Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula Error: bvecs and bvals don't have the same number of entries

2012-09-27 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Can you please send the original bvals and bvecs files (the ones that you 
specify in the configuration file), and the configuration file itself? 
Thanks!

a.y

On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Loi wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I generate the files in Linux (using gedit) and they look normal (I
> have compared them to the files in the tutorial).
>
> So far I have tried ending both with and without .txt, transposing the
> files, changing to equal number of decimals and adding 'setenv LC_ALL
> en_US' to the .tchsrc file.
>
> The inputs I am using are dicoms, and even though I specify a path to
> the b-value files and gradient tables I make (I originally didn't
> specify these, and got the same error message), new bvecs and bvals
> are generated in the trac-all -prep process, leading to the error.
>
> Thank you,
> Joy-Loi
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Anastasia Yendiki
>  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Joy - How were your bvecs and bvals files generated? In the past some
>> people have had problems with files exported from Excel b/c it generates
>> text files with Windows-specific end-of-line characters that cannot be read
>> properly on Linux. Do the files look normal when you run "more" on them on
>> the system where you ran trac-all?
>>
>> a.y
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Loi wrote:
>>
>>> Dear FreeSurfers,
>>>
>>> I am trying to run trac-all -prep on a single subject, and get the
>>> following error:
>>>
>>> dtifit -k
>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data/id101/dmri/dwi.nii.gz
>>> -m
>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data/id101/dlabel/diff/aparc+aseg_mask.flt.nii.gz
>>> -r
>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data/id101/dmri/bvecs
>>> -b
>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data/id101/dmri/bvals
>>> -o
>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data/id101/dmri/dtifit
>>> Error: bvecs and bvals don't have the same number of entries
>>>
>>> I have searched the message thread, and cannot seem to find a solution
>>> applicable to my situation: it seems that the trac-all process
>>> generates transposed bvec and bval files.
>>> Therefore, I tried transposing these manually and specifying the
>>> location to these files (as explained in the tutorial:
>>> http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/Tracula), but
>>> attempting to run trac-all again still leads to the same result: new
>>> bval and bvec files are generated, and I receive the same error
>>> message.
>>>
>>> Does anyone know how I can solve this problem?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Joy-Loi
>>>
>>>
>>> *
>>> My configuration file:
>>>
>>>
>>> setenv SUBJECTS_DIR
>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_recons
>>>
>>> set dtroot =
>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data
>>>
>>> set subjlist = id101
>>> set runlist = 1
>>>
>>> set dcmroot =
>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data
>>> set dcmlist = id101/orig/1.dcm
>>>
>>> set bvalfile =
>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data/id101/dmri/bvals.txt
>>>
>>> set bvecfile =
>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data/id101/dmri/bvecs.txt
>>>
>>> set nb0 = 10
>>>
>>> set doeddy = 1
>>> set dorotbvecs = 1
>>> set thrbet = 0.3
>>> set doregflt = 1
>>> set doregbbr = 0
>>> set doregmni = 1
>>> set mnitemp =  /psyklab/fsl/data/standard/MNI152_T1_1mm_brain.nii.gz
>>>
>>> #set trainfile =
>>>
>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data/subj,train,difftutorial123.txt
>>>
>>> set pathlist = (lh.cst_AS rh.cst_AS \
>>>  lh.ilf_AS rh.ilf_AS \
>>> lh.unc_AS rh.unc_AS \
>>>  fmajor_PP fminor_PP \
>>>  lh.atr_PP rh.atr_PP \
>>>  lh.cab_PP rh.cab_PP \
>>>  lh.ccg_PP rh.ccg_PP \
>>>  lh.slfp_PP rh.slfp_PP \
>>>  lh.slft_PP rh.slft_PP)
>>>
>>>
>>

Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula Error: bvecs and bvals don't have the same number of entries

2012-09-28 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

There are 10 empty lines at the end of your Tbvecs.txt file. Can you try 
removing those and reruning?

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Loi wrote:

> Hello again,
>
> Here is the configuration file and some variations of the bvec and
> bval files I have tried using.
>
> Also, I have noticed that the first time I run trac-all (without
> specifying the bvecs and bvals), the bval file generated seems to list
> the values twice. ie:
>
> 0
> 0
> 7
> 7
> 7
> 7
> 0
> 0
> 7
> 7
> 7
> 7
>
> I hope this make sense. Thank you,
>
> Joy-Loi
>
>
> On 9/27/12, Anastasia Yendiki  wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, no problem. I'd like to see the actual files on one of our
>> machines just to make sure.
>>
>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Loi wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Anastasia,
>>>
>>> I am in Norway and home from work for the evening, but will send you
>>> the files first thing tomorrow morning.
>>> Meanwhile, here is a copy of the contents in the files (as included in
>>> my original e-mail).
>>> Thank you for your help!
>>>
>>> *
>>> My configuration file:
>>>
>>>
>>> setenv SUBJECTS_DIR
>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_recons
>>>
>>> set dtroot =
>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data
>>>
>>> set subjlist = id101
>>> set runlist = 1
>>>
>>> set dcmroot =
>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data
>>> set dcmlist = id101/orig/1.dcm
>>>
>>> set bvalfile =
>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data/id101/dmri/bvals.txt
>>>
>>> set bvecfile =
>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data/id101/dmri/bvecs.txt
>>>
>>> set nb0 = 10
>>>
>>> set doeddy = 1
>>> set dorotbvecs = 1
>>> set thrbet = 0.3
>>> set doregflt = 1
>>> set doregbbr = 0
>>> set doregmni = 1
>>> set mnitemp =  /psyklab/fsl/data/standard/MNI152_T1_1mm_brain.nii.gz
>>>
>>> #set trainfile =
>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data/subj,train,difftutorial123.txt
>>>
>>> set pathlist = (lh.cst_AS rh.cst_AS \
>>> lh.ilf_AS rh.ilf_AS \
>>> lh.unc_AS rh.unc_AS \
>>> fmajor_PP fminor_PP \
>>> lh.atr_PP rh.atr_PP \
>>> lh.cab_PP rh.cab_PP \
>>> lh.ccg_PP rh.ccg_PP \
>>> lh.slfp_PP rh.slfp_PP \
>>> lh.slft_PP rh.slft_PP)
>>>
>>>
>>> set ncpts = 5
>>>
>>> set usetrunc = 1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *
>>> My bvals:
>>>
>>> 0.000
>>> 0.000
>>> 0.000
>>> 0.000
>>> 0.000
>>> 0.000
>>> 0.000
>>> 0.000
>>> 0.000
>>> 0.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>> 700.000
>>>
>>> *
>>> My bvecs:
>>>
>>> 0.000 0.000 0.000
>>> 0.000 0.000 0.000
>>> 0.000 0.000 0.000
>>> 0.000 0.000 0.000
>>> 0.000 0.000 0.000
>>> 0.000 0.000 0.000
>>> 0.000 0.000 0.000
>>> 0.000 0.000 0.000
>>> 0.000 0.000 0.000
>>> 0.000 0.000 0.000
>>> -0.9998760 0.0011040 0.0157340
>>> -0.7705615 0.6320276 0.0823114
>>> -0.2461791 0.0273479 0.9688392
>>> -0.7953558 0.1076421 0.5965091
>>> 0.4620816 -0.8755928 0.1407778
>>> 0.22610

Re: [Freesurfer] TRACULA Question

2012-09-28 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Gabor - The info that tracula uses is which aparc+aseg labels each 
pathway neighbors at each point along its trajectory. It learns this 
information from the 33 subjects in the atlas, where the pathways were 
labeled manually, and then applies that knowledge to reconstruct the 
pathways in your subject.

As long as the aparc+aseg of your subject is consistent with the ones in 
the atlas, you're fine. But if you think that the version you used to 
generate your aparc+aseg, and the latest version, that the aparc+aseg's in 
the atlas were generated with, have significant differences, this *may* be 
a problem. The extent of the problem will depend on how often the 
problematic label occurs next to one of the 18 pathways that tracula 
reconstructs and how different the label is b/w the versions. A small 
diference will probably not affect tracula at all.

Your aparc+aseg's were generated with freesurfer 4.5, and there was no 
tracula atlas generated with that version of aparc+aseg's.

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Gabor Perlaki wrote:

> Dear Anastasia,
>
> Thanks a lot your answer. My fear is that the pars triangular
> segmentation also seems bad, because it is right lateralized in most
> of our analyzed data. Here is the post about this issue:
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/freesurfer/2012-June/024541.html
>
> Is it also OK with Tracula?
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Gabor
>
> 2012/9/27 Anastasia Yendiki :
>>
>> Hi Gabor - Tracula doesn't use the BA labels, only the labels in the
>> aparc+aseg. I hope this answers your question.
>>
>> a.y
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012, Gabor Perlaki wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Anastasia,
>>>
>>> Earlier I was posted an issue about BA44/pars triangular:
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg23706.html
>>>
>>> Because TRACULA also uses the cortical parcellation it may be
>>> important to handle this issue somehow. Is it handled in TRACULA
>>> analysis? Does it affect the result of WM-volumes?
>>>
>>> Thank you for your answer,
>>> Gabor
>>> ___
>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>> e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
>> error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
>> properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula Error: bvecs and bvals don't have the same number of entries

2012-09-28 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

In the files that you sent me earlier, the final bvecs had a set of 10 
all-zero directions in the end (which I thought may have been caused by 
the 10 empty lines at the end of your input Tbvecs.txt) Are those zeros 
still there in bvecs?

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Loi wrote:

> Hello again,
>
> I have tried removing the empty lines and rerunning trac-all -prep,
> but the error persists.
>
>
> Joy-Loi
>
> On 9/28/12, Anastasia Yendiki  wrote:
>>
>> There are 10 empty lines at the end of your Tbvecs.txt file. Can you try
>> removing those and reruning?
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>> a.y
>>
>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Loi wrote:
>>
>>> Hello again,
>>>
>>> Here is the configuration file and some variations of the bvec and
>>> bval files I have tried using.
>>>
>>> Also, I have noticed that the first time I run trac-all (without
>>> specifying the bvecs and bvals), the bval file generated seems to list
>>> the values twice. ie:
>>>
>>> 0
>>> 0
>>> 7
>>> 7
>>> 7
>>> 7
>>> 0
>>> 0
>>> 7
>>> 7
>>> 7
>>> 7
>>>
>>> I hope this make sense. Thank you,
>>>
>>> Joy-Loi
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/27/12, Anastasia Yendiki  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, no problem. I'd like to see the actual files on one of our
>>>> machines just to make sure.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Loi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Anastasia,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am in Norway and home from work for the evening, but will send you
>>>>> the files first thing tomorrow morning.
>>>>> Meanwhile, here is a copy of the contents in the files (as included in
>>>>> my original e-mail).
>>>>> Thank you for your help!
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>> My configuration file:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> setenv SUBJECTS_DIR
>>>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_recons
>>>>>
>>>>> set dtroot =
>>>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data
>>>>>
>>>>> set subjlist = id101
>>>>> set runlist = 1
>>>>>
>>>>> set dcmroot =
>>>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data
>>>>> set dcmlist = id101/orig/1.dcm
>>>>>
>>>>> set bvalfile =
>>>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data/id101/dmri/bvals.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> set bvecfile =
>>>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data/id101/dmri/bvecs.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> set nb0 = 10
>>>>>
>>>>> set doeddy = 1
>>>>> set dorotbvecs = 1
>>>>> set thrbet = 0.3
>>>>> set doregflt = 1
>>>>> set doregbbr = 0
>>>>> set doregmni = 1
>>>>> set mnitemp =  /psyklab/fsl/data/standard/MNI152_T1_1mm_brain.nii.gz
>>>>>
>>>>> #set trainfile =
>>>>> /usit/tsd/nevro-work/projects/Memory_project/TRACULA_test/TRACULA_data/subj,train,difftutorial123.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> set pathlist = (lh.cst_AS rh.cst_AS \
>>>>> lh.ilf_AS rh.ilf_AS \
>>>>> lh.unc_AS rh.unc_AS \
>>>>> fmajor_PP fminor_PP \
>>>>> lh.atr_PP rh.atr_PP \
>>>>> lh.cab_PP rh.cab_PP \
>>>>> lh.ccg_PP rh.ccg_PP \
>>>>> lh.slfp_PP rh.slfp_PP \
>>>>> lh.slft_PP rh.slft_PP)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> set ncpts = 5
>>>>>
>>>>> set usetrunc = 1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>> My bvals:
>>>>>
>>>>> 0.000
>>>>> 0.000
>>>>> 0.000
>>>>> 0.000
>>>>> 0.000
>>>>> 0.000
>>>>> 0.000
>>>>> 0.000
>>>>> 0.000
>>>>> 0.000
>>>>> 700.000
>>>>> 700.000
>>>

Re: [Freesurfer] tracula question

2012-10-05 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hola Fernando - Please send questions about tracula to the freesurfer list 
and not me personally, so that all users may benefit.


This issue will be resolved in the next version. For now, if you're on a 
unix system that doesn't have the jot command, you'll just have to specify 
the runlist in your configuration file, even if you want to process all 
subjects on your list. So if you have 5 subjects for example:

set runlist = (1 2 3 4 5)

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Fri, 5 Oct 2012, Fernando Ventrice wrote:


Dear Anastasia Yendiki,
I have been trying to use TRACULA and I think I'm doing something wrong. 
Because it keeps on giving me this error (I tried within tcsh and bash):

fventrice@xubuntu1204x64fleni:~$ trac-all -prep -c 
${TUTORIAL_DATA}/diffusion_tutorial/scripts/dmrirc_single_subject
jot: Command not found.
INFO: SUBJECTS_DIR is 
/media/LEVIATAN01/LaboINEBA/testing_TRACULA/diffusion_recons
INFO: Diffusion root is 
/media/LEVIATAN01/LaboINEBA/testing_TRACULA/diffusion_tutorial
Actual FREESURFER_HOME /home/fventrice/CONTAINER_FLENI/Programs/freesurfer

I use freesurfer and fsl perfectly well. I have also tried with the new version 
of trac-all. But keeps on giving the same error.
Best regards and thanks!
Fernando Ventrice

El contenido del presente mensaje y el de sus adjuntos, es confidencial, 
privado y de uso exclusivo de los destinatarios a los cuales está dirigido, 
pudiendo contener información legalmente protegida. Queda prohibida la 
revisión, divulgación, publicación, modificación, copia, distribución o acción 
en relación con esta información, por personas o entidades distintas al 
destinatario. Si usted, por alguna razón, lo ha recibido por error, por favor 
tenga la amabilidad de eliminarlo de su sistema. Las opiniones contenidas, son 
exclusivas de su autor, y no representa necesariamente, la opinión de FLENI.
http://www.fleni.org.ar


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] TRACULA: multiple bvecs files in one configuration file

2012-10-11 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Joy-Loi - No, all updates that happened since the 5.1 release are 
listed here:
http://www.freesurfer.net/fswiki/Tracula

For now it's assumed that all your subjects were scanned with the same 
protocol, which is usually the case, unless you're comparing different 
protocols. If you want to specify a different set of gradients for some 
subjects, you have to create a different configuration file for them.

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Loi wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I see in the message thread that as of July 2011 there was no support
> for multiple bvecs files in one configuration file. Have any changes
> been made regarding this? And if so, how can I include multiple paths
> to bvecs files?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Joy-Loi
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] TRACULA trac-all -path ERROR

2012-10-11 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Fernando - Can you please send your scripts/trac-all.log file? My guess 
is something went wrong earlier in the process that caused those files not 
to be created.


Thanks,
a.y

On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Fernando Ventrice wrote:


Dear Freesurfer-Tracula users,
I'm trying to use Tracula to analyze some DTI images. I already used Freesurfer 
and FSL without problems. First of all, my system is the following:

Linux Xubuntu 12.04 LTS x86_64 - Intel i7 - 8Gb RAM - Nvidia GeForce GT 520 1GB
Freesurfer version 5.1.0 
(freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.1.0.tar.gz)
FSL version 5.0.1 (from Neurodebian)

The first problem I had was with the first command: "trac-all -prep -c dmrirc_file" gave 
an error about not finding the 'job' command. This was solved (thanks to Anastasia Yendiki) using: 
"set runlist=(1)" in the 'dmrirc_file'.
Then, I had some problems with the second command: "trac-all -bedp -c 
dmrirc_file", which gave this error:

Queuing preprocessing stages
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 216: [: NONE: 
unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 263: [: NONE: 
unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 321: [: 
xbedpostx_pre: unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 458: [: x: 
unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 472: [: -le: 
argument expected
Queuing parallel processing stage
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 216: [: NONE: 
unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 321: [: 
xbedpostx: unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 458: [: x43: 
unexpected operator
0 slices processed
Queuing post processing stage
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 216: [: NONE: 
unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 263: [: NONE: 
unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 321: [: 
xbedpostx_post: unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 458: [: x: 
unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 472: [: -le: 
argument expected

Reading about this on the freesurfer mailing-list I got to the conclusion of 
running directly:

bedpostx /home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/subject/TRACULA/subject/dmri

(in the middle I learned how to use condor!)
It finished without errors. So I went to the last command: "trac-all -path -c 
dmrirc_file" which complained about not finding the following file:

ERROR: Could not open 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/subject/TRACULA/subject/dlabel/diff/lh.cst_AS_avg33_mni_flt_cpts_5.txt

These files were at 
"/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/subject/TRACULA/subject/dlabel/mni"...
 should I copy them to the diff folder??

I send as attachments the error output from "trac-all -path -c dmrirc_file" and the 
"dmrirc_file" I used.
Best regards and thanks a lot!
Fernando Ventrice

El contenido del presente mensaje y el de sus adjuntos, es confidencial, 
privado y de uso exclusivo de los destinatarios a los cuales está dirigido, 
pudiendo contener información legalmente protegida. Queda prohibida la 
revisión, divulgación, publicación, modificación, copia, distribución o acción 
en relación con esta información, por personas o entidades distintas al 
destinatario. Si usted, por alguna razón, lo ha recibido por error, por favor 
tenga la amabilidad de eliminarlo de su sistema. Las opiniones contenidas, son 
exclusivas de su autor, y no representa necesariamente, la opinión de FLENI.
http://www.fleni.org.ar
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] TRACULA trac-all -path ERROR

2012-10-11 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Fernando - You need to provide you bvecs and bvals files explicitly in 
your configuration file. The first error occurs b/c these files are 
missing.


a.y

On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Fernando Ventrice wrote:


Yes, of course. Here I send it. Best regards,
Fernando

From: Anastasia Yendiki [ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 1:50 PM
To: Fernando Ventrice
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] TRACULA trac-all -path ERROR

Hi Fernando - Can you please send your scripts/trac-all.log file? My guess
is something went wrong earlier in the process that caused those files not
to be created.

Thanks,
a.y

On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Fernando Ventrice wrote:


Dear Freesurfer-Tracula users,
I'm trying to use Tracula to analyze some DTI images. I already used Freesurfer 
and FSL without problems. First of all, my system is the following:

Linux Xubuntu 12.04 LTS x86_64 - Intel i7 - 8Gb RAM - Nvidia GeForce GT 520 1GB
Freesurfer version 5.1.0 
(freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.1.0.tar.gz)
FSL version 5.0.1 (from Neurodebian)

The first problem I had was with the first command: "trac-all -prep -c dmrirc_file" gave 
an error about not finding the 'job' command. This was solved (thanks to Anastasia Yendiki) using: 
"set runlist=(1)" in the 'dmrirc_file'.
Then, I had some problems with the second command: "trac-all -bedp -c 
dmrirc_file", which gave this error:

Queuing preprocessing stages
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 216: [: NONE: 
unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 263: [: NONE: 
unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 321: [: 
xbedpostx_pre: unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 458: [: x: 
unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 472: [: -le: 
argument expected
Queuing parallel processing stage
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 216: [: NONE: 
unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 321: [: 
xbedpostx: unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 458: [: x43: 
unexpected operator
0 slices processed
Queuing post processing stage
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 216: [: NONE: 
unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 263: [: NONE: 
unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 321: [: 
xbedpostx_post: unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 458: [: x: 
unexpected operator
/home/labneuroimg/Programs/freesurfer_510/bin/fsl_sub_seychelles: 472: [: -le: 
argument expected

Reading about this on the freesurfer mailing-list I got to the conclusion of 
running directly:

bedpostx /home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/subject/TRACULA/subject/dmri

(in the middle I learned how to use condor!)
It finished without errors. So I went to the last command: "trac-all -path -c 
dmrirc_file" which complained about not finding the following file:

ERROR: Could not open 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/subject/TRACULA/subject/dlabel/diff/lh.cst_AS_avg33_mni_flt_cpts_5.txt

These files were at 
"/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/subject/TRACULA/subject/dlabel/mni"...
 should I copy them to the diff folder??

I send as attachments the error output from "trac-all -path -c dmrirc_file" and the 
"dmrirc_file" I used.
Best regards and thanks a lot!
Fernando Ventrice

El contenido del presente mensaje y el de sus adjuntos, es confidencial, 
privado y de uso exclusivo de los destinatarios a los cuales está dirigido, 
pudiendo contener información legalmente protegida. Queda prohibida la 
revisión, divulgación, publicación, modificación, copia, distribución o acción 
en relación con esta información, por personas o entidades distintas al 
destinatario. Si usted, por alguna razón, lo ha recibido por error, por favor 
tenga la amabilidad de eliminarlo de su sistema. Las opiniones contenidas, son 
exclusivas de su autor, y no representa necesariamente, la opinión de FLENI.
http://www.fleni.org.ar




The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

El contenido del presente mensaje y el de sus adjuntos, es confidencial, 
privado y de uso exclusivo de los destinatarios a lo

Re: [Freesurfer] FW: TRACULA some fiber volumes being too small

2012-10-18 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Fernando - Thank you for your kind words. You can indeed try the reinit 
option as Christofer suggested when one of the pathways looks like a 
single curve and not like a volume.


However, because some of your other pathways in the screenshots look a bit 
funky too, I would also check that there was nothing wrong with the 
gradient directions. An easy way to check that is by looking at the 
eigenvectors from the tensor fit (dmri/dtifit_V1.nii.gz). Although tracula 
itself doesn't use tensors, if there's something wrong with the gradient 
directions, it'll show up in the tensor fit.


If you're not sure how to check, you can upload all tracula-related 
directories of your subject here and I'll take a look:

http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FtpFileExchange

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Fernando Ventrice wrote:


Dear Freesurfer/Tracula users,
Finally I could successfully test Tracula and I think it is amazing what it can 
do automatically. These are the commands I used:

export FREESURFER_HOME=${HOME}/Programs/freesurfer_510 && source 
$FREESURFER_HOME/SetUpFreeSurfer.sh
source /etc/fsl/fsl.sh
export FSLPARALLEL=condor
trac-all -prep -c 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/dmrirc_Fernando_Ventrice
trac-all -bedp -c 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/dmrirc_Fernando_Ventrice
# "trac-all -bedp" gave some errors so I used bedpostx directly:
bedpostx 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/20120112_VENTRICE_FERNANDO/dmri
trac-all -path -c 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/dmrirc_Fernando_Ventrice
freeview -tv 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/20120112_VENTRICE_FERNANDO/dpath/merged_avg33_mni_flt.mgz
 -v 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/20120112_VENTRICE_FERNANDO/dmri/dtifit_FA.nii.gz
 &

All finished without errors, but there seems to be a problem with CC Forceps 
Mayor volume, which gave very small values. Is this OK or I made some mistake? 
First I tested with some patient and other fiber tracks also gave very small 
volumes. I attached some pictures and the dmrirc and trac-all log files.
Best,
Fernando Ventrice

El contenido del presente mensaje y el de sus adjuntos, es confidencial, 
privado y de uso exclusivo de los destinatarios a los cuales está dirigido, 
pudiendo contener información legalmente protegida. Queda prohibida la 
revisión, divulgación, publicación, modificación, copia, distribución o acción 
en relación con esta información, por personas o entidades distintas al 
destinatario. Si usted, por alguna razón, lo ha recibido por error, por favor 
tenga la amabilidad de eliminarlo de su sistema. Las opiniones contenidas, son 
exclusivas de su autor, y no representa necesariamente, la opinión de FLENI.
http://www.fleni.org.ar
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] trac-all -prep error during inter-subject registration with mri_cvs_register

2012-10-23 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Verena - Which version of freesurfer are you using? In the public 
release of 5.1 the CVS registration option in trac-all is disabled.

a.y

On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Verena Gramse wrote:

> 
> 
> From: Verena Gramse
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 8:19 PM
> To: freesur...@nmr.mgh.harvard
> Subject: trac-all -prep error during inter-subject registration with
> mri_cvs_register
> 
> Dear Tracula Team,
> 
> I have been running into problems during Inter-subject registration at the
> mri_cvs_register step: it aborts with Image Exception : #22 :: ERROR: Could
> not open image /gablab/p/BGFU/data/freesurfer/cvs_avg35/mri//norm.mgz. But
> norm.mgz exists at the specified location and it can be opened with freeview
> without problems.
> 
> Did I oversee anything?
> Thanks in advance!
> Verena
> 
> 
> Find attached my dmrirc and the error.log
> 
> 
> 
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] trac-all -prep error during inter-subject registration with mri_cvs_register

2012-10-23 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Yes. Using affine vs. nonlinear registration to the atlas shouldn't be as 
big a deal for tracula as, say, for a voxel-based analysis. That's because 
the anatomical priors used by tracula don't use the exact spatial location 
of the tracts but the IDs of the anatomical labels neighboring the tracts.

On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Verena Gramse wrote:

> Hi Anastasia,
>
> Ahh.. I used the regular 5.1 and pointed to our dev folder where the 
> cvs_avg35 (and cvs_avg_inMNI152) live.
> So, do you recommend skipping cvs registration for now?
>
> Thanks in advance!
> Verena
>
>
> ________
> From: Anastasia Yendiki [ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 12:00 PM
> To: Verena Gramse
> Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] trac-all -prep error during inter-subject 
> registration with mri_cvs_register
>
> Hi Verena - Which version of freesurfer are you using? In the public
> release of 5.1 the CVS registration option in trac-all is disabled.
>
> a.y
>
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Verena Gramse wrote:
>
>>
>> 
>> From: Verena Gramse
>> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 8:19 PM
>> To: freesur...@nmr.mgh.harvard
>> Subject: trac-all -prep error during inter-subject registration with
>> mri_cvs_register
>>
>> Dear Tracula Team,
>>
>> I have been running into problems during Inter-subject registration at the
>> mri_cvs_register step: it aborts with Image Exception : #22 :: ERROR: Could
>> not open image /gablab/p/BGFU/data/freesurfer/cvs_avg35/mri//norm.mgz. But
>> norm.mgz exists at the specified location and it can be opened with freeview
>> without problems.
>>
>> Did I oversee anything?
>> Thanks in advance!
>> Verena
>>
>>
>> Find attached my dmrirc and the error.log
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
> at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] Trac-all Error

2012-10-24 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Crystal - This is because of the way the B0 dewarping script is called 
during the pre-processing. It assumes that you have 2 phase images instead 
of the difference of 2 phase images (which is what you have). The next 
version actually accommodates both cases but for now you have 2 options:


1. Edit the script $FREESURFER_HOME/bin/trac-preproc and change this line:
set cmd = ($cmd --ph $dwidir/b0pha.nii.gz)
   to this:
set cmd = ($cmd --dph $dwidir/b0pha.nii.gz)

2. Be lazy and skip B0 dewarping!

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Franklin, Crystal G wrote:


Freesurfer,

I am trying to run trac-all –prep and trac-preproc keeps exiting with errors.  
It
keeps saying the unwrappedphasemaps must contain at least two volumes.  My data
only contains one phase image and 2 magnitude images.  Do you know what could be
causing this error or how to get around it?

Thanks in advance,
Crystal

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] FW: TRACULA some fiber volumes being too small

2012-10-30 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Fernando - Thanks for uploading your data. Looking at the primary 
directions from tensor fit on the data that you sent me (see screenshot), 
they seem to be off by a 90 degree angle from what you'd expect them. This 
means that your gradient table is probably off as well.


Hope this helps,
a.y

On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Fernando Ventrice wrote:


Dear Freesurfer/Tracula users,
Finally I could successfully test Tracula and I think it is amazing what it can 
do automatically. These are the commands I used:

export FREESURFER_HOME=${HOME}/Programs/freesurfer_510 && source 
$FREESURFER_HOME/SetUpFreeSurfer.sh
source /etc/fsl/fsl.sh
export FSLPARALLEL=condor
trac-all -prep -c 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/dmrirc_Fernando_Ventrice
trac-all -bedp -c 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/dmrirc_Fernando_Ventrice
# "trac-all -bedp" gave some errors so I used bedpostx directly:
bedpostx 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/20120112_VENTRICE_FERNANDO/dmri
trac-all -path -c 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/dmrirc_Fernando_Ventrice
freeview -tv 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/20120112_VENTRICE_FERNANDO/dpath/merged_avg33_mni_flt.mgz
 -v 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/20120112_VENTRICE_FERNANDO/dmri/dtifit_FA.nii.gz
 &

All finished without errors, but there seems to be a problem with CC Forceps 
Mayor volume, which gave very small values. Is this OK or I made some mistake? 
First I tested with some patient and other fiber tracks also gave very small 
volumes. I attached some pictures and the dmrirc and trac-all log files.
Best,
Fernando Ventrice

El contenido del presente mensaje y el de sus adjuntos, es confidencial, 
privado y de uso exclusivo de los destinatarios a los cuales está dirigido, 
pudiendo contener información legalmente protegida. Queda prohibida la 
revisión, divulgación, publicación, modificación, copia, distribución o acción 
en relación con esta información, por personas o entidades distintas al 
destinatario. Si usted, por alguna razón, lo ha recibido por error, por favor 
tenga la amabilidad de eliminarlo de su sistema. Las opiniones contenidas, son 
exclusivas de su autor, y no representa necesariamente, la opinión de FLENI.
http://www.fleni.org.ar
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] tracula - posterior density just one-dimensional curve

2012-10-30 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Andi - The most common problem that would cause all or almost all 
pathways to fail is an incorrect gradient table. You can do a sanity check 
on that by looking at the primary eigenvectors from your tensor fit 
(dmri/dtifit_V1.nii.gz). See also my answer to Fernando earlier today.


Hope this helps,
a.y

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Andi Heckel wrote:


Dear Tracula team,

I have noticed in a  multisubject tracula analysis, that the posterior density 
in many if not all paths in
the path.pd.nii.gz file is just a bright one-dimensional curve, rather than a 
true distribution.
The path.map.nii.gz is empty. This is true for both flirt and bbreg registered 
versions in many subjects.
Trac-all finished wiithout errors. So did Recon-all.

Could it actually be a memory (RAM) problem ? We are running tracula on a 
cluster with only 2.5 GB per
core.

thx for any help and kind regards,
andi




___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] FW: TRACULA some fiber volumes being too small

2012-10-31 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


If FSL isn't happy with the directions, that's going to be fatal b/c
trac-all relies on bedpostx running properly. I'm going to look into this 
further to try to figure out what it is about this data that's causing 
the discrepancy.


On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Fernando Ventrice wrote:


Dear Anastasia,
When I open the dtifit_V1 and dtifit_FA with Freeview the vector directions 
actually are OK, but when I open them with FSLview they are similar to your 
screen-shot. Here I also send a screen-shot with the comparison between the two 
softwares in each monitor.
Best,
Fernando
________
From: Anastasia Yendiki [ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 1:24 PM
To: Fernando Ventrice
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] FW: TRACULA some fiber volumes being too small

See screenshot now :)

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Anastasia Yendiki wrote:



Hi Fernando - Thanks for uploading your data. Looking at the primary
directions from tensor fit on the data that you sent me (see screenshot),
they seem to be off by a 90 degree angle from what you'd expect them. This
means that your gradient table is probably off as well.

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Fernando Ventrice wrote:


 Dear Freesurfer/Tracula users,
 Finally I could successfully test Tracula and I think it is amazing what
 it can do automatically. These are the commands I used:

 export FREESURFER_HOME=${HOME}/Programs/freesurfer_510 && source
 $FREESURFER_HOME/SetUpFreeSurfer.sh
 source /etc/fsl/fsl.sh
 export FSLPARALLEL=condor
 trac-all -prep -c
 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/dmrirc_Fernando_Ventrice
 trac-all -bedp -c
 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/dmrirc_Fernando_Ventrice
 # "trac-all -bedp" gave some errors so I used bedpostx directly:
 bedpostx
 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/20120112_VENTRICE_FERNANDO/dmri
 trac-all -path -c
 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/dmrirc_Fernando_Ventrice
 freeview -tv
 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/20120112_VENTRICE_FERNANDO/dpath/merged_avg33_mni_flt.mgz
 -v
 
/home/labneuroimg/STATION_FLENI/Tensores/Fernando_Ventrice/20120112_VENTRICE_FERNANDO/dmri/dtifit_FA.nii.gz
 &

 All finished without errors, but there seems to be a problem with CC
 Forceps Mayor volume, which gave very small values. Is this OK or I made
 some mistake? First I tested with some patient and other fiber tracks also
 gave very small volumes. I attached some pictures and the dmrirc and
 trac-all log files.
 Best,
 Fernando Ventrice

 El contenido del presente mensaje y el de sus adjuntos, es confidencial,
 privado y de uso exclusivo de los destinatarios a los cuales está
 dirigido, pudiendo contener información legalmente protegida. Queda
 prohibida la revisión, divulgación, publicación, modificación, copia,
 distribución o acción en relación con esta información, por personas o
 entidades distintas al destinatario. Si usted, por alguna razón, lo ha
 recibido por error, por favor tenga la amabilidad de eliminarlo de su
 sistema. Las opiniones contenidas, son exclusivas de su autor, y no
 representa necesariamente, la opinión de FLENI.
 http://www.fleni.org.ar






The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

El contenido del presente mensaje y el de sus adjuntos, es confidencial, 
privado y de uso exclusivo de los destinatarios a los cuales está dirigido, 
pudiendo contener información legalmente protegida. Queda prohibida la 
revisión, divulgación, publicación, modificación, copia, distribución o acción 
en relación con esta información, por personas o entidades distintas al 
destinatario. Si usted, por alguna razón, lo ha recibido por error, por favor 
tenga la amabilidad de eliminarlo de su sistema. Las opiniones contenidas, son 
exclusivas de su autor, y no representa necesariamente, la opinión de FLENI.
http://www.fleni.org.ar

El contenido del presente mensaje y el de sus adjuntos, es confidencial, 
privado y de uso exclusivo de los destinatarios a los cuales está dirigido, 
pudiendo contener información legalmente protegida. Queda prohibida la 
revisión, divulgación, publicación, modificación, copia, distribución o acción 
en relación con esta información, por personas o entidades distintas al 
destinatario. Si usted, por alguna razón, lo ha recibido por error, por favor 
tenga la amabilidad de eliminarlo de su sistema. Las opiniones contenidas, son 
exclusivas de su autor, y no representa necesariament

Re: [Freesurfer] Interpretation of voxel values in TRACULA "path.pd" images

2012-11-09 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Jon - The path.pd volumes are indeed the posterior probability 
distributions of each pathway. They are not normalized to a sum of 1 
though b/c they're estimated by a sampling algorithm (drawing sample paths 
from this unknown distribution and adding up the sample paths, instead of 
estimating the distribution directly).

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Fri, 9 Nov 2012, Jon Clayden wrote:

> Dear all,
> I understand that the various "path.pd" image files that are created by 
> TRACULA represent a posterior
> distribution over the corresponding tract location, but I was wondering if 
> someone could explain to me
> exactly what the values in these images mean. I assume that they are not 
> probabilities as such, since they
> have values ranging up to several hundreds.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Jon
> 
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] trac-all -bedp post processing e-mail notification

2012-11-20 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Joy-Loi,

You can edit the bedpostx script (make sure you figure out which version 
of that script trac-all is calling). Find this line and delete the 
"@fmrib.ox.ac.uk" part:
mailto=`whoami`@fmrib.ox.ac.uk

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Loi wrote:

> Hello FreeSurfer experts,
>
> I am wondering if it is possible to run trac-all -bedp without
> generating the email notification at the end of the post-processing
> stage?
> After submitting a long list of -bedp jobs to the local cluster, I
> received a message from our IT center reporting being spammed by the
> Mail Delivery System with the following message:
>
> - -
>
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
> 'myusername'@fmrib.ox.ac.uk
>
> - -
>
> I am assuming it is the -bedp e-mail notification that is bouncing.
>
> Thanks for the help
>
>
> Joy-Loi
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Pixelated DTI mask from Tracula

2012-11-21 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Alessia - I'm not sure what you're referring to as "the dti mask". Can 
you give me the file name of the image that you're displaying in the 
screehshot? It does look like noise.


Thanks,
a.y

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Alessia Sarica wrote:


Dear Freesurfer Users,I'm a Ph.D. Student and I'm working on tractography using 
Tracula, 
with the aim of conducting statistical analysis on the FA values.

I have a cohort of 18 Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients, and i'm doing all 
the process phases,
starting from recon-all, ending to trac-all path.

I've attached a text file with info about DTI DICOM extracted by ImageJ.

Now, my problem is about the dti mask, as you can see on the attached image, a 
pixelated one is obtained,
even if
the left and right cst tracts seem good. This problem only occurs in few 
patients, not in all of them, even
if the script
is the same for all.

This is the script i'm using:

  #Patient_name
  setenv SUBJECTS_DIR $TUTORIAL_DATA/Patient_recons
  set dtroot = $TUTORIAL_DATA/Patient_tracula
  set subjlist = (Patient_name)
  set runlist = (1)
  set dcmroot = $TUTORIAL_DATA/Patient_tracula
  set dcmlist = (Patient_name/orig/MR00)
  set bvalfile = 
$TUTORIAL_DATA/Patient_tracula/Patient_name/bfiles/Patient_name.bval
  set bvecfile = 
$TUTORIAL_DATA/Patient_tracula/Patient_name/bfiles/Patient_name.bvec
  set nb0 = 1
  set dob0 = 0
  set doeddy = 1
  set dorotbvecs = 1
  set usemaskanat = 0
  set thrbet = 0.3
  set doregflt = 1
  set doregbbr = 0
  set doregmni = 1
  set mnitemp = $FSLDIR/data/standard/MNI152_T1_1mm_brain.nii.gz
  set pathlist = (lh.cst_AS rh.cst_AS \
  lh.ilf_AS rh.ilf_AS \
                   lh.unc_AS rh.unc_AS \
  fmajor_PP fminor_PP \
  lh.atr_PP rh.atr_PP \
  lh.cab_PP rh.cab_PP \
  lh.ccg_PP rh.ccg_PP \
  lh.slfp_PP rh.slfp_PP \
  lh.slft_PP rh.slft_PP)
   
  set ncpts = 5
  set nburnin = 200
  set usetrunc = 1
  set nkeep = 5
  set nsample = 5000


I want to highlight that bval and bvec files are obtained from the tool 
dicom2nift, because Tracula is not
able to extract them from DICOM header.
I will really appreciate your help.

Best regards,
Alessia.


--
Alessia Sarica
Ph.D. Student Biomedical and Informatics Engineering,
Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences,
University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro,
Viale Europa (Località Germaneto), 88100 CATANZARO, ITALY.
Phone: +3909613694193

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Pixelated DTI mask from Tracula

2012-11-21 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Alessia - So it's the FA map. Yes, this doesn't look like a correct FA 
map, there's no contrast between the white matter and everything else. The 
calculation of the FA has nothing to do with the freesurfer or tracula 
algorithms. It just uses your DWI data set, the gradient directions and 
the b-values, so these 3 things must be in disagreement if the FA doesn't 
come out right. I'd look into whether the subjects that have this problem 
were scanned with a different protocol or if the gradient directions and 
b-values were not extracted properly for them.


Hope this helps,
a.y

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Alessia Sarica wrote:


Hi Anastasia,thanks for your fast reply.

I mean the file named dtifit_FA.nii

I've re-run twice recon-all and tracula both, but it doesn't change the result.

Best regards,
Alessia.

2012/11/21 Anastasia Yendiki 

  Hi Alessia - I'm not sure what you're referring to as "the dti mask". Can 
you give me the file
  name of the image that you're displaying in the screehshot? It does look 
like noise.

  Thanks,
  a.y

  On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Alessia Sarica wrote:

Dear Freesurfer Users,I'm a Ph.D. Student and I'm working on 
tractography using
Tracula, 
with the aim of conducting statistical analysis on the FA values.

I have a cohort of 18 Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients, and 
i'm doing all the
process phases,
starting from recon-all, ending to trac-all path.

I've attached a text file with info about DTI DICOM extracted by 
ImageJ.

Now, my problem is about the dti mask, as you can see on the 
attached image, a
pixelated one is obtained,
even if
the left and right cst tracts seem good. This problem 
only occurs in few patients,
not in all of them, even
if the script
is the same for all.

This is the script i'm using:

      #Patient_name
      setenv SUBJECTS_DIR $TUTORIAL_DATA/Patient_recons
      set dtroot = $TUTORIAL_DATA/Patient_tracula
      set subjlist = (Patient_name)
      set runlist = (1)
      set dcmroot = $TUTORIAL_DATA/Patient_tracula
      set dcmlist = (Patient_name/orig/MR00)
      set bvalfile =
$TUTORIAL_DATA/Patient_tracula/Patient_name/bfiles/Patient_name.bval
      set bvecfile =
$TUTORIAL_DATA/Patient_tracula/Patient_name/bfiles/Patient_name.bvec
      set nb0 = 1
      set dob0 = 0
      set doeddy = 1
      set dorotbvecs = 1
      set usemaskanat = 0
      set thrbet = 0.3
      set doregflt = 1
      set doregbbr = 0
      set doregmni = 1
      set mnitemp = $FSLDIR/data/standard/MNI152_T1_1mm_brain.nii.gz
      set pathlist = (lh.cst_AS rh.cst_AS \
      lh.ilf_AS rh.ilf_AS \
                       lh.unc_AS rh.unc_AS \
      fmajor_PP fminor_PP \
      lh.atr_PP rh.atr_PP \
      lh.cab_PP rh.cab_PP \
      lh.ccg_PP rh.ccg_PP \
      lh.slfp_PP rh.slfp_PP \
      lh.slft_PP rh.slft_PP)
       
      set ncpts = 5
      set nburnin = 200
      set usetrunc = 1
      set nkeep = 5
      set nsample = 5000


I want to highlight that bval and bvec files are obtained from the 
tool dicom2nift,
because Tracula is not
able to extract them from DICOM header.
I will really appreciate your help.

Best regards,
Alessia.


--
Alessia Sarica
Ph.D. Student Biomedical and Informatics Engineering,
Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Surgical and Medical 
Sciences,
University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro,
Viale Europa (Località Germaneto), 88100 CATANZARO, ITALY.
Phone: +3909613694193




The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.




--
Alessia Sarica
Ph.D. Student Biomedical and Informatics Engineering,
Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences,
University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro,
Viale Europa (Località Germaneto), 88100 CATANZARO, ITALY.
Phone: +3909613694193

___

Re: [Freesurfer] TRACULA tract path failure

2012-11-28 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Arman - Have you ruled out any issues with the gradient directions? In 
situations where the problem is wide-spread, this seems to be the usual 
suspect. If you've checked the eigenvectors and they're ok, can you send 
an example case where the problem persists? You can use this page to 
upload a tar ball of all the tracula-related directories of the subject:

https://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html

Thanks!
a.y

On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Arman Eshaghi wrote:


Dear all,
I have difficulty sorting out the problem with some tracts in several subjects, 
tracts are incomplete or
missing. As it has come up quite a few times on the list, for this sort of 
problem I have first set
"reinit=1" and then increased control points to 7, and re-ran trac-all with 
"-prior" flag. This has worked
for some tracts in several subjects, however there are a few subjects that 
still have this problem. 

It would be great if someone could let me know what else I might be able to do 
in order to correct
missing/faulty tracts in my subjects. (The problem is not limited to a specific 
tract, it varies in
different subjects)

All the best,
-Arman

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] SEEDING in Tracula

2014-03-31 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Durai - Tracula is not for exploratory tractography, i.e., to answer 
questions like "what is this region connected to"? It uses prior 
anatomical information on known pathways to reconstruct those specific 
pathways. The anatomical information comes from the FreeSurfer anatomical 
segmentation of the same subject, and it's not just a seed region, but 
rather the probability of the pathway to go through each label in the 
anatomical segmentation at each point along the pathway's trajectory.


Hope this helps,
a.y

On Sat, 29 Mar 2014, Durai Arasan wrote:


Hi Freesurfer experts,
So I have seen studies where tracula was used to examine one of the 18 major
tracts.

However can tracula perform seed based probabilistic tractography? i.e. can
I seed ANY region and specify targets etc?

I guess I am asking if it can do LOCAL tractography of any kind? 

Thank you!


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer version after 5.3.0 from May 2013?

2014-04-01 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Janosch - The December 9th tracula update is just that, an update to 
the tracula code without any changes to the rest of freesurfer.


a.y

On Tue, 1 Apr 2014, Janosch Linkersdörfer wrote:


Hi all,

I am a little confused about what the latest Freesurfer version is.

I thought that v5.3.0 from May 15, 2013 would be the latest, but today I saw in 
the Tracula update list that there is apparently a version from December 9, 
2013.

Could you please clear that up for me?

Thanks,

Janosch
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] SEEDING in Tracula

2014-04-01 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Emily - I don't remember off the top of my head where this is 
mentioned, but it probably refers to the FA, MD, etc maps. An ROI-based 
analysis would be one where you average the FA in an ROI, so it doesn't 
refer to tractography.


Hope this helps,
a.y

On Mon, 31 Mar 2014, ebell...@uwm.edu wrote:


Hi Anastasia,


Although the website says: In addition to the tract-based analysis that can be 
performed on the tract-based averages of anisotropy and diffusivity, the same 
maps could also be used for other voxel-based and ROI-based group analyses.

So this makes me think that this type of group based ROI analysis is possible?

Emily
- Original Message -
From: ebell...@uwm.edu
To: "Freesurfer support list" 
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 10:53:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] SEEDING in Tracula

Hi Anastasia,

On a related note, with tracula, you can't let's say track the amygdala to the 
vmpfc (there is a study already demostrating that there is a white matter tract 
that connects these two structures). Can I do something like that...take 
the amygdala as the seed and the vmpfc as the target? Based on your response I 
am guessing no?

Thanks,

Emily

- Original Message -
From: "Anastasia Yendiki" 
To: "Freesurfer support list" 
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 6:32:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] SEEDING in Tracula


Hi Durai - Tracula is not for exploratory tractography, i.e., to answer
questions like "what is this region connected to"? It uses prior
anatomical information on known pathways to reconstruct those specific
pathways. The anatomical information comes from the FreeSurfer anatomical
segmentation of the same subject, and it's not just a seed region, but
rather the probability of the pathway to go through each label in the
anatomical segmentation at each point along the pathway's trajectory.

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Sat, 29 Mar 2014, Durai Arasan wrote:


Hi Freesurfer experts,
So I have seen studies where tracula was used to examine one of the 18 major
tracts.

However can tracula perform seed based probabilistic tractography? i.e. can
I seed ANY region and specify targets etc?

I guess I am asking if it can do LOCAL tractography of any kind? 

Thank you!




___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] TRACULA longitudinal stream - length of Center variable

2014-04-04 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Vincent - I suspect that this problem would be fixed by some recent 
changes that I've implemented for the longitudinal stream of tracula, and 
that I'm in the process of testing. As soon as we can get a new dev 
version built, I'll let you know so you can test it.

Thank you for your patience!

a.y

On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, Vincent Brunsch wrote:

> Dear TRACULA experts,
>
> I have used the longitudinal version and find that for some subjects'
> tracts Len_Min is larger than Len_Center. How is this possible? (An
> extreme example is Len_Min: 36, Len_Max: 75, Len_Center: 4.)
>
> Best, Vincent
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
> protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] tracula and libnetcdf

2014-04-04 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Satra - We've been talking about a 5.3.1, yes. On my end, it would 
include the tracula updates that are currently available and possibly some 
more (I've been working on some improvements to longitudinal tracula).


Not sure about libnetcdf but this is a good time to add things to the wish 
list :)


a.y

On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, Satrajit Ghosh wrote:


hi folks,
we are setting up freesurfer on a new cluster and trying to be as modular as
possible in terms of dependencies. at present we are only installing 5.3.0 +
tracula updates.

will libnetcdf (required by tracula) be included in freesurfer? or is it
considered a dependency?

and talking of which, is there a patch (a 5.3.1) in the horizon which will
include the tracula updates and perhaps netcdf in the freesurfer download.

cheers,

satra

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Satrajit Ghosh  wrote:
  update: the lack of libnetcdf eventually makes it fail.
i found a libnetcdf.so.7 on the cluster and soft linked it to
libnetcdf.so.6 and added the path to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. 

that let trac-all -prep run to completion.

cheers,

satra


On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Satrajit Ghosh  wrote:
  hi a.y.,
when running trac-preproc i'm getting this error (for
dmri_motion and dmri_group), but it continues running:

/software/freesurfer/bin/dmri_motion: error while loading shared
libraries: libnetcdf.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No
such file or directory

what will this fail to do?

also is libnetcdf now a dependency for freesurfer? the reason i
ask is that i'm running this on a remote cluster for which i
don't have admin privileges.

cheers,

satra




___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] TRACULA longitudinal stream - length of Center variable

2014-04-04 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Vincent - Overall measures for the whole tract would not be affected 
by this type of error.

a.y

On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, Vincent Brunsch wrote:

> Great, thank you!
>
> Do you maybe know if these changes will only affect the "center
> variables"? I have almost completed my soon-due report about the
> longitudinal analysis of "weighted average variables" (overall not
> byvoxel along the MAP) and now I fear that results are maybe not correct
> because after all the MAP is a part of all sampled paths.
>
> Best, Vincent
>
> Am 4/4/2014 11:49 AM, schrieb Anastasia Yendiki:
>> Hi Vincent - I suspect that this problem would be fixed by some recent
>> changes that I've implemented for the longitudinal stream of tracula, and
>> that I'm in the process of testing. As soon as we can get a new dev
>> version built, I'll let you know so you can test it.
>>
>> Thank you for your patience!
>>
>> a.y
>>
>> On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, Vincent Brunsch wrote:
>>
>>> Dear TRACULA experts,
>>>
>>> I have used the longitudinal version and find that for some subjects'
>>> tracts Len_Min is larger than Len_Center. How is this possible? (An
>>> extreme example is Len_Min: 36, Len_Max: 75, Len_Center: 4.)
>>>
>>> Best, Vincent
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
>>> protection is active.
>>> http://www.avast.com
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
> protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] SNR on DTI data

2014-04-07 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Yuko - As long as you define in your paper how you calculated SNR, 
you'll be fine reporting these values.


a.y

On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Yuko Yotsumoto wrote:


Hi Anastasia and freesurfers,

I have more questions regarding SNR on DTI data.

I masked the low-b images by the white matter label (aseg), then calculated the 
SNR ( mean / standard deviation within the label).
The mean values ranged for 250-350 across subjects, and the sd ranged for 
60-140 across subjects.
As a result, I got the SNR ranged for 2.5-4.0 ish.

When I compared these values with the ones reported in other studies, I 
realized that my values are much smaller.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21591016
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=370#.U0JSS8dLFAI

They reported SNR to be around 20-50. It looks like they used different 
calculations, so probably I should not make direct comparisons, but still the 
difference worries me.

My questions are:
(1) Do our values look valid to you?
(2) Are there any article that reported SNR as mean low-b / sd in the white 
matter aseg mask?

Thank you in advance!
Yuko Yotsumoto

Mar 18, 2014 1:26 PM、Anastasia Yendiki  のメール:



Signal-to-noise ratio = mean / standard deviation

On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Yuko Yotsumoto wrote:


Anastasia,

Thank you so much for your reply.

So I should calculate the mean and s.d. of the values of the low-b within the 
white matter region for each subject, and compare those numbers between groups.
Is it correct to say that the higher mean values indicate larger SNR?

Yuko

On Mar 18, 2014, at 12:53 AM, Anastasia Yendiki wrote:



Hi Yuko - You can use the low-b images and compute the SNR of those images 
inside a mask of the white matter. Because dt_recon computes a registration 
from the diffusion to the structural data, you can use that registration to map 
the white matter label from the freesurfer segmentation (aseg) to the diffusion 
data. Then calculate the mean and standard deviation of the values of the low-b 
images inside that white matter mask.

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Yuko Yotsumoto wrote:


Hello Freesurfers,
I have DTI data for two groups of subjects, and were asked SNR for each
group.
I did ROI analysis on FA values, therefore, I  do not have the averaged DTI
data.
I am wondering if there is any way to compute SNR from dt_recon output. It
doesn't have to be the ROI specific SNR values, I just need SNR for the
whole DTI data for each group.
Any suggestions will be appreciated!
Yuko Yotsumoto
---
-
Yuko Yotsumoto, Ph. D.
Associate Professor
The University of Tokyo, Department of Life Sciences
Bldg #2, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902 Japan
phone : (+81)-3-5454-4332
E-mail: cy...@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.









___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Questions about byvoxel statistics from Tracula

2014-04-09 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Bonsoir Emilie - Tracula draws a large number of path samples, which in 
the end are added up to produce the path probability distribution. "FA" 
shows the values of FA at each point along the path sample with the 
greatest probability, i.e., along a single 1D curve. "FA_Avg" averages the 
FA from all the path samples at corresponding points along their 
trajectory. Because it is an average of many values rather than a single 
value, FA_Avg will tend to be less noisy and more reliable.


Currently there is no way to average other values along the path, but you 
can trick the software into doing it. Find the "dmri_pathstats" command 
line corresponding to the tract that you want in trac-all.log. Rename 
"dmri/dtifit_FA.nii.gz" to something else temporarily, and rename the 
volume that you want to get values along the tract from as 
"dmri/dtifit_FA.nii.gz". Now when you run the same dmri_pathstats command, 
the pathstats.byvoxel.txt file will contain the values from the new 
volume in the FA/FA_Avg columns, instead of the values from the FA volume.


The coordinates in the stats files are in the subject's native DWI space.

Hope this helps,
a.y

PS: For combining the pathstats.byvoxel.txt files across subjects, get the 
latest tracula update, if you haven't:

http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Tracula/#Updates


On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Emilie Poirion wrote:


Hello
I'm using Tracula to analyse our DWI-images. Freesurfer reconstructions of
the corresponding T1-images have been perfomed before.
Respectively, the version used are 1.53 and 5.3.
The Tracula process works fine and I have extracted the statistics for all
tracts.
About this statistics, I wanted to know what is the difference between FA
and FA_Avg ?

An other question about the values extracted is about the coordinates in the
file "byvoxel.txt". Are they correspind with the coordinates of the voxel in
the dtifit image were the values were extracted?

The last question, can we extracted the same by tract statistics from an
other image like a PET registered to the DWI with your code?

Thanks for your answer

--
Emilie Poirion

Master 1 Informatique Industrielle et  Imagerie Industrielle
Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6)



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] TRACULA lesions

2014-04-16 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Florian - Tracula has certain expectations for what aparc+aseg labels 
each tract goes through or next to, and it'll skip areas that don't match 
those expectations. If the voxels in the lesions get labeled in the 
aparc+aseg, e.g. as white-matter hypointensities instead of white matter, 
you can switch those voxels to the white matter label, and then tracula 
will treat them like the rest of white matter. I should probably add an 
option for trac-all to be able to do that in the next version.

For now, you can change those voxels in mri/aparc+aseg.mgz (first keep a 
copy of the original file under another name for all other intents and 
purposes!) and then rerun trac-all. You can skip the trac-all steps before 
-masks, that's the step where it grabs the aparc+aseg to use in subsequent 
steps.

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Wed, 16 Apr 2014, Florian Borsodi wrote:

> Dear Freesurfer TRACULA Experts,
>
> We are trying to run TRACULA on patients with lesions and found out, that 
> TRACULA had problems tracking streamlines trough the lesions, which is 
> understandable. The problem is, if TRACULA gets lost in the lesions, the 
> whole streamline is not considered, even if the streamline until the lesion 
> might be correct!
>
> Is there any possibility to hand TRACULA lesionmasks, so that the regions 
> with lesions are ignored? If not, is there a possibility to maintain the lost 
> streamlines, or at least parts of it?
>
> Thank you in advance for your help.
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Florian Borsodi, Lukas Pirpamer
> Department of Neurology
> Medical Universtiy of Graz
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] openmp/mkl support in tracula

2014-04-25 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Satra - Sorry, no.

a.y

On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Satrajit Ghosh wrote:

> hi a.y.,
> is there any part of tracula that currently benefits from openmp or mkl 
> availability?
> 
> cheers,
> 
> satra
> 
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer-Tracula Error

2014-05-09 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Elia - This issue was fixed in the last update:
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Tracula/#Updates

FYI, there will be another tracula update soon (after ISMRM) that will 
further improve the longitudinal stream specifically.


a.y

On Fri, 9 May 2014, Elia S. wrote:


Dear Freesurfer Staff,
I encountered the following error while running tracula - longitudinal:

ERROR: flag ; unrecognized

The exact command line i ran is the following one:

trac-all -prep -c
'/home/elia/scripts/Tracula/LCL/dcmTimePoints_tar-2/tracula.config' 

I will attach  the complete error log  as well as my dmrirc file (which I
called in this case tracula.config).


Best,
Elia

---
---

Freesurfer version: freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0

Linux Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04 precise - Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS

Environment/Version: Linux king-ubuntu 3.2.0-56-generic #86-Ubuntu SMP Wed
Oct 23 09:20:45 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

My Current Working Directory: /home/elia


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] TRACULA preprocessing error, FreeSurfer 5.2.0

2014-05-16 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Colm - The final version used is bvecs. The eddy current correction 
step registers each DWI to the first b=0 image, and the same 
transformation is applied to the corresponding gradient vector. This is a 
standard procedure when doing eddy current correction by registration.


Hope this helps,
a.y

On Fri, 16 May 2014, McGinnity, Colm wrote:


Hi Anastasia,

Many thanks for your help.
I did reply but don't see the email on the forum.

I have began using FreeSurfer 5.3.0 instead, thanks. However, I'm a bit 
confused - I've created a 3-column bvecs format file (I had been using for 
version 5.2.0).

After running several I've noticed the 'bvecs' file in the dmri folder is 
slightly different from the input file, whereas the 'bvecs.norot' file matches 
the input file extactly.

For example:
File 2:
0.9200842 0.3251221 0.2185593
File 2:
0.919   0.3311 0.2141

Can you please clarify which is used, and if these differences can be ignored?

Thanks and best wishes,
Colm.


-----Original Message-
From: Anastasia Yendiki [mailto:ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: 11 March 2014 00:39
To: McGinnity, Colm
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] TRACULA preprocessing error, FreeSurfer 5.2.0


Hi Colm - Note that the information in the tutorial (particularly the part 
where gradient tables can be formatted in 3 rows or 3 columns) pertains to the 
latest tracula update:
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Tracula#Updates

You're using an older version that only supports the 3-column format. I have no 
idea if this is what's causing the error without looking at your trac-all.log, 
but this would be a first guess.

a.y

On Mon, 10 Mar 2014, McGinnity, Colm wrote:


Dear Experts,
 
I am very new to TRACULA, I apologise for what is probably a silly question.
 
I’ve got the following error on running trac-all –prep (FreeSurfer 5.2.0):
 
awk: cmd. line:1: fatal: cannot open file `0' for reading (No such
file or
directory)
mri_concat --i
/home/k1193186/FreeSurfer/TRACULA/ROLAND03A/dmri/dwi_frame.nii.gz
--mean --o /home/k1193186/
FreeSurfer/TRACULA/ROLAND03A/dmri/lowb.nii.gz
niiRead(): error opening file /home/k1193186/
FreeSurfer/TRACULA/ROLAND03A/dmri/dwi_frame.nii.gz
ninputs = 1
Checking inputs
ERROR: reading
/home/k1193186/FreeSurfer/TRACULA/ROLAND03A/dmri/dwi_frame.nii.gz
 
Can anyone tell me what this means and how to fix this, please?
I’m guessing I’ve set up my configuration wrong or have the files in
the wrong place?
 
Many thanks!
Best wishes,
Colm.
King's College London
 
 
 





The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
properly dispose of the e-mail.


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Compatibility Tracula v.5.3 and recon v.5.2 longitudinal

2014-05-21 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Yoonho - Tracula did not change at all between the 5.2 and 5.3 
releases. It was recon-all that changed, and in fact 5.3 was released to 
correct a bug in 5.2, so it is not recommended to use 5.2 recon-all.

For info about tracula versions, see:
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Tracula#Updates

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Wed, 21 May 2014, Chung, Yoonho wrote:

> Hi Anastasia,
>
> I have a large set of freesurfer recons (T1) already processed through 
> FS version 5.2 longitudinal stream while ago. However, I see now that 
> there is an advantage of using Tracula 5.3 longitudinal stream for DTI 
> longitudinal analysis. Do you know if I run the DWI data using 5.3 
> TRACULA longitudinal stream - if it will work with recons that are 
> processed with 5.2? Thanks!
>
> Y
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Compatibility Tracula v.5.3 and recon v.5.2 longitudinal

2014-05-22 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Yoon - If you are getting an error from longitudinal tracula, do check 
the tracula updates at the link that I gave you in my previous email.

As for 5.2 recon-all, others can chime in here, but like I said it is not 
recommended to use it. Sorry about that.

a.y

On Thu, 22 May 2014, Yoonho Chung wrote:

> Thanks for the quick response!
>
> If I already have all the T1 data processed using recon-all with FS v5.2, do 
> you think it is okay to switch the stream to FS v.5.3 and run Tracula? - 
> without having to do the recon-all again for the T1 data? It is because I am 
> also experiencing DTI longitudinal error due to the OS issue (according to 
> other threads). And if possible, I would like to avoid having to redo all the 
> recons if we have to switch it to v5.3.
>
> Thanks again!
> Yoon
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Compatibility Tracula v.5.3 and recon v.5.2 longitudinal

2014-06-13 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Yoon - No, in the current code the assumption is that the b-values are 
the same for all subjects in the study. One scenario where this wouldn't 
be the case is if different DWI volumes are removed for different subjects 
because of excessive motion, and we'll be able to handle this in the next 
version.

a.y

On Fri, 30 May 2014, Chung, Yoonho wrote:

> Thanks for the tip. Another question.
>
> In the dmrirc file, can we also define multiple bval file? (like how in the 
> example-dmrirc long- you can set multiple bvecs.txt using 'set bveclist'?
> In the example, option for specifying multiple bval files is not shown.
>
> Thank you
> Yoon
>
>
>
> On May 22, 2014, at 5:37 PM, Anastasia Yendiki  
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Yoon - If you are getting an error from longitudinal tracula, do check 
>> the tracula updates at the link that I gave you in my previous email.
>>
>> As for 5.2 recon-all, others can chime in here, but like I said it is not 
>> recommended to use it. Sorry about that.
>>
>> a.y
>>
>> On Thu, 22 May 2014, Yoonho Chung wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the quick response!
>>>
>>> If I already have all the T1 data processed using recon-all with FS v5.2, 
>>> do you think it is okay to switch the stream to FS v.5.3 and run Tracula? - 
>>> without having to do the recon-all again for the T1 data? It is because I 
>>> am also experiencing DTI longitudinal error due to the OS issue (according 
>>> to other threads). And if possible, I would like to avoid having to redo 
>>> all the recons if we have to switch it to v5.3.
>>>
>>> Thanks again!
>>> Yoon
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance 
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
>> error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
>> properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] TRACULA: ERROR in -qa Flag

2014-06-13 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Shantanu - The -qa flag was added in the update to tracula that was 
posted after the 5.3 release.
http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/Tracula/#Updates

Martinos Center users can simply switch to the dev version of freesurfer 
to take advantage of these updates, in which case you don't need to 
download anything.

a.y

On Mon, 2 Jun 2014, Shantanu Ghosh wrote:

> Dear Anastasia and Freesurfer experts,
>
> I am trying to set up an analysis of motion parameters using the flag -q
> from a set of DTI Dicoms located on the Martinos cluster, but I am facing
> problems -- it says "ERROR: flag -qa unrecognized". My .tcshrc is set to
> Freesurfer5.3 and FSL.
>
> What am I doing wrong?
>
> My config file is attached and here are my commands.
>
> cd /autofs/space/glia_001/users/shantanu/dtistudy/
> setenv PATH /usr/pubsw/packages/python/epd/bin:${PATH}
> setenv FSENV_KEEP_PROMPT
> setenv MNE_ROOT /usr/pubsw/packages/mne/stable
> setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /autofs/space/calvin_001/marvin/1/users/MRI/WMA/recons
> setenv FSL_DIR /usr/pubsw/packages/fsl/5.0.0
> source /usr/local/freesurfer/nmr-stable53-env
> source /usr/pubsw/packages/mne/stable/bin/mne_setup
>
> My console output-
> glia:shantanu[120] mynmr53
>  freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v5.3.0-20130514 
> Setting up environment for FreeSurfer/FS-FAST (and FSL)
> WARNING: /autofs/space/calvin_001/marvin/1/users/MRI/WMA/recons does not
> exist
> FREESURFER_HOME   /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0
> FSFAST_HOME   /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/fsfast
> FSF_OUTPUT_FORMAT nii.gz
> SUBJECTS_DIR  /autofs/space/calvin_001/marvin/1/users/MRI/WMA/recons
> MNI_DIR   /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_1_0/mni
> FSL_DIR   /usr/pubsw/packages/fsl/5.0.0
>
> MNE software location set to:/usr/pubsw/packages/mne/stable
> MATLAB software not available
>
> /usr/pubsw/packages/mne/stable/bin already in PATH
> /usr/pubsw/packages/mne/stable/lib added to LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> /usr/pubsw/packages/mne/stable/share/app-defaults/%N added to
> XUSERFILESEARCHPATH
>
> Note: Remember to set SUBJECTS_DIR and SUBJECT environment variables
> correctly.
> Note: FreeSurfer environment is needed to access tkmedit from mne_analyze.
>
> glia:shantanu[121] trac-all -qa -s 008801 -c
> /autofs/space/glia_001/users/shantanu/dtistudy/dticonfigfile.txt
> ERROR: flag -qa unrecognized
> -qa -s 008801 -c
> /autofs/space/glia_001/users/shantanu/dtistudy/dticonfigfile.txt
> glia:shantanu[122]
>
>
> Thanks in advance for all help.
> Shantanu
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] trac-all -stat option

2014-06-13 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Kathryn - The -stat option was added in the latest tracula update, see 
here:
http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/Tracula/#Updates

You need to download this update, after installing freesurfer 5.3, to be 
able to do what is described in the tutorials.

a.y

On Wed, 4 Jun 2014, Kathryn Cullen wrote:

> Hello, I am trying to examine FA along the trajectory of the white matter
> tract, as described in the wiki:
> http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/FsTutorial/TraculaStatistics (half way down the
> page).
> 
> I am using the FreeSurfer version 3.0.
> 
> The wiki says:
> 
> The pathstats.byvoxel.txt files will generally not contain the same number
> of positions (rows) for each subject because the tracts are reconstructed in
> each subject's native diffusion space and not in a template space. Thus they
> are not ready for performing group analyses yet. To combine these files from
> multiple subjects, interpolating the anisotropy and diffusivity values at
> corresponding positions along the tract for all subjects, run the following:
> 
> trac-all -stat -c $TUTORIAL_DATA/diffusion_tutorial/dmrirc.tutorial
> 
> However, when I try to use the -stat option, it says it is not recognized. 
> There is no -stat option described in the help, either.
> 
> Am I using the wrong version, or do I need to upload something differently?
> 
> Thanks very much,
> 
> Katie
> 
> --
> Kathryn R. Cullen, M.D.
> Assistant Professor
> University of Minnesota Medical School
> Department of Psychiatry
> Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
> F268 West Building
> 2450 Riverside Avenue
> Minneapolis, MN 55454
> (612) 273-9762
> 
> 
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] possible to enable openmp with tracula cvsreg?

2014-06-13 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Sal - There is no way to do this through trac-all, sorry.

a.y

On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, Salil Soman wrote:

> Hi,
> I noticed in the output for tracula -prep I am currently running using
> cvsreg it mentions openmp=1, I was wondering if there is a way to enable
> more than 1 core for openmp for tracula-prep?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --
> Salil Soman, MD, MS
> Postdoctoral Research Fellow - Stanford Radiological Sciences Laboratory
> Fellow - Palo Alto War Related Illness and Injury Study Center
> WOC Neuroradiology Attending - Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System
> 
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] TRACULA: ERROR in -qa Flag

2014-06-13 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

The right one to source is /usr/local/freesurfer/nmr-dev-env


On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Shantanu Ghosh wrote:

> Hi Anastasia,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> After I edit my .tcshrc file to source the dev, I still get an error message.
>
> glia:shantanu[64] mynmr53
>
> MNE software location set to:/usr/pubsw/packages/mne/stable
> MATLAB software not available
>
> /usr/pubsw/packages/mne/stable/bin added to PATH
> /usr/pubsw/packages/mne/stable/lib added to LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> /usr/pubsw/packages/mne/stable/share/app-defaults/%N added to
> XUSERFILESEARCHPATH
>
> Note: Remember to set SUBJECTS_DIR and SUBJECT environment variables
> correctly.
> Note: FreeSurfer environment is needed to access tkmedit from mne_analyze.
>
> glia:shantanu[65] fslview
> fslview: Command not found.
>
>
>
> Can you tell me if this is the right one to source?
> /autofs/cluster/freesurfer/centos6_x86_64/dev
>
> Or do I have to make further changes to my .tcshrc to access the dev version?
>
> Thanks in advance.
> Shantanu
>
>
> On Fri, June 13, 2014 12:02 pm, Anastasia Yendiki wrote:
>>
>> Hi Shantanu - The -qa flag was added in the update to tracula that was
> posted after the 5.3 release.
>>  http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/Tracula/#Updates
>>
>> Martinos Center users can simply switch to the dev version of freesurfer
> to take advantage of these updates, in which case you don't need to
> download anything.
>>
>> a.y
>>
>> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014, Shantanu Ghosh wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Anastasia and Freesurfer experts,
>>> I am trying to set up an analysis of motion parameters using the flag
> -q
>>> from a set of DTI Dicoms located on the Martinos cluster, but I am facing
>>> problems -- it says "ERROR: flag -qa unrecognized". My .tcshrc is set
> to
>>> Freesurfer5.3 and FSL.
>>> What am I doing wrong?
>>> My config file is attached and here are my commands.
>>> cd /autofs/space/glia_001/users/shantanu/dtistudy/
>>> setenv PATH /usr/pubsw/packages/python/epd/bin:${PATH}
>>> setenv FSENV_KEEP_PROMPT
>>> setenv MNE_ROOT /usr/pubsw/packages/mne/stable
>>> setenv SUBJECTS_DIR
>>> /autofs/space/calvin_001/marvin/1/users/MRI/WMA/recons
>>> setenv FSL_DIR /usr/pubsw/packages/fsl/5.0.0
>>> source /usr/local/freesurfer/nmr-stable53-env
>>> source /usr/pubsw/packages/mne/stable/bin/mne_setup
>>> My console output-
>>> glia:shantanu[120] mynmr53
>>>  freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v5.3.0-20130514
> 
>>> Setting up environment for FreeSurfer/FS-FAST (and FSL)
>>> WARNING: /autofs/space/calvin_001/marvin/1/users/MRI/WMA/recons does
> not
>>> exist
>>> FREESURFER_HOME   /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0
>>> FSFAST_HOME   /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/fsfast
>>> FSF_OUTPUT_FORMAT nii.gz
>>> SUBJECTS_DIR
> /autofs/space/calvin_001/marvin/1/users/MRI/WMA/recons
>>> MNI_DIR   /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_1_0/mni
>>> FSL_DIR   /usr/pubsw/packages/fsl/5.0.0
>>> MNE software location set to:/usr/pubsw/packages/mne/stable MATLAB
> software not available
>>> /usr/pubsw/packages/mne/stable/bin already in PATH
>>> /usr/pubsw/packages/mne/stable/lib added to LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>>> /usr/pubsw/packages/mne/stable/share/app-defaults/%N added to
>>> XUSERFILESEARCHPATH
>>> Note: Remember to set SUBJECTS_DIR and SUBJECT environment variables
> correctly.
>>> Note: FreeSurfer environment is needed to access tkmedit from
>>> mne_analyze.
>>> glia:shantanu[121] trac-all -qa -s 008801 -c
>>> /autofs/space/glia_001/users/shantanu/dtistudy/dticonfigfile.txt ERROR:
> flag -qa unrecognized
>>> -qa -s 008801 -c
>>> /autofs/space/glia_001/users/shantanu/dtistudy/dticonfigfile.txt
> glia:shantanu[122]
>>> Thanks in advance for all help.
>>> Shantanu
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula preprocessing error ( set dob0 = 1 )

2014-06-15 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Elia - It looks like this file didn't get created:
/home/elia/scripts/Tracula/LCL/Tracula-B0-Input_zip/T13D/timePoint1/dmri/dwi.nii.gz

The command that was supposed to create it was epidewarp.fsl. You can find 
the command line that begins with "epidewarp.fsl" in the log file that you 
sent me. When you run that whole line directly from the unix command line, 
do you get any errors?


a.y

On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Elia S. wrote:


Dear Freesurfer community,
Whenever i try to launch the tracula preprocessing, using  "set dob0 = 1 " and 
the following command
line:

trac-all -prep -no-isrunning -c 
'/home/elia/scripts/Tracula/LCL/Tracula-B0-Input_zip/tracula.config

It stops, giving me errors like these:

niiRead(): error opening file
/home/elia/scripts/Tracula/LCL/Tracula-B0-Input_zip/T13D/timePoint1/dmri/dwi.nii.gz

ERROR: reading
/home/elia/scripts/Tracula/LCL/Tracula-B0-Input_zip/T13D/timePoint1/dmri/dwi_frame0.nii.gz

While setting "dob0 = 0" everything runs smoothly.

Can you help me please?  I'll attach the log + dmrirc (tracula.config)

Best,
Elia.

---
---

Freesurfer version: freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0

Linux Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04 precise - Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS

Environment/Version: Linux king-ubuntu 3.2.0-56-generic #86-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 
23 09:20:45 UTC 2013
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula preprocessing error ( set dob0 = 1 )

2014-06-17 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Elia - This could very well be the case. Does the epidewarp.fsl command 
give you any specific error message, or does it just not create an output?


a.y

On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Elia S. wrote:


Hi Anastasia,
Yes, launching the same command line from terminal produced the same error, but 
at the same
time we realized we were using the wrong magnetic/phase dicoms.which weren't
magnetic/phase images at all.
Could that be the cause of the failure? I would answer the question myself but 
right now I
don't have the correct images to test it.

Best,
Elia.


Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 07:21:28 -0400
From: ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula preprocessing error ( set dob0 = 1 )


Hi Elia - It looks like this file didn't get created:
/home/elia/scripts/Tracula/LCL/Tracula-B0-Input_zip/T13D/timePoint1/dmri/dwi.nii.gz

The command that was supposed to create it was epidewarp.fsl. You can find 
the command line that begins with "epidewarp.fsl" in the log file that you 
sent me. When you run that whole line directly from the unix command line, 
do you get any errors?


a.y

On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Elia S. wrote:

> Dear Freesurfer community,
> Whenever i try to launch the tracula preprocessing, using  "set dob0 = 1 " 
and the follow
ing command
> line:
> 
> trac-all -prep -no-isrunning -c '/home/elia/scripts/Tracula/LCL/Tracula-B0-Input_zip/trac

ula.config
> 
> It stops, giving me errors like these:
> 
> niiRead(): error opening file

> 
/home/elia/scripts/Tracula/LCL/Tracula-B0-Input_zip/T13D/timePoint1/dmri/dwi.nii.gz
> 
> ERROR: reading

> 
/home/elia/scripts/Tracula/LCL/Tracula-B0-Input_zip/T13D/timePoint1/dmri/dwi_frame0.nii.g
z
> 
> While setting "dob0 = 0" everything runs smoothly.
> 
> Can you help me please?  I'll attach the log + dmrirc (tracula.config)
> 
> Best,

> Elia.
> 
> -

--
> ---
> 
> Freesurfer version: freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0
> 
> Linux Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04 precise - Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS
> 
> Environment/Version: Linux king-ubuntu 3.2.0-56-generic #86-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 23 09:20:4

5 UTC 2013
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> 
>


___ Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. If
you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient
information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error 
but does
not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose 
of the
e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula preprocessing error ( set dob0 = 1 )

2014-06-17 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Check the email archives for a recent message about epidewarp.fsl from 
Doug, there is a newer version that works with FSL 5.


On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Elia S. wrote:



Hi Anastasia,
The epidewarp.fsl gives me the following output:

FSLVersion 5.0.6
FSLVerMaj 5
FSL Version is 5.0.6, must be 3.X or 4.X

Either from script or command line.

Best,
Elia.


Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 09:17:58 -0400
From: ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula preprocessing error ( set dob0 = 1 )


Hi Elia - This could very well be the case. Does the epidewarp.fsl command 
give you any specific error message, or does it just not create an output?


a.y

On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Elia S. wrote:

> Hi Anastasia,
> Yes, launching the same command line from terminal produced the same error, 
but at the sa
me
> time we realized we were using the wrong magnetic/phase dicoms.which 
weren't
> magnetic/phase images at all.
> Could that be the cause of the failure? I would answer the question myself but right now 
I

> don't have the correct images to test it.
> 
> Best,

> Elia.
> 
> 
> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 07:21:28 -0400

> From: ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula preprocessing error ( set dob0 = 1 )
>
> 
> Hi Elia - It looks like this file didn't get created:

> 
/home/elia/scripts/Tracula/LCL/Tracula-B0-Input_zip/T13D/timePoint1/dmri/dwi.nii.gz
> 
> The command that was supposed to create it was epidewarp.fsl. You can find 
> the command line that begins with "epidewarp.fsl" in the log file that you 
> sent me. When you run that whole line directly from the unix command line, 
> do you get any errors?
> 
> a.y
> 
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Elia S. wrote:
> 
> > Dear Freesurfer community,

> > Whenever i try to launch the tracula preprocessing, using  "set dob0 = 1 " 
and the foll
ow
> ing command
> > line:
> > 
> > trac-all -prep -no-isrunning -c '/home/elia/scripts/Tracula/LCL/Tracula-B0-Input_zip/tr

ac
> ula.config
> > 
> > It stops, giving me errors like these:
> > 
> > niiRead(): error opening file

> > 
/home/elia/scripts/Tracula/LCL/Tracula-B0-Input_zip/T13D/timePoint1/dmri/dwi.nii.gz
> > 
> > ERROR: reading

> > 
/home/elia/scripts/Tracula/LCL/Tracula-B0-Input_zip/T13D/timePoint1/dmri/dwi_frame0.nii
.g
> z
> > 
> > While setting "dob0 = 0" everything runs smoothly.
> > 
> > Can you help me please?  I'll attach the log + dmrirc (tracula.config)
> > 
> > Best,

> > Elia.
> > 
> > ---

--
> --
> > ---
> > 
> > Freesurfer version: freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0
> > 
> > Linux Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04 precise - Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS
> > 
> > Environment/Version: Linux king-ubuntu 3.2.0-56-generic #86-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 23 09:20

:4
> 5 UTC 2013
> > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > 
> >
> 
> ___ Freesurfer mailing list

> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurf
er
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. I
f
> you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains 
patient
> information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
error but does
> not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly 
dispose of the
> e-mail.
> 
>


___ Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. If
you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient
information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error 
but does
not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose 
of the
e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] trac-all error (segmentation fault?)

2014-06-25 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Durai - You cannot run all 3 steps of trac-all at the same time. The 3 
steps need to be run separately. Please check the tutorial on the wiki for 
more details.


a.y

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Durai Arasan wrote:


Hi Freesurfer experts,
I tried running trac-all with my config file and received the following
error :

Segmentation fault 
Linux 129-x-xx-xxx 3.4.33-2.24-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Feb 26 03:34:33
UTC 2013 (5f00a32) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

trac-paths exited with ERRORS at Tue Jun 24 11:15:12 EDT 2014

Any help would be greatly appreciated! I am attaching the config file, log
and error files.

Thank you!
Durai


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula ERROR: fMRIframe: frame >= nframes

2014-06-30 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Jun - It's failing at the point where it tries to extract the low-b 
images from the DWI series. I suspect that the number of frames in the 4D 
DWI volume that is extracted from your dicom does not match the number of 
frames that it expects to find based on how many gradient vectors or 
b-values it's looking for. So I'd check these DWI, gradient vector and 
b-value files to make sure they are all consistent.

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Jun Shinozaki wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> I am trying to run a single subject in TRACULA (trac-all -prep -c
> dmrirc), but exited with ERRORS.
>
> ERROR: fMRIframe: frame >= nframes
>
> The attached file is a log file.
>
> Can anyone help me?
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Jun Shinozaki.
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula ERROR: fMRIframe: frame >= nframes

2014-06-30 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Jun - By a simple word count on these files:

% wc -w bvals bvecs
   65 bvals
  198 bvecs
  263 total

As you can see, there are 3 extra entries in the bvecs file. If you then 
open the file, you'll see that there is an extra column of zeros in the 
end. Not sure if that's what's causing the problem, but you might want to 
look for empty lines at the end of your original gradient table.

a.y

On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Jun Shinozaki wrote:

> Hi Anastasia,
> Thank you for your e-mail.
> I took 65 DWIs (5 b0 volumes and 60 direction DWIs).
>
> I checked dwi.nii.gz in the dmri folder, and dwi.nii.gz had 65 images.
> Also, I checked bvals and bvecs in the dmri folder, and they have 65 counts.
> It seems consistent.
> I attach bvals and bvecs. These files were created by freesurfer 
> automatically.
>
> Regards,
> Jun Shinozaki
>
> 2014-06-30 18:38 GMT+09:00 Anastasia Yendiki :
>>
>> Hi Jun - It's failing at the point where it tries to extract the low-b
>> images from the DWI series. I suspect that the number of frames in the 4D
>> DWI volume that is extracted from your dicom does not match the number of
>> frames that it expects to find based on how many gradient vectors or
>> b-values it's looking for. So I'd check these DWI, gradient vector and
>> b-value files to make sure they are all consistent.
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>> a.y
>>
>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Jun Shinozaki wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> I am trying to run a single subject in TRACULA (trac-all -prep -c
>>> dmrirc), but exited with ERRORS.
>>>
>>> ERROR: fMRIframe: frame >= nframes
>>>
>>> The attached file is a log file.
>>>
>>> Can anyone help me?
>>> Thank you in advance.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jun Shinozaki.
>>>
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance 
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
>> error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
>> properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula ERROR: fMRIframe: frame >= nframes

2014-07-01 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

There are probably some empty spaces at the end of the lines of the 
original files that confuses it into introducing those zeros. If you 
attach the original files, I can take a look at them.

On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Jun Shinozaki wrote:

> Hi Anastasia,
>
> I created bvals.txt and bvecs.txt using dcm2nii.
> These original files were text files and set in dmrirc profile as
> "set bvalfile = /path/to/bvals.txt".
>
> I checked word count for these files
> # wc -w bvals.txt bvecs.txt
>  65 bvals.txt
>  195 bvecs.txt
>  260 total
>
> However, when I run "trac-all -prep -c dmrirc", then freesurfer creates
> bvals and bvecs automatically in dmri folder.
>
> Then, I check word count
> # wc -w bvals bvecs
>  65 bvals
> 198 bvecs
> 263 total
>
> Now, freesurfer adds 3 extra entries in the bvecs file.
> As you said, there is an extra column of zeros in the end.
>
> So, I cannot fix the error.
>
> Regards,
> Jun Shinozaki
>
> 2014-07-01 15:56 GMT+09:00 Anastasia Yendiki :
>>
>> Hi Jun - By a simple word count on these files:
>>
>> % wc -w bvals bvecs
>>65 bvals
>>   198 bvecs
>>   263 total
>>
>> As you can see, there are 3 extra entries in the bvecs file. If you then
>> open the file, you'll see that there is an extra column of zeros in the
>> end. Not sure if that's what's causing the problem, but you might want to
>> look for empty lines at the end of your original gradient table.
>>
>> a.y
>>
>> On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Jun Shinozaki wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Anastasia,
>>> Thank you for your e-mail.
>>> I took 65 DWIs (5 b0 volumes and 60 direction DWIs).
>>>
>>> I checked dwi.nii.gz in the dmri folder, and dwi.nii.gz had 65 images.
>>> Also, I checked bvals and bvecs in the dmri folder, and they have 65 counts.
>>> It seems consistent.
>>> I attach bvals and bvecs. These files were created by freesurfer 
>>> automatically.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jun Shinozaki
>>>
>>> 2014-06-30 18:38 GMT+09:00 Anastasia Yendiki :
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jun - It's failing at the point where it tries to extract the low-b
>>>> images from the DWI series. I suspect that the number of frames in the 4D
>>>> DWI volume that is extracted from your dicom does not match the number of
>>>> frames that it expects to find based on how many gradient vectors or
>>>> b-values it's looking for. So I'd check these DWI, gradient vector and
>>>> b-value files to make sure they are all consistent.
>>>>
>>>> Hope this helps,
>>>> a.y
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Jun Shinozaki wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am trying to run a single subject in TRACULA (trac-all -prep -c
>>>>> dmrirc), but exited with ERRORS.
>>>>>
>>>>> ERROR: fMRIframe: frame >= nframes
>>>>>
>>>>> The attached file is a log file.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can anyone help me?
>>>>> Thank you in advance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Jun Shinozaki.
>>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it 
>>>> is
>>>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the 
>>>> e-mail
>>>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance 
>>>> HelpLine at
>>>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
>>>> error
>>>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
>>>> properly
>>>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>>>
>>>
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] DTI FA Values in Diffusion Space vs. Standard Space

2014-07-01 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Emily - Depends on what you're doing. If you're doing an ROI-based or 
tractography-based analysis, where you extract average FA in a part of 
white matter, there is no need to warp. If you're doing a voxel-based 
analysis, obviously all the subjects need to be in a common space to 
compare their FA values voxel-by-voxel.

a.y

On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, ebell...@uwm.edu wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if it is better to keep the FA results from a DTI 
> analysis in diffusion space for group analysis or if you should warp 
> them into standard space as you would typically do with functional MRI 
> data.
>
> Emily
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula ERROR: fMRIframe: frame >= nframes

2014-07-02 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Pedro - Have you specified not to do eddy current compensation? It 
looks like it's being skipped. In that case, you need to also skip the QA 
step (by adding -noqa to your trac-all command line). That's because the 
QA step requires the output of the eddy current compensation to assess how 
much motion there is in the data.

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Thu, 3 Jul 2014, Pedro Rosa wrote:

> Anastasia,
> I was finding the same error as Jun, and your help fixed it. Thank you very 
> much.
> However, I am now finding a new error (attached).
> Can you help me?
> Thank you again.
> Regards,
> Pedro Rosa.
> 
> On Wednesday, July 2, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Jun Shinozaki wrote:
>
>   Hi Anastasia,
> 
> You are right! There are empty spaces at the end of the lines in
> original bvecs and bvals.
> I could fix the error and finish trac-preproc without error by
> eliminating these spaces.
> Thank you so much!
> 
> Regards,
> Jun Shinozaki
> 
> 2014-07-02 15:21 GMT+09:00 Anastasia Yendiki :
> 
> There are probably some empty spaces at the end of the lines of the
> original files that confuses it into introducing those zeros. If you
> attach the original files, I can take a look at them.
> 
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Jun Shinozaki wrote:
>
>   Hi Anastasia,
> 
> I created bvals.txt and bvecs.txt using dcm2nii.
> These original files were text files and set in dmrirc profile as
> "set bvalfile = /path/to/bvals.txt".
> 
> I checked word count for these files
> # wc -w bvals.txt bvecs.txt
> 65 bvals.txt
> 195 bvecs.txt
> 260 total
> 
> However, when I run "trac-all -prep -c dmrirc", then freesurfer creates
> bvals and bvecs automatically in dmri folder.
> 
> Then, I check word count
> # wc -w bvals bvecs
> 65 bvals
> 198 bvecs
> 263 total
> 
> Now, freesurfer adds 3 extra entries in the bvecs file.
> As you said, there is an extra column of zeros in the end.
> 
> So, I cannot fix the error.
> 
> Regards,
> Jun Shinozaki
> 
> 2014-07-01 15:56 GMT+09:00 Anastasia Yendiki
> :
> 
> Hi Jun - By a simple word count on these files:
> 
> % wc -w bvals bvecs
> 65 bvals
> 198 bvecs
> 263 total
> 
> As you can see, there are 3 extra entries in the bvecs file. If you
> then
> open the file, you'll see that there is an extra column of zeros in
> the
> end. Not sure if that's what's causing the problem, but you might
> want to
> look for empty lines at the end of your original gradient table.
> 
> a.y
> 
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Jun Shinozaki wrote:
>
>   Hi Anastasia,
> Thank you for your e-mail.
> I took 65 DWIs (5 b0 volumes and 60 direction DWIs).
> 
> I checked dwi.nii.gz in the dmri folder, and dwi.nii.gz had
> 65 images.
> Also, I checked bvals and bvecs in the dmri folder, and they
> have 65 counts.
> It seems consistent.
> I attach bvals and bvecs. These files were created by
> freesurfer automatically.
> 
> Regards,
> Jun Shinozaki
> 
> 2014-06-30 18:38 GMT+09:00 Anastasia Yendiki
> :
> 
> Hi Jun - It's failing at the point where it tries to
> extract the low-b
> images from the DWI series. I suspect that the number
> of frames in the 4D
> DWI volume that is extracted from your dicom does not
> match the number of
> frames that it expects to find based on how many
> gradient vectors or
> b-values it's looking for. So I'd check these DWI,
> gradient vector and
> b-value files to make sure they are all consistent.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> a.y
> 
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Jun Shinozaki wrote:
>
>   Dear All,
> 
> I am trying to run a single subject in TRACULA
> (trac-all -prep -c
> dmrirc), but exited with ERRORS.
> 
> ERROR: fMRIframe: frame >= nframes
> 
> The attached file is a log file.
> 
> Can anyone help me?
> Thank you in advance.
> 
> Regards,
> Jun Shinozaki.
> 
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> 
> 
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
> person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you
> in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the
> Partners Compliance HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail
> was sent to you in error
> but does not contain patient information, please
> contact the sender and properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
> 
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https

Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula ERROR: fMRIframe: frame >= nframes

2014-07-04 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


The error message is "data and bvals/bvecs do not contain the same number 
of entries". This doesn't necessarily mean that the bvecs and bvals don't 
agree with each other, but that the bvecs and bvals don't agree with the 
DWI data.


Based on this line in the log file, there are 130 frames in the DWI 
dicoms, so I suspect that you may have two repetitions of your 65 
directions:


INFO: (120 120  50), nframes = 130, ismosaic=0

You can confirm this my looking at the images. If that is the case, you 
need to have two repetitions in the bvecs/bvals files too.


On Thu, 3 Jul 2014, Pedro Rosa wrote:


Hi!
Thanks! It helped, but now I have another error…
I attached the log, and both the bvec and bval files that served as inputs
(without any empty space in the end) and the ones generated by the script in
the $subject/dmri (which turns out to have empty spaces in the end). All
these 4 files have 65 entries (bval with 65 for each one of the three
sequences).
Can you spot the error?
Regards

Pedro Rosa

On Thursday, July 3, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Anastasia Yendiki wrote:


Hi Pedro - Have you specified not to do eddy current compensation? It
looks like it's being skipped. In that case, you need to also skip the
QA
step (by adding -noqa to your trac-all command line). That's because
the
QA step requires the output of the eddy current compensation to assess
how
much motion there is in the data.

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Thu, 3 Jul 2014, Pedro Rosa wrote:

  Anastasia,
I was finding the same error as Jun, and your help fixed it.
Thank you very much.
However, I am now finding a new error (attached).
Can you help me?
Thank you again.
Regards,
Pedro Rosa.

On Wednesday, July 2, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Jun Shinozaki wrote:

Hi Anastasia,

You are right! There are empty spaces at the end of the lines in
original bvecs and bvals.
I could fix the error and finish trac-preproc without error by
eliminating these spaces.
Thank you so much!

Regards,
Jun Shinozaki

2014-07-02 15:21 GMT+09:00 Anastasia Yendiki
:

There are probably some empty spaces at the end of the lines of
the
original files that confuses it into introducing those zeros. If
you
attach the original files, I can take a look at them.

On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Jun Shinozaki wrote:

Hi Anastasia,

I created bvals.txt and bvecs.txt using dcm2nii.
These original files were text files and set in dmrirc profile
as
"set bvalfile = /path/to/bvals.txt".

I checked word count for these files
# wc -w bvals.txt bvecs.txt
65 bvals.txt
195 bvecs.txt
260 total

However, when I run "trac-all -prep -c dmrirc", then freesurfer
creates
bvals and bvecs automatically in dmri folder.

Then, I check word count
# wc -w bvals bvecs
65 bvals
198 bvecs
263 total

Now, freesurfer adds 3 extra entries in the bvecs file.
As you said, there is an extra column of zeros in the end.

So, I cannot fix the error.

Regards,
Jun Shinozaki

2014-07-01 15:56 GMT+09:00 Anastasia Yendiki
:

Hi Jun - By a simple word count on these files:

% wc -w bvals bvecs
65 bvals
198 bvecs
263 total

As you can see, there are 3 extra entries in the bvecs file. If
you
then
open the file, you'll see that there is an extra column of zeros
in
the
end. Not sure if that's what's causing the problem, but you
might
want to
look for empty lines at the end of your original gradient table.

a.y

On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Jun Shinozaki wrote:

Hi Anastasia,
Thank you for your e-mail.
I took 65 DWIs (5 b0 volumes and 60 direction DWIs).

I checked dwi.nii.gz in the dmri folder, and dwi.nii.gz had
65 images.
Also, I checked bvals and bvecs in the dmri folder, and they
have 65 counts.
It seems consistent.
I attach bvals and bvecs. These files were created by
freesurfer automatically.

Regards,
Jun Shinozaki

2014-06-30 18:38 GMT+09:00 Anastasia Yendiki
:

Hi Jun - It's failing at the point where it tries to
extract the low-b
images from the DWI series. I suspect that the number
of frames in the 4D
DWI volume that is extracted from your dicom does not
match the number of
frames that it expects to find based on how many
gradient vectors or
b-values it's looking for. So I'd check these DWI,
gradient vector and
b-value files to make sure they are all consistent.

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Jun Shinozaki wrote:

Dear All,

I am trying to run a single subject in TRACULA
(trac-all -prep -c
dmrirc), but exited with ERRORS.

ERROR: fMRIframe: frame >= nframes

The attached file is a log file.

Can anyone help me?
Thank you in advance.

Regards,
Jun Shinozaki.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you
in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the
Partners Compliance HelpLin

Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula ERROR: fMRIframe: frame >= nframes

2014-07-04 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


ERROR: Found 130 b-values but 108.333 gradient vectors

If the b-value table has 130 entries, then the gradient table should have 
130*3 entries (one x,y,z direction vector for each b-value). This error 
means that there are fewer entries in the gradient table than there should 
be. Run wc -w on these text files to check for yourself.


On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Pedro Rosa wrote:


Thank you once again!
Yes, that is true.
The bval and bvec file were doubled, so I removed half the values (and also
the empty spaces) and the fMRIframe: frame >= nframes stopped from
happening.
A converted the dcm to nii using dcm2nii software, and used its bval and
bvec files as input to TRACULA. Is it frequent to have a repetition of
directions?
I now included the doubled bvec and bval files, but it seems I have another
error:

[server:/MRI/Tracula-test] pedrogomesrosa% trac-all -prep -c config
-no-isrunning

INFO: SUBJECTS_DIR is /MRI/Tracula-test

INFO: Diffusion root is /MRI/Tracula-test

Actual FREESURFER_HOME /Applications/Freesurfer5.3/freesurfer

INFO: current FREESURFER_HOME does not match that of previous processing.

    Current: /Applications/Freesurfer5.3/freesurfer

    Previous: /Volumes/Data/Freesurfer_5.3/freesurfer

trac-preproc -c /MRI/Tracula-test/ESNA149/scripts/dmrirc.local -log
/MRI/Tracula-test/ESNA149/scripts/trac-all.log -cmd
/MRI/Tracula-test/ESNA149/scripts/trac-all.cmd -no-isrunning

#-

/Applications/Freesurfer5.3/freesurfer/bin/trac-preproc 

#-

#@# Image corrections Fri Jul  4 07:00:19 BRT 2014

mri_convert/MRI/Tracula-test/149/1.3.12.2.1107.5.2.31.30747.2012061308004376537404155.
dcm /MRI/Tracula-test/ESNA149/dmri/dwi_orig.nii.gz

mri_convert/MRI/Tracula-test/149/1.3.12.2.1107.5.2.31.30747.2012061308004376537404155.
dcm /MRI/Tracula-test/ESNA149/dmri/dwi_orig.nii.gz 

$Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.7 2012/09/05 21:55:16 mreuter Exp $

reading 
from/MRI/Tracula-test/149/1.3.12.2.1107.5.2.31.30747.2012061308004376537404155.
dcm...

Getting Series No 

INFO: Found 6607 files in /MRI/Tracula-test/149

INFO: Scanning for Series Number 3

Scanning Directory 

INFO: found 6500 files in series

INFO: loading series header info.


RunNo = 2

INFO: sorting.

INFO: (120 120  50), nframes = 130, ismosaic=0

PE Dir COL COL

AutoAlign matrix detected 

AutoAlign Matrix - 

 1.000   0.000   0.000   0.000;

 0.000   1.000   0.000   0.000;

 0.000   0.000   1.000   0.000;

 0.000   0.000   0.000   1.000;


FileName/MRI/Tracula-test/149/1.3.12.2.1107.5.2.31.30747.2012061308004780512604280.
dcm

Identification

NumarisVer        syngo MR B15

ScannerModel      Espree

PatientName       XX

Date and time

StudyDate         20120613

StudyTime         074845.171000 

SeriesTime        080047.531000 

AcqTime           080046.267500 

Acquisition parameters

PulseSeq          *ep_b0

Protocol          DIF 64 2NEX 2.7mmX2mm Trigger (Ax Puro) 

PhEncDir          COL

EchoNo            1

FlipAngle         90

EchoTime          110

InversionTime     -1

RepetitionTime    8000

PhEncFOV          240

ReadoutFOV        240

Image information

RunNo             2

SeriesNo          3

ImageNo           1

NImageRows        120

NImageCols        120

NFrames           130

SliceArraylSize   50

IsMosaic          0

ImgPos            116.6747  79.4248 -34.6722 

VolRes              2.   2.   2.7000 

VolDim            120      120       50 

Vc                 -1.  -0.   0. 

Vr                 -0.  -1.  -0.0052 

Vs                 -0.  -0.0052   1. 

VolCenter          -3.3253 -40.9270  32.1985 

TransferSyntaxUID 1.2.840.10008.1.2.1

UseSliceScaleFactor 0 (slice 0: 1)

INFO: no Siemens slice order reversal detected (good!). 

TR=8000.00, TE=110.00, TI=-1.00, flip angle=90.00

i_ras = (-1, -0, 0)

j_ras = (-0, -0.86, -0.00523596)

k_ras = (-0, -0.00523596, 0.86)

writing to /MRI/Tracula-test/ESNA149/dmri/dwi_orig.nii.gz...

mri_probedicom 
--i/MRI/Tracula-test/149/1.3.12.2.1107.5.2.31.30747.2012061308004376537404155.
dcm > /MRI/Tracula-test/ESNA149/dmri/dcminfo.dat

cp /MRI/Tracula-test//bvec.bvec
/MRI/Tracula-test/ESNA149/dmri/dwi_orig.mghdti.bvecs

cp /MRI/Tracula-test//bval2.bval
/MRI/Tracula-test/ESNA149/dmri/dwi_orig.mghdti.bvals

ERROR: Found 130 b-values but 108.333 gradient vectors

Darwin server.macbookpro.com 13.2.0 Darwin Kernel Version 13.2.0: Thu Apr 17
23:03:13 PDT 2014; root:xnu-2422.100.13~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64


trac-preproc exited with ERRORS at Fri Jul  4 07:04:02 BRT 2014



Pedro Rosa

On Friday, July 4, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Anastasia Yendiki wrote:


The error message is "data and bvals/bvecs do not contain the same
number
of entries". This doesn't necessarily mean that the bvecs and bvals
don't
agree with each other, but that the bvecs and bvals don't agree with
the
DWI data.

Based on this line in the log file, there are 130 frames 

Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula

2014-07-14 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Emily,

1. That's fine because the BET-based mask is not used by default in the 
the tractography. The brain mask from the freesurfer segmentation of the 
structural scan is used instead.

2. To check the diffusion-to-anatomical registration, you can look at the 
aparc+aseg registered into diffusion space, i.e., from the dlabel/diff 
directory, overlaid onto the FA map. It's also important to check that the 
gradient table is correct by looking at dtifit_V1 (the primary eigenvector 
of the tensors) displayed as lines. Assuming the protocol is the same for 
all subjects, you just need to do this latter check for one of your 
subjects only.

3. TRACULA doesn't do whole-brain tractography. It reconstructs a set of 
specific tracts. Information on the anatomical regions that these tracts 
go through or next to is derived from a set of training subjects. See our 
paper for more info:

http://www.frontiersin.org/Neuroinformatics/10.3389/fninf.2011.00023/abstract

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, ebell...@uwm.edu wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have a few questions about Tracula. I am very new to DTI, so I hope you can 
> bare with me.
>
> 1.) I have been checking my registration at the prep stage. I am very new to 
> this so it may be that I am not looking at the right files.
>
> I looked at my eddy current corrected diffusion data (which I believe is in 
> data.nii.gz in the dmri folder) with the no_dif_brain_mask.nii, and noticed 
> that the no_dif_brain_mask does not cover very well for some of my subjects. 
> Should I individually tailor the Fractional Intensity Threshold for BET mask 
> extraction from low-b images at the prep stage?
>
>
> 2.) In general what files should I be checking at each phase (prep, bedpost, 
> path)?
>
> 3.)How do you generate the whole-brain ROIS to guide the tractography (is the 
> white matter mask that is generated at the prep phase involved)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Emily
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula

2014-07-14 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Emily - When a mask is used as input to bedpostx, all voxels outside 
that mask will be zero in all bedpostx output volumes. So it makes sense 
to use the same mask for any subsequent processing. Is the mask that 
you're referring to a symbolic link to another volume? You can run ls -l 
to see what volume it points to.

a.y

On Mon, 14 Jul 2014, ebell...@uwm.edu wrote:

> Hi Anastasia,
>
> Thank you so much, this is really helpful.
>
> I have one other question. So, at the bedpost stage, the no_dif_brain mask is 
> used correct (looking at the fsl webpage), or at this stage the freesurfer 
> segmentation is used as well?
>
> If in addition to using tracula, lets say if I also wanted to look into doing 
> local probablistic tractography in FSL (using probtractx). I know that 
> probtractx uses the output from the fsl bedpost stage. In this case then, 
> would I need to adjust the no_dif_brain mask since it was used in the bedpost 
> stage? I planned on using the output from the bedpost stage in tracula into 
> FSL's probtractx to also try some local probablistic tractography.
>
> Emily
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Anastasia Yendiki" 
> To: "Freesurfer support list" 
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:14:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula
>
>
> Hi Emily,
>
> 1. That's fine because the BET-based mask is not used by default in the
> the tractography. The brain mask from the freesurfer segmentation of the
> structural scan is used instead.
>
> 2. To check the diffusion-to-anatomical registration, you can look at the
> aparc+aseg registered into diffusion space, i.e., from the dlabel/diff
> directory, overlaid onto the FA map. It's also important to check that the
> gradient table is correct by looking at dtifit_V1 (the primary eigenvector
> of the tensors) displayed as lines. Assuming the protocol is the same for
> all subjects, you just need to do this latter check for one of your
> subjects only.
>
> 3. TRACULA doesn't do whole-brain tractography. It reconstructs a set of
> specific tracts. Information on the anatomical regions that these tracts
> go through or next to is derived from a set of training subjects. See our
> paper for more info:
>
> http://www.frontiersin.org/Neuroinformatics/10.3389/fninf.2011.00023/abstract
>
> Hope this helps,
> a.y
>
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, ebell...@uwm.edu wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a few questions about Tracula. I am very new to DTI, so I hope you 
>> can bare with me.
>>
>> 1.) I have been checking my registration at the prep stage. I am very new to 
>> this so it may be that I am not looking at the right files.
>>
>> I looked at my eddy current corrected diffusion data (which I believe is in 
>> data.nii.gz in the dmri folder) with the no_dif_brain_mask.nii, and noticed 
>> that the no_dif_brain_mask does not cover very well for some of my subjects. 
>> Should I individually tailor the Fractional Intensity Threshold for BET mask 
>> extraction from low-b images at the prep stage?
>>
>>
>> 2.) In general what files should I be checking at each phase (prep, bedpost, 
>> path)?
>>
>> 3.)How do you generate the whole-brain ROIS to guide the tractography (is 
>> the white matter mask that is generated at the prep phase involved)?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Emily
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
> at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] trac-all -prep error field map error

2014-07-14 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Eileen - That step is run with the program epidewarp.fsl, which you can 
run on the command line to see the available options. The input phase map 
volume is expected to have either 2 frames (2 separate phase maps) or 1 
frame (the difference phase map). This error from trac-all means that it 
found that your input phase map has something other than 1 or 2 frames, so 
it doesn't know how to handle it.


Hope this helps,
a.y

On Sat, 12 Jul 2014, Eileen Moore wrote:


Hi - I'm using freesurfer 5.3 on an Ubuntu operating system. I'm tyring to
run tracula on some  images acquired from a GE scanner. I am running into
problems when I try to perform the registration-based B0-inhomogeneity
compensation, getting an error in the terminal output: "ERROR: Unrecognized
format of phase map". However, trac-all -prep runs fine when I skip the
B0-inhomogeneity compensation step. Is there something else I need to do to
use field map correction?

I've attached the trac-all.log and a copy of the terminal output.

Thanks,
Eileen.



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula

2014-07-14 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Emily - Sorry for the confusion. The mask in the bedpostx output 
directory is a copy of whichever mask was input to bedpostx. By default, 
tracula uses the anatomical mask for this. If that mask doesn't cover the 
brain well, I would check for diffusion-to-anatomical miregistration. 
Probtrackx will use whichever mask you specify as its input.

a.y

On Mon, 14 Jul 2014, ebell...@uwm.edu wrote:

> Hi Anastasia,
>
> So probtractx uses the output from the bedpost stage (which I ran in 
> Tracula). I noticed that the bedpost stage (in the dmri.bedpostx folder) also 
> outputs a no_dif_brain mask. I guess what I am worried about is that if 
> bedpost creates this no_dif_brain mask, that is what will be utilized in 
> probtractx instead of the Freesurfer brain mask.
>
> When bedpost is conducted in Tracula, is the brain mask from the freesurfer 
> segmentation of the structural scan utilized?
>
> I am sorry. I know I am making this confusing!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Emily
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Anastasia Yendiki" 
> To: "Freesurfer support list" 
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 10:18:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula
>
>
> Hi Emily - When a mask is used as input to bedpostx, all voxels outside
> that mask will be zero in all bedpostx output volumes. So it makes sense
> to use the same mask for any subsequent processing. Is the mask that
> you're referring to a symbolic link to another volume? You can run ls -l
> to see what volume it points to.
>
> a.y
>
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2014, ebell...@uwm.edu wrote:
>
>> Hi Anastasia,
>>
>> Thank you so much, this is really helpful.
>>
>> I have one other question. So, at the bedpost stage, the no_dif_brain mask 
>> is used correct (looking at the fsl webpage), or at this stage the 
>> freesurfer segmentation is used as well?
>>
>> If in addition to using tracula, lets say if I also wanted to look into 
>> doing local probablistic tractography in FSL (using probtractx). I know that 
>> probtractx uses the output from the fsl bedpost stage. In this case then, 
>> would I need to adjust the no_dif_brain mask since it was used in the 
>> bedpost stage? I planned on using the output from the bedpost stage in 
>> tracula into FSL's probtractx to also try some local probablistic 
>> tractography.
>>
>> Emily
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Anastasia Yendiki" 
>> To: "Freesurfer support list" 
>> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 4:14:49 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula
>>
>>
>> Hi Emily,
>>
>> 1. That's fine because the BET-based mask is not used by default in the
>> the tractography. The brain mask from the freesurfer segmentation of the
>> structural scan is used instead.
>>
>> 2. To check the diffusion-to-anatomical registration, you can look at the
>> aparc+aseg registered into diffusion space, i.e., from the dlabel/diff
>> directory, overlaid onto the FA map. It's also important to check that the
>> gradient table is correct by looking at dtifit_V1 (the primary eigenvector
>> of the tensors) displayed as lines. Assuming the protocol is the same for
>> all subjects, you just need to do this latter check for one of your
>> subjects only.
>>
>> 3. TRACULA doesn't do whole-brain tractography. It reconstructs a set of
>> specific tracts. Information on the anatomical regions that these tracts
>> go through or next to is derived from a set of training subjects. See our
>> paper for more info:
>>
>> http://www.frontiersin.org/Neuroinformatics/10.3389/fninf.2011.00023/abstract
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>> a.y
>>
>> On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, ebell...@uwm.edu wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have a few questions about Tracula. I am very new to DTI, so I hope you 
>>> can bare with me.
>>>
>>> 1.) I have been checking my registration at the prep stage. I am very new 
>>> to this so it may be that I am not looking at the right files.
>>>
>>> I looked at my eddy current corrected diffusion data (which I believe is in 
>>> data.nii.gz in the dmri folder) with the no_dif_brain_mask.nii, and noticed 
>>> that the no_dif_brain_mask does not cover very well for some of my 
>>> subjects. Should I individually tailor the Fractional Intensity Threshold 
>>> for BET mask extraction from low-b images at the prep stage?
>>>
>>>
>>> 2.) In general what files should I be checking at each phase (prep, 
>>> bedpost, path)?
>>>
>>> 3.)How do y

Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula : Path not entirely in the white matter

2014-07-16 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Emily - This is not necessarily a problem. To make sure, you can check 
the output path.pd.nii.gz file from that specific tract. If it got stuck 
somewhere (e.g., because the brain mask is missing a bit of brain that 
this tract should go through) then the path.pd.nii.gz will look like a 
single curve rather than a more diffuse volumetric distribution.

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, ebell...@uwm.edu wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I was looking at a trac-all log file to get my bearings on what is being done 
> and making sure things were done successfully,
>
> I did not get any errors for this subject but when I was looking at the right 
> uncinate fasciculus: It would say "Path from initial control points not 
> entirely in the white matter" and then it attempted to perturb control points.
>
> I noticed that for this tract, it did not say that it did not say sucess 
> after how ever many control points. It just said that it reverted back to the 
> initial control points.
>
> Do I then need to be concerned about the validity of this particular tract 
> for this subject?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Emily
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] trac-all -prep error field map error

2014-07-17 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Eileen - All image formats that mri_convert (and thus any freesurfer 
program) can read will do, you don't need dicom. Try giving trac-all the 
phase difference maps you have and let's see what happens.

Best,
a.y

On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, Eileen Moore wrote:

> Hi Anastasia,
> 
> OK - our imaging physicists had developed a wrapper script around epidewarp
> which takes our dicom images and converts them into the phase difference map
> (it is based on the script that was authored by Doug Greve for the fBIRN
> consortium). It looks like the tracula script requires dicom images. Is
> there a way for me to do epidewarp manually and then follow through with the
> remaining steps using trac-all?
> 
> Thanks,
> Eileen.
> 
>
>   Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:23:47 -0400 (EDT)
>   From: Anastasia Yendiki 
>   Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] trac-all -prep error field map error
>   To: Freesurfer support list 
>   Message-ID:
>   
>   Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
>
>   Hi Eileen - That step is run with the program epidewarp.fsl,
>   which you can
>   run on the command line to see the available options. The input
>   phase map
>   volume is expected to have either 2 frames (2 separate phase
>   maps) or 1
>   frame (the difference phase map). This error from trac-all means
>   that it
>   found that your input phase map has something other than 1 or 2
>   frames, so
>   it doesn't know how to handle it.
>
>   Hope this helps,
>   a.y
>
>   On Sat, 12 Jul 2014, Eileen Moore wrote:
>
>   > Hi - I'm using freesurfer 5.3 on an Ubuntu operating system.
>   I'm tyring to
>   > run tracula on some? images acquired from a GE scanner. I am
>   running into
>   > problems when I try to perform the registration-based
>   B0-inhomogeneity
>   > compensation, getting an error in the terminal output: "ERROR:
>   Unrecognized
>   > format of phase map". However, trac-all -prep runs fine when I
>   skip the
>   > B0-inhomogeneity compensation step. Is there something else I
>   need to do to
>   > use field map correction?
>   >
>   > I've attached the trac-all.log and a copy of the terminal
>   output.
>   >
>   > Thanks,
>   > Eileen.
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
> 
> 
> 
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula AD weighted average

2014-07-18 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Cat - AD_AVG_Weight weighs the AD value at each voxel with the 
probability value of the tract going through that voxel. So it's the 
proper definition of the expected (mean) value from probability theory.


a.y

On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, Cat Chong wrote:


Dear Anastasia,

Another quick question:
We found significant differences in two subject groups for the AD_AVG as
well as the  AD_AVG_Weight, which is stated as the "weighted average over
the entire path distribution'. Could you tell me how the average weight is
calculated and why it would be better to use than the AD_AVG perhaps?

Thank you very much,
Cat



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] dwi_motion Tracula

2014-07-21 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Cat - Just install the update and run trac-all -qa. This will produce 
the motion measures. Check the tutorial for where to find the output.


a.y

On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Cat Chong wrote:


Hello Anastasia,

 I ran Tracula on Freesurfer 5.3 but without the 2013 Tracula updates. Now,
I would like to use the command "dwi_motion" on my data. I have installed
the updates, but will I have to completely reprocess my data inducing steps
trac-all -prep, trace-all -bedp, and trac-all path in order to use
dwi_motion? 

cheers,
Cat

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Diffusion analysis qs - gradient matrix

2014-07-21 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


It'd be nice if things were that simple, but!

Although the pre-processing is done with FSL tools, tractography is done 
with locally written code. Some gradient sets may appear to work with FSL, 
but they won't work for us. For example, some dicom converters may perform 
a L-R flip as preparation for feeding the gradient vectors into FSL. We 
need the unflipped vectors because, instead of flipping vectors, we 
convert both vectors and images to LAS orientation. This ensures that they 
work both for FSL and for us, and that you can view things correctly in 
both freeview and fslview, without the subject looking like it's hanging 
upside down from its bat cave or some such awkward arrangement.


In the end, the best way of knowing that the gradient table is correct is 
to run one example subject through and view the eigenvectors of the 
tensors as lines to see if they're pointing in the right direction. (Even 
though the tensors themselves aren't used for tractography, they're good 
for troubleshooting.)


On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Harms, Michael wrote:



FS uses FSL tools under the hood, so you want to use the bvecs that are
rotated into the axes of the scan.

cheers,
-MH

-- 
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
---
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO  63110 Email: mha...@wustl.edu

From: Rotem Saar 
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Monday, July 21, 2014 1:54 PM
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] Diffusion analysis qs - gradient matrix

Dear freesurfer experts,

For diffusion analysis in freesurfer - I want to know which gradient matrix
freesurfer expects.

The thing is - when I look at the gradient matrix created using a MATLAB
script that reads the directions from the dicom header - I get one table,
but the bvecs file created in MRIconvert (for converting dicoms to nifti)
looks different.

This is the situation when an angle is applied during the acquisition of the
dMRI scans, which means that each subject has its own gradient matrix.

So my question is which table should I use for diffusion analysis in
freesurfer? The one that was created from the dicom header or the one
created for NIFTI format using MRIconvert ? 

Thanks

Rotem Saar-Ashkenazy

Department of Brain and Cognitive Science
Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105

School of Social Work
Ashkelon Academic College, Ashkelon, 78211 

Israel

 





The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected
Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you
are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use,
disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents
of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email
in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] DTImap

2014-07-21 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Shantanu - What do you mean by compatible? Are you trying to import an 
output from the other software into tracula or vice versa?

a.y

On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Shantanu Ghosh wrote:

> Hi FS experts,
>
> Is the DtiMap software (www.kennedykrieger.org) compatible with
> Freesurfer/Tracula?
>
> Thanks
> Shantanu
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] DTImap

2014-07-22 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Can DTImap read nifti volumes? The output of tracula includes one nifti 
volume with the probability distribution of each of the 18 pathways in 
each subject.

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, Shantanu Ghosh wrote:

> Hi Anastasia,
>
> By `compatible' I meant whether I could export tracula outputs into a
> format recognized by DtiMap, with the LAS coordinates preserved.
>
> My goal for this project is to use tracula outputs to prepare
> probabilistic segmentations of the white matter including deep structures.
>
> I was thinking of using Mori group's WM Fiber tract based atlases, but if
> tracula has this capability, then it would be ideal.
>
> Shantanu
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, July 22, 2014 2:35 am, Anastasia Yendiki wrote:
>>
>> Hi Shantanu - What do you mean by compatible? Are you trying to import an
>> output from the other software into tracula or vice versa?
>>
>> a.y
>>
>> On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Shantanu Ghosh wrote:
>>
>>> Hi FS experts,
>>>
>>> Is the DtiMap software (www.kennedykrieger.org) compatible with
>>> Freesurfer/Tracula?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Shantanu
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] ERROR: Could not open [..]/bvals for reading

2014-07-22 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Elia - Have you searched for the libnetcdf error in the archives? I do 
believe that a few people were getting that error when 5.3 was first 
released.


a.y

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, Elia S. wrote:


Dear Freesurfer Community,
Running Tracula preprocessing produces this error:

ERROR: Could not open
/home/elia/scripts/Tracula/LCL/dcmTimePoints_tar/T13D/timePoint1/dmri/bvals for
reading

I think the error described is the same as here: 
https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg34169.html

And as suggested 
here(https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2014-February/035935.h
tml) I swapped the dmri_motion from the centos4 updates with the dmri_motion
from the centos6 updates, and it works.

Now here's the situation, I need to run tracula on machines where is not
possibile to install the centos6 updates, since the message i get is this:

error while loading shared libraries: libnetcdf.so.6: cannot open shared object
file: No such file or directory

Do you have any advice for me?

Thanks in advance,
Elia.


--
-
Freesurfer version: freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0

Linux Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04 precise - Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS

Environment/Version: Linux king-ubuntu 3.2.0-56-generic #86-Ubuntu SMP Wed
Oct 23 09:20:45 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

My Current Working Directory: /home/elia

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] dwi_motion Tracula

2014-07-22 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Cat - I'll have to see your trac-all.log, I can't tell what is going on 
just from that one line.


a.y

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, Cat Chong wrote:


 
Dear Anastasia,
 
With the new Tracula update installed, I ran the command:
 trac-all –qa –c dmrirc_file  with location of bval specified and received
the following error after ‘Loading volume-to-baseline affine
transformations’
 
Could not open ../dmri/ dwi.ecclog for reading.
 
It seems like all subjects do have the dwi.ecclog in their /dmri/
directories.
 
Any ideas of what might have gone wrong?
Cheers,
Cat


On Monday, July 21, 2014 1:53 PM, Anastasia Yendiki
 wrote:



Hi Cat - Just install the update and run trac-all -qa. This will produce
the motion measures. Check the tutorial for where to find the output.

a.y

On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Cat Chong wrote:

> Hello Anastasia,
>
>  I ran Tracula on Freesurfer 5.3 but without the 2013 Tracula updates.
Now,
> I would like to use the command "dwi_motion" on my data. I have installed
> the updates, but will I have to completely reprocess my data inducing
steps
> trac-all -prep, trace-all -bedp, and trac-all path in order to use
> dwi_motion? 
>
> cheers,
> Cat
>
>

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
properly
dispose of the e-mail.



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Looking at dtifit_V1 in freeview

2014-07-23 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Emily - Actually, there is a bug in the 5.3 version of freeview in that 
specific feature. But you can use fslview - you select the V1 file, click 
on the (i) button and choose Display as: Lines.

a.y

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, ebell...@uwm.edu wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering how you go about looking at dtifit_V1 (the primary 
> eigenvector of the tensors) displayed as lines in freeview?
>
> Emily
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Pathstat.byvoxel.txt question

2014-07-23 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Sarina - It's linear interpolation.

a.y

On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Sarina Sacco wrote:

> 
> Hi all freesurfer experts ,
> I have a question about the command trac-all-stat-c ,what is the
> interpolation that uses?
> 
> 
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Diffusion analysis qs

2014-07-23 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Rotem - The FA values are actually invariant to a rotation of the 
gradient vectors. You can test that yourself. If, however, you get 
different FA maps with the different gradient tables, then something else 
is going on and not a simple rotation.


a.y

On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Rotem Saar wrote:


Dear Anastasia & Michael,

Thank u for your answers (I attached my last email and your answers at the
end of this email.

I still want to specify my question. If I only want to extract FA values
using the following script (see script below), and I know that an angle was
applied during the dMRI scans, should I use the rotated gradient matrix ?

When I first analyzed 20 subjects with the gradient matrix that is published
for a T3 Philips magnet (I also read the gradients from the dicom header -
they were the same) I got reasonable results - but now I don't know what to
think of them...
___
___

source ~/Desktop/fs_script

dt_recon --i /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/I160.dcm --s
Anatomy0207 --o /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI --b
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/bvals.bval
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/bvecs.bvec

To check results, run:

tkregister2 --mov /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/lowb.nii
--reg /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/register.dat --surf

tkregister2 --s fsaverage --surf white --reg
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/mask-tal.nii.reg --mov
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/mask-tal.nii

tkregister2 --s fsaverage --surf white --reg
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa-tal.nii.reg --mov
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa-tal.nii

freeview -v /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa.nii
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/adc.nii

freeview -v 
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/mri/brain.mgz/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa.nii:reg=register.dat:colo
rmap=heat:heatscale=.2,.2,1

tkmedit Anatomy0207 orig.mgz -aux brain.mgz -seg wmparc.mgz -reg
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/register.dat -overlay
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa.nii -fthresh 0.2 -fmax 1

mri_vol2vol --mov /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/lowb.nii \
    --targ /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/mri/wmparc.mgz
\
    --inv --interp nearest --o
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/mri/wmparc2diff.mgz \
    --reg
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/register.dat --no-save-reg

mri_vol2vol --mov /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/lowb.nii \
    --targ
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz \
    --inv --interp nearest --o
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/mri/aparc+aseg2diff.mgz \
    --reg
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/register.dat --no-save-reg

freeview -v /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa.nii \
   
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/mri/aparc+aseg2diff.mgz:colormap
=lut


mri_mask /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa.nii \
 /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/mri/wmparc2diff.mgz \
 /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa-masked.mgz


freeview -v 
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa-masked.mgz/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/mri/aparc+aseg2diff.mgz:colormap
=lut

mri_segstats --seg
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/mri/wmparc2diff.mgz --ctab
$FREESURFER_HOME/FreeSurferColorLUT.txt --i
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa-masked.mgz --sum
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/stats/all_stats_fa-masked

___
___

It'd be nice if things were that simple, but!

Although the pre-processing is done with FSL tools, tractography is done
with locally written code. Some gradient sets may appear to work with FSL,
but they won't work for us. For example, some dicom converters may perform
a L-R flip as preparation for feeding the gradient vectors into FSL. We
need the unflipped vectors because, instead of flipping vectors, we
convert both vectors and images to LAS orientation. This ensures that they
work both for FSL and for us, and that you can view things correctly in
both freeview and fslview, without the subject looking like it's hanging
upside down from its bat cave or some such awkward arrangement.

In the end, the best way of knowing that the gradient table is correct is
to run one example subject through and view the eigenvectors of the
tensors as lines to see if they're pointing in the right direction. (Even
though the tensors themselves aren't used for tractography, they're good
for troubleshooting.)

On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Harms, Michael wrote:

>
> FS uses FSL tools under the

Re: [Freesurfer] Compatibility Tracula v.5.3 and recon v.5.2 longitudinal

2014-08-18 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Yoon - The update is here:
http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/Tracula#Updates

There will also be a new freesurfer release in the next couple of months, 
but I don't anticipate making more changes to longitudinal tracula before 
that, so this should be the same as in the future 5.4 version.

a.y

On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Yoonho Chung wrote:

> Thank you for your input. Before we go ahead and reprocess our recon and DTI 
> data with FS v 5.3 we were wondering if you plan an update on the TRACULA DTI 
> longitudinal stream anytime soon.
> I think I saw somewhere in the email chain that this is likely to happen soon 
> with additional features and bug fixes. If so, I think it would be worth the 
> wait.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Yoon
>
>
>
>
> On May 22, 2014, at 5:37 PM, Anastasia Yendiki  
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Yoon - If you are getting an error from longitudinal tracula, do check 
>> the tracula updates at the link that I gave you in my previous email.
>>
>> As for 5.2 recon-all, others can chime in here, but like I said it is not 
>> recommended to use it. Sorry about that.
>>
>> a.y
>>
>> On Thu, 22 May 2014, Yoonho Chung wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the quick response!
>>>
>>> If I already have all the T1 data processed using recon-all with FS v5.2, 
>>> do you think it is okay to switch the stream to FS v.5.3 and run Tracula? - 
>>> without having to do the recon-all again for the T1 data? It is because I 
>>> am also experiencing DTI longitudinal error due to the OS issue (according 
>>> to other threads). And if possible, I would like to avoid having to redo 
>>> all the recons if we have to switch it to v5.3.
>>>
>>> Thanks again!
>>> Yoon
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance 
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
>> error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
>> properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula : Path not entirely in the white matter

2014-08-18 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Emily - Yes, this is fine. I just meant that it shouldn't look like a 
single line.

a.y

On Thu, 24 Jul 2014, ebell...@uwm.edu wrote:

> Hi Anastasia,
>
> Just to be clear, is this what you mean by a more diffuse volumetric 
> distribution. Here is a snapshot of the right inferior longitudinal 
> fasiculous.
>
> I am just getting a better sense of what to look for in terms of bad vs. good 
> tracts.
>
> Emily
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Anastasia Yendiki" 
> To: "Freesurfer support list" 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 4:54:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula : Path not entirely in the white matter
>
>
> Hi Emily - This is not necessarily a problem. To make sure, you can check
> the output path.pd.nii.gz file from that specific tract. If it got stuck
> somewhere (e.g., because the brain mask is missing a bit of brain that
> this tract should go through) then the path.pd.nii.gz will look like a
> single curve rather than a more diffuse volumetric distribution.
>
> Hope this helps,
> a.y
>
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, ebell...@uwm.edu wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was looking at a trac-all log file to get my bearings on what is being 
>> done and making sure things were done successfully,
>>
>> I did not get any errors for this subject but when I was looking at the 
>> right uncinate fasciculus: It would say "Path from initial control points 
>> not entirely in the white matter" and then it attempted to perturb control 
>> points.
>>
>> I noticed that for this tract, it did not say that it did not say sucess 
>> after how ever many control points. It just said that it reverted back to 
>> the initial control points.
>>
>> Do I then need to be concerned about the validity of this particular tract 
>> for this subject?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Emily
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
> at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] dmri_trk2trk issue

2014-08-18 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Tommi - The input reference volume (--inref) should be in the same 
space as the input .trk file, i.e., your individual's diffusion space. It 
seems that you're using the individual's T1 space instead?

a.y

On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, r...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am attempting to morph deterministic tractography results (.trk file)
> from the individual diffusion space into the average brain
> cvs_avg35_inMNI152. However, something goes wrong, as the output trk file
> is greatly misplaced / strongly distorted / wrongly sized.
>
> The input file (dsi60.trk, a TrackVis trk file with an angle threshold of
> 60 degrees) loads fine in Trackvis, as do the inref and outref volumes (in
> .nii format). The rigid body (.mat) and nonlinear (.m3z) registrations
> also appear ok. The mat file (or more precisely, the corresponding
> register.dat file) looked fine with tkregister2 and the latter was
> successfully used to morph the corresponding probabilistic tractography
> results from the individual diffusion space to cvs_avg35_inMNI152 (= the
> same transformation I am trying to do here).
>
> Any suggestions what I am doing wrong? For example, could this be related
> to inref/outref voxel sizes or coordinate systems?
>
> Just in case, I already tried using the inverse rigid registration
> (anat2diff.mat) and the FDT-generated files inside DSI.bedpostX/xfms
> (diff2str.mat and its inverse) but the results were in all cases very much
> wrong, just in different ways.
>
> FS 5.3 (nmr-std-env)
> on machine avml
> cd $SUBJECTS_DIR
>
> dmri_trk2trk \
> --in $SUBJECT/DSI/dsi60.trk \
> --out TMSDSIGA_19Jul14/${SUBJECT}inCVS35MNI152_dsi60.trk \
> --inref $SUBJECT/mri/norm.mgz \
> --outref $FREESURFER_HOME/subjects/cvs_avg35_inMNI152/mri/norm.mgz \
> --reg $SUBJECT/DSI/${SUBJECT}_diff2anat.mat \
> --regnl $SUBJECT/cvs_CVS35MNI152/final_CVSmorph_tocvs_avg35_inMNI152.m3z \
>
> reg (.mat) was computed as follows:
> bbregister --mov dsi_b0.nii --frame 0 --bold --s $SUBJECT --init-fsl --reg
> DSIregister.dat --fslmat ${SUBJECT}_anat2diff.mat
>
> I would be happy to copy the data to a location of your choosing if you
> would like to replicate the error. Thanks!
>
> Tommi
>
> ---
> Tommi Raij, MD, PhD
> MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
> Bldg 149, 13th St
> Charlestown, MA 02129
> U.S.A.
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Diffusion analysis qs

2014-08-18 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Rotem - It's hard to tell without zooming into some key areas, like 
corpus callosum and cingulum for example. The colors look ok (red and 
green, respectively) but it's hard to see how the lines look.


a.y

On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Rotem Saar wrote:


Dear Anastasia,

I followed your suggestion:

I calculated the FA maps in freesurfer using the script below (see last 
message): I
did it with both the rotated and the not rotated gradient table. The FA maps 
were
identical as u said.

BUT ! - when I used the rotated gradient table in FSL and tried to create the FA 
&
MD maps (as in the first step of tracula), I got the attached
results: http://tinypic.com/r/skzwqa/8

Does this map seems ok to u ? I think that something is wrong but can't specify
what.

I will appreciate your help here again:)



Hi Rotem - The FA values are actually invariant to a rotation of the
gradient vectors. You can test that yourself. If, however, you get
different FA maps with the different gradient tables, then something else
is going on and not a simple rotation.

a.y

On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Rotem Saar wrote:

> Dear Anastasia & Michael,
>
> Thank u for your answers (I attached my last email and your answers at the
> end of this email.
>
> I still want to specify my question. If I only want to extract FA values
> using the following script (see script below), and I know that an angle was
> applied during the dMRI scans, should I use the rotated gradient matrix ?
>
> When I first analyzed 20 subjects with the gradient matrix that is published
> for a T3 Philips magnet (I also read the gradients from the dicom header -
> they were the same) I got reasonable results - but now I don't know what to
> think of them...

>
> source ~/Desktop/fs_script
>
> dt_recon --i /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/I160.dcm --s
> Anatomy0207 --o /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI --b
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/bvals.bval
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/bvecs.bvec
>
> To check results, run:
>
> tkregister2 --mov /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/lowb.nii
> --reg /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/register.dat --surf
>
> tkregister2 --s fsaverage --surf white --reg
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/mask-tal.nii.reg --mov
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/mask-tal.nii
>
> tkregister2 --s fsaverage --surf white --reg
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa-tal.nii.reg --mov
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa-tal.nii
>
> freeview -v /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa.nii
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/adc.nii
>
> freeview 
-v/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/mri/brain.mgz/usr/local/freesurfer/subje
cts/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa.nii:reg=register.dat:colo
> rmap=heat:heatscale=.2,.2,1
>
> tkmedit Anatomy0207?orig.mgz -aux brain.mgz -seg wmparc.mgz -reg
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/register.dat -overlay
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa.nii -fthresh 0.2 -fmax 1
>
> mri_vol2vol --mov /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/lowb.nii \
> ??? --targ /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/mri/wmparc.mgz
> \
> ??? --inv --interp nearest --o
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/mri/wmparc2diff.mgz \
> ??? --reg
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/register.dat --no-save-reg
>
> mri_vol2vol --mov /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/lowb.nii \
> ??? --targ
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz \
> ??? --inv --interp nearest --o
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/mri/aparc+aseg2diff.mgz \
> ??? --reg
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/register.dat --no-save-reg
>
> freeview -v /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa.nii \
>???/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/mri/aparc+aseg2diff.mgz:color
map
> =lut
>
>
> mri_mask /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa.nii \
>  /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/mri/wmparc2diff.mgz \
>  /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa-masked.mgz
>
>
> freeview 
-v/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa-masked.mgz/usr/local/freesurfer/s
ubjects/Anatomy0207/mri/aparc+aseg2diff.mgz:colormap
> =lut
>
> mri_segstats --seg
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/mri/wmparc2diff.mgz --ctab
> $FREESURFER_HOME/FreeSurferColorLUT.txt --i
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/DTI/fa-masked.mgz --sum
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0207/stats/all_stats_fa-masked
>

> It'd be nice if things were that simple, but!
>
> Although the pre-processing is done with FSL tools, tractography is done
> with locally written code. Some gradient sets may appear to work with FSL,
> but they won't work for us. For example, some dicom converters may perfo

Re: [Freesurfer] trac-all -prep problem

2014-08-18 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Shantanu - It's stuck trying to initialize one of the tracts. You can 
check which tract it is, and then check the data to see if there's 
something wrong that would affect that particular tract (for example, if 
part of the brain that this tract goes through is cut off in the mask).

a.y

On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Shantanu Ghosh wrote:

> Hi Freesurfer experts,
>
> I ran the command 
>
> on a bunch of subjects and all of them finished in ~90 minutes except one.
> This subject keeps on going into a seemingly endless loop. It has been
> running for almost 12 hours now. A section of the console output is
> reproduced below.
>
> What is the issue here, and how can this be solved?
> I am using the dev version on a Linux box.
>
> Thanks in advance for all help.
> Shantanu
>
> --
> SAMPLE CONSOLE OUTPUT
> --
> INFO: Distances between consecutive points in test subject's space are 11
> 11 10 10 10
> WARN: Could not find satisfactory control point fit - try 1831
> Finding center streamline
> INFO: Step is 5 voxels
> WARN: Turning off deviation check for center streamline
> INFO: Step is 5 voxels
> WARN: Turning off FA check for center streamline
> INFO: Step is 5 voxels
> INFO: Length of center streamline is 91 voxels
> Selecting 6 points on center streamline
> INFO: Minimum allowable distance between dominant points is 9
> INFO: Minimum allowable curvature at a dominant point is 0.0283381
> INFO: Points where local peeks in curvature occur are
> 106 105 67 (curv = 0.0284049)
> 112 108 77 (curv = 0.0450985)
> 115 108 98 (curv = 0.0526145)
> 113 104 116 (curv = 0.0460477)
> 107 103 128 (curv = 0.0759711)
> INFO: Intermediate dominant points are
> 103 98 50
> 112 108 77
> 114 108 89
> 115 108 98
> 107 103 128
> 105 106 145
> INFO: Final dominant points are
> 103 98 50
> 112 108 77
> 114 108 89
> 115 108 98
> 107 103 128
> 105 106 145
> WARN: Defaulting to equidistant dominant points
> WARN: Defaulting to equidistant control points
> INFO: Selected control points are
> 103 98 50
> 108 106 69
> 114 108 89
> 114 105 108
> 108 103 126
> 105 106 145
> INFO: Distances between consecutive points are 21 21 19 19 19
> INFO: Selected control points in test subject's space are
> 80 62 23
> 81 66 31
> 84 68 40
> 84 66 48
> 82 64 56
> 81 65 64
> INFO: Distances between consecutive points in test subject's space are 9
> 10 8 8 8
> WARN: Could not find satisfactory control point fit - try 1832
> Finding center streamline
> INFO: Step is 5 voxels
> WARN: Turning off deviation check for center streamline
> INFO: Step is 5 voxels
> WARN: Turning off FA check for center streamline
> INFO: Step is 5 voxels
>
>
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula Missing Statistics

2014-08-18 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Emily - The weighted average is the most reliable in practice, and it 
is also the proper statistical definition of mean (expected) value. It 
weighs the value of FA etc at each voxel with the probability of the tract 
going through that voxel.

The cases that are missing stats may need to be rerun. I'm guessing that 
those will look like single curves if you view the path.pd.nii.gz volume. 
You can rerun them by using "set reinit = 1" in the config file, and also 
specifying in the config file to run only the specific tract and specific 
subject. You'd have to rerun the -prior and -path steps only.

a.y

On Sun, 3 Aug 2014, Emily Louise Belleau wrote:

>
> 
> Hello Tracula Experts,
>
> I noticed that for a few of my subjects, I am missing all "Center" statistics 
> for FA, MD etc. for certain tracts like the left uncinate fasciculus for 
> example.
>
> I am assuming this means that an optimal pathway was unable to be found?  I 
> do have the average and weighted statistics for these subjects. Should I 
> consider excluding these subjects or should I try analyzing them again with 
> different parameters?
>
> Additionally, I noticed that for a couple of my subjects, the "Length Center" 
> (length of the highest probability pathway) is unusually short compared to 
> the rest of the subjects? Is this a problem and do I consider excluding or 
> tweaking the parameters for these subjects?
>
> Also, do individuals usually report in publications just the average 
> statistics or are the weighted average or center statistics used?
>
> Attached are the stats of the problematic subjects. Any advice would be 
> greatly appreciated!
>
> Emily
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] DTI Statistics

2014-08-18 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Weighted average recommended, see my previous email.


On Tue, 5 Aug 2014, Emily Louise Belleau wrote:




​Hello all,


I was just wondering if in publications/papers it is more common to report the
average FA statistics, the weighted average statistics, or the center statistics
(the average of the highest probability pathway).


These are the statistics provided by Tracula.


Thanks,


Emily


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] tracula longitudinal

2014-08-18 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Kevin - The names should be the cross-sectional IDs, i.e., without the 
.long.basename suffix.


Note that the version of longitudinal tracula originally included in 
freesurfer 5.3 uses the cross-sectional aparc+aseg from freesurfer, 
whereas the latest updated version (recommended) uses the longitudinal 
aparc+aseg of each time point. But in either case what I said above about 
how to specify the names in the config file applies.

http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/Tracula#Updates

a.y

On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Dabbs (Kevin) wrote:


Getting ready to run longitudinal tracula.  Does the sublist entries in the
dmrirc.long file refer to the cross-sectional or longitudinal processed subject 
time
points?

set subjlist = ( huey-scan1 \
                 huey-scan2 \
                 dewey-scan1 \
                 dewey-scan2 \
                 louie-scan1 \
                 louie-scan2 )

Thanks, Kevin Dabbs
Department of Neurology
University of Wisconsin-Madison


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Steps for Longitudinal trac-all

2014-08-18 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Yoon - Sorry, the config file is necessary for anything that doesn't 
use default settings for trac-all, and that includes running it in 
longitudinal mode.

What kind of cluster do you have? I'm working on making running trac-all 
easier on clusters that are not currently supported, as part of the 5.4 
release.

a.y

On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Chung, Yoonho wrote:

> Dear FS experts.
>
> I am trying run trac-all - the longitudinal version - on the cluster and not 
> by using the dmrirc file. I am looking at the 'trac-all -help' and also the 
> wiki, but I couldn't find a flag or option where I could specify the use of 
> unbiased-template (e.g. [subjectID-base]) and other steps that may be 
> necessary for the longitudinal analysis. Could someone please provide the 
> steps that is required for running the longitudinal stream using 'trac-all' ? 
> Thank you very much.
>
> Best,
> Yoon
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] download link broken?

2014-08-18 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Wynn - There is a scheduled outage of the Martinos Center storage 
cluster today and tomorrow.


a.y

On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Wynn Legon wrote:



Hi,Trying to
download freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0.tar.gz. Link
gives 550 error and terminal error is:
No such directory 'pub/dist/freesurfer/5.3.0'

Please advise
--
---
-Wynn Legon
 PhD
Assistant Professor
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
School of Medicine
University of Minnesota
R398 - 426 Church St. E
Minneapolis, MN 55455
USA

Ph. (612) 626-1183

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] downloads of freesurfer from website doesn't work

2014-08-19 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Lau - There is a scheduled outage of the Martinos Center storage 
cluster all day today. Please try again later, it has nothing to do with 
your system.


a.y

On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Lau Møller Andersen wrote:


Dear List

I get the following error: „550 Failed to change directory.”

I tried on two operating systems. The wget also doesn’t work. Says the file 
doesn’t exist.

Do you get the same errors, or is it specific to my system?

Best

Lau
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] tracula update link not working

2014-08-20 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Kirstie - This was a glitch related to yesterday's storage cluster 
maintence. It's been fixed now, so please try again.

a.y

On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Kirstie Whitaker wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I apologise if this is only on my end but I can't seem to download any of the 
> updates from http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Tracula. I was 
> successful last week
> so I wonder if something's changed?
> 
> Thanks
> Kx
> 
> --
> Kirstie Whitaker, PhD
> Research Associate
> 
> Department of Psychiatry
> University of Cambridge
> 
> Mailing Address
> Brain Mapping Unit
> Department of Psychiatry
> Sir William Hardy Building
> Downing Street
> Cambridge CB2 3EB
> 
> Phone: +44 7583 535 307
> Website: www.kirstiewhitaker.com
> 
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Some notes on getting Tracula to work for newbies

2014-08-20 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Thanks a lot, Kirstie. Nice job on finding solutions in the archives! You 
are a model user :)

On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Kirstie Whitaker wrote:

> Hi Anastasia and the freesurfer list,
> 
> I've been working on getting the latest version of tracula to run and I 
> thought I would post here the errors that I've worked around. It's all been 
> based on looking
> through the mailing list archives but I thought it would be useful to add 
> them here all in one place! The goal of this email is simply to save time for 
> others in the
> future (including myself when I forget all these things!)
> 
> [Note that if I've written something between < > then it will be specific to 
> your files/directories etc]
> 
> When running trac-all on an input nii file with corresponding bval and bvec 
> files:
> 
> 1) If you're getting an error that says:
> 
> nifti1Read(): unsupported slice timing pattern 5 in  FILE>
> 
> Try running the command:
> 
> fslmaths  
> 
> eg: fslmaths dti.nii.gz dti.nii.gz
> 
> I'm really not clear on what exactly is wrong with my files (created using an 
> in house dicom converter) but taking in the file and writing it straight back 
> out again
> gets rid of this problem for me.
> 
> 2) If you're getting an error that says
> 
> ERROR: Could not open //dmri/bvals for reading
> 
> Then you're probably using the centos4 update at 
> http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Tracula. You have two options - if 
> the centos6 update works then switch to
> that, otherwise all other steps in trac-all -prep work *except* for the 
> quality control. So you can run trac-all -prep -noqa and all should be well.
> 
> To install the update just download it (I used wget ) 
> and the untar it (tar -zxvf ). Copy the files 
> inside the folder
> you've created into the $FREESURFER_HOME/bin/ directory.
> 
> 3) If you're getting an error that says (something along the lines of)
> 
> mri_convert --frame 0 14 27 41 54 68 //dmri/dwi.nii.gz 
> //dmri/lowb.nii.gz
> 
> mri_convert: extra arguments ("41" and following)
> 
> type mri_convert -u for usage
> 
> Then you're probably using an old version of trac-all. Double check that 
> you've replaced the appropriate files in your $FREESURFER_HOME/bin directory 
> with those
> contained in the appropriate update at 
> http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Tracula. (See my instructions at 
> point 2).
> 
> 
> Some fun facts from my experience:
>  *  You can have decimal points (not commas though) in your bvals files.
>  *  You can run trac-all in either a bash or tcsh shell.
> (These were not the droids I was looking for)
> 
> Thanks again for the really excellent software. And please correct anything 
> that I've written here if it's wrong!
> 
> Kx
> 
> --
> Kirstie Whitaker, PhD
> Research Associate
> 
> Department of Psychiatry
> University of Cambridge
> 
> Mailing Address
> Brain Mapping Unit
> Department of Psychiatry
> Sir William Hardy Building
> Downing Street
> Cambridge CB2 3EB
> 
> Phone: +44 7583 535 307
> Website: www.kirstiewhitaker.com
> 
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Some notes on getting Tracula to work for newbies

2014-08-25 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Kirstie - Your work-around works, but I should've actually included the 
new mri_convert in the update. I've included it now, so you'll find it if 
you download the last tracula update again. This should make things run 
smoothly without changing any scripts.


Let me know if this solves it and sorry for the confusion! And I stand by 
my statement on the model user - it's not about not ever running into 
problems but about not being afraid to troubleshoot them! :)


a.y

On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Kirstie Whitaker wrote:


On 20 August 2014 14:27, Anastasia Yendiki  wrote:

  Thanks a lot, Kirstie. Nice job on finding solutions in the archives!
  You
  are a model user :)

 
Thank youalthough unfortunately not quite the best user - I still have
problems...

I think I lied in my earlier email - I think that the mri_convert problem (#3
below) is actually in the newest version of trac-preproc. (I didn't do a great
job of keeping track of my version because I was being lazy! More fool me.)

Here's the part of the code which in the May 2014 update ('$Id: trac-preproc,v
1.49 2014/03/22 03:31:22 ayendiki Exp $' ) that is leading to the error:

#=
  # Make diffusion brain mask
  if ($#nb0 > 0) then
    set lowblist = ()
    @ k = 0
    while ($k < $nb0)
  set lowblist = ($lowblist $k)
  @ k = $k + 1
    end
  else
    set bmin = `grep -v ^$ $dwidir/dwi_orig.mghdti.bvals \
    | sort --numeric-sort | head -1`
    set lowblist = `cat $dwidir/dwi_orig.mghdti.bvals \
    | awk -v bmin=$bmin '{if ($1 == bmin) print NR-1}'`
  endif

  if (! $#lowblist) then
    echo "ERROR: Cannot detect low-b volumes"
    goto error_exit
  endif

  set cmd = mri_convert
  set cmd = ($cmd --frame $lowblist)
  set cmd = ($cmd $dwidir/dwi.nii.gz)
  set cmd = ($cmd $dwidir/lowb.nii.gz)
  echo $cmd |& tee -a $LF |& tee -a $CF
  if ($RunIt) then
    $cmd |& tee -a $LF
    if ($status) goto error_exit
  endif

#=

Which leads to this command:

> mri_convert --frame 0 14 27 41 54 68
/scratch/kw401/UCHANGE_INTERIM/SUB_DATA/10778/SURFER/MRI0/dmri/dwi.nii.gz
/scratch/kw401/UCHANGE_INTERIM/SUB_DATA/10778/SURFER/MRI0/dmri/lowb.nii.gz

And then to this error:

> mri_convert: extra arguments ("41" and following)


I made the following changes to the code (trac-preproc) and everything seems to
run just fine.

#=
OLD
>  set cmd = ($cmd --frame $lowblist)

NEW
< set cmd = ($cmd --frame ${lowblist[1]})

#=

What do you think? Is this just an odd-ness for me, or is it a helpful fix? One
thing that I haven't been able to ascertain is whether I have an old version of
mri_convert that should be able to concatenate the six listed volumes! (The next
section of code seems to look like its trying to concatenate volumes so it might
be expecting a 4D file? Or multiple lowb.nii.gz volumes?)

I hope this all makes sense! Thank you again for all your hard work!
Kx



  On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Kirstie Whitaker wrote:

  > Hi Anastasia and the freesurfer list,
  >
  > I've been working on getting the latest version of tracula to run
  and I thought I would post here the errors that I've worked around.
  It's all been based on looking
  > through the mailing list archives but I thought it would be useful
  to add them here all in one place! The goal of this email is simply
  to save time for others in the
  > future (including myself when I forget all these things!)
  >
  > [Note that if I've written something between < > then it will be
  specific to your files/directories etc]
  >
  > When running trac-all on an input nii file with corresponding bval
  and bvec files:
  >
  > 1) If you're getting an error that says:
  >
  > nifti1Read(): unsupported slice timing pattern 5 in 
  >
  > Try running the command:
  >
  > fslmaths  
  >
  > eg: fslmaths dti.nii.gz dti.nii.gz
  >
  > I'm really not clear on what exactly is wrong with my files
  (created using an in house dicom converter) but taking in the file
  and writing it straight back out again
  > gets rid of this problem for me.
  >
  > 2) If you're getting an error that says
  >
  > ERROR: Could not open //dmri/bvals for reading
  >
  > Then you're probably using the centos4 update at
  http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Tracula. You have two
  options - if the centos6 update works then switch

Re: [Freesurfer] tracula: bvec-error

2014-08-25 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Robby - It looks like in your config file "setbveclist" is one word, 
instead of "set bveclist". This may be why you're getting the "Badly 
placed ()'s." error at the very beginning of your trac-all output. And it 
would explain why it can't find the files.


Hope this helps,
a.y

On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Robby De Pauw wrote:


Dear FreeSurfer,

When I try to use TRACULA I keep getting the following error:

mv -f 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/dmri/dwi_orig_flip.mghdti.bvecs
 /Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/dmri/bvecs
mv: rename 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/dmri/dwi_orig_flip.mghdti.bvecs
 to /Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/dmri/bvecs: No such 
file or directory

after entering the following command:

$ trac-all -prep -c dmrirc.preproc

I tried to specify my bval and bvec in the config file, but that doesn’t seem 
to help.

My data was assessed using a Siemens-scanner. Attached you can find the 
config-file.

Thank you in advance,

Best regards,

Robby

—

the complete output can be found here:

~/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS $ trac-all -prep -c dmrirc.preproc
Badly placed ()'s.
INFO: SUBJECTS_DIR is /Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1
INFO: Diffusion root is /Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1
Actual FREESURFER_HOME /Applications/freesurfer
INFO: FreeSurfer build stamps do not match
Subject Stamp: freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0
Current Stamp: freesurfer-Darwin-lion-stable-pub-v5.3.0
INFO: current FREESURFER_HOME does not match that of previous processing.
   Current: /Applications/freesurfer
   Previous: /apps/gent/SL6/sandybridge/software/FreeSurfer/5.3.0-centos4_x86_64
trac-preproc -c 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/scripts/dmrirc.local -log 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/scripts/trac-all.log -cmd 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/scripts/trac-all.cmd
#-
/Applications/freesurfer/bin/trac-preproc
#-
#@# Image corrections Thu Aug 21 15:59:52 CEST 2014
mri_convert /Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/Diffusion/INP_080_LISA_V_1/1.IMA 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/dmri/dwi_orig.nii.gz
mri_convert /Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/Diffusion/INP_080_LISA_V_1/1.IMA 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/dmri/dwi_orig.nii.gz
$Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.7 2012/09/05 21:55:16 mreuter Exp $
reading from 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/Diffusion/INP_080_LISA_V_1/1.IMA...
INFO: this looks like a dicom, not an old Siemens .ima file, so I'm going to 
unpack it as a dicom.
If this fails, run mri_convert with -it dicom
Getting Series No
INFO: Found 71 files in 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/Diffusion/INP_080_LISA_V_1
INFO: Scanning for Series Number 5
Scanning Directory
INFO: found 65 files in series
INFO: loading series header info.

RunNo = 4
WARNING: Run 1 appears to be truncated
 Files Found: 65, Files Expected (lRep+1): 1
FileName
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/Diffusion/INP_080_LISA_V_1/1.IMA
Identification
NumarisVersyngo MR B17
ScannerModel  TrioTim
PatientName   Sabbe^Linde
Date and time
StudyDate 20140422
StudyTime 164616.578000
SeriesTime171854.765000
AcqTime   171832.007500
Acquisition parameters
PulseSeq  *ep_b0
Protocol  DTI64dir_1av_b1200_2.5x2.5x2.5_sfs
PhEncDir  COL
EchoNo1
FlipAngle 90
EchoTime  83
InversionTime -1
RepetitionTime10800
PhEncFOV  240
ReadoutFOV240
Image information
RunNo 4
SeriesNo  5
ImageNo   1
NImageRows768
NImageCols768
NFrames   65
SliceArraylSize   60
IsMosaic  1
ImgPos961.3685 959.9193 107.7635
VolRes  2.5000   2.5000   2.5000
VolDim 96   96   60
Vc -1.  -0.0011   0.0062
Vr  0.  -0.9841  -0.1774
Vs  0.0063  -0.1774   0.9841
VolCenter   0.   0.   0.
TransferSyntaxUID 1.2.840.10008.1.2.1
INFO: sorting.
INFO: ( 96  96  60), nframes = 65, ismosaic=1
Could not parse NUMARIS version string syngo MR B17
found in dicom tag 18,1020 (len = 3 != 6)
Repetition Time = 10800, TR = 10800 ms
PE Dir COL COL
AutoAlign matrix detected
AutoAlign Matrix -
1.000   0.000   0.000   0.000;
0.000   1.000   0.000   0.000;
0.000   0.000   1.000   0.000;
0.000   0.000   0.000   1.000;

FileName
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/Diffusion/INP_080_LISA_V_1/1.IMA
Identification
NumarisVer   

Re: [Freesurfer] error in pre-processing in TRACULA

2014-08-25 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Anri - What text editor did you use to create the configuration file? 
It looks like the last line (which specifies the b-value file) has no 
end-of-line, and so that line is not executed, hence the failure to find 
the b-value file. Can you please press "enter" at the end of that line, so 
that you move to the next line, then save the configuration file and try 
again?


a.y

On Fri, 22 Aug 2014, 渡辺杏里 wrote:


Dear TRACULA experts

Hello.
I am running TRACULA, but it exited an error very early in pre-processing.
My data is not a format in DICOM but .nii, does this cause the error?
I set the dcmlist to .nii file (in attachment).

Could anyone help me?
This is the error log and I attached the configuration file.

-error log-

[watanabeanris-Mac-Pro:mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial] watanabeanri% trac-all 
-prep -c
$TUTORIAL_DATA/diffusion_tutorial/dmrirc.tutorial

INFO: SUBJECTS_DIR is /volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_recons

INFO: Diffusion root is /volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial

Actual FREESURFER_HOME /Applications/freesurfer

trac-preproc -c 
/volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/scripts/dmrirc.local -log
/volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/scripts/trac-all.log -cmd
/volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/scripts/trac-all.cmd

#-

/Applications/freesurfer/bin/trac-preproc 

#-

#@# Image corrections Fri Aug 22 11:03:45 JST 2014

mri_convert /volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/orig/00.nii
/volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/dmri/dwi_orig.nii.gz

mri_convert /volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/orig/00.nii
/volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/dmri/dwi_orig.nii.gz 

$Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.7 2012/09/05 21:55:16 mreuter Exp $

reading from /volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/orig/00.nii...

TR=7175.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00

i_ras = (-0.996496, -0.0735924, -0.0397398)

j_ras = (-0.0756091, 0.995787, 0.0518831)

k_ras = (-0.0357542, -0.0547061, 0.997862)

writing to 
/volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/dmri/dwi_orig.nii.gz...

cp /volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/dmri/bvecs
/volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/dmri/dwi_orig.mghdti.bvecs

flip4fsl /volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/dmri/dwi_orig.nii.gz
/volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/dmri/dwi_orig_flip.nii.gz

INFO: input image orientation is LAS

INFO: input image determinant is -8

fslswapdim /volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/dmri/dwi_orig.nii.gz 
x y z
/volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/dmri/dwi_orig_flip.nii.gz

fslorient -forceradiological 
/volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/dmri/dwi_orig_flip.nii.gz

INFO: found 
/volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/dmri/dwi_orig.mghdti.bvecs, 
converting to FSL format

mv -f 
/volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/dmri/dwi_orig_flip.mghdti.bvecs
/volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/dmri/bvecs

mv -f 
/volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/dmri/dwi_orig_flip.mghdti.bvals
/volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/dmri/bvals

mv: rename 
/volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/dmri/dwi_orig_flip.mghdti.bvals 
to
/volumes/mybook/Anri/diffusion_tutorial/HC_025/dmri/bvals: No such file or 
directory

Darwin watanabeanris-Mac-Pro.local 13.1.0 Darwin Kernel Version 13.1.0: Wed Apr 
 2 23:52:02 PDT 2014;
root:xnu-2422.92.1~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64


trac-preproc exited with ERRORS at Fri Aug 22 11:03:46 JST 2014


Many thanks for your help.


Best Wishes, 
Anri WATANABE



**
京都府立医科大学附属病院
精神科・心療内科
渡辺 杏里
**
WATANABE ANRI
Department of Psychiatry,
University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
**

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] anatorig vs anat in dlabel

2014-08-25 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Kirstie - That's correct. The only difference between the anatorig and 
anat is in the orientation, where the latter is always in LAS so it looks 
straight if you open it in fslview. For the purposes of freeview and every 
other freesurfer program, the two are indistinguishable, and they should 
align with the volumes in your subject's mri/...

a.y

On Fri, 22 Aug 2014, Kirstie Whitaker wrote:

> Hi
> 
> I have a very minor question about the naming scheme for tracula output.
> 
> I have the folders anat and anatorig in the dlabel folder. Am I right that:
>  *  anatorig is the T1 image in "freesurfer space" (256 x 256 x 256; LIA)
>  *  anat is a rotated version of the T1 image in freesurfer space that lines 
> up with the standard orientation
> used by FSL (256 x 256 x 256; LAS)
> 
> So neither is actually in the same space as the *original* file that was 
> passed to recon-all (176 x 240 x 256;
> LAS)?
> 
> I ran mri_label2vol with dlabel/anat/anat_brain_mask.nii.gz as the --temp 
> argument and the labels didn't line
> up nicely. They did line up with anatorig though. Is this what you'd expect?
> 
> Kx
> 
> --
> Kirstie Whitaker, PhD
> Research Associate
> 
> Department of Psychiatry
> University of Cambridge
> 
> Mailing Address
> Brain Mapping Unit
> Department of Psychiatry
> Sir William Hardy Building
> Downing Street
> Cambridge CB2 3EB
> 
> Phone: +44 7583 535 307
> Website: www.kirstiewhitaker.com
> 
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] tracula: bvec-error

2014-08-25 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Robby - Which version of tracula are you using? In general it's hard to 
guess what's going on just by seeing the error message. Please attach the 
entire log file (scripts/trac-all.log).


a.y

On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Robby De Pauw wrote:


Hi Anastasia

Thanks for your quick reply. I’ve changed the command and I got one step 
further. Now I get another error:

mv -f 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/dmri/dwi_orig_flip.mghdti.bvecs
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/dmri/bvecs
mv: rename 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/dmri/dwi_orig_flip.mghdti.bvecs
 to
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/dmri/bvecs: No such file 
or directory
Darwin ge24p176.ugent.be 13.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 13.3.0: Tue Jun  3 
21:27:35 PDT 2014; root:xnu-2422.110.17~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64

trac-preproc exited with ERRORS at Mon Aug 25 14:23:03 CEST 2014

Somehow the folder bvecs was not created? 

Regards,

Robby



Hi Robby - It looks like in your config file "setbveclist" is one word, instead of 
"set bveclist". This may be why you're getting the
"Badly placed ()'s." error at the very beginning of your trac-all output. And 
it would explain why it can't find the files.

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Robby De Pauw wrote:

Dear FreeSurfer,

When I try to use TRACULA I keep getting the following error:

mv -f 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/dmri/dwi_orig_flip.mghdti.bvecs

 /Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/dmri/bvecs
mv: rename 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/dmri/dwi_orig_flip.mghdti.bvecs
 to /Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/dmri/bvecs: No such 
file or directory


after entering the following command:

$ trac-all -prep -c dmrirc.preproc

I tried to specify my bval and bvec in the config file, but that doesn’t seem 
to help.


My data was assessed using a Siemens-scanner. Attached you can find the 
config-file.


Thank you in advance,

Best regards,

Robby

—

the complete output can be found here:

~/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS $ trac-all -prep -c dmrirc.preproc
Badly placed ()'s.
INFO: SUBJECTS_DIR is /Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1
INFO: Diffusion root is /Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1
Actual FREESURFER_HOME /Applications/freesurfer
INFO: FreeSurfer build stamps do not match
Subject Stamp: freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0
Current Stamp: freesurfer-Darwin-lion-stable-pub-v5.3.0
INFO: current FREESURFER_HOME does not match that of previous processing.
   Current: /Applications/freesurfer
   Previous: /apps/gent/SL6/sandybridge/software/FreeSurfer/5.3.0-centos4_x86_64
trac-preproc -c 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/scripts/dmrirc.local -log 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/scripts/trac-all.log -cmd 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/scripts/trac-all.cmd

#-
/Applications/freesurfer/bin/trac-preproc
#-
#@# Image corrections Thu Aug 21 15:59:52 CEST 2014
mri_convert /Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/Diffusion/INP_080_LISA_V_1/1.IMA 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/dmri/dwi_orig.nii.gz
mri_convert /Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/Diffusion/INP_080_LISA_V_1/1.IMA 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/T1/INP_080_LISA_V_1/dmri/dwi_orig.nii.gz

$Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.7 2012/09/05 21:55:16 mreuter Exp $
reading from 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/Diffusion/INP_080_LISA_V_1/1.IMA...
INFO: this looks like a dicom, not an old Siemens .ima file, so I'm going to 
unpack it as a dicom.

If this fails, run mri_convert with -it dicom
Getting Series No
INFO: Found 71 files in 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/Diffusion/INP_080_LISA_V_1

INFO: Scanning for Series Number 5
Scanning Directory
INFO: found 65 files in series
INFO: loading series header info.

RunNo = 4
WARNING: Run 1 appears to be truncated
 Files Found: 65, Files Expected (lRep+1): 1
FileName 
/Users/rdpauw/Desktop/SUBJECTS_FS/Diffusion/INP_080_LISA_V_1/1.IMA

Identification
NumarisVersyngo MR B17
ScannerModel  TrioTim
PatientName   Sabbe^Linde
Date and time
StudyDate 20140422
StudyTime 164616.578000
SeriesTime171854.765000
AcqTime   171832.007500
Acquisition parameters
PulseSeq  *ep_b0
Protocol  DTI64dir_1av_b1200_2.5x2.5x2.5_sfs
PhEncDir  COL
EchoNo1
FlipAngle 90
EchoTime  83
InversionTime -1
RepetitionTime10800
PhEncFOV  240
ReadoutFOV240
Image information
RunNo 4
SeriesNo  5
ImageNo   1
NImageRows768
NImageCols768
NFrames   65
SliceArraylSize

Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula - May update version

2014-09-04 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Peggy,

1. All anatomical volumes used in the last update of longitudinal tracula 
are in the same space as the *.long.* freesurfer volumes, i.e., the 
within-subject base template.


2. There are no changes to the bedpostx step.

2a. The brain mask should be the same across all steps of trac-all, i.e., 
either use a mask based on the anatomical segmentation throughout, or use 
a mask based on the low-b diffusion volumes throughout. Whether you want 
to use the anatomical or diffusion brain mask for another analysis with 
FSL is up to you.


3. You can't skip the tensor fit step. Even if it weren't used it in the 
-prior step, the -path step would need it because it calculates average FA 
and other such measures for each tract that it reconstructs. In any case, 
skipping the tensor fit step would not save you much time.


Hope this helps,
a.y

On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Peggy Skelly wrote:


I have a few questions about the May 2014 update to Tracula:

1. Between the 2013-12-04 trac-all version 1.53 and 2014-05-26 trac-all
version 1.56, the longitudinal stream now uses the aparc+aseg.mgz from the
*.long.* directories, and all output is saved there, too. Are
the .long./dlabel/anat and anatorig transformed into the
base space like other images from the longitudinal recon-all, or are they in
the original space of the timepoint T1 image?

2. Are there any changes to the bedpostX step, other than using a different
mask? I've already run bedpostx in the Dec 2013 version (with
lowb_brain_mask). Can the results be used with the new version by moving the
/dmri.bedpostX directory to .long.base/dmri.bedpostX?

2a. (Maybe pertains to both versions) The link to
.../dmri/nodif_brain_mask.nii.gz seems to be made during the -prep stage
using .../dlabel/diff/aparc+aseg_mask.bbr.nii.gz or lowb_brain_mask.nii.gz
depending on usemaskanat's value in the dmrirc file. The bedpost stage seems
to use the target file as its mask no matter what usemaskanat is in the
dmrirc file used when calling trac-all -bedp. (I'm trying to use
aparc+aseg_mask for -prep and -path, but lowb_brain_mask for -bedp in
anticipation of using the bedpostx output for other seed-base tracking in
FSL.)

3. May 2014 version: trac-all -prep -notensor fails when it gets to
computing the priors because dmri_train includes the --fa flag and the
dtifit_FA.nii.gz is not present. Running trac-all -prior without a computed
FA also fails the same way. I could compute the tensor, but thought I would
save some time. I didn't realize computing the priors would use it. Does it
improve the accuracy?

Thanks,
Peggy

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] tracula: bvec-error

2014-09-04 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Robby - The option to specify a different gradient table for each scan 
(with bveclist) was introduced more recently. See:

http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Tracula/#Updates

The version that you're using doesn't recognize bveclist.

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Tue, 26 Aug 2014, Robby De Pauw wrote:


Hi Anastasia,

I’m using this version of tracula.

trac-all,v 1.22.2.12 2013/02/23 02:01:02 ayendiki Exp

I’ve attached the log-file you requested.

Robby De Pauw, dra.
Ghent University
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences
3B3
De Pintelaan 185
B-9000 Ghent

robby.dep...@ugent.be





___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] trac-all -prep error field map error

2014-09-04 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Eileen - In b0plist you can give files that contain either 2 phase maps 
(a volume with 2 frames), or the difference of 2 phase maps (a volume with 
only 1 frame). Depending on whether the volume that you specified has 2 or 
1 frame, trac-all will assume which of the above you're giving it.


Your error seems to be that mri_convert doesn't recognize the format of 
your volume:


mri_convert /home/image/FASD/call1285/call1285_dti_021210/proc/b0pha.nii
/home/image/FASD/Shared/freesurfer/tracula/CIFASDII_T1-DTI/call1285_CIFASDII
_T1_021210/dmri/b0pha.nii.gz
niiRead(): unsupported datatype 32 (with scl_slope != 0) in
/home/image/FASD/call1285/call1285_dti_021210/proc/b0pha.nii

Can you view the volume in freeview, for example? If freesurfer tools 
can't recognize the format of your file, then it's not a tracula-specific 
problem. In that case, it's best to send a new email on the list about the 
mri_convert error, so that you get responses from the appropriate experts.


a.y

On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Eileen Moore wrote:


Anastasia, I'm not sure how I can give tracula the phase difference maps,
can you provide an example?

As a reminder, I've run a wrapper script around epidewarp which takes our
dicom images and converts them into a phase difference map (it is based on
the script that was authored by Doug Greve for the fBIRN consortium).

In the tutorial dmrirc example I see only the 'set b0mlist' and 'set
b0plist' options, and am unsure where I could give it the phase difference
map.

I've also tried converting the dicom magnitude and phase maps to nifti
format and inputting these into the dmrirc file but I am still getting an
error. (See attached log file).

Thanks,
Eileen.



  --

  Message: 10
  Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 04:14:16 -0400 (EDT)
  From: Anastasia Yendiki 
  Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] trac-all -prep error field map error
  To: Freesurfer support list 
  Message-ID:
  
  Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed


  Hi Eileen - All image formats that mri_convert (and thus any
  freesurfer
  program) can read will do, you don't need dicom. Try giving
  trac-all the
  phase difference maps you have and let's see what happens.

  Best,
  a.y

  On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, Eileen Moore wrote:

  > Hi Anastasia,
  >
  > OK - our imaging physicists had developed a wrapper script
  around epidewarp
  > which takes our dicom images and converts them into the phase
  difference map
  > (it is based on the script that was authored by Doug Greve for
  the fBIRN
  > consortium). It looks like the tracula script requires dicom
  images. Is
  > there a way for me to do epidewarp manually and then follow
  through with the
  > remaining steps using trac-all?
  >
  > Thanks,
  > Eileen.
  >
  >
  >       Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:23:47 -0400 (EDT)
  >       From: Anastasia Yendiki 
  >       Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] trac-all -prep error field map
  error
  >       To: Freesurfer support list
  
  >       Message-ID:
  >     
   
  >       Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
  >
  >
  >       Hi Eileen - That step is run with the program
  epidewarp.fsl,
  >       which you can
  >       run on the command line to see the available options.
  The input
  >       phase map
  >       volume is expected to have either 2 frames (2 separate
  phase
  >       maps) or 1
  >       frame (the difference phase map). This error from
  trac-all means
  >       that it
  >       found that your input phase map has something other than
  1 or 2
  >       frames, so
  >       it doesn't know how to handle it.
  >
  >       Hope this helps,
  >       a.y
  >
  >       On Sat, 12 Jul 2014, Eileen Moore wrote:
  >
  >       > Hi - I'm using freesurfer 5.3 on an Ubuntu operating
  system.
  >       I'm tyring to
  >       > run tracula on some? images acquired from a GE
  scanner. I am
  >       running into
  >       > problems when I try to perform the registration-based
  >       B0-inhomogeneity
  >       > compensation, getting an error in the terminal output:
  "ERROR:
  >       Unrecognized
  >       > format of phase map". However, trac-all -prep runs
  fine when I
  >       skip the
  >       > B0-inhomogeneity compensation step. Is there 

Re: [Freesurfer] problems with tracula pre-processing (bvecs)

2014-09-04 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Michelle - Your column-formatted gradient table (original_columns.bvec) 
shows up as having only 2 rows in unix (e.g. with the cat command). That's 
sometimes the case for text files saved from Excel or other non-unix 
applications. When I open your file in TextEdit on a mac and then 
copy-paste it into a unix text editor, it shows up fine.

For row-formatted gradient tables, you have to make sure you have the 
latest version of tracula, as that option was added more recently:
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Tracula/#Updates

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote:

> Hi,
> I'm having some problems with the first command of the tracula pipeline.
> I am using FreeSurfer 5.3 on a mac (OS 10.9).
> The problem seems to be related to the bvecs file. I received the following
> error message:
> niiRead(): error opening file /path/to/dmri/dwi_frame.nii.gz
>
> I read some threads available on your website, but couldn't figured out a
> solution yet. I tried to organize the bvecs in columns, as opposed to the
> original configuration in rows. By doing that and re-launching the
> pre-processing command I obtained a differente error message:
> Error: bvecs and bvals don't have the same number of entries
>
> The original bvals and bvecs files seem to have the same numbers of entries
> to me. But the bvecs file produced by the processing - both the bvecs.norot
> and the bvecs files in the dmri folder - don't have all the information of
> the vectors.
>
> I am enclosing a zip folder with attachments:
> 1) original bvecs and bvals files organized in rows and columns
> 2) bvecs and bvals files generated by tracula
> 3) error logs
>
> Let me know if you need any other information.
> Thanks in advance for your help.
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] tracula: bvec-error

2014-09-04 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Barbara - If your version is the same as Robby's, then you're trying to 
use an option (different gradient table for each scan) that was added in a 
tracula update. Older versions only allowed a single gradient table for 
all scans. See:

http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Tracula/#Updates

a.y

On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Barbara Kreilkamp wrote:


Dear all,
Robby, are you still having the problem? Did you solve it?
I am really having the same problem, just that I am using nifti files
instead of dicoms. I am using the same version as Robby. Please find my
command+output, trac-all.log and configuration file in the attachment.
I would also appreciate any help.
Thank you,
Barbara


  On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Robby De Pauw
   wrote:
  Hi Anastasia,

I’m using this version of tracula.

trac-all,v 1.22.2.12 2013/02/23 02:01:02 ayendiki Exp

I’ve attached the log-file you requested.

Robby De Pauw, dra.
Ghent University
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences
3B3
De Pintelaan 185
B-9000 Ghent

robby.dep...@ugent.be









___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person
to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error
and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners
Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent
to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the
sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.




___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] problems with tracula pre-processing (bvecs)

2014-09-04 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Michelle - Based on your recon-all.log, your SUBJECTS_DIR that contains 
the freesurfer recon of your subject is /PHShome/my738/FSout. But based on 
you trac-all.log, you're using:

SUBJECTS_DIR /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula

So tracula cannot find the freesurfer recon of your subject. This is 
what's causing the latest error.


About the confusion with the gradient table formats: The tutorials refer 
to the latest version of tracula, which has been updated since the 5.3 
release. The newer features included in those updates are described here:

http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Tracula/#Updates

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote:


Hi Barbara,thanks again for your help. 
I checked the bvecs file using the 'more' command, and (as you pointed out)
there was some extra text. This was likely due to MS-excel formatting, which
I have used to reshape the bvecs file from row to column configuration. Such
extra text was not part of the original bvecs file organized in rows though,
but tracula was not giving errors as well.
So, take home message#1
It is not true that FreeSurfer 5.3 allows both rows and columns
configuration of the bvecs (as stated in the wiki page). Or at least that's
not true for all the scanners. I'd recommend a column configuration of the
bvecs, even with FreeSurfer 5.3.
Also - take home message#2
verify that there's no extra text due to excel formatting in the reshaped
bvecs file.

That said, now this lead me to the next error!
It seems that there's a problem with the recon-all output that I'm using
(?). However, both the log file and the output of the recon-all processing
seem fine to me.
Here is the detail of the error message I am getting
ERROR: fio_pushd: path/to/dlabel/mni
And attached are the log files of both tracula pre-processing (with errors)
and recon-all (apparently without errors).

Any help/suggestions?
Thanks.



On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Barbara Kreilkamp 
wrote:
  Hi Michele,
This might be the solution - try the command 'more' in unix on your
column bvec and bval, they should each have one (bval) and three
(bvec) columns and no strange symbols. But you have these symbols in
the bvec-file (probably because you have extra formatting information,
that is not needed and an obstacle to Tracula).

more original_columns.bval 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000

NEURO-222:tracula_help NEURO-222$ more original_columns.bvec 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 ^M0 0 0 ^M0 0 0 ^M0 0 0 ^M-1 0 0 ^M-0.166 0.986 0 ^M0.11 0.664
0.74 ^M-0.901 -0.419 -0.11 ^M0.169 -0.601 0.781 ^M0.815 -0.386 0.433
^M-0.656 0.366 0.66 ^M^M-0.582 0.8 0.143 ^M-0.9 0.259 0.35 ^M-0.693
-0.698 0.178 ^M-0.357 -0.924 -0.14 ^M-0.543 -0.488 -0.683 ^M0.525
-0.396 0.753 ^M0.639 0.689 0.341 ^M0.33 -0.013 -0.944 ^M0.524 -0.783
0.335 ^M-0.609 -0.065 -0.791 ^M-0.22 -0.233 -0.947 ^M0.004 -0.91
-0.415 ^M0.511 0.627 -0.589 ^M-0.414 0.737 0.535 ^M0.679 0.139 -0.721
^M-0.884 -0.296 0.362 ^M-0.262 0.432 0.863 ^M-0.088 0.185 -0.979
^M-0.294 -0.907 0.302 ^M-0.887 -0.089 -0.453 ^M-0.257 -0.443 0.859
^M-0.086 0.867 -0.491 ^M-0.863 0.504 -0.025 


You are ending up with multiple columns in the second row, please make
sure they are 3 columns.


Good luck,

Barbara



On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Barbara Kreilkamp
 wrote:
  Hi Michele,

  Do you use the dicoms or the nifti files as input to
  TRACULA?
  Also, I think the complete trac-all.log could be even more
  helpful.
  I am a newbie myself but I am having a similar problem, so
  I am trying to find a solution as well :).

  Best,
  Barbara


On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Michele Cavallari
 wrote:
  Hi Barbara,
  thanks for your reply. I checked the dwi series on a
  viewer and it looks
  fine: I have 1960 dicoms, corresponding to 56 slices
  x 35 directions
  specified in the bval/bvec. Also, I was able to
  obtain the FA and MD maps
  through fsl using the very same dicoms and
  bval/bvec.
  Any suggestion?
  Thanks


  On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Barbara Kreilkamp
   wrote:
  Dear Michele,

  I cannot find anything wrong with your bvec and bval
  files.
  Seeing as you had an errormessage related to the dwi
  (the one about the
  dwi_frame.nii.gz): Did you check that your dwi data
  have the same amount of
  volumes as entries in bvec and bval?

  Good luck,
  Barbara



  On 28/08/2014 22:47, Michele Cavallari wrote:
  Hi,
  I'm having some problems with the first command of
  the tracula pipeline.
  I am using FreeSurfer 5.3 on a mac (OS 10.9).
  The problem seems to be related to the bvecs file. I
  received the following
  error message:
  niiRead(): e

Re: [Freesurfer] problems with tracula pre-processing (bvecs)

2014-09-04 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Michelle - Try replacing this line:
setenv 
/Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/SD40_1/FSout_P0401_e20130813_s002_Cor7minMDEFT_T1_b

with:
setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /PHShome/my738/FSout

(Or whatever the location of your freesurfer recons is.)

a.y

On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Michele Cavallari wrote:


Hi Barbara,I checked the path. The folder with the trac-all output is is the
very same folder of the dwi dicoms.
Attached is the dmrirc file I am using, with all the specs.
Thanks


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Barbara Kreilkamp 
wrote:
  Hi Michele,

  You would have to make sure that the files are written to the
  same folder for both commands (recon-all and trac-all)
  Right now it seems you wrote the output of recon-all to
  /PHShome/my738/FSout/FSout_P0401_e20130813_s002_Cor7minMDEFT_T1_b/

  and trac-all output to
   /Users/michele/Desktop/tracula/sages_diff_test_tracula/SD40_1/

  This is what the code was looking for but did not find:
  Location of aparc+aseg's relative to base:
  dlabel/mni/aparc+aseg.nii.gz

  What path did you specify for the T1 segmentations (by
  recon-all) in your configuration file?

  Hope it helps,
  All the best,
  Barbara

  On 03.09.14 17:31, Michele Cavallari wrote:
  Hi Barbara, thanks again for your help. 
I checked the bvecs file using the 'more' command, and (as you
pointed out) there was some extra text. This was likely due to
MS-excel formatting, which I have used to reshape the bvecs file
from row to column configuration. Such extra text was not part
of the original bvecs file organized in rows though, but tracula
was not giving errors as well.
So, take home message#1
It is not true that FreeSurfer 5.3 allows both rows and columns
configuration of the bvecs (as stated in the wiki page). Or at
least that's not true for all the scanners. I'd recommend a
column configuration of the bvecs, even with FreeSurfer 5.3.
Also - take home message#2
verify that there's no extra text due to excel formatting in the
reshaped bvecs file.

That said, now this lead me to the next error!
It seems that there's a problem with the recon-all output that
I'm using (?). However, both the log file and the output of the
recon-all processing seem fine to me.
Here is the detail of the error message I am getting
ERROR: fio_pushd: path/to/dlabel/mni
And attached are the log files of both tracula pre-processing
(with errors) and recon-all (apparently without errors).

Any help/suggestions?
Thanks.



On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Barbara Kreilkamp
 wrote:
  Hi Michele,
This might be the solution - try the command 'more' in
unix on your column bvec and bval, they should each have
one (bval) and three (bvec) columns and no strange
symbols. But you have these symbols in the bvec-file
(probably because you have extra formatting information,
that is not needed and an obstacle to Tracula).

more original_columns.bval 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000 

1000

NEURO-222:tracula_help NEURO-222$ more
original_columns.bvec 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 ^M0 0 0 ^M0 0 0 ^M0 0 0 ^M-1 0 0 ^M-0.166 0.986 0
^M0.11 0.664 0.74 ^M-0.901 -0.419 -0.11 ^M0.169 -0.601
0.781 ^M0.815 -0.386 0.433 ^M-0.656 0.366 0.66 ^M^M-0.582
0.8 0.143 ^M-0.9 0.259 0.35 ^M-0.693 -0.698 0.178 ^M-0.357
-0.924 -0.14 ^M-0.543 -0.488 -0.683 ^M0.525 -0.396 0.753
^M0.639 0.689 0.341 ^M0.33 -0.013 -0.944 ^M0.524 -0.783
0.335 ^M-0.609 -0.065 -0.791 ^M-0.22 -0.233 -0.947 ^M0.004
-0.91 -0.415 ^M0.511 0.627 -0.589 ^M-0.414 0.737 0.535
^M0.679 0.139 -0.721 ^M-0.884 -0.296 0.362 ^M-0.262 0.432
0.863 ^M-0.088 0.185 -0.979 ^M-0.294 -0.907 0.302 ^M-0.887
-0.089 -0.453 ^M-0.257 -0.443 0.859 ^M-0.086 0.867 -0.491
^M-0.863 0.504 -0.025 


You are ending up with multiple columns in the second row,
please make sure they are 3 columns.


Good luck,

Barbara



On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Barbara Kreilkamp
 wrote:
  Hi Michele,

  Do you use the dicoms or the nifti files as
  input to TRACULA?
  Also, I think the complete trac-all.log could
  be even more helpful.
  I am a newbie myself but I am having a similar
  problem, so I am trying to find a solution as
  well :).

  Best,
  Barbara


On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Michele Cavallari
 wrote:
  Hi Barbara,
  thanks for your reply. I checked the dwi
  series on a viewer and it looks
  fine: I have 1960 dicoms, corresponding
  to 56 slices x 35 directions
  specified in the bval/bvec. Also, I was
  able to obtain the FA and MD maps
  through fsl using the very same dicoms
  and bval/bvec.
  Any suggestion?
  Thanks


  On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Barbara
  Kreilkamp
   wrote:
  Dear Michele,

  I cannot find anything wr

Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula

2014-09-04 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Emily - Is your amygdala seed ROI in MNI space? Only in that case the 
seed-to-diffusion transformation would be the MNI-to-diffusion 
transformation.

a.y

On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Emily Louise Belleau wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I did all of my DTI preprocessing through tracula.  I now am using FSL 
> probtractx (which utilizes the bedpost stage output) to explore pathways from 
> the amygdala to the ventromedial prefontal cortex.
>
> When I used FSL's probtractx, when I viewed the tract. The tract was in the 
> wrong area of the brain.
>
> So, I think this may have something to do with the transfromation matrices I 
> gave it via tracula.
>
> *FSL asks for the seed to diffusion transformation matrix so that it can 
> convert your seed masks from MNI space to diffusion space. I gave the 
> transformation matrix  in the dmri folder under xfms, titled 
> mni2diff.bbr.mat. I have a feeling this may be the issue.
>
> * I then tried to use the FLIRT registration tool through FSL to get the 
> appropriate transformation matrices.  It asks for the bedpost directory. I 
> got an error saying it could not read my no_dif_brain_mask.nii.
>
> I am not sure what transformation matrix to give and was wondering if you 
> could give me some guidance.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Emily
>
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] From bedpostX and recon-all to tracula

2014-09-04 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Kate - There is an example configuration file for tracula in your 
freesurfer distribution ($FREESURFER_HOME/bin/dmrirc.example). The same 
file is also here:
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/dmrirc

If you attach your configuration file and the log file 
(scripts/trac-all.log), we can try to troubleshoot.

a.y

On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Katherine Damme wrote:

> Hello Freesurfer Community!
> I have sucessfully completed diffusion preprocessing in FSL and the
> recon-all of the structural image and would like to use tracula for the
> tract reconstruction. I keep having trouble with my configuration file.
> 
> Does anyone have a bedpostX tracula config file they could share as an
> example?
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Kate
> 
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula

2014-09-04 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Certainly you can, and it's a good idea for troubleshooting this. In FSL 
you can do it with:

flirt -in your_label_in_MNI_space.nii.gz -out your_label_in_diff_space.nii.gz 
-ref dmri/lowb.nii.gz -applyxfm -init dmri/xfms/mni2diff.bbr.mat -interp 
nearestneighbour

Then you can overlay the transformed label on some of the other inputs 
that you're giving probtrackx (e.g. a volume from the bedpostx directory) 
to make sure they look right in fslview.


On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, Emily Louise Belleau wrote:

> Hi Anastasia,
>
> Yes my amygdala seed is in MNI space. When I used the MNI to diffusion.mat 
> file in the dmri folder and placed it into FSL's probtractx, I developed a 
> track that was in the wrong area of the brain, so I am thinking there is 
> something wrong happening with the transformation to diffusion space.
>
> Can I transform the amygdala mask into diffusion space prior to putting it 
> into FSL's probtrackx viz bb register. If so, how might I go about doing that?
>
> Thanks so much for your help,
>
> Emily
> 
> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
>  on behalf of Anastasia Yendiki 
> 
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 4:26 PM
> To: Freesurfer support list
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula
>
> Hi Emily - Is your amygdala seed ROI in MNI space? Only in that case the
> seed-to-diffusion transformation would be the MNI-to-diffusion
> transformation.
>
> a.y
>
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Emily Louise Belleau wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I did all of my DTI preprocessing through tracula.  I now am using FSL 
>> probtractx (which utilizes the bedpost stage output) to explore pathways 
>> from the amygdala to the ventromedial prefontal cortex.
>>
>> When I used FSL's probtractx, when I viewed the tract. The tract was in the 
>> wrong area of the brain.
>>
>> So, I think this may have something to do with the transfromation matrices I 
>> gave it via tracula.
>>
>> *FSL asks for the seed to diffusion transformation matrix so that it can 
>> convert your seed masks from MNI space to diffusion space. I gave the 
>> transformation matrix  in the dmri folder under xfms, titled 
>> mni2diff.bbr.mat. I have a feeling this may be the issue.
>>
>> * I then tried to use the FLIRT registration tool through FSL to get the 
>> appropriate transformation matrices.  It asks for the bedpost directory. I 
>> got an error saying it could not read my no_dif_brain_mask.nii.
>>
>> I am not sure what transformation matrix to give and was wondering if you 
>> could give me some guidance.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Emily
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
> at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] problems with tracula pre-processing (bvecs)

2014-09-04 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Ludy - If your gradient table is formatted in 3 rows you need to 
either:

1. Convert it to 3 columns so you can use it with the 5.3 version of 
tracula, which requires the gradient table to be formatted in columns

OR

2. Download the tracula update that can use gradient tables formatted in 
rows

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, ls...@bidmc.harvard.edu wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was having similar errors as Michele Cavallari regarding "error reading 
> /path/to/subject/dmri/dwi_frame," but I'm not sure it's related to my bvecs 
> file. I did try reconfiguring my bvecs file into columns instead of row just 
> in case, but that didn't solve the problem. It really just looks like it 
> can't find the dwi_frame file after the mri_concat command.
>
> I am attaching my trac-all.log and config file.
>
> Running Freesurfer 5.3 on Macbook OS 10.7.5. The bvecs files were generated 
> after I converted my dicoms to nifti using dcm2niigui (GE scanner).
>
> Can anyone tell me how dwi_frame is generated?
>
>
> Ludy
>
> This message is intended for the use of the person(s) to whom it may be 
> addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or 
> otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, copying, or use of this 
> information is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
> permanently delete it and immediately notify the sender. Thank you.
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula

2014-09-05 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

To view your label over the MNI average brain:

fslview $FSLDIR/data/standard/MNI152_T1_1mm.nii.gz 
your_label_in_MNI_space.nii.gz -l Red

There are no settings, other than choosing a different color for the 
label.

On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Emily Louise Belleau wrote:

> Hi Anastasia,
>
> I am still having a bit of trouble understanding how to properly view my 
> tract through fsl view.
>
> What is the appropriate underlay to use/settings?
>
> Thanks again for your continued help!
>
> Emily
> 
> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
>  on behalf of Anastasia Yendiki 
> 
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 4:54 PM
> To: Freesurfer support list
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula
>
> Certainly you can, and it's a good idea for troubleshooting this. In FSL
> you can do it with:
>
> flirt -in your_label_in_MNI_space.nii.gz -out your_label_in_diff_space.nii.gz 
> -ref dmri/lowb.nii.gz -applyxfm -init dmri/xfms/mni2diff.bbr.mat -interp 
> nearestneighbour
>
> Then you can overlay the transformed label on some of the other inputs
> that you're giving probtrackx (e.g. a volume from the bedpostx directory)
> to make sure they look right in fslview.
>
>
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, Emily Louise Belleau wrote:
>
>> Hi Anastasia,
>>
>> Yes my amygdala seed is in MNI space. When I used the MNI to diffusion.mat 
>> file in the dmri folder and placed it into FSL's probtractx, I developed a 
>> track that was in the wrong area of the brain, so I am thinking there is 
>> something wrong happening with the transformation to diffusion space.
>>
>> Can I transform the amygdala mask into diffusion space prior to putting it 
>> into FSL's probtrackx viz bb register. If so, how might I go about doing 
>> that?
>>
>> Thanks so much for your help,
>>
>> Emily
>> 
>> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
>>  on behalf of Anastasia Yendiki 
>> 
>> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 4:26 PM
>> To: Freesurfer support list
>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula
>>
>> Hi Emily - Is your amygdala seed ROI in MNI space? Only in that case the
>> seed-to-diffusion transformation would be the MNI-to-diffusion
>> transformation.
>>
>> a.y
>>
>> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Emily Louise Belleau wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I did all of my DTI preprocessing through tracula.  I now am using FSL 
>>> probtractx (which utilizes the bedpost stage output) to explore pathways 
>>> from the amygdala to the ventromedial prefontal cortex.
>>>
>>> When I used FSL's probtractx, when I viewed the tract. The tract was in the 
>>> wrong area of the brain.
>>>
>>> So, I think this may have something to do with the transfromation matrices 
>>> I gave it via tracula.
>>>
>>> *FSL asks for the seed to diffusion transformation matrix so that it can 
>>> convert your seed masks from MNI space to diffusion space. I gave the 
>>> transformation matrix  in the dmri folder under xfms, titled 
>>> mni2diff.bbr.mat. I have a feeling this may be the issue.
>>>
>>> * I then tried to use the FLIRT registration tool through FSL to get the 
>>> appropriate transformation matrices.  It asks for the bedpost directory. I 
>>> got an error saying it could not read my no_dif_brain_mask.nii.
>>>
>>> I am not sure what transformation matrix to give and was wondering if you 
>>> could give me some guidance.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Emily
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance 
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
>> error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
>> properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula

2014-09-05 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

If your label is in diffusion space, then replace the MNI brain with any 
volume that's in diffusion space.

On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Emily Louise Belleau wrote:

> Hi Anastasia,
>
> This would be in diffusion space though. Since I converted all of my seeds to 
> diffusion space.
>
> Emily
> 
> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
>  on behalf of Anastasia Yendiki 
> 
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 11:32 AM
> To: Freesurfer support list
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula
>
> To view your label over the MNI average brain:
>
> fslview $FSLDIR/data/standard/MNI152_T1_1mm.nii.gz 
> your_label_in_MNI_space.nii.gz -l Red
>
> There are no settings, other than choosing a different color for the
> label.
>
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Emily Louise Belleau wrote:
>
>> Hi Anastasia,
>>
>> I am still having a bit of trouble understanding how to properly view my 
>> tract through fsl view.
>>
>> What is the appropriate underlay to use/settings?
>>
>> Thanks again for your continued help!
>>
>> Emily
>> 
>> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
>>  on behalf of Anastasia Yendiki 
>> 
>> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 4:54 PM
>> To: Freesurfer support list
>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula
>>
>> Certainly you can, and it's a good idea for troubleshooting this. In FSL
>> you can do it with:
>>
>> flirt -in your_label_in_MNI_space.nii.gz -out 
>> your_label_in_diff_space.nii.gz -ref dmri/lowb.nii.gz -applyxfm -init 
>> dmri/xfms/mni2diff.bbr.mat -interp nearestneighbour
>>
>> Then you can overlay the transformed label on some of the other inputs
>> that you're giving probtrackx (e.g. a volume from the bedpostx directory)
>> to make sure they look right in fslview.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, Emily Louise Belleau wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Anastasia,
>>>
>>> Yes my amygdala seed is in MNI space. When I used the MNI to diffusion.mat 
>>> file in the dmri folder and placed it into FSL's probtractx, I developed a 
>>> track that was in the wrong area of the brain, so I am thinking there is 
>>> something wrong happening with the transformation to diffusion space.
>>>
>>> Can I transform the amygdala mask into diffusion space prior to putting it 
>>> into FSL's probtrackx viz bb register. If so, how might I go about doing 
>>> that?
>>>
>>> Thanks so much for your help,
>>>
>>> Emily
>>> 
>>> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
>>>  on behalf of Anastasia Yendiki 
>>> 
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 4:26 PM
>>> To: Freesurfer support list
>>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula
>>>
>>> Hi Emily - Is your amygdala seed ROI in MNI space? Only in that case the
>>> seed-to-diffusion transformation would be the MNI-to-diffusion
>>> transformation.
>>>
>>> a.y
>>>
>>> On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Emily Louise Belleau wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I did all of my DTI preprocessing through tracula.  I now am using FSL 
>>>> probtractx (which utilizes the bedpost stage output) to explore pathways 
>>>> from the amygdala to the ventromedial prefontal cortex.
>>>>
>>>> When I used FSL's probtractx, when I viewed the tract. The tract was in 
>>>> the wrong area of the brain.
>>>>
>>>> So, I think this may have something to do with the transfromation matrices 
>>>> I gave it via tracula.
>>>>
>>>> *FSL asks for the seed to diffusion transformation matrix so that it can 
>>>> convert your seed masks from MNI space to diffusion space. I gave the 
>>>> transformation matrix  in the dmri folder under xfms, titled 
>>>> mni2diff.bbr.mat. I have a feeling this may be the issue.
>>>>
>>>> * I then tried to use the FLIRT registration tool through FSL to get the 
>>>> appropriate transformation matrices.  It asks for the bedpost directory. I 
>>>> got an error saying it could not read my no_dif_brain_mask.nii.
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure what transformation matrix to give and was wondering if you 
>>>> could give me some guidance.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Emily
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 

Re: [Freesurfer] help extracting Brodmann areas masks

2014-09-08 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi David - On the difference between .thresh and "not .thresh" labels: The 
BA labels come from averaging histologically derived labels from a set of 
post mortem brains. The non-thresholded version is just the sum of the 
corresponding labels from the different brains in fsaverage space. So 
vertices are included even if only one of the brains had their BA in that 
vertex, which means that these labels are going to be rather large. In the 
thresholded version, a threshold has been applied to the average BA label, 
to make it have an area as close as possible to the average area of the 
individual BA labels. I hope this makes sense.

a.y

On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, David Provencher wrote:

> Hi Bruce,
> 
> First of all, thanks for the reply! There was a typo in my initial question, 
> so I
> rewrote it to make it clearer :
> 
> # convert labels to annotation (outputs lh.myAnnot.annot & rh.myAnnot.annot)
> mris_label2annot --s   --h lh --l lh.V1.label --l lh.V2.label --l 
> lh.label --ct
> ab BA.ctab --a myAnnot
> mris_label2annot --s   --h rh --l rh.V1.label --l rh.V2.label --l 
> rh.label --ct
> ab BA.ctab --a myAnnot
> 
> # convert ?h.myAnnot.annot files to volume
> mri_aparc2aseg --s  --annot myAnnot.annot --o mySeg.mgz
> 
> 
> I had not noticed the ?h.BA.annot and ?h.BA.thresh.annot files so I was 
> trying to create
> an annotation with the labels I was interested in (V1, V2, MT). Maybe I 
> misunderstood
> what an annotation is, but I thought it was just a collection of labels. I'm 
> not sure
> what the difference is between .thresh and "not .thresh" labels. Anyway, 
> whether I run
> the code above or just the following :
> 
> # convert ?h.BA.annot to volume
> mri_aparc2aseg --s  --annot BA --o BAseg.mgz
> 
> when I open the .mgz file in freeview, something is obviously wrong (see
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/evthp4sx40azost/BAseg.png?dl=0 and
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/s5s7wcwywlaq68o/mySeg.png?dl=0).
> In comparison, when I convert either the ?h.myAnnot.annot or ?h.BA.annot 
> files using
> mri_label2vol, it seems fine (see
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/avo1ot8bitbaeeo/BAlabels.png?dl=0).
> 
> regards,
> David
> 
> On 14-09-08 10:37 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> 
> p.s. probably you should use the ?h.BA.thresh.annot, which is the annot 
> containing the labels thresholded to have the correct area
> 
> cheers
> Bruce
> 
> 
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> 
> Hi David
> 
> what is the annot you are using in mris_label2annot? is it the
> ?h.BA.annot?
> 
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, David Provencher wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am new to freesurfer and I am trying to figure our how to extract 3d
> masks in native space for the visual cortex (BA 17,18,19) of individual
> subjects. I have looked at other threads similar to this, but there are
> still a few things I can't figure out in generating the masks (the
> conversion to native space should be fine).
> 
> 1-  I ran recon-all and I have V1, V2 and MT labels. My knowledge of
> brain anatomy is very limited, but if I understand correctly, this
> equates to BA 17, 18 and V5, so I don't have access to all of B19 (V3,
> V4 and V5), right?
> 
> 2- I managed to convert V1, V2 and MT labels to 3d masks using
> mri_label2vol and it seems to work at first glance when I looked at the
> generated file with freeView. However, I read in the mailing list that
> mri_label2vol produces "patchy" volumes and that it is preferable to use
> mri_aparc2aseg instead. That's what I can't figure out. From what I
> understand, mri_aparc2aseg aims to map the surface labels of interest to
> the segmented volumes? I tried doing the following (I altered some file
> names/paths for readability):
> 
> # convert labels to annotation (outputs lh.myAnnot.annot &
> rh.myAnnot.annot))
> mris_label2annot --s   --h lh --l lh.V1.label --l lh.V2.label
> ---l lh.label --ctab BA.ctab --a annot
> mris_label2annot --s   --h rh --l rh.V1.label --l rhV2.label
> ---l rh.label --ctab BA.ctab --a annot
> 
> # convert to volume
> mri_aparc2aseg --s  --annot  myAnnot.annot --o lh.asegTest.mgz
> 
> When I look at the asegTest.mgz file in freeView, I only see segmented
> cortical volumes and I can't see anything related to V1, V2 or MT, so I
> assume that I don't use mri_aparc2aseg correctly, but I can't manage to
> make it work.
> 
> Any help would be appreciated!
> David
> 
> 
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> 
> 
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. 

Re: [Freesurfer] does Tracula correct for CSF contamination

2014-09-08 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Hi Laura - Apologies, I just found your email and realized I hadn't 
answered earlier. Which tract are you concerned about being contaminated 
by CSF?


a.y

On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Laura Christine Anderson wrote:


Dear Tracula users, does anyone know whether or not Tracula uses any 
corrections for CSF
contamination? 

Thanks for your time,
Laura
-- 
Laura Anderson, B.A.
Graduate Student 
Clinical / Developmental Psychology
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742
BPS 0112

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula reconstructed tracts quality

2014-09-08 Thread Anastasia Yendiki

Hi Peggy - It's hard to diagnose the problem by seeing only the tracts and 
not the rest of the data, but this does look very strange. 1.5T is not a 
problem, but anisotropic resolution is not optimal for tractography, as it 
can bias the amount of diffusion measured in the direction that the voxels 
are larger.

If you upload the entire data set (all the tracula directories: dmri, 
dmri.bedpostX, dlabel, dpath) for me here, I'll take a closer look.
https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2/

a.y

On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Peggy Skelly wrote:

> Hello Tracula experts,
> I was wondering if you could comment on the quality of the tracts 
> reconstructed with our
> 1.5T data. These 2 files are from the same subject at 2 timepoints, processed 
> in the
> longitudinal stream.
> 
> Is much of the non-smooth look of the tracts due to the resolution of the dwi 
> scans
> (1.8x1.8x4mm)?
> What could be the source of the diagonal lines/gaps in the tracts seen in tp1 
> when
> viewed from above?
> 
> Thanks,
> Peggy
> 
> 
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >