several policies and explaining the importance of utilizing these
policies from hand held to network protocols. 

 

Then I receive that deer in the headlight look and they say ok, but it's
been 3 years and till this day not one of those policies has been
presented to the directors or the board for approval. Yes the policies
have been submitted to HR but they do not conform or even read them. The
primary mission at the org is MEMBERSHIP. (vent)

 

Also, you stated you run a device report; which report is that? A custom
report or some type of third party?

 

 

 

Thanks

 

Thomas

From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:41 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

+1

 



From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

Well the only thing with ActiveSync is you cannot restrict what devices
connect.  So say you supply a employee with a iphone or windows mobile
device.  You enable ActiveySync for them, then they can go out and
connect as many devices they want and you have no control.  We have had
users break or lose the device and they get it replace and reconnect
without telling us.  So when I run the device report I see they have
multiple devices.

 

This is why I like the Blackberry or Good approach to device.  You must
have the company add you and then only 1 device per person.  ActiveSync
is free so it is limited to what it can and can't do.  If MS really
wants this to be a way to take Blackberry or Good out, they need to put
a lot more control on the interface.  The other thing that really sucks
is ActiveSync is enabled, by default, for every Exchange user.  There is
no way to change the default setting so we run script every few days to
change anyone that has the default setting of "not set" to disable.  If
a user wants to use ActiveSync they have to get approval then we enable
the account.  

 

From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

The other alternative is to not allow non company supplied hardware to
connect to the corporate network.

 



From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com] 
Sent: 30 September 2009 16:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

If a user leaves the company I would hope you disable the account if not
delete it.  If the account is disabled it will not sync.  If I remember
correctly on the restore, it does not restore the data just the setup
information so if a device is wiped and a user does a restore, if the
account is disabled/deleted, it will error on the connection and there
will be nothing on the device.

 

From: Kat Collins [mailto:messagel...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

However, the other reason for a wipe is when a user leaves a company,
has a personal iPhone that has been connected to corporate resources,
and you now want to wipe and clear the device.  I don't want that user
to EVER be able to reconnect and resync that device, thus the change of
the password on AD and some other steps that can be taken to block
reconnection to Exchange...

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Thomas Gonzalez
 wrote:

So John, if I interpret your comment, the THIEF would have to be on the
mac/pc that has the backup for the iPhone device to be succesful? I ask
since I'm not a fan of Apple and I have very little time to test this
out, since I'm a one person IT shop.

 

 

 

From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:06 AM 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

This is why you force a password lock on the device, with a bad password
attempt limit so the device will auto erase after x attempts.  If a
device is locked, iTunes will not back it up, unless the system they are
running iTunes on has already backed up the device before.  You have to
put in the password then iTunes will recognize it.  So I guess if they
get the iphone and the mac/pc that is used to sync with then you are
SOL.

 

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

I know it's not an ideal answer, but assuming you're wiping because of a
stolen device, the th

RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Don Andrews]

+1

 



From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

Well the only thing with ActiveSync is you cannot restrict what devices
connect.  So say you supply a employee with a iphone or windows mobile
device.  You enable ActiveySync for them, then they can go out and
connect as many devices they want and you have no control.  We have had
users break or lose the device and they get it replace and reconnect
without telling us.  So when I run the device report I see they have
multiple devices.

 

This is why I like the Blackberry or Good approach to device.  You must
have the company add you and then only 1 device per person.  ActiveSync
is free so it is limited to what it can and can't do.  If MS really
wants this to be a way to take Blackberry or Good out, they need to put
a lot more control on the interface.  The other thing that really sucks
is ActiveSync is enabled, by default, for every Exchange user.  There is
no way to change the default setting so we run script every few days to
change anyone that has the default setting of "not set" to disable.  If
a user wants to use ActiveSync they have to get approval then we enable
the account.  

 

From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

The other alternative is to not allow non company supplied hardware to
connect to the corporate network.

 



From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com] 
Sent: 30 September 2009 16:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

If a user leaves the company I would hope you disable the account if not
delete it.  If the account is disabled it will not sync.  If I remember
correctly on the restore, it does not restore the data just the setup
information so if a device is wiped and a user does a restore, if the
account is disabled/deleted, it will error on the connection and there
will be nothing on the device.

 

From: Kat Collins [mailto:messagel...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

However, the other reason for a wipe is when a user leaves a company,
has a personal iPhone that has been connected to corporate resources,
and you now want to wipe and clear the device.  I don't want that user
to EVER be able to reconnect and resync that device, thus the change of
the password on AD and some other steps that can be taken to block
reconnection to Exchange...

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Thomas Gonzalez
 wrote:

So John, if I interpret your comment, the THIEF would have to be on the
mac/pc that has the backup for the iPhone device to be succesful? I ask
since I'm not a fan of Apple and I have very little time to test this
out, since I'm a one person IT shop.

 

 

 

From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:06 AM 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

This is why you force a password lock on the device, with a bad password
attempt limit so the device will auto erase after x attempts.  If a
device is locked, iTunes will not back it up, unless the system they are
running iTunes on has already backed up the device before.  You have to
put in the password then iTunes will recognize it.  So I guess if they
get the iphone and the mac/pc that is used to sync with then you are
SOL.

 

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

I know it's not an ideal answer, but assuming you're wiping because of a
stolen device, the thief will hopefully not have had time to make a
backup - and probably never would have anyway - so the "iPhone" will not
try to resync with the same credentials and, by all accounts, succeed.

 

Richard

 

From: bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Thomas Gonzalez
Sent: 30 September 2009 15:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

So if I read the thread correctly and according to THX1138 ;) 

 

On a serious note: if a iPhone has been wiped and deleted and after a
restore of the device, the credentials will reappear? I hope that's not
the case. I think I need to test this out now.

 

At our organization (Girl Scouts) we looked at BBs (too expensive for
us) so we allowed WinMobile and the iPhone...but I never tested the wipe
/ delete on the iPhone.

 

Great, now this adds a

RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Don Andrews]

+1

 



From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

The other alternative is to not allow non company supplied hardware to
connect to the corporate network.

 



From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com] 
Sent: 30 September 2009 16:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

If a user leaves the company I would hope you disable the account if not
delete it.  If the account is disabled it will not sync.  If I remember
correctly on the restore, it does not restore the data just the setup
information so if a device is wiped and a user does a restore, if the
account is disabled/deleted, it will error on the connection and there
will be nothing on the device.

 

From: Kat Collins [mailto:messagel...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

However, the other reason for a wipe is when a user leaves a company,
has a personal iPhone that has been connected to corporate resources,
and you now want to wipe and clear the device.  I don't want that user
to EVER be able to reconnect and resync that device, thus the change of
the password on AD and some other steps that can be taken to block
reconnection to Exchange...

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Thomas Gonzalez
 wrote:

So John, if I interpret your comment, the THIEF would have to be on the
mac/pc that has the backup for the iPhone device to be succesful? I ask
since I'm not a fan of Apple and I have very little time to test this
out, since I'm a one person IT shop.

 

 

 

From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:06 AM 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

This is why you force a password lock on the device, with a bad password
attempt limit so the device will auto erase after x attempts.  If a
device is locked, iTunes will not back it up, unless the system they are
running iTunes on has already backed up the device before.  You have to
put in the password then iTunes will recognize it.  So I guess if they
get the iphone and the mac/pc that is used to sync with then you are
SOL.

 

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

I know it's not an ideal answer, but assuming you're wiping because of a
stolen device, the thief will hopefully not have had time to make a
backup - and probably never would have anyway - so the "iPhone" will not
try to resync with the same credentials and, by all accounts, succeed.

 

Richard

 

From: bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Thomas Gonzalez
Sent: 30 September 2009 15:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

So if I read the thread correctly and according to THX1138 ;) 

 

On a serious note: if a iPhone has been wiped and deleted and after a
restore of the device, the credentials will reappear? I hope that's not
the case. I think I need to test this out now.

 

At our organization (Girl Scouts) we looked at BBs (too expensive for
us) so we allowed WinMobile and the iPhone...but I never tested the wipe
/ delete on the iPhone.

 

Great, now this adds another issue to my current standings..@

 

Thomas

 

From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

I'm guessing that there were 2 "yankers", Ben, and then Dave.

 



From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

I do believe that Ben is yanking your chain.

THX1138 is almost certainly a reference to the George Lucas film.  He's
indicating that these steps are not documented on Apple's support
knowledgebase.

 

I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've seen the movie so I might
be missing the allusion.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Dave Vantine 
wrote:

After seeing this info yesterday, I tried to Bing & Google it based upon
THX1138 and Apple Support + THX1138 and I get no hits. Would someone
have a URL for this article as I would like to read it.

 

Thanks in Advance

-Dave Vantine

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven M. Caesare
 wrote:

I use that support article ALL THE TIME for not-so-mainstream stuff.
Amazing how every ve

RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Senter, John]

Well the only thing with ActiveSync is you cannot restrict what devices 
connect.  So say you supply a employee with a iphone or windows mobile device.  
You enable ActiveySync for them, then they can go out and connect as many 
devices they want and you have no control.  We have had users break or lose the 
device and they get it replace and reconnect without telling us.  So when I run 
the device report I see they have multiple devices.

This is why I like the Blackberry or Good approach to device.  You must have 
the company add you and then only 1 device per person.  ActiveSync is free so 
it is limited to what it can and can't do.  If MS really wants this to be a way 
to take Blackberry or Good out, they need to put a lot more control on the 
interface.  The other thing that really sucks is ActiveSync is enabled, by 
default, for every Exchange user.  There is no way to change the default 
setting so we run script every few days to change anyone that has the default 
setting of "not set" to disable.  If a user wants to use ActiveSync they have 
to get approval then we enable the account.

From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

The other alternative is to not allow non company supplied hardware to connect 
to the corporate network.


From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
Sent: 30 September 2009 16:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
If a user leaves the company I would hope you disable the account if not delete 
it.  If the account is disabled it will not sync.  If I remember correctly on 
the restore, it does not restore the data just the setup information so if a 
device is wiped and a user does a restore, if the account is disabled/deleted, 
it will error on the connection and there will be nothing on the device.

From: Kat Collins [mailto:messagel...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

However, the other reason for a wipe is when a user leaves a company, has a 
personal iPhone that has been connected to corporate resources, and you now 
want to wipe and clear the device.  I don't want that user to EVER be able to 
reconnect and resync that device, thus the change of the password on AD and 
some other steps that can be taken to block reconnection to Exchange...
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Thomas Gonzalez 
mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org>> wrote:

So John, if I interpret your comment, the THIEF would have to be on the mac/pc 
that has the backup for the iPhone device to be succesful? I ask since I'm not 
a fan of Apple and I have very little time to test this out, since I'm a one 
person IT shop.







From: Senter, John 
[mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:06 AM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?



This is why you force a password lock on the device, with a bad password 
attempt limit so the device will auto erase after x attempts.  If a device is 
locked, iTunes will not back it up, unless the system they are running iTunes 
on has already backed up the device before.  You have to put in the password 
then iTunes will recognize it.  So I guess if they get the iphone and the 
mac/pc that is used to sync with then you are SOL.



From: Sobey, Richard A 
[mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?



I know it's not an ideal answer, but assuming you're wiping because of a stolen 
device, the thief will hopefully not have had time to make a backup - and 
probably never would have anyway - so the "iPhone" will not try to resync with 
the same credentials and, by all accounts, succeed.



Richard



From: 
bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 
[mailto:bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
 On Behalf Of Thomas Gonzalez
Sent: 30 September 2009 15:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?



So if I read the thread correctly and according to THX1138 ;)



On a serious note: if a iPhone has been wiped and deleted and after a restore 
of the device, the credentials will reappear? I hope that's not the case. I 
think I need to test this out now.



At our organization (Girl Scouts) we looked at BBs (too expensive for us) so we 
allowed WinMobile and the iPhone...but I never tested the wipe / delete on the 
iPhone.



Great, now this adds another issue to my

RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Ellis, John P.]

The other alternative is to not allow non company supplied hardware to
connect to the corporate network.



From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com] 
Sent: 30 September 2009 16:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?



If a user leaves the company I would hope you disable the account if not
delete it.  If the account is disabled it will not sync.  If I remember
correctly on the restore, it does not restore the data just the setup
information so if a device is wiped and a user does a restore, if the
account is disabled/deleted, it will error on the connection and there
will be nothing on the device.

 

From: Kat Collins [mailto:messagel...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

However, the other reason for a wipe is when a user leaves a company,
has a personal iPhone that has been connected to corporate resources,
and you now want to wipe and clear the device.  I don't want that user
to EVER be able to reconnect and resync that device, thus the change of
the password on AD and some other steps that can be taken to block
reconnection to Exchange...

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Thomas Gonzalez
 wrote:

So John, if I interpret your comment, the THIEF would have to be on the
mac/pc that has the backup for the iPhone device to be succesful? I ask
since I'm not a fan of Apple and I have very little time to test this
out, since I'm a one person IT shop.

 

 

 

From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:06 AM 


To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

This is why you force a password lock on the device, with a bad password
attempt limit so the device will auto erase after x attempts.  If a
device is locked, iTunes will not back it up, unless the system they are
running iTunes on has already backed up the device before.  You have to
put in the password then iTunes will recognize it.  So I guess if they
get the iphone and the mac/pc that is used to sync with then you are
SOL.

 

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

I know it's not an ideal answer, but assuming you're wiping because of a
stolen device, the thief will hopefully not have had time to make a
backup - and probably never would have anyway - so the "iPhone" will not
try to resync with the same credentials and, by all accounts, succeed.

 

Richard

 

From: bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Thomas Gonzalez
Sent: 30 September 2009 15:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

So if I read the thread correctly and according to THX1138 ;) 

 

On a serious note: if a iPhone has been wiped and deleted and after a
restore of the device, the credentials will reappear? I hope that's not
the case. I think I need to test this out now.

 

At our organization (Girl Scouts) we looked at BBs (too expensive for
us) so we allowed WinMobile and the iPhone...but I never tested the wipe
/ delete on the iPhone.

 

Great, now this adds another issue to my current standings..@

 

Thomas

 

From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

I'm guessing that there were 2 "yankers", Ben, and then Dave.

 



From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

I do believe that Ben is yanking your chain.

THX1138 is almost certainly a reference to the George Lucas film.  He's
indicating that these steps are not documented on Apple's support
knowledgebase.

 

I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've seen the movie so I might
be missing the allusion.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Dave Vantine 
wrote:

After seeing this info yesterday, I tried to Bing & Google it based upon
THX1138 and Apple Support + THX1138 and I get no hits. Would someone
have a URL for this article as I would like to read it.

 

Thanks in Advance

-Dave Vantine

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven M. Caesare
 wrote:

I use that support article ALL THE TIME for not-so-mainstream stuff.
Amazing how every vendor seems to have that KB ID #.

-sc


> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

> Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + rem

RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Senter, John]

If a user leaves the company I would hope you disable the account if not delete 
it.  If the account is disabled it will not sync.  If I remember correctly on 
the restore, it does not restore the data just the setup information so if a 
device is wiped and a user does a restore, if the account is disabled/deleted, 
it will error on the connection and there will be nothing on the device.

From: Kat Collins [mailto:messagel...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

However, the other reason for a wipe is when a user leaves a company, has a 
personal iPhone that has been connected to corporate resources, and you now 
want to wipe and clear the device.  I don't want that user to EVER be able to 
reconnect and resync that device, thus the change of the password on AD and 
some other steps that can be taken to block reconnection to Exchange...
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Thomas Gonzalez 
mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org>> wrote:

So John, if I interpret your comment, the THIEF would have to be on the mac/pc 
that has the backup for the iPhone device to be succesful? I ask since I'm not 
a fan of Apple and I have very little time to test this out, since I'm a one 
person IT shop.







From: Senter, John 
[mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:06 AM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?



This is why you force a password lock on the device, with a bad password 
attempt limit so the device will auto erase after x attempts.  If a device is 
locked, iTunes will not back it up, unless the system they are running iTunes 
on has already backed up the device before.  You have to put in the password 
then iTunes will recognize it.  So I guess if they get the iphone and the 
mac/pc that is used to sync with then you are SOL.



From: Sobey, Richard A 
[mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?



I know it's not an ideal answer, but assuming you're wiping because of a stolen 
device, the thief will hopefully not have had time to make a backup - and 
probably never would have anyway - so the "iPhone" will not try to resync with 
the same credentials and, by all accounts, succeed.



Richard



From: 
bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 
[mailto:bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
 On Behalf Of Thomas Gonzalez
Sent: 30 September 2009 15:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?



So if I read the thread correctly and according to THX1138 ;)



On a serious note: if a iPhone has been wiped and deleted and after a restore 
of the device, the credentials will reappear? I hope that's not the case. I 
think I need to test this out now.



At our organization (Girl Scouts) we looked at BBs (too expensive for us) so we 
allowed WinMobile and the iPhone...but I never tested the wipe / delete on the 
iPhone.



Great, now this adds another issue to my current standings..@



Thomas



From: Kim Longenbaugh 
[mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?



I'm guessing that there were 2 "yankers", Ben, and then Dave.





From: Jonathan Link 
[mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?



I do believe that Ben is yanking your chain.

THX1138 is almost certainly a reference to the George Lucas film.  He's 
indicating that these steps are not documented on Apple's support knowledgebase.



I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've seen the movie so I might be 
missing the allusion.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Dave Vantine 
mailto:dvant...@gmail.com>> wrote:

After seeing this info yesterday, I tried to Bing & Google it based upon 
THX1138 and Apple Support + THX1138 and I get no hits. Would someone have a URL 
for this article as I would like to read it.



Thanks in Advance

-Dave Vantine

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven M. Caesare 
mailto:scaes...@caesare.com>> wrote:

I use that support article ALL THE TIME for not-so-mainstream stuff.
Amazing how every vendor seems to have that KB ID #.

-sc

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issue

RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Sobey, Richard A]

If that user has left, surely the account will be disabled and/or deleted...

From: bounce-8672312-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
[mailto:bounce-8672312-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Kat 
Collins
Sent: 30 September 2009 16:19
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

However, the other reason for a wipe is when a user leaves a company, has a 
personal iPhone that has been connected to corporate resources, and you now 
want to wipe and clear the device.  I don't want that user to EVER be able to 
reconnect and resync that device, thus the change of the password on AD and 
some other steps that can be taken to block reconnection to Exchange...
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Thomas Gonzalez 
mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org>> wrote:

So John, if I interpret your comment, the THIEF would have to be on the mac/pc 
that has the backup for the iPhone device to be succesful? I ask since I'm not 
a fan of Apple and I have very little time to test this out, since I'm a one 
person IT shop.







From: Senter, John 
[mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:06 AM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?



This is why you force a password lock on the device, with a bad password 
attempt limit so the device will auto erase after x attempts.  If a device is 
locked, iTunes will not back it up, unless the system they are running iTunes 
on has already backed up the device before.  You have to put in the password 
then iTunes will recognize it.  So I guess if they get the iphone and the 
mac/pc that is used to sync with then you are SOL.



From: Sobey, Richard A 
[mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?



I know it's not an ideal answer, but assuming you're wiping because of a stolen 
device, the thief will hopefully not have had time to make a backup - and 
probably never would have anyway - so the "iPhone" will not try to resync with 
the same credentials and, by all accounts, succeed.



Richard



From: 
bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
 
[mailto:bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com]
 On Behalf Of Thomas Gonzalez
Sent: 30 September 2009 15:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?



So if I read the thread correctly and according to THX1138 ;)



On a serious note: if a iPhone has been wiped and deleted and after a restore 
of the device, the credentials will reappear? I hope that's not the case. I 
think I need to test this out now.



At our organization (Girl Scouts) we looked at BBs (too expensive for us) so we 
allowed WinMobile and the iPhone...but I never tested the wipe / delete on the 
iPhone.



Great, now this adds another issue to my current standings..@



Thomas



From: Kim Longenbaugh 
[mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?



I'm guessing that there were 2 "yankers", Ben, and then Dave.





From: Jonathan Link 
[mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?



I do believe that Ben is yanking your chain.

THX1138 is almost certainly a reference to the George Lucas film.  He's 
indicating that these steps are not documented on Apple's support knowledgebase.



I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've seen the movie so I might be 
missing the allusion.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Dave Vantine 
mailto:dvant...@gmail.com>> wrote:

After seeing this info yesterday, I tried to Bing & Google it based upon 
THX1138 and Apple Support + THX1138 and I get no hits. Would someone have a URL 
for this article as I would like to read it.



Thanks in Advance

-Dave Vantine

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven M. Caesare 
mailto:scaes...@caesare.com>> wrote:

I use that support article ALL THE TIME for not-so-mainstream stuff.
Amazing how every vendor seems to have that KB ID #.

-sc

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

> Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Kurt Buff 
> mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
> > Turn off ActiveSync?
>
>   Turn off Activesync, delete the user account, uni

RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Senter, John]

Yes. I just tested it on my system.  My primary PC is where I do all the iphone 
sync'ing so when I connected it itunes recognized the device and allowed me to 
do a backup.  This was while the iphone was locked.  I then plugged it into a 
mac I have and it popped up a box stating the device was locked and needed to 
be unlocked before iTunes could access it.

So if they steal just the iphone and you have a ActiveSync policy to have a 5 
min timeout with mandatory password and say a 8 attempt before erase; they will 
get 8 tries before the device gets completely wiped, OS and all.  Also on the 
iphone after a couple of tries the device stops accepting password attemps for 
1 min so they will have to take a little while to get the erase to occur.

Oh one more thing, on the ActiveSync policy, do not set the option to force 
encryption.  I have read that on the 2G and 3G devices it can cause corruption 
on the phone.  The 3GS is the only device that supports encryption, but the 
ActiveSync app on the iphone does not stop the policy correctly.

From: Thomas Gonzalez [mailto:tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

So John, if I interpret your comment, the THIEF would have to be on the mac/pc 
that has the backup for the iPhone device to be succesful? I ask since I'm not 
a fan of Apple and I have very little time to test this out, since I'm a one 
person IT shop.



From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

This is why you force a password lock on the device, with a bad password 
attempt limit so the device will auto erase after x attempts.  If a device is 
locked, iTunes will not back it up, unless the system they are running iTunes 
on has already backed up the device before.  You have to put in the password 
then iTunes will recognize it.  So I guess if they get the iphone and the 
mac/pc that is used to sync with then you are SOL.

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

I know it's not an ideal answer, but assuming you're wiping because of a stolen 
device, the thief will hopefully not have had time to make a backup - and 
probably never would have anyway - so the "iPhone" will not try to resync with 
the same credentials and, by all accounts, succeed.

Richard

From: bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
[mailto:bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Thomas 
Gonzalez
Sent: 30 September 2009 15:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

So if I read the thread correctly and according to THX1138 ;)

On a serious note: if a iPhone has been wiped and deleted and after a restore 
of the device, the credentials will reappear? I hope that's not the case. I 
think I need to test this out now.

At our organization (Girl Scouts) we looked at BBs (too expensive for us) so we 
allowed WinMobile and the iPhone...but I never tested the wipe / delete on the 
iPhone.

Great, now this adds another issue to my current standings..@

Thomas

From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

I'm guessing that there were 2 "yankers", Ben, and then Dave.


From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

I do believe that Ben is yanking your chain.
THX1138 is almost certainly a reference to the George Lucas film.  He's 
indicating that these steps are not documented on Apple's support knowledgebase.

I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've seen the movie so I might be 
missing the allusion.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Dave Vantine 
mailto:dvant...@gmail.com>> wrote:
After seeing this info yesterday, I tried to Bing & Google it based upon 
THX1138 and Apple Support + THX1138 and I get no hits. Would someone have a URL 
for this article as I would like to read it.

Thanks in Advance
-Dave Vantine
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven M. Caesare 
mailto:scaes...@caesare.com>> wrote:
I use that support article ALL THE TIME for not-so-mainstream stuff.
Amazing how every vendor seems to have that KB ID #.

-sc

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 a

Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Kat Collins]

However, the other reason for a wipe is when a user leaves a company, has a
personal iPhone that has been connected to corporate resources, and you now
want to wipe and clear the device.  I don't want that user to EVER be able
to reconnect and resync that device, thus the change of the password on AD
and some other steps that can be taken to block reconnection to Exchange...

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Thomas Gonzalez <
tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org> wrote:

>  So John, if I interpret your comment, the THIEF would have to be on the
> mac/pc that has the backup for the iPhone device to be succesful? I ask
> since I’m not a fan of Apple and I have very little time to test this out,
> since I’m a one person IT shop.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:06 AM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>
>
> This is why you force a password lock on the device, with a bad password
> attempt limit so the device will auto erase after x attempts.  If a device
> is locked, iTunes will not back it up, unless the system they are running
> iTunes on has already backed up the device before.  You have to put in the
> password then iTunes will recognize it.  So I guess if they get the iphone
> and the mac/pc that is used to sync with then you are SOL.
>
>
>
> *From:* Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:49 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>
>
> I know it’s not an ideal answer, but assuming you’re wiping because of a
> stolen device, the thief will hopefully not have had time to make a backup –
> and probably never would have anyway – so the “iPhone” will not try to
> resync with the same credentials and, by all accounts, succeed.
>
>
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> *From:* bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:
> bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] *On Behalf Of *Thomas
> Gonzalez
> *Sent:* 30 September 2009 15:43
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>
>
> So if I read the thread correctly and according to THX1138 ;)
>
>
>
> On a serious note: if a iPhone has been wiped and deleted and after a
> restore of the device, the credentials will reappear? I hope that’s not the
> case. I think I need to test this out now.
>
>
>
> At our organization (Girl Scouts) we looked at BBs (too expensive for us)
> so we allowed WinMobile and the iPhone…but I never tested the wipe / delete
> on the iPhone.
>
>
>
> Great, now this adds another issue to my current standings…...@
>
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> *From:* Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:32 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>
>
> I’m guessing that there were 2 “yankers”, Ben, and then Dave.
>
>
>  --
>
> *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:20 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>
>
> I do believe that Ben is yanking your chain.
>
> THX1138 is almost certainly a reference to the George Lucas film.  He's
> indicating that these steps are not documented on Apple's support
> knowledgebase.
>
>
>
> I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've seen the movie so I might be
> missing the allusion.
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Dave Vantine  wrote:
>
> After seeing this info yesterday, I tried to Bing & Google it based upon
> THX1138 and Apple Support + THX1138 and I get no hits. Would someone have a
> URL for this article as I would like to read it.
>
>
>
> Thanks in Advance
>
> -Dave Vantine
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven M. Caesare 
> wrote:
>
> I use that support article ALL THE TIME for not-so-mainstream stuff.
> Amazing how every vendor seems to have that KB ID #.
>
> -sc
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>
> > Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Kurt Buff 
> wrote:
> > > Turn off ActiveSync?
> >
> >   Turn off Activesync, delete the user account, uninstall iTunes,
> > smash up the iPhone with a hammer, reformat the server hard drives,
> > and have the Exchange administrator shot.
> >
> >   It's all documented in Apple Support Article THX1138.
> >
> >   ;-)
> >
> > -- Ben
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> Dave Vantine
>
>
>
>
>
> *GSSWT's Vision Statement: Our vision is to be a high performing,
> girl-focused staff with the desire and skill set to provide the highest
> standard of support that enriches, empowers and energizes the local

RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Thomas Gonzalez]

So John, if I interpret your comment, the THIEF would have to be on the
mac/pc that has the backup for the iPhone device to be succesful? I ask
since I'm not a fan of Apple and I have very little time to test this
out, since I'm a one person IT shop.

 

 

 

From: Senter, John [mailto:john.sen...@etrade.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

This is why you force a password lock on the device, with a bad password
attempt limit so the device will auto erase after x attempts.  If a
device is locked, iTunes will not back it up, unless the system they are
running iTunes on has already backed up the device before.  You have to
put in the password then iTunes will recognize it.  So I guess if they
get the iphone and the mac/pc that is used to sync with then you are
SOL.

 

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

I know it's not an ideal answer, but assuming you're wiping because of a
stolen device, the thief will hopefully not have had time to make a
backup - and probably never would have anyway - so the "iPhone" will not
try to resync with the same credentials and, by all accounts, succeed.

 

Richard

 

From: bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Thomas Gonzalez
Sent: 30 September 2009 15:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

So if I read the thread correctly and according to THX1138 ;) 

 

On a serious note: if a iPhone has been wiped and deleted and after a
restore of the device, the credentials will reappear? I hope that's not
the case. I think I need to test this out now.

 

At our organization (Girl Scouts) we looked at BBs (too expensive for
us) so we allowed WinMobile and the iPhone...but I never tested the wipe
/ delete on the iPhone.

 

Great, now this adds another issue to my current standings..@

 

Thomas

 

From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

I'm guessing that there were 2 "yankers", Ben, and then Dave.

 



From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

I do believe that Ben is yanking your chain.

THX1138 is almost certainly a reference to the George Lucas film.  He's
indicating that these steps are not documented on Apple's support
knowledgebase.

 

I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've seen the movie so I might
be missing the allusion.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Dave Vantine 
wrote:

After seeing this info yesterday, I tried to Bing & Google it based upon
THX1138 and Apple Support + THX1138 and I get no hits. Would someone
have a URL for this article as I would like to read it.

 

Thanks in Advance

-Dave Vantine

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven M. Caesare
 wrote:

I use that support article ALL THE TIME for not-so-mainstream stuff.
Amazing how every vendor seems to have that KB ID #.

-sc


> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

> Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Kurt Buff 
wrote:
> > Turn off ActiveSync?
>
>   Turn off Activesync, delete the user account, uninstall iTunes,
> smash up the iPhone with a hammer, reformat the server hard drives,
> and have the Exchange administrator shot.
>
>   It's all documented in Apple Support Article THX1138.
>
>   ;-)
>
> -- Ben





 

-- 
Thanks
Dave Vantine

 

 

GSSWT's Vision Statement: Our vision is to be a high performing,
girl-focused staff with the desire and skill set to provide the highest
standard of support that enriches, empowers and energizes the local Girl
Scout Movement.  In doing so, we create a lifetime of inspiration
through Girl Scout experiences that are so relevant and inclusive every
girl will want to be a part. 




This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of 
Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make 
sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept 
responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or 
attachme

RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Senter, John]

This is why you force a password lock on the device, with a bad password 
attempt limit so the device will auto erase after x attempts.  If a device is 
locked, iTunes will not back it up, unless the system they are running iTunes 
on has already backed up the device before.  You have to put in the password 
then iTunes will recognize it.  So I guess if they get the iphone and the 
mac/pc that is used to sync with then you are SOL.

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

I know it's not an ideal answer, but assuming you're wiping because of a stolen 
device, the thief will hopefully not have had time to make a backup - and 
probably never would have anyway - so the "iPhone" will not try to resync with 
the same credentials and, by all accounts, succeed.

Richard

From: bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
[mailto:bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Thomas 
Gonzalez
Sent: 30 September 2009 15:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

So if I read the thread correctly and according to THX1138 ;)

On a serious note: if a iPhone has been wiped and deleted and after a restore 
of the device, the credentials will reappear? I hope that's not the case. I 
think I need to test this out now.

At our organization (Girl Scouts) we looked at BBs (too expensive for us) so we 
allowed WinMobile and the iPhone...but I never tested the wipe / delete on the 
iPhone.

Great, now this adds another issue to my current standings..@

Thomas

From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

I'm guessing that there were 2 "yankers", Ben, and then Dave.


From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

I do believe that Ben is yanking your chain.
THX1138 is almost certainly a reference to the George Lucas film.  He's 
indicating that these steps are not documented on Apple's support knowledgebase.

I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've seen the movie so I might be 
missing the allusion.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Dave Vantine 
mailto:dvant...@gmail.com>> wrote:
After seeing this info yesterday, I tried to Bing & Google it based upon 
THX1138 and Apple Support + THX1138 and I get no hits. Would someone have a URL 
for this article as I would like to read it.

Thanks in Advance
-Dave Vantine
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven M. Caesare 
mailto:scaes...@caesare.com>> wrote:
I use that support article ALL THE TIME for not-so-mainstream stuff.
Amazing how every vendor seems to have that KB ID #.

-sc

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Kurt Buff 
> mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
> > Turn off ActiveSync?
>
>   Turn off Activesync, delete the user account, uninstall iTunes,
> smash up the iPhone with a hammer, reformat the server hard drives,
> and have the Exchange administrator shot.
>
>   It's all documented in Apple Support Article THX1138.
>
>   ;-)
>
> -- Ben



--
Thanks
Dave Vantine




GSSWT's Vision Statement: Our vision is to be a high performing, girl-focused 
staff with the desire and skill set to provide the highest standard of support 
that enriches, empowers and energizes the local Girl Scout Movement.  In doing 
so, we create a lifetime of inspiration through Girl Scout experiences that are 
so relevant and inclusive every girl will want to be a part.

RE: Blacklisted out of the blue

[Chris Drobny]

Currently my people using email do have to VPN in so that isn't a
problem.  The barracuda is just for filtering spam coming in I don't
think I have it relaying mail out. But maybe I am confused. Again
nothing has changed in 3 years and I am just getting these open relay
messages now.  I fought this when I first put the box up and thought I
had closed everything off.

Chris Drobny
Network/System Administrator
LMS Intellibound, Inc.
office 770.724.0562
cell 404.797.9710
cdro...@lmsintellibound.com

-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blacklisted out of the blue

> Ok so we are having trouble emailing some of our customers so I do a
> quick check to find out why.  Seems http://njabl.org/ is saying we are
an
> open relay which I had thought I had closed up years ago.

Looks like you should go through those barracuda settings again because
spammers are likely abusing your public service.  If you need to have
mobile users relay mail from the field, you need to enable and require
some kind of LDAP/AD authentication for all senders.  If the barracuda
doesn't support authenticated relaying via AD you will have to turn off
all relaying except from your exchange server.  In this case, the remote
users will have to use a vpn of some sort in order to send mail as
though
they were in the office


220 barracuda.mail.lmsintellibound.com ESMTP Service ready
helo lmsintellibound.com
250 Requested mail action okay, completed
mail from: administra...@lmsintellibound.com
250 Requested mail action okay, completed
rcpt to: x...@gmail.com
250 Requested mail action okay, completed
data
354 Start mail input; end with .
To: x...@gmail.com
From: administra...@lmsintellibound.com
Subject: Sent from an open relay

Testing out the body
cheers
.
250 Requested mail action okay, completed
quit


Found in a mailbox moments later...woops


Delivered-To: x...@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.16.65 with SMTP id n1cs224076iba;
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.8.136 with SMTP id h8mr5707464qah.25.1254320534533;
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: 
Received: from barracuda.mail.lmsintellibound.com
(mail.lmsintellibound.com [66.64.158.244])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id
27si8524489ywh.104.2009.09.30.07.22.14;
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of
administra...@lmsintellibound.com designates 66.64.158.244 as permitted
sender) client-ip=66.64.158.244;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess
record for domain of administra...@lmsintellibound.com designates
66.64.158.244 as permitted sender)
smtp.mail=administra...@lmsintellibound.com
To: x...@gmail.com
From: administra...@lmsintellibound.com
Subject: Sent from an open relay
Message-Id:
<20090930142153.4f3d923b...@barracuda.mail.lmsintellibound.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:21:53 -0400 (EDT)

Testing out the body
cheers



What's really bad here is that all the spam comes from your IP and the
sender is also spoofed as you since you have locked down relaying from
senders with a domain other than yours.  Some chickenboner has probably
discovered your service lately...

~JasonG

Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Jonathan Link]

I'm assuming you would force a password reset on the person who had the
device stolen, too?



On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Thomas Gonzalez <
tgonza...@girlscouts-swtx.org> wrote:

>  Hmmm…ok I guess that may make some sense…but I’m going to have to test
> this out. Since we have only 3 iPhones on the network and 6 winmobiles, I’ll
> take one of the iPhones and run the testing of wipe / delete and act like a
> thief and see what happens.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:49 AM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>
>
> I know it’s not an ideal answer, but assuming you’re wiping because of a
> stolen device, the thief will hopefully not have had time to make a backup –
> and probably never would have anyway – so the “iPhone” will not try to
> resync with the same credentials and, by all accounts, succeed.
>
>
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> *From:* bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com [mailto:
> bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] *On Behalf Of *Thomas
> Gonzalez
> *Sent:* 30 September 2009 15:43
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>
>
> So if I read the thread correctly and according to THX1138 ;)
>
>
>
> On a serious note: if a iPhone has been wiped and deleted and after a
> restore of the device, the credentials will reappear? I hope that’s not the
> case. I think I need to test this out now.
>
>
>
> At our organization (Girl Scouts) we looked at BBs (too expensive for us)
> so we allowed WinMobile and the iPhone…but I never tested the wipe / delete
> on the iPhone.
>
>
>
> Great, now this adds another issue to my current standings…...@
>
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> *From:* Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:32 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>
>
> I’m guessing that there were 2 “yankers”, Ben, and then Dave.
>
>
>  --
>
> *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:20 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>
>
> I do believe that Ben is yanking your chain.
>
> THX1138 is almost certainly a reference to the George Lucas film.  He's
> indicating that these steps are not documented on Apple's support
> knowledgebase.
>
>
>
> I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've seen the movie so I might be
> missing the allusion.
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Dave Vantine  wrote:
>
> After seeing this info yesterday, I tried to Bing & Google it based upon
> THX1138 and Apple Support + THX1138 and I get no hits. Would someone have a
> URL for this article as I would like to read it.
>
>
>
> Thanks in Advance
>
> -Dave Vantine
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven M. Caesare 
> wrote:
>
> I use that support article ALL THE TIME for not-so-mainstream stuff.
> Amazing how every vendor seems to have that KB ID #.
>
> -sc
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>
> > Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Kurt Buff 
> wrote:
> > > Turn off ActiveSync?
> >
> >   Turn off Activesync, delete the user account, uninstall iTunes,
> > smash up the iPhone with a hammer, reformat the server hard drives,
> > and have the Exchange administrator shot.
> >
> >   It's all documented in Apple Support Article THX1138.
> >
> >   ;-)
> >
> > -- Ben
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> Dave Vantine
>
>
>
>
>
> *GSSWT's Vision Statement: Our vision is to be a high performing,
> girl-focused staff with the desire and skill set to provide the highest
> standard of support that enriches, empowers and energizes the local Girl
> Scout Movement.  In doing so, we create a lifetime of inspiration through
> Girl Scout experiences that are so relevant and inclusive every girl will
> want to be a part.*
>
> **
>
> *GSSWT's Vision Statement: Our vision is to be a high performing,
> girl-focused staff with the desire and skill set to provide the highest
> standard of support that enriches, empowers and energizes the local Girl
> Scout Movement.  In doing so, we create a lifetime of inspiration through
> Girl Scout experiences that are so relevant and inclusive every girl will
> want to be a part.*
>

RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Thomas Gonzalez]

Hmmm...ok I guess that may make some sense...but I'm going to have to
test this out. Since we have only 3 iPhones on the network and 6
winmobiles, I'll take one of the iPhones and run the testing of wipe /
delete and act like a thief and see what happens.

 

 

Thanks,

 

Thomas

 

 

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

I know it's not an ideal answer, but assuming you're wiping because of a
stolen device, the thief will hopefully not have had time to make a
backup - and probably never would have anyway - so the "iPhone" will not
try to resync with the same credentials and, by all accounts, succeed.

 

Richard

 

From: bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of
Thomas Gonzalez
Sent: 30 September 2009 15:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

So if I read the thread correctly and according to THX1138 ;) 

 

On a serious note: if a iPhone has been wiped and deleted and after a
restore of the device, the credentials will reappear? I hope that's not
the case. I think I need to test this out now.

 

At our organization (Girl Scouts) we looked at BBs (too expensive for
us) so we allowed WinMobile and the iPhone...but I never tested the wipe
/ delete on the iPhone.

 

Great, now this adds another issue to my current standings..@

 

Thomas

 

From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

I'm guessing that there were 2 "yankers", Ben, and then Dave.

 



From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

I do believe that Ben is yanking your chain.

THX1138 is almost certainly a reference to the George Lucas film.  He's
indicating that these steps are not documented on Apple's support
knowledgebase.

 

I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've seen the movie so I might
be missing the allusion.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Dave Vantine 
wrote:

After seeing this info yesterday, I tried to Bing & Google it based upon
THX1138 and Apple Support + THX1138 and I get no hits. Would someone
have a URL for this article as I would like to read it.

 

Thanks in Advance

-Dave Vantine

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven M. Caesare
 wrote:

I use that support article ALL THE TIME for not-so-mainstream stuff.
Amazing how every vendor seems to have that KB ID #.

-sc


> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

> Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Kurt Buff 
wrote:
> > Turn off ActiveSync?
>
>   Turn off Activesync, delete the user account, uninstall iTunes,
> smash up the iPhone with a hammer, reformat the server hard drives,
> and have the Exchange administrator shot.
>
>   It's all documented in Apple Support Article THX1138.
>
>   ;-)
>
> -- Ben





 

-- 
Thanks
Dave Vantine

 

 

GSSWT's Vision Statement: Our vision is to be a high performing,
girl-focused staff with the desire and skill set to provide the highest
standard of support that enriches, empowers and energizes the local Girl
Scout Movement.  In doing so, we create a lifetime of inspiration
through Girl Scout experiences that are so relevant and inclusive every
girl will want to be a part. 




This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of 
Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make 
sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept 
responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or 
attachments.

RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Sobey, Richard A]

I know it's not an ideal answer, but assuming you're wiping because of a stolen 
device, the thief will hopefully not have had time to make a backup - and 
probably never would have anyway - so the "iPhone" will not try to resync with 
the same credentials and, by all accounts, succeed.

Richard

From: bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
[mailto:bounce-8672283-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Thomas 
Gonzalez
Sent: 30 September 2009 15:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

So if I read the thread correctly and according to THX1138 ;)

On a serious note: if a iPhone has been wiped and deleted and after a restore 
of the device, the credentials will reappear? I hope that's not the case. I 
think I need to test this out now.

At our organization (Girl Scouts) we looked at BBs (too expensive for us) so we 
allowed WinMobile and the iPhone...but I never tested the wipe / delete on the 
iPhone.

Great, now this adds another issue to my current standings..@

Thomas

From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

I'm guessing that there were 2 "yankers", Ben, and then Dave.


From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

I do believe that Ben is yanking your chain.
THX1138 is almost certainly a reference to the George Lucas film.  He's 
indicating that these steps are not documented on Apple's support knowledgebase.

I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've seen the movie so I might be 
missing the allusion.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Dave Vantine 
mailto:dvant...@gmail.com>> wrote:
After seeing this info yesterday, I tried to Bing & Google it based upon 
THX1138 and Apple Support + THX1138 and I get no hits. Would someone have a URL 
for this article as I would like to read it.

Thanks in Advance
-Dave Vantine
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven M. Caesare 
mailto:scaes...@caesare.com>> wrote:
I use that support article ALL THE TIME for not-so-mainstream stuff.
Amazing how every vendor seems to have that KB ID #.

-sc

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Kurt Buff 
> mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
> > Turn off ActiveSync?
>
>   Turn off Activesync, delete the user account, uninstall iTunes,
> smash up the iPhone with a hammer, reformat the server hard drives,
> and have the Exchange administrator shot.
>
>   It's all documented in Apple Support Article THX1138.
>
>   ;-)
>
> -- Ben



--
Thanks
Dave Vantine




GSSWT's Vision Statement: Our vision is to be a high performing, girl-focused 
staff with the desire and skill set to provide the highest standard of support 
that enriches, empowers and energizes the local Girl Scout Movement.  In doing 
so, we create a lifetime of inspiration through Girl Scout experiences that are 
so relevant and inclusive every girl will want to be a part.

Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Micheal Espinola Jr]

Indeed.
IIRC, THX 138 is a movie about an over-developed society that enforces
strict social laws based on what has turned into lies.

Sure sounds like Apple to me.  :-)

--
ME2


On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Maglinger, Paul wrote:

>  As evidenced by the ";-)" at the end of his message?
>
>  --
> *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:20 AM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
>  I do believe that Ben is yanking your chain.
> THX1138 is almost certainly a reference to the George Lucas film.  He's
> indicating that these steps are not documented on Apple's support
> knowledgebase.
>
> I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've seen the movie so I might be
> missing the allusion.
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Dave Vantine  wrote:
>
>> After seeing this info yesterday, I tried to Bing & Google it based upon
>> THX1138 and Apple Support + THX1138 and I get no hits. Would someone have a
>> URL for this article as I would like to read it.
>>
>> Thanks in Advance
>> -Dave Vantine
>>
>>   On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven M. Caesare <
>> scaes...@caesare.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I use that support article ALL THE TIME for not-so-mainstream stuff.
>>> Amazing how every vendor seems to have that KB ID #.
>>>
>>> -sc
>>>
>>> > -Original Message-
>>> > From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
>>> > Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 PM
>>> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>>>  > Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Kurt Buff 
>>> wrote:
>>> > > Turn off ActiveSync?
>>> >
>>> >   Turn off Activesync, delete the user account, uninstall iTunes,
>>> > smash up the iPhone with a hammer, reformat the server hard drives,
>>> > and have the Exchange administrator shot.
>>> >
>>> >   It's all documented in Apple Support Article THX1138.
>>> >
>>> >   ;-)
>>> >
>>> > -- Ben
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks
>> Dave Vantine
>>
>
>

RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Thomas Gonzalez]

So if I read the thread correctly and according to THX1138 ;) 

 

On a serious note: if a iPhone has been wiped and deleted and after a
restore of the device, the credentials will reappear? I hope that's not
the case. I think I need to test this out now.

 

At our organization (Girl Scouts) we looked at BBs (too expensive for
us) so we allowed WinMobile and the iPhone...but I never tested the wipe
/ delete on the iPhone.

 

Great, now this adds another issue to my current standings..@

 

Thomas

 

From: Kim Longenbaugh [mailto:k...@colonialsavings.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

I'm guessing that there were 2 "yankers", Ben, and then Dave.

 



From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

I do believe that Ben is yanking your chain.

THX1138 is almost certainly a reference to the George Lucas film.  He's
indicating that these steps are not documented on Apple's support
knowledgebase.

 

I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've seen the movie so I might
be missing the allusion.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Dave Vantine 
wrote:

After seeing this info yesterday, I tried to Bing & Google it based upon
THX1138 and Apple Support + THX1138 and I get no hits. Would someone
have a URL for this article as I would like to read it.

 

Thanks in Advance

-Dave Vantine

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven M. Caesare
 wrote:

I use that support article ALL THE TIME for not-so-mainstream stuff.
Amazing how every vendor seems to have that KB ID #.

-sc


> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

> Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Kurt Buff 
wrote:
> > Turn off ActiveSync?
>
>   Turn off Activesync, delete the user account, uninstall iTunes,
> smash up the iPhone with a hammer, reformat the server hard drives,
> and have the Exchange administrator shot.
>
>   It's all documented in Apple Support Article THX1138.
>
>   ;-)
>
> -- Ben







 

-- 
Thanks
Dave Vantine

 




This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl Scouts of 
Southwest Texas company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make 
sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept 
responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or 
attachments.

RE: Blacklisted out of the blue

[Jason Gurtz]

> Ok so we are having trouble emailing some of our customers so I do a
> quick check to find out why.  Seems http://njabl.org/ is saying we are
an
> open relay which I had thought I had closed up years ago.

Looks like you should go through those barracuda settings again because
spammers are likely abusing your public service.  If you need to have
mobile users relay mail from the field, you need to enable and require
some kind of LDAP/AD authentication for all senders.  If the barracuda
doesn't support authenticated relaying via AD you will have to turn off
all relaying except from your exchange server.  In this case, the remote
users will have to use a vpn of some sort in order to send mail as though
they were in the office


220 barracuda.mail.lmsintellibound.com ESMTP Service ready
helo lmsintellibound.com
250 Requested mail action okay, completed
mail from: administra...@lmsintellibound.com
250 Requested mail action okay, completed
rcpt to: x...@gmail.com
250 Requested mail action okay, completed
data
354 Start mail input; end with .
To: x...@gmail.com
From: administra...@lmsintellibound.com
Subject: Sent from an open relay

Testing out the body
cheers
.
250 Requested mail action okay, completed
quit


Found in a mailbox moments later...woops


Delivered-To: x...@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.16.65 with SMTP id n1cs224076iba;
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.8.136 with SMTP id h8mr5707464qah.25.1254320534533;
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: 
Received: from barracuda.mail.lmsintellibound.com
(mail.lmsintellibound.com [66.64.158.244])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id
27si8524489ywh.104.2009.09.30.07.22.14;
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of
administra...@lmsintellibound.com designates 66.64.158.244 as permitted
sender) client-ip=66.64.158.244;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess
record for domain of administra...@lmsintellibound.com designates
66.64.158.244 as permitted sender)
smtp.mail=administra...@lmsintellibound.com
To: x...@gmail.com
From: administra...@lmsintellibound.com
Subject: Sent from an open relay
Message-Id:
<20090930142153.4f3d923b...@barracuda.mail.lmsintellibound.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:21:53 -0400 (EDT)

Testing out the body
cheers



What's really bad here is that all the spam comes from your IP and the
sender is also spoofed as you since you have locked down relaying from
senders with a domain other than yours.  Some chickenboner has probably
discovered your service lately...

~JasonG

RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Kim Longenbaugh]

I'm guessing that there were 2 "yankers", Ben, and then Dave.

 



From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

 

I do believe that Ben is yanking your chain.

THX1138 is almost certainly a reference to the George Lucas film.  He's
indicating that these steps are not documented on Apple's support
knowledgebase.

 

I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've seen the movie so I might
be missing the allusion.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Dave Vantine 
wrote:

After seeing this info yesterday, I tried to Bing & Google it based upon
THX1138 and Apple Support + THX1138 and I get no hits. Would someone
have a URL for this article as I would like to read it.

 

Thanks in Advance

-Dave Vantine

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven M. Caesare
 wrote:

I use that support article ALL THE TIME for not-so-mainstream stuff.
Amazing how every vendor seems to have that KB ID #.

-sc


> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

> Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Kurt Buff 
wrote:
> > Turn off ActiveSync?
>
>   Turn off Activesync, delete the user account, uninstall iTunes,
> smash up the iPhone with a hammer, reformat the server hard drives,
> and have the Exchange administrator shot.
>
>   It's all documented in Apple Support Article THX1138.
>
>   ;-)
>
> -- Ben








 

-- 
Thanks
Dave Vantine

 

RE: Blacklisted out of the blue

[Doug Rooney]

I had this happen about 2 years ago, I signed up with MessageLabs, never
had a problem since.

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com 

 

 

 

From: Chris Drobny [mailto:cdro...@lmsintellibound.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 7:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blacklisted out of the blue

 

Ok so we are having trouble emailing some of our customers so I do a
quick check to find out why.  Seems http://njabl.org/ is saying we are
an open relay which I had thought I had closed up years ago.  So I go
thru google searching on how to find and close this, I followed MS idea
some other random ideas and I am not seeing the issue.  I run some tests
on the web and it says I am fine.  I have run the test on abuse.net and
it says im ok but may or may not be an open relay.  I am getting towards
my wits end, can anyone help.

 

Chris Drobny

Network/System Administrator

LMS Intellibound, Inc.

office 770.724.0562

cell 404.797.9710

cdro...@lmsintellibound.com

 

RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Maglinger, Paul]

As evidenced by the ";-)" at the end of his message?



From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?


I do believe that Ben is yanking your chain.
THX1138 is almost certainly a reference to the George Lucas film.  He's
indicating that these steps are not documented on Apple's support
knowledgebase.
 
I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've seen the movie so I might
be missing the allusion.


On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Dave Vantine 
wrote:


After seeing this info yesterday, I tried to Bing & Google it
based upon THX1138 and Apple Support + THX1138 and I get no hits. Would
someone have a URL for this article as I would like to read it.
 
Thanks in Advance
-Dave Vantine


On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven M. Caesare
 wrote:


I use that support article ALL THE TIME for
not-so-mainstream stuff.
Amazing how every vendor seems to have that KB ID #.

-sc


> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

> Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove
partnership = ?
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Kurt Buff

wrote:
> > Turn off ActiveSync?
>
>   Turn off Activesync, delete the user account,
uninstall iTunes,
> smash up the iPhone with a hammer, reformat the server
hard drives,
> and have the Exchange administrator shot.
>
>   It's all documented in Apple Support Article
THX1138.
>
>   ;-)
>
> -- Ben








-- 
Thanks
Dave Vantine

Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Jonathan Link]

I do believe that Ben is yanking your chain.
THX1138 is almost certainly a reference to the George Lucas film.  He's
indicating that these steps are not documented on Apple's support
knowledgebase.

I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've seen the movie so I might be
missing the allusion.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Dave Vantine  wrote:

> After seeing this info yesterday, I tried to Bing & Google it based upon
> THX1138 and Apple Support + THX1138 and I get no hits. Would someone have a
> URL for this article as I would like to read it.
>
> Thanks in Advance
> -Dave Vantine
>
>   On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven M. Caesare  > wrote:
>
>> I use that support article ALL THE TIME for not-so-mainstream stuff.
>> Amazing how every vendor seems to have that KB ID #.
>>
>> -sc
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 PM
>> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>>  > Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Kurt Buff 
>> wrote:
>> > > Turn off ActiveSync?
>> >
>> >   Turn off Activesync, delete the user account, uninstall iTunes,
>> > smash up the iPhone with a hammer, reformat the server hard drives,
>> > and have the Exchange administrator shot.
>> >
>> >   It's all documented in Apple Support Article THX1138.
>> >
>> >   ;-)
>> >
>> > -- Ben
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> Dave Vantine
>

RE: Blacklisted out of the blue

[Carl Houseman]

Go to the source and ask the horse:

 

http://njabl.org/method.html

 

"If you would like your server tested, use telnet to connect to port 2500 on
rt.njabl.org from the server you want tested. Your server will be tested and
you will see the results of the test as it is run.

Note: If you are not sure how your system was used as an open relay, you can
telnet as instructed above and the SMTP conversation will display in real
time as your system is (re)tested, demonstrating the combination of to/from
addresses which result in your system acting as an open relay."

 

From: Chris Drobny [mailto:cdro...@lmsintellibound.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:08 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blacklisted out of the blue

 

Ok so we are having trouble emailing some of our customers so I do a quick
check to find out why.  Seems http://njabl.org/ is saying we are an open
relay which I had thought I had closed up years ago.  So I go thru google
searching on how to find and close this, I followed MS idea some other
random ideas and I am not seeing the issue.  I run some tests on the web and
it says I am fine.  I have run the test on abuse.net and it says im ok but
may or may not be an open relay.  I am getting towards my wits end, can
anyone help.

 

Chris Drobny

Network/System Administrator

LMS Intellibound, Inc.

office 770.724.0562

cell 404.797.9710

cdro...@lmsintellibound.com

 

Re: Blacklisted out of the blue

[David Nowak]

** Low Priority **

http://www.mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=blacklist%3a

then try this

http://www.mxtoolbox.com/BlacklistSuggestions.aspx

David  Nowak 
Informations Security & Forensics
Robinson Home Products
An Employee Owned Company
2615 Walden Ave.
Buffalo Ny 14225



***NOTICE: Robinson Home Products limits all e-mail, including attachments, to 
8MB. Your message will not be delivered if it exceeds this limit. Please create 
a shorter message, remove attachments, or consult your tech support if your 
message exceeds the 8MB limit.***


>>> cdro...@lmsintellibound.com 9/30/2009 10:07:34 AM >>>
Ok so we are having trouble emailing some of our customers so I do a
quick check to find out why.  Seems http://njabl.org/ is saying we are
an open relay which I had thought I had closed up years ago.  So I go
thru google searching on how to find and close this, I followed MS idea
some other random ideas and I am not seeing the issue.  I run some tests
on the web and it says I am fine.  I have run the test on abuse.net and
it says im ok but may or may not be an open relay.  I am getting towards
my wits end, can anyone help.

 

Chris Drobny

Network/System Administrator

LMS Intellibound, Inc.

office 770.724.0562

cell 404.797.9710

cdro...@lmsintellibound.com 

 

Blacklisted out of the blue

[Chris Drobny]

Ok so we are having trouble emailing some of our customers so I do a
quick check to find out why.  Seems http://njabl.org/ is saying we are
an open relay which I had thought I had closed up years ago.  So I go
thru google searching on how to find and close this, I followed MS idea
some other random ideas and I am not seeing the issue.  I run some tests
on the web and it says I am fine.  I have run the test on abuse.net and
it says im ok but may or may not be an open relay.  I am getting towards
my wits end, can anyone help.

 

Chris Drobny

Network/System Administrator

LMS Intellibound, Inc.

office 770.724.0562

cell 404.797.9710

cdro...@lmsintellibound.com

 

RE: Public Folders

[Doug Rooney]

Both servers are Windows server 2003 I will double check to make sure
SPs and patches are the same.

I will also get more details on the errors.

 

 

Thank You 

~Doug Rooney 
Sonoma Tilemakers 
IT Manager 
7750 Bell Rd. 
Windsor Ca, 95492 
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX 
i...@sonomatilemakers.com   

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 3:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Public Folders

 

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Doug Rooney 
wrote:

> I am attempting to migrate my Exchange 2003 to a new server ...

 

  Same software on both old and new servers?  If so, make sure both

have the same Service Pack, updates, hotfixes, etc.

 

  What version and Service Pack of Windows?  What SP for Exchange?

 

> Part of the problem is that we run around the clock Sunday Midnight
till

> Friday Midnight and no interruptions are allowed.

 

  Shouldn't be too big a deal.  PF include replication by design,

that's easy.  Exchange does mailbox moves well enough.  Individual

mailboxes aren't available while they are being moved, but you can do

it in small chunks -- one at a time, if you have to.  Exchange and

Outlook should find the new server automatically, as long as the old

server is still around to give them a referral.

 

> The issue with OWA is if I try it with an account on the old server,

> no problem, on the new server, I get the normal login screen, then

> it come back with 'Server Not Found'.

 

  Is that the browser saying Server Not Found, or something that the

server is saying?  If there's more detail in the error message,

provide it.

 

  Anything in Event Viewer on the servers?

 

  Anything in the IIS logs?

 

> With Public Folders, the instructions I have don't seem to work.

 

  Uh... some information might help.  Like, for example, what the

instructions you have say to do, and how they didn't work.  :)

 

  We did this by creating a PF replica on the new server, waiting for

replication, and then removing the original server from the replica

set.  I think there were a couple small but important details, but

that was the gist of it.  I can dig up my notes if you want.

 

-- Ben

 

 

 

Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Dave Vantine]

After seeing this info yesterday, I tried to Bing & Google it based upon
THX1138 and Apple Support + THX1138 and I get no hits. Would someone have a
URL for this article as I would like to read it.

Thanks in Advance
-Dave Vantine

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Steven M. Caesare wrote:

> I use that support article ALL THE TIME for not-so-mainstream stuff.
> Amazing how every vendor seems to have that KB ID #.
>
> -sc
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
>  > Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Kurt Buff 
> wrote:
> > > Turn off ActiveSync?
> >
> >   Turn off Activesync, delete the user account, uninstall iTunes,
> > smash up the iPhone with a hammer, reformat the server hard drives,
> > and have the Exchange administrator shot.
> >
> >   It's all documented in Apple Support Article THX1138.
> >
> >   ;-)
> >
> > -- Ben
>
>
>
>


-- 
Thanks
Dave Vantine

RE: Email Forwarding.

[Campbell, Rob]

If you want to dump it into a file (csv) for distribution:

Get-mailbox |? {$_.forwardingaddress} | select displayname,forwardingaddress | 
export-csv forwarded.csv -notype


From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email Forwarding.


Perfect, thank you.



Paul Cookman * Technical Account Manager
[cid:image001.jpg@01CA41A6.965219E0]+44(0) 844 874 1000 * 
[cid:image002.jpg@01CA41A6.965219E0] +44(0) 844 874 1001
[cid:image003.jpg@01CA41A6.965219E0]Paul.Cookman@selection.co.uk * 
www.selection.co.uk



[cid:image004.jpg@01CA41A6.965219E0]


This e-mail is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the 
addressee only. Selection Services Plc accepts no liability for personal views 
expressed. While every effort has been made to ensure the attachments are 
virus-free, they must be checked before further use, especially those 
containing encrypted data. If you have any problems with this e-mail, please 
contact our IT Manager on em...@selection.co.uk

Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 2758710 Registered Office: 
Provident House, 122 High Street, Bromley, Kent BR1 1EZ

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: 30 September 2009 14:07
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email Forwarding.

Get-mailbox |? {$_.forwardingaddress} | select displayname,forwardingaddress

From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email Forwarding.


It is exchange 2007, any way of bring that info back without all the other 
information?



Paul Cookman * Technical Account Manager
[cid:image001.jpg@01CA41A6.965219E0]+44(0) 844 874 1000 * 
[cid:image002.jpg@01CA41A6.965219E0] +44(0) 844 874 1001
[cid:image003.jpg@01CA41A6.965219E0]Paul.Cookman@selection.co.uk * 
www.selection.co.uk



[cid:image004.jpg@01CA41A6.965219E0]


This e-mail is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the 
addressee only. Selection Services Plc accepts no liability for personal views 
expressed. While every effort has been made to ensure the attachments are 
virus-free, they must be checked before further use, especially those 
containing encrypted data. If you have any problems with this e-mail, please 
contact our IT Manager on em...@selection.co.uk

Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 2758710 Registered Office: 
Provident House, 122 High Street, Bromley, Kent BR1 1EZ

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: 30 September 2009 13:39
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email Forwarding.

Using Get-Mailbox, check the value of ForwardingAddress. If it's null, there is 
no forward.

From: bounce-8672159-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
[mailto:bounce-8672159-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Paul 
Cookman
Sent: 30 September 2009 13:23
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Email Forwarding.


I have an issue where I need to find out which mailboxes have for forwarding 
enabled and we have a lot of mailboxes, does anyone know of a powershell 
command or away to bring back this information?


Paul Cookman * Technical Account Manager
[cid:image001.jpg@01CA41A6.965219E0]+44(0) 844 874 1000 * 
[cid:image002.jpg@01CA41A6.965219E0] +44(0) 844 874 1001
[cid:image003.jpg@01CA41A6.965219E0]Paul.Cookman@selection.co.uk * 
www.selection.co.uk



[cid:image004.jpg@01CA41A6.965219E0]


This e-mail is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the 
addressee only. Selection Services Plc accepts no liability for personal views 
expressed. While every effort has been made to ensure the attachments are 
virus-free, they must be checked before further use, especially those 
containing encrypted data. If you have any problems with this e-mail, please 
contact our IT Manager on em...@selection.co.uk

Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 2758710 Registered Office: 
Provident House, 122 High Street, Bromley, Kent BR1 1EZ


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner,
and is believed to be clean.

**

Note:

The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and

protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended

recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to

the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you

have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by

replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

*

RE: Email Forwarding.

[Campbell, Rob]

Get-mailbox |? {$_.forwardingaddress} | select displayname,forwardingaddress

From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email Forwarding.


It is exchange 2007, any way of bring that info back without all the other 
information?



Paul Cookman * Technical Account Manager
[cid:image001.jpg@01CA41A4.EF3A0740]+44(0) 844 874 1000 * 
[cid:image002.jpg@01CA41A4.EF3A0740] +44(0) 844 874 1001
[cid:image003.jpg@01CA41A4.EF3A0740]Paul.Cookman@selection.co.uk * 
www.selection.co.uk



[cid:image004.jpg@01CA41A4.EF3A0740]


This e-mail is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the 
addressee only. Selection Services Plc accepts no liability for personal views 
expressed. While every effort has been made to ensure the attachments are 
virus-free, they must be checked before further use, especially those 
containing encrypted data. If you have any problems with this e-mail, please 
contact our IT Manager on em...@selection.co.uk

Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 2758710 Registered Office: 
Provident House, 122 High Street, Bromley, Kent BR1 1EZ

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: 30 September 2009 13:39
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email Forwarding.

Using Get-Mailbox, check the value of ForwardingAddress. If it's null, there is 
no forward.

From: bounce-8672159-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
[mailto:bounce-8672159-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Paul 
Cookman
Sent: 30 September 2009 13:23
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Email Forwarding.


I have an issue where I need to find out which mailboxes have for forwarding 
enabled and we have a lot of mailboxes, does anyone know of a powershell 
command or away to bring back this information?


Paul Cookman * Technical Account Manager
[cid:image001.jpg@01CA41A4.EF3A0740]+44(0) 844 874 1000 * 
[cid:image002.jpg@01CA41A4.EF3A0740] +44(0) 844 874 1001
[cid:image003.jpg@01CA41A4.EF3A0740]Paul.Cookman@selection.co.uk * 
www.selection.co.uk



[cid:image004.jpg@01CA41A4.EF3A0740]


This e-mail is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the 
addressee only. Selection Services Plc accepts no liability for personal views 
expressed. While every effort has been made to ensure the attachments are 
virus-free, they must be checked before further use, especially those 
containing encrypted data. If you have any problems with this e-mail, please 
contact our IT Manager on em...@selection.co.uk

Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 2758710 Registered Office: 
Provident House, 122 High Street, Bromley, Kent BR1 1EZ


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner,
and is believed to be clean.
**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
**
**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
**
<><><><>

RE: Email Forwarding.

[Paul Cookman]

It is exchange 2007, any way of bring that info back without all the other 
information?




Paul Cookman * Technical Account Manager
[cid:image9f2fc8.jpg@cdf27770.c9614f43] +44(0) 844 874 1000 * 
[cid:image9acfd6.jpg@b71aa813.04744a39]  +44(0) 844 874 1001
[cid:image81b606.jpg@362dea67.3d604915] paul.cook...@selection.co.uk * 
www.selection.co.uk


[cid:image8620f0.jpg@0a41c4d3.469c4187]


This e-mail is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the 
addressee only. Selection Services Plc accepts no liability for personal views 
expressed. While every effort has been made to ensure the attachments are 
virus-free, they must be checked before further use, especially those 
containing encrypted data. If you have any problems with this e-mail, please 
contact our IT Manager on em...@selection.co.uk

Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 2758710 Registered Office: 
Provident House, 122 High Street, Bromley, Kent BR1 1EZ


From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: 30 September 2009 13:39
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email Forwarding.

Using Get-Mailbox, check the value of ForwardingAddress. If it's null, there is 
no forward.

From: bounce-8672159-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
[mailto:bounce-8672159-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Paul 
Cookman
Sent: 30 September 2009 13:23
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Email Forwarding.


I have an issue where I need to find out which mailboxes have for forwarding 
enabled and we have a lot of mailboxes, does anyone know of a powershell 
command or away to bring back this information?


Paul Cookman * Technical Account Manager
[cid:image001.jpg@01CA41D6.C70DAF10]+44(0) 844 874 1000 * 
[cid:image002.jpg@01CA41D6.C70DAF10] +44(0) 844 874 1001
[cid:image003.jpg@01CA41D6.C70DAF10]Paul.Cookman@selection.co.uk * 
www.selection.co.uk



[cid:image004.jpg@01CA41D6.C70DAF10]


This e-mail is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the 
addressee only. Selection Services Plc accepts no liability for personal views 
expressed. While every effort has been made to ensure the attachments are 
virus-free, they must be checked before further use, especially those 
containing encrypted data. If you have any problems with this e-mail, please 
contact our IT Manager on em...@selection.co.uk

Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 2758710 Registered Office: 
Provident House, 122 High Street, Bromley, Kent BR1 1EZ


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner,
and is believed to be clean.


<><><><><><><><>

RE: Email Forwarding.

[Sobey, Richard A]

Using Get-Mailbox, check the value of ForwardingAddress. If it's null, there is 
no forward.

From: bounce-8672159-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
[mailto:bounce-8672159-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Paul 
Cookman
Sent: 30 September 2009 13:23
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Email Forwarding.


I have an issue where I need to find out which mailboxes have for forwarding 
enabled and we have a lot of mailboxes, does anyone know of a powershell 
command or away to bring back this information?


Paul Cookman * Technical Account Manager
[cid:image001.jpg@01CA41D3.6D292B80]+44(0) 844 874 1000 * 
[cid:image002.jpg@01CA41D3.6D292B80] +44(0) 844 874 1001
[cid:image003.jpg@01CA41D3.6D292B80]Paul.Cookman@selection.co.uk * 
www.selection.co.uk



[cid:image004.jpg@01CA41D3.6D292B80]


This e-mail is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the 
addressee only. Selection Services Plc accepts no liability for personal views 
expressed. While every effort has been made to ensure the attachments are 
virus-free, they must be checked before further use, especially those 
containing encrypted data. If you have any problems with this e-mail, please 
contact our IT Manager on em...@selection.co.uk

Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 2758710 Registered Office: 
Provident House, 122 High Street, Bromley, Kent BR1 1EZ

<><><><>

RE: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?

[Steven M. Caesare]

I use that support article ALL THE TIME for not-so-mainstream stuff.
Amazing how every vendor seems to have that KB ID #.

-sc

> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: uuh... iPhone + EAS + wipe + remove partnership = ?
> 
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Kurt Buff 
wrote:
> > Turn off ActiveSync?
> 
>   Turn off Activesync, delete the user account, uninstall iTunes,
> smash up the iPhone with a hammer, reformat the server hard drives,
> and have the Exchange administrator shot.
> 
>   It's all documented in Apple Support Article THX1138.
> 
>   ;-)
> 
> -- Ben

RE: Email Forwarding.

[Campbell, Rob]

Exchange version?

From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 7:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Email Forwarding.


I have an issue where I need to find out which mailboxes have for forwarding 
enabled and we have a lot of mailboxes, does anyone know of a powershell 
command or away to bring back this information?


Paul Cookman * Technical Account Manager
[cid:image001.jpg@01CA419F.41446F90]+44(0) 844 874 1000 * 
[cid:image002.jpg@01CA419F.41446F90] +44(0) 844 874 1001
[cid:image003.jpg@01CA419F.41446F90]Paul.Cookman@selection.co.uk * 
www.selection.co.uk



[cid:image004.jpg@01CA419F.41446F90]


This e-mail is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the 
addressee only. Selection Services Plc accepts no liability for personal views 
expressed. While every effort has been made to ensure the attachments are 
virus-free, they must be checked before further use, especially those 
containing encrypted data. If you have any problems with this e-mail, please 
contact our IT Manager on em...@selection.co.uk

Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 2758710 Registered Office: 
Provident House, 122 High Street, Bromley, Kent BR1 1EZ

**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
**
**
Note: 
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential 
and 
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended  
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to  
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,   
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you  
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by  
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. 
**
<><><><>

Email Forwarding.

[Paul Cookman]

I have an issue where I need to find out which mailboxes have for forwarding 
enabled and we have a lot of mailboxes, does anyone know of a powershell 
command or away to bring back this information?



Paul Cookman * Technical Account Manager
[cid:image8cc04c.jpg@462e796f.023641a7] +44(0) 844 874 1000 * 
[cid:imagea1a571.jpg@5d0cc156.608f4859]  +44(0) 844 874 1001
[cid:image8be57b.jpg@9f252310.013248e6] paul.cook...@selection.co.uk * 
www.selection.co.uk


[cid:imageb34c40.jpg@d27bf929.a578472b]


This e-mail is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the 
addressee only. Selection Services Plc accepts no liability for personal views 
expressed. While every effort has been made to ensure the attachments are 
virus-free, they must be checked before further use, especially those 
containing encrypted data. If you have any problems with this e-mail, please 
contact our IT Manager on em...@selection.co.uk

Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 2758710 Registered Office: 
Provident House, 122 High Street, Bromley, Kent BR1 1EZ




<><><><>

RE: Piping files to Set-*

[Sobey, Richard A]

Thank you Michael, Rob and Eric; I'll go and play with some of the ideas.

Richard

From: bounce-8671373-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
[mailto:bounce-8671373-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Michael 
B. Smith
Sent: 29 September 2009 20:01
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Piping files to Set-*

Then they fixed it for Exchange 2010, because the Identity parameter can come 
from the pipe.

Sorry for not checking on 2007...


From: Campbell, Rob [rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 2:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Piping files to Set-*
I think I tried something like that once and couldn't get it to work.  When I 
checked it with get-command, it said none of the parameter sets accepted 
pipeline input so I decided it probably wasn't going to be possible.

I ended up using a script like this (it's been scrubbed) to clone most of the 
properties from one resource to another when we upgraded from E2k3.  It's kind 
of a kludge, and I'd probably do it differently if I had to do it again, but 
FWIW:

It will either clone all the properties directly (uncomment the #iex), or build 
a script you can tweak settings on or just do a search/replace on the mailbox 
name before you run it.

I excluded Identity for obvious reasons, and the array properties.  The array 
properties could be added, but it would take some additional code.  I didn't 
need them at the time, so I just left then out.



$mbx = 
if ($mbx -match "\s"){$mbx = "'" + $mbx + "'"}
$rsc_base = get-mailboxcalendarsettings 
$rsc_props = $rsc_base | Get-Member -MemberType Property
$cmds = @()
$rsc_props |%{
$setting = $($rsc_base.($_.name))

$excluded = 
"Identity","RequestInPolicy","RequestOutOfPolicy","ResourceDelegates"

if ($excluded -notcontains $_.name.tostring()){


if ($setting.tostring() -eq "False"){$setting = '$False'}
if ($setting.tostring() -eq "True"){$setting = '$True'}
if ($setting.tostring() -match "\s"){$setting = "'" + $setting + "'"}
}

$cmd_str = "set-mailboxcalendarsettings $mbx -" + $_.name + " $setting"

$cmds += $cmd_str
#iex $cmd_str
}

$cmds | Out-File set_resourcesettings.ps1


From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Piping files to Set-*

It's not even that hard

get-mailboxcalendarsettings "template calendar" | set-mailboxcalendarsettings 
-param1 value -param2 value

etc. etc.

From: Eric Woodford [ericwoodf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Piping files to Set-*
I'd think you could attempt to play with the -instance switch on the command.

$Master = get-mailboxcalendarsettings "Master Conference Room"
$Master.displayname = "New Conference Room name"
Set-MailboxCalendarSettings -identity "NewConferenceRoom" -instance $Master

I have not tested this, ended up writing a reusable script that grants same 
settings for all new conference rooms.

Reference: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996340.aspx



On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Sobey, Richard A 
mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk>> wrote:

All,



This is more of a Powershell question, but it's relating to an Exchange 
problem, so hopefully someone can help me.



I've got a resource mailbox configured just right, and I'm going to be creating 
a few more in the next couple of weeks. Is there any way I can export the 
configuration of the existing mailbox and use it to set up the new mailboxes 
correctly, instead of manually entering all the various parameters into 
Set-MailboxCalendarSettings?



Thanks



Richard


**

Note:

The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and

protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended

recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to

the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you

have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by

replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

**

RE: Piping files to Set-*

[Sobey, Richard A]

None of those settings have been defined. We do use BookInPolicy though.

Cheers

Richard

From: bounce-8671181-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
[mailto:bounce-8671181-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of 
Campbell, Rob
Sent: 29 September 2009 17:28
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Piping files to Set-*

Do you need to set the RequestInPolicy, RequestOutOfPolicy, or ResourceDelegate 
properties?

From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 9:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Piping files to Set-*

All,

This is more of a Powershell question, but it's relating to an Exchange 
problem, so hopefully someone can help me.

I've got a resource mailbox configured just right, and I'm going to be creating 
a few more in the next couple of weeks. Is there any way I can export the 
configuration of the existing mailbox and use it to set up the new mailboxes 
correctly, instead of manually entering all the various parameters into 
Set-MailboxCalendarSettings?

Thanks

Richard

**

Note:

The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and

protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended

recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to

the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,

distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you

have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by

replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

**

Re: Tren quarantined post in OAB System Folder.

[Graeme Carstairs]

Hi There Michael,
The folder is not scanned by the file AV, it is the mail AV scanner thats
removed the attachments.

I have never seen this before and we have several sites using various
different versions of Trend Worry Free Small Business Software (through all
its different names, and versions)

The Exchange part can be configured to exclude folder etc, .

I think I will need to raise it with Trend as it is there software thats
done it.

Graeme


2009/9/29 Michael B. Smith 

>  if you exclude the folder from a/v scanning, the rebuild will probably
> succeed.
>
> here is a blog post i wrote on this general topic:
>
> http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2007/12/05/file-level-antivirus-for-exchange.aspx
>
>  --
> *From:* Graeme Carstairs [loonyto...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:34 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Tren quarantined post in OAB System Folder.
>
>   Hi,
>
> i have just inherited an Exchange 2003 server and it has been showing
> errors in generating OAB.
>
> So following much google fu, I had found the attached page.
> http://forums.msexchange.org/m_1800436892/printable.htm
>
> 2nd bottom replay from scott.french suggest that it is a corrupt OAB file
> and to change the age limit on the folder.
>
> When I checked the post in the OAB4 folde rI discovered that there is one
> post and when opened it shows a list of atachemnts to big to fit on the OWA
> screen, all removed and replaced with tct files of the type
> REMOVED_BY_THE_EXCHANGE_EMAIL_SCANNING_SERVICE_008BC5E7_55E9F.txt?attach=1
>
> Now this is what Trend puts in when it removes something.
>
> They are currently on Client Server Suite for SMB V3.6 with the Exchange
> module.
>
> I cannot delete this post and rebuilds fail.
>
> Anyone got any suggestions as to what to do to get rid of the post, and to
> ensure that trend doesnt snaffle it again.
>
> TIA
>
> Graeme
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Good news everyone, you have just received and e-mail from me!
>
> Joan Crawford 
> - "I, Joan Crawford, I believe in the dollar. Everything I earn, I spend."
>



-- 
Good news everyone, you have just received and e-mail from me!

Mike Ditka   -
"If God had wanted man to play soccer, he wouldn't have given us arms."