[mythtv-users] Feature request / discussion - Record Button Behavior

2005-12-02 Thread Jeff Simpson
We had a discussion on here awhile ago about what we thought the record button should do,
both in the normal case and in the case of missing guide data. I just thought of a new feature
I'd like to see, curious to hear what people think.

I was flipping channels last night and came across a program already showing. As I'm watching
it, I think this is really good, I want to record it! so I hit record, and keep watching. While it's recording,
I go on mythweb, look up the program, schedule a later recording to get the whole thing, go into the frontend,
delete the current recording, go back to live TV to continue watching it. Seems complicated when all I wantedto do was make sure I recorded the full program if it was on later. So here's the idea that I came up with:


Option A). Multiple record buttons, users can map whichever one they want to the actual red circle on the remote.
The standard button will be the same, immediately start recording the current program. The advanced record button
will work as follows:

Option B). Advance Record button: when you hit record (and there is guide data), it will tell you what the current program is,
how long it is, and how far in you are. It will give you these options:
- Record Now
- Find and record a later showing
- Cancel

Find and record a later showing would have some kind of feedback where it would let you know if the show is on again and if
it can be recorded. If it can, it will be, and if not, it will let the user know and allow them to still immediate record.

Again, I'm not sure how useful this feature is - this is the only time
I ran into that situation, I just wasn't sure how common it
was or if anyone else liked the idea. In my case it was a star wars
making-of special on the history channel that ran 10-midnight,
and there was another showing at 2am. A lot of specials and movies show
that way, one in primetime or a little later, and a repeat
in the middle of the night.

Thoughts?
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request / discussion - Record Button Behavior

2005-12-02 Thread Bob Cottingham
On 12/2/05, Jeff Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 I was flipping channels last night and came across a program already
 showing. As I'm watching
 it, I think this is really good, I want to record it! so I hit record, and
 keep watching. While it's recording,
 I go on mythweb, look up the program, schedule a later recording to get the
 whole thing, go into the frontend,
 delete the current recording, go back to live TV to continue watching it.
 Seems complicated when all I wanted
 to do was make sure I recorded the full program if it was on later. So
 here's the idea that I came up with:

 Option A). Multiple record buttons, users can map whichever one they want to
 the actual red circle on the remote.
 The standard button will be the same, immediately start recording the
 current program. The advanced record button
 will work as follows:

 Option B). Advance Record button: when you hit record (and there is guide
 data), it will tell you what the current program is,
 how long it is, and how far in you are. It will give you these options:
 - Record Now
 - Find and record a later showing
 - Cancel

 Find and record a later showing would have some kind of feedback where it
 would let you know if the show is on again and if
 it can be recorded. If it can, it will be, and if not, it will let the user
 know and allow them to still immediate record.
snip

 Thoughts?

How about a more general function of re-recording shows that are
shorter than the length found in the guide data, with the exception of
those under the LiveTV recording group. If you are watching LiveTV and
hit record it changes the recording group to Default (under current
svn).  After the recording is finished, the start and end times could
be compared to the times in the guide data (accounting for any pre and
post time settings) to determine if the entire show was recorded. If
not, it could be marked for re-record in a new column in the
recordedprograms table, which would be checked each time the scheduler
ran.  If the new recording is made, then the old recording would be
deleted.

This would also work on shows that are split because of restarting the
backend, which is admittedly a fairly rare event but does happen.  It
also allows you to immediately get the rest of the recording that you
were interested in while watching LiveTV, while allowing it to be
re-recorded in full when it is on again, all without adding any
additional questions during the process.

Bob C
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


[mythtv-users] Feature request: live tv Browse Mode via seperate key bindings

2005-11-14 Thread Edward Rosinzonsky
I apollogize if this is already implemented in SVN, as I'm running 18.1.

It woud be really nice, to (while watching live tv) change channels in Browse mode or classic mode, with seperate key bindings. I wouldlike to change channels with theCh+/Ch- keys on my remote, or browse them with the Up/Down keys.

___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


[mythtv-users] Feature Request: Max number of recordings of a show per day

2005-08-21 Thread Bryan Halter
It would be nice if in addition to a maximum number of episodes to be
stored there were a way to set the maximum number of episodes of a show
to be recorded in a day.  The reason I suggest that is that on a normal
day Law and Order is only on about twice but if they have a marathon and
show a bunch more episodes the normal retention policy causes all but
the last 2 not to be kept, but all the episodes get recorded unless
something with higher priority is on inbetween.  The result is that
things that normally would get recorded don't and from the end user's
point of view only 2 episodes of Law and Order got recorded.  I realize
this can all be fixed by knowing ahead of time and tweaking the settings
in MythWeb or in mythfrontend but it would be nice not to have to.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: Max number of recordings of a show per day

2005-08-21 Thread Nick
On 8/21/05, Bryan Halter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It would be nice if in addition to a maximum number of episodes to be
 stored there were a way to set the maximum number of episodes of a show
 to be recorded in a day.  The reason I suggest that is that on a normal
 day Law and Order is only on about twice but if they have a marathon and
 show a bunch more episodes the normal retention policy causes all but
 the last 2 not to be kept, but all the episodes get recorded unless
 something with higher priority is on inbetween.  The result is that
 things that normally would get recorded don't and from the end user's
 point of view only 2 episodes of Law and Order got recorded.  I realize
 this can all be fixed by knowing ahead of time and tweaking the settings
 in MythWeb or in mythfrontend but it would be nice not to have to.

What about setting it to record the show at all times on the channel,
using no dupe policy, no auto-expire, and setting it to store 0
recordings. I am under the impression (perhaps misguided ...) that
this should record every episode and not delete any.

Nick
___
mythtv-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: Max number of recordings of a show per day

2005-08-21 Thread Bryan Halter




Right I know how to record every episode, what I'd like to do is record
at most some number of episodes per day while being able to record off
multiple channels (any channel any time) and using dupe checking along
with auto expire. Example Law and Order is shown 4 times per day as
some special event. If I only keep 2 episodes, the current result is
that 4 episodes would be recorded and 2 would be dumped before I got a
chance to watch them. Now if there were something on that was lower
priority but not necessarily of less interest during the first 2
episodes that would not get recorded because the 2 episodes of law and
order I will never watch would have been. What I would like is some
way to set the scheduler so that it will only record 2 episodes, I
don't really care which 2 but I would propose that it record episodes
w/o conflict or where the priority difference is the biggest.



Nick wrote:

  On 8/21/05, Bryan Halter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
It would be nice if in addition to a maximum number of episodes to be
stored there were a way to set the maximum number of episodes of a show
to be recorded in a day.  The reason I suggest that is that on a normal
day Law and Order is only on about twice but if they have a marathon and
show a bunch more episodes the normal retention policy causes all but
the last 2 not to be kept, but all the episodes get recorded unless
something with higher priority is on inbetween.  The result is that
things that normally would get recorded don't and from the end user's
point of view only 2 episodes of Law and Order got recorded.  I realize
this can all be fixed by knowing ahead of time and tweaking the settings
in MythWeb or in mythfrontend but it would be nice not to have to.

  
  
What about setting it to record the show at all times on the channel,
using no dupe policy, no auto-expire, and setting it to store 0
recordings. I am under the impression (perhaps misguided ...) that
this should record every episode and not delete any.

Nick
___
mythtv-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users

  



___
mythtv-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


[mythtv-users] Feature request...

2005-07-15 Thread Warpme

Hi *

I found, MythTV isn't ready for spaces in programme channel string in
XMLTV file.

If I have in XMLTV file tag programme channel=TVP 1 and in channel
editor defined XMLTV ID as TVP 1. Running mythfilldatabase is
reporting: TVP - unknown channel.

Is here possibility to modify MythTV for accepting spaces in tag
programme channel ?

Thx

--
cYa, 3.14iotr/2
Nie ma złych systemów operacyjnych. Może tylko brakować alkoholu !!!
W takiej sytuacji dobry programista wiesza się wraz z programem ;-P
Hiroshima'45;   Czernobyl'86;   Windows'95

Zwrotne bajty daj na [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


[mythtv-users] Feature request

2005-07-07 Thread Robert Edwards
I searched the archives for pre-roll and early/late bute didn't see
this exact request.  I know we can stop late and start early, but how
about a stop early and start late?  With the darn networks doing
everything they can to stop us DVR'ers i don't mind if i lose the
first 1-2 min of a show, but i can't schedule two shows that overlap
by a min or two.  If i could get the later show to wait 1-2 min before
starting, that would be better.


-- 
I know.. I caved.  I'm trying this Free IPod thing.  If you want 
to try it go to the link below to get me my referral.
http://www.freeiPods.com/?r=13353711
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request

2005-07-07 Thread Brad Benson
On 7/7/05, Robert Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I searched the archives for pre-roll and early/late bute didn't see
 this exact request.  I know we can stop late and start early, but how
 about a stop early and start late?  With the darn networks doing
 everything they can to stop us DVR'ers i don't mind if i lose the
 first 1-2 min of a show, but i can't schedule two shows that overlap
 by a min or two.  If i could get the later show to wait 1-2 min before
 starting, that would be better.

You can enter negative values into the start/stop early fields.  (or
start/stop late, I can't remember exactly how they're labeled).  Start
early by -2 minutes effectively means start late by 2 minutes.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request

2005-07-07 Thread Robert Tsai
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 06:12:54PM -0400, Brad Benson wrote:
 On 7/7/05, Robert Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I searched the archives for pre-roll and early/late bute didn't see
  this exact request.  I know we can stop late and start early, but how
  about a stop early and start late?  With the darn networks doing
  everything they can to stop us DVR'ers i don't mind if i lose the
  first 1-2 min of a show, but i can't schedule two shows that overlap
  by a min or two.  If i could get the later show to wait 1-2 min before
  starting, that would be better.
 
 You can enter negative values into the start/stop early fields.  (or
 start/stop late, I can't remember exactly how they're labeled).
 Start early by -2 minutes effectively means start late by 2 minutes.

Yes, for mythweb you can enter negative values.

In the MythTV GUI, you can hit left/right when setting up a schedule,
and you should see the early and late text choices.

--Rob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request/idea?

2005-06-28 Thread Chad
 For example, I have an xbox hooked up as a channel, and sometimes we'll record
 our games online. 

G33k  ;)
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


[mythtv-users] Feature request/idea?

2005-06-27 Thread LKO
Searching the archives tells me there used to be an instant record feature in 
MythTV. I hope this feature returns someday.

What I'd like to be able to do is if I se something on Live TV that I want to 
record, is 
be able to tell Myth essentially save its live buffer and continue recording 
for some 
amount of time (like a VCR will to instant record for 30 minutes, an hour, and 
so 
on). It should be able to do this even if there is no guide data for a source 
or 
channel.

For example, I have an xbox hooked up as a channel, and sometimes we'll record 
our games online. Sometimes it isn't worth recording, sometimes it is. It'd be 
nice if 
Myth could be running in Live TV mode, and if things were going well, run in 
and tell 
it to keep the live buffer, and start recording. I've tried getting it to 
record now, but 
Myth doesn't seem to let you start a recording on a channel without guide data.


___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request/idea?

2005-06-27 Thread Phill Edwards
 Searching the archives tells me there used to be an instant record feature 
 in
 MythTV. I hope this feature returns someday.
 
 What I'd like to be able to do is if I se something on Live TV that I want to 
 record, is
 be able to tell Myth essentially save its live buffer and continue recording 
 for some
 amount of time (like a VCR will to instant record for 30 minutes, an hour, 
 and so
 on). It should be able to do this even if there is no guide data for a source 
 or
 channel.
 
 For example, I have an xbox hooked up as a channel, and sometimes we'll record
 our games online. Sometimes it isn't worth recording, sometimes it is. It'd 
 be nice if
 Myth could be running in Live TV mode, and if things were going well, run in 
 and tell
 it to keep the live buffer, and start recording. I've tried getting it to 
 record now, but
 Myth doesn't seem to let you start a recording on a channel without guide 
 data.

The R key should already record what's left of the program. However,
I don't believe it will write the buffer to the recording as well .

Regards,
Phill
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] feature request: plasma burn-in module

2005-06-21 Thread Jason H
Only if the naked pics of his wife and daughter fome
my collection come up, else, after some beers, i think
i'd have myself a party and apromotion! :-)


--- Tony Godshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 According to Michael Anthon,
  Jason H wrote:
  
  so what you're saying I can just write an X
  application  and plug that into myth some how?
  
  How does one set a screensaver app that is
 activated
  from an idle myth menu?
   
  
  How about using the gallery slideshow?
 
 Tie a nice google images search to a randomizing
 script and 
 viola.  (Of course, it could pop up a pron image
 when the boss 
 is over for dinner; that might be bad.)
 
 
  ___
 mythtv-users mailing list
 mythtv-users@mythtv.org

http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
 




__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Make Yahoo! your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] feature request: plasma burn-in module

2005-06-21 Thread David
Well, you could write an X screensaver, but I don't think you need to.  
Most Linux distros come with a multiple of screensavers and I'm pretty 
sure that several offer background color cycling.  If not, one should be 
simple to write, and would not require Myth programming at all.  Just 
let the saver kick in on an idle timer like usual.


However you'd probably want to at least script something to disable it 
when playing videos/live TV since you wouldn't want it kicking in while 
watching something.


Jason H wrote:


so what you're saying I can just write an X
application  and plug that into myth some how?

How does one set a screensaver app that is activated
from an idle myth menu?


--- David Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 


But what constitutes burn-in is a pixel left in an
unchanged state for 
an extended period.  It doesn't have to be in a
random state, or a state 
different than an adjacent pixel, like in static --
it just needs to 
change.  So if you, say, changed the background
color at regular 
intervals that would change every pixel on the
screen.  To make it less 
jarring you could use muted colors and fade/gradient
them in.  To me 
that would be the most effective and easiest to
achieve result -- every 
pixel would change at the same time for the same
length of time and 
therefore be more uniform in their wear pattern. 
Seeing random 
channel changing would be more disruptive (to me)
than seeing blank 
color transitions.


Just a thought...

Jason H wrote:

   


Because screensavers exhibit patterns. They are
 


loops.
   


It varies per screensaver, but there are ones that
 


are
   


never touch the corners(window's mystify, bouble -
anything that bounces on the edges are
 


statistically
   


more likely to wear the middle and seldom venture
 


into
   


the corners)

The thing we are going to go for is no pattern.
 


Static
   


is best, but hard to come by. Real TV samples
 


switched
   


regularly is the next best. The number of channels
(70+) provides a nice long rotation cycle and
sufficiently varied data.


--- Dan Wilga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 


At 9:30 PM -0700 6/19/05, Andy Alsup wrote:
  

   


If your plasma has a RF tuner, just tune it to a


 


non-existant channel
  

   


with snow for burn-in.  As long as the image is


 


changing it doesn't
  

   


really matter where it comes from.


 


Or, since you're probably running X anyway, why
   


not
   

just turn the 
screensaver on with something non-blank? Then all
you have to do is 
remember to leave the TV on for the next 41 days.


--
Dan Wilga
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Administrator
http://www.mtholyoke.edu
Mount Holyoke College 
   



   


Tel: 413-538-3027
South Hadley, MA  01075Who left the
cake out in the rain?
  

   


___


 


mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org

  

   


http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
   






__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
 

protection around 
   

http://mail.yahoo.com 
___

mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
 


http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
   




 


___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org

   


http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
 






__ 
Yahoo! Mail 
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: 
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html 


___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users

 


___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] feature request: plasma burn-in module

2005-06-20 Thread Dan Wilga

At 9:30 PM -0700 6/19/05, Andy Alsup wrote:

If your plasma has a RF tuner, just tune it to a non-existant channel
with snow for burn-in.  As long as the image is changing it doesn't
really matter where it comes from.


Or, since you're probably running X anyway, why not just turn the 
screensaver on with something non-blank? Then all you have to do is 
remember to leave the TV on for the next 41 days.


--
Dan Wilga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Administrator http://www.mtholyoke.edu
Mount Holyoke CollegeTel: 413-538-3027
South Hadley, MA  01075Who left the cake out in the rain?
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] feature request: plasma burn-in module

2005-06-20 Thread Jason H
Because screensavers exhibit patterns. They are loops.
It varies per screensaver, but there are ones that are
never touch the corners(window's mystify, bouble -
anything that bounces on the edges are statistically
more likely to wear the middle and seldom venture into
the corners)

The thing we are going to go for is no pattern. Static
is best, but hard to come by. Real TV samples switched
regularly is the next best. The number of channels
(70+) provides a nice long rotation cycle and
sufficiently varied data.


--- Dan Wilga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 At 9:30 PM -0700 6/19/05, Andy Alsup wrote:
 If your plasma has a RF tuner, just tune it to a
 non-existant channel
 with snow for burn-in.  As long as the image is
 changing it doesn't
 really matter where it comes from.
 
 Or, since you're probably running X anyway, why not
 just turn the 
 screensaver on with something non-blank? Then all
 you have to do is 
 remember to leave the TV on for the next 41 days.
 
 -- 
 Dan Wilga
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Web Administrator
 http://www.mtholyoke.edu
 Mount Holyoke College   
 Tel: 413-538-3027
 South Hadley, MA  01075Who left the
 cake out in the rain?
  ___
 mythtv-users mailing list
 mythtv-users@mythtv.org

http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] feature request: plasma burn-in module

2005-06-20 Thread David Morris
But what constitutes burn-in is a pixel left in an unchanged state for 
an extended period.  It doesn't have to be in a random state, or a state 
different than an adjacent pixel, like in static -- it just needs to 
change.  So if you, say, changed the background color at regular 
intervals that would change every pixel on the screen.  To make it less 
jarring you could use muted colors and fade/gradient them in.  To me 
that would be the most effective and easiest to achieve result -- every 
pixel would change at the same time for the same length of time and 
therefore be more uniform in their wear pattern.  Seeing random 
channel changing would be more disruptive (to me) than seeing blank 
color transitions.


Just a thought...

Jason H wrote:


Because screensavers exhibit patterns. They are loops.
It varies per screensaver, but there are ones that are
never touch the corners(window's mystify, bouble -
anything that bounces on the edges are statistically
more likely to wear the middle and seldom venture into
the corners)

The thing we are going to go for is no pattern. Static
is best, but hard to come by. Real TV samples switched
regularly is the next best. The number of channels
(70+) provides a nice long rotation cycle and
sufficiently varied data.


--- Dan Wilga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 


At 9:30 PM -0700 6/19/05, Andy Alsup wrote:
   


If your plasma has a RF tuner, just tune it to a
 


non-existant channel
   


with snow for burn-in.  As long as the image is
 


changing it doesn't
   


really matter where it comes from.
 


Or, since you're probably running X anyway, why not
just turn the 
screensaver on with something non-blank? Then all
you have to do is 
remember to leave the TV on for the next 41 days.


--
Dan Wilga
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Administrator
http://www.mtholyoke.edu
Mount Holyoke College   
Tel: 413-538-3027

South Hadley, MA  01075Who left the
cake out in the rain?
   


___
 


mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org

   


http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
 




__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___

mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


 



___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] feature request: plasma burn-in module

2005-06-20 Thread Jason H
so what you're saying I can just write an X
application  and plug that into myth some how?

How does one set a screensaver app that is activated
from an idle myth menu?


--- David Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 But what constitutes burn-in is a pixel left in an
 unchanged state for 
 an extended period.  It doesn't have to be in a
 random state, or a state 
 different than an adjacent pixel, like in static --
 it just needs to 
 change.  So if you, say, changed the background
 color at regular 
 intervals that would change every pixel on the
 screen.  To make it less 
 jarring you could use muted colors and fade/gradient
 them in.  To me 
 that would be the most effective and easiest to
 achieve result -- every 
 pixel would change at the same time for the same
 length of time and 
 therefore be more uniform in their wear pattern. 
 Seeing random 
 channel changing would be more disruptive (to me)
 than seeing blank 
 color transitions.
 
 Just a thought...
 
 Jason H wrote:
 
 Because screensavers exhibit patterns. They are
 loops.
 It varies per screensaver, but there are ones that
 are
 never touch the corners(window's mystify, bouble -
 anything that bounces on the edges are
 statistically
 more likely to wear the middle and seldom venture
 into
 the corners)
 
 The thing we are going to go for is no pattern.
 Static
 is best, but hard to come by. Real TV samples
 switched
 regularly is the next best. The number of channels
 (70+) provides a nice long rotation cycle and
 sufficiently varied data.
 
 
 --- Dan Wilga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   
 
 At 9:30 PM -0700 6/19/05, Andy Alsup wrote:
 
 
 If your plasma has a RF tuner, just tune it to a
   
 
 non-existant channel
 
 
 with snow for burn-in.  As long as the image is
   
 
 changing it doesn't
 
 
 really matter where it comes from.
   
 
 Or, since you're probably running X anyway, why
 not
 just turn the 
 screensaver on with something non-blank? Then all
 you have to do is 
 remember to leave the TV on for the next 41 days.
 
 -- 
 Dan Wilga
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Web Administrator
 http://www.mtholyoke.edu
 Mount Holyoke College 
  
 Tel: 413-538-3027
 South Hadley, MA  01075Who left the
 cake out in the rain?
 
 
 ___
   
 
 mythtv-users mailing list
 mythtv-users@mythtv.org
 
 
 

http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
   
 
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
 protection around 
 http://mail.yahoo.com 
 ___
 mythtv-users mailing list
 mythtv-users@mythtv.org

http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
 
 
   
 
 
 ___
 mythtv-users mailing list
 mythtv-users@mythtv.org

http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
 




__ 
Yahoo! Mail 
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: 
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html 

___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] feature request: plasma burn-in module

2005-06-20 Thread Michael Anthon

Jason H wrote:


so what you're saying I can just write an X
application  and plug that into myth some how?

How does one set a screensaver app that is activated
from an idle myth menu?
 


How about using the gallery slideshow?
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] feature request: plasma burn-in module

2005-06-20 Thread Tony Godshall
According to Michael Anthon,
 Jason H wrote:
 
 so what you're saying I can just write an X
 application  and plug that into myth some how?
 
 How does one set a screensaver app that is activated
 from an idle myth menu?
  
 
 How about using the gallery slideshow?

Tie a nice google images search to a randomizing script and 
viola.  (Of course, it could pop up a pron image when the boss 
is over for dinner; that might be bad.)


___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-19 Thread Blammo
On 6/17/05, Dan Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Wouldn't it be even better if myth wrote the data from the overlap
 period to *both* .nuv files?  I've often wished for this.

Now there's a clever suggestion. That would be a great way to resolve
same-channel overlaps, which would have resolved the problem, at least
in this case, for me.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


[mythtv-users] feature request: plasma burn-in module

2005-06-19 Thread Jason H
since, we are uber techies here, some, if not all of
us like our high perf displays. (I don't have one yet,
but i'm starting to look into it) one of the things
that I found is that plasmas are more reliable than i
thought. they have a 1/2 bright life of 60,000hrs, vs
15,000 for crts. but they do have a burn in problem.
this is mitigatable. it turns out that the first 1000
hrs are critical to avoid any kind of burn-in. 

what we need then is a simple module that counts the
hours that it runs, and flips channels every minute.
people can leave it on 24/7 for 42 days, using it as
they would, but when not watching it they just select
the plasma burn-in option.



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] feature request: plasma burn-in module

2005-06-19 Thread Todd Bailey

thanks for the suggestion,  I forgot about this.

I plan on a major modification to myth, what I've seen so far is ok, but 
needs improvement, setup gui for example is a real pain to navigate.
I'm not sure what these people were thinking when they did the design,  but 
no matter,  looking forward to a rewrite, that is once I get a stable 
install completed.







This mailbox protected from junk email by MailFrontier Desktop
from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com

- Original Message - 
From: Jason H [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: mythtv-users@mythtv.org
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 3:57 PM
Subject: [mythtv-users] feature request: plasma burn-in module



since, we are uber techies here, some, if not all of
us like our high perf displays. (I don't have one yet,
but i'm starting to look into it) one of the things
that I found is that plasmas are more reliable than i
thought. they have a 1/2 bright life of 60,000hrs, vs
15,000 for crts. but they do have a burn in problem.
this is mitigatable. it turns out that the first 1000
hrs are critical to avoid any kind of burn-in.

what we need then is a simple module that counts the
hours that it runs, and flips channels every minute.
people can leave it on 24/7 for 42 days, using it as
they would, but when not watching it they just select
the plasma burn-in option.



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users 


___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] feature request: plasma burn-in module

2005-06-19 Thread Andy Alsup
If your plasma has a RF tuner, just tune it to a non-existant channel
with snow for burn-in.  As long as the image is changing it doesn't
really matter where it comes from.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] feature request: plasma burn-in module

2005-06-19 Thread Jason H
but that assumes that it doesn't blank the snow with a
screen. ;-) I am just repeating what panasonic
published...


--- Andy Alsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If your plasma has a RF tuner, just tune it to a
 non-existant channel
 with snow for burn-in.  As long as the image is
 changing it doesn't
 really matter where it comes from.
 ___
 mythtv-users mailing list
 mythtv-users@mythtv.org

http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
 




 
Yahoo! Sports 
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football 
http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-17 Thread Dan Christensen
David Kyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I understand why there shouldn't be an automatic resolution of
 schedules involving different channels, but what about having an
 option to have conflicts on the same channel resolve automatically? 
 If two programs on the same channel conflict by a few minutes, then
 just have the second one start late.  The second program will have
 it's beginning tacked onto the end of the first one, but it would be
 better than not recording at all.

Wouldn't it be even better if myth wrote the data from the overlap
period to *both* .nuv files?  I've often wished for this.

Dan
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-16 Thread Chris Rouch
On 6/16/05, Blammo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ran into a problem tonight where the clock on one of the backends was
 off 8 seconds from the master backend. As a result, the first program
 recorded, but the program after it was deemed tuner busy and didn't
 record.
 
 Another example is several of the big networks making a program run
 til, for example, 9:05pm This bumps a 9pm scheduled recording, when in
 fact, I wouldn't mind missing the first 5 minutes to get the other 55.
 
 Would would be nifty would be a configurable fudge factor, that you
 could set, allowing the scheduler to pick up XXX minutes into the
 program, as soon as the tuner became free. Or maybe, no fudge factor
 at all. Maybe it checks every minute, and if a tuner suddenly became
 free, it would start recording.
 
 Thoughts?

I think something like this would be useful, e.g. an option to start
the recording late once a conflict is identified (so the default
behaviour would be as it is now).

Here in Holland programs don't keep to an hourly schedule so it is
common to have the first part of a program conflict with the end of a
program on a different channel. It is also common for the actual start
of a program to be several minutes after the scheduled start, so that
what looks like a conflict in the tv guide isn't in practice.

OTOH I have a disk full of recordings I don't have time to watch already...

Chris
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-16 Thread Blammo
On 6/15/05, Robert Tsai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:14:55PM -0700, Blammo wrote:
  Ran into a problem tonight where the clock on one of the backends
  was off 8 seconds from the master backend. As a result, the first
  program recorded, but the program after it was deemed tuner busy
  and didn't record.
 
 In this case, the solution is to run NTP on both machines to keep
 their clocks in sync with each other.

NTP was set up on both machines, but had stopped on the backend in
question. That issue has been solved. However, given clock drift, it's
a little disturbing that a single second of clock offset could
actually cause a program to cancel recording.
 
  Another example is several of the big networks making a program run
  til, for example, 9:05pm This bumps a 9pm scheduled recording, when
  in fact, I wouldn't mind missing the first 5 minutes to get the
  other 55.
 
 This scenario is quite normal, and easy to spot: in the listings data,
 the show will run 8:05-9:05pm. In the USA, for example, ABC does this
 on Wednesday evenings, running everything 2 minutes after the hour.
 
 When setting up your Wednesday evening recording schedules (say)
 simply set everything up to begin/end 2 minutes early (e.g., mentally
 note that you want all your schedules to begin/end on the hour, unless
 you know you don't have any conflicts).

Agreed. It's normal, easy to spot, and increases the hands on factor
of something that is supposed to make my life, and those who watch TV
in my household, easier. While the overlap not recording may make
sense in programming terms, it makes ZERO sense from a human factor.


  Would would be nifty would be a configurable fudge factor, that
  you could set, allowing the scheduler to pick up XXX minutes into
  the program, as soon as the tuner became free. Or maybe, no fudge
  factor at all. Maybe it checks every minute, and if a tuner suddenly
  became free, it would start recording.
 
 You essentially have a conflict between a show that runs late and
 another one that starts on time (or early), so you should fix your
 schedules accordingly.

No, I essentially have a problem with a very literal program doing
exactly what the scheduler is telling it to do, NOT what I told it to
do, which was to record both programs. Some sort of configurable fudge
factor would allow the backends to make more efficient use of the
tuners.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-16 Thread Isaac Richards
On Thursday 16 June 2005 11:22 am, Blammo wrote:
 Agreed. It's normal, easy to spot, and increases the hands on factor
 of something that is supposed to make my life, and those who watch TV
 in my household, easier. While the overlap not recording may make
 sense in programming terms, it makes ZERO sense from a human factor.

Sure it does.  I'd rather not waste tuner space on a partial recording, 
especially since that partial recording might then prevent a repeat of that 
same episode from getting recorded in its entirety later.

Isaac
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-16 Thread Robert Tsai
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 11:26:37AM -0400, Isaac Richards wrote:
 On Thursday 16 June 2005 11:22 am, Blammo wrote:
  Agreed. It's normal, easy to spot, and increases the hands on
  factor of something that is supposed to make my life, and those
  who watch TV in my household, easier. While the overlap not
  recording may make sense in programming terms, it makes ZERO sense
  from a human factor.
 
 Sure it does.  I'd rather not waste tuner space on a partial
 recording, especially since that partial recording might then
 prevent a repeat of that same episode from getting recorded in its
 entirety later.

To play devil's advocate, recording schedule priorities can arbitrate
conflicts during the overlap period, and IIRC there is already some
notion of tolerance for starting a recording late (I think it's part
of record live TV configuration?), so all the bits are there to do
what is being proposed, and there might not be a repeat airing.

But then again, this doesn't really affect me at all ...

--Rob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-16 Thread Nathaniel Manista
Joe-
Are you Joe Caputo with whom I went to high school, and some college?
Hey! How are you these days?
-Nathaniel

On 6/16/05, Joseph A. Caputo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thursday 16 June 2005 0:46, Robert Tsai wrote:
  On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:14:55PM -0700, Blammo wrote:
   Another example is several of the big networks making a program run
   til, for example, 9:05pm This bumps a 9pm scheduled recording, when
   in fact, I wouldn't mind missing the first 5 minutes to get the
   other 55.
 
  This scenario is quite normal, and easy to spot: in the listings data,
  the show will run 8:05-9:05pm. In the USA, for example, ABC does this
  on Wednesday evenings, running everything 2 minutes after the hour.
 
  When setting up your Wednesday evening recording schedules (say)
  simply set everything up to begin/end 2 minutes early (e.g., mentally
  note that you want all your schedules to begin/end on the hour, unless
  you know you don't have any conflicts).
 
   Would would be nifty would be a configurable fudge factor, that
   you could set, allowing the scheduler to pick up XXX minutes into
   the program, as soon as the tuner became free. Or maybe, no fudge
   factor at all. Maybe it checks every minute, and if a tuner suddenly
   became free, it would start recording.
 
  You essentially have a conflict between a show that runs late and
  another one that starts on time (or early), so you should fix your
  schedules accordingly.
 
 In general, it's rather unreasonable to expect users to go through their
 entire recording schedule looking for these scenarios, especially when
 you consider that many of the scheduled recordings might be record at
 any time or other such non-time-specific rules.  In such a case,
 changing the recording schedule would change it for the entire rule,
 rather than just that instance.
 
 IMHO, a better solution would be to add an option to the Conflict
 Resolution screen; something like Allow recording of non-conflicting
 portion only.  An override like that would affect only that particular
 showing, and would be much easier to remedy than editing the recording
 schedule (and possibly remembering to change it back again later).
 
 Just my $.02.
 
 -JAC
 ___
 mythtv-users mailing list
 mythtv-users@mythtv.org
 http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
 


-- 
Nathaniel Manista
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-16 Thread Bruce Markey

Blammo wrote:
...

Another example is several of the big networks making a program run
til, for example, 9:05pm This bumps a 9pm scheduled recording, when in
fact, I wouldn't mind missing the first 5 minutes to get the other 55.


If you can see that that is what you want to do then tell it to
do so. No algorithm can know if you don't mind missing the last
five minutes of the earlier show or if you don't mind missing the
first five of the later, neither or both. You know and, unlike the
leading commercial product, you can tell it that you've decided to
start late if that's what you want.


at all. Maybe it checks every minute, and if a tuner suddenly became
free, it would start recording.


There's no guess work or sudden surprises. The current schedule
plan is always clearly stated in the Upcoming Recordings page and
you have every opportunity to look hours or days ahead of time
to modify things in any number of ways so that it will meet your
wishes. It will not, however, read your mind and any vague, nebulous
behavior is just as likely to do the opposite of what you wanted.

http://www.mythtv.org/docs/mythtv-HOWTO-11.html#ss11.7

--  bjm
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-16 Thread David Kyle
I understand why there shouldn't be an automatic resolution of
schedules involving different channels, but what about having an
option to have conflicts on the same channel resolve automatically? 
If two programs on the same channel conflict by a few minutes, then
just have the second one start late.  The second program will have
it's beginning tacked onto the end of the first one, but it would be
better than not recording at all.

In my case, I have The Simpsons set to record every time it airs on
any channel.  This way I get both the syndicated ones on WB and the
new ones on FOX.  I set it to start and end one minute early/late. 
This works fine unless someone airs two episodes back to back, in
which case the second one doesn't get recorded at all.  I can fix it
manually, but it's a pain to do it when it could easily be done
automatically.  I can't really think of any cases where this automatic
behavior would be less desirable than the current behavior.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-16 Thread Donavan Stanley
On 6/16/05, David Kyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In my case, I have The Simpsons set to record every time it airs on
 any channel.  This way I get both the syndicated ones on WB and the
 new ones on FOX.  I set it to start and end one minute early/late.
 This works fine unless someone airs two episodes back to back, in
 which case the second one doesn't get recorded at all.  I can fix it
 manually, but it's a pain to do it when it could easily be done
 automatically.  I can't really think of any cases where this automatic
 behavior would be less desirable than the current behavior.

The system is doing what you asked it to.  If you want to start early
/ end late and NOT have it impact conflict resolution like that then
use a global setting.  The global setting will be ignored if honoring
it would cause a conflict that can't be resolved any other way.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-16 Thread Joseph A. Caputo
On Thursday 16 June 2005 13:19, Joseph A. Caputo wrote:
 
 IMHO, a better solution would be to add an option to the Conflict 
 Resolution screen; something like Allow recording of non-conflicting 
 portion only.  An override like that would affect only that 
 particular  
 showing, and would be much easier to remedy than editing the recording 
 schedule (and possibly remembering to change it back again later).
 
 Just my $.02.


Replying to myself here... I knew I'd discussed this before:

http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/users/41056

and

http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/dev/15490

These old threads were the genesis of the current per-recording start 
early/end late feature, but it seems the allow partial recordings to 
resolve a conflict idea never really got picked up.  If anyone's 
interested in taking a crack at this, the -dev list awaits...

-JAC
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-16 Thread Niklas Brunlid
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:29:57 +0200, Donavan Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:



On 6/16/05, David Kyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In my case, I have The Simpsons set to record every time it airs on
any channel.  This way I get both the syndicated ones on WB and the
new ones on FOX.  I set it to start and end one minute early/late.
This works fine unless someone airs two episodes back to back, in
which case the second one doesn't get recorded at all.  I can fix it
manually, but it's a pain to do it when it could easily be done
automatically.  I can't really think of any cases where this automatic
behavior would be less desirable than the current behavior.


The system is doing what you asked it to.  If you want to start early
/ end late and NOT have it impact conflict resolution like that then
use a global setting.  The global setting will be ignored if honoring
it would cause a conflict that can't be resolved any other way.


Been reading this and similar threads and thought I'd ask; if for some  
reason I don't want to use the global setting and, like the GP, want one  
specific show to start/end late, could the conflict caused by the  
early/late setting be handled differently if the shows are on the same  
channel and only one tuner is available? This is all assuming that either  
1) there are no repeats of the second show or 2) the listings data has no  
episode-specific info.


For me it feels natural to assume that it would handle it like it would a  
global early/late setting in that specific case. Or is it handled like it  
is now based on the principle of first-come, first-serve, and that  
recoring programs fully is most important?


Just throwing in my two (euro)cents... :)

/ Niklas
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-16 Thread Joseph A. Caputo
On Thursday 16 June 2005 15:38, Bruce Markey wrote:
 Joseph A. Caputo wrote:
  IMHO, a better solution would be to add an option to the Conflict 
  Resolution screen; something like Allow recording of 
  non-conflicting  
  portion only.  An override like that would affect only that 
  particular  
  showing, and would be much easier to remedy than editing the 
  recording  
  schedule (and possibly remembering to change it back again later).
 
 Joesph, I know you've been here a long time and are one of the most
 knowledgeable users and regularly give some of the best, correct and
 helpful answers. I can't accept that you didn't know that overrides
 have existed for a year or two =). I must be misreading this.

Thanks... I think :-)

To be honest, I knew about overrides but I wasn't fully aware of the UI 
to enter them manually.  I'd actually kind of forgotten about them, as 
I don't have much use for overrides myself, having a 2-tuner system and 
almost *never* having a conflict that isn't automatically resolved by 
the scheduler (and I usually don't care if it decides to record a later 
showing).  Well, at least that was the case until I recently installed 
TVWish, which filled up my recording schedule quite nicely... as if I 
didn't have more than I could watch before :-)  But, I digress...

 
 As far as automatically generating an override, first, I agree with
 Isaac (and gigem's code) that I'd rather have the scheduler get a
 complete later showing that a partial now. If I know that I want the
 partial recording now, I can tell the system how to do that.

I'm not suggesting that the schedular automatically record a partial... 
all I'm suggesting is (I think...) that a button be added to the 
Conflict Resolution screen that allows the user to instantly add an 
override that results in a partial recording.

A real enhancement (and a real trick) would be getting the override to 
be conditional... that is, if a future run of the scheduler determines 
that the original conflict is gone (maybe I decided not to record the 
other overlapping program, or the lineup changed), then the 'partial' 
override would be silently disregarded.

 
 http://www.mythtv.org/docs/mythtv-HOWTO-11.html#ss11.7

Wow, I just realized how long it's been since I looked at any of the 
docs... they're looking pretty nice these days!  Kudos to RK!

 
 If I still what to re-record the full program later, I can tell the
 system to do that too.
 
 If there is an overlap that results in a conflict (if it was really
 important to me, I'd buy a sixth card ;-) the system can't know if
 I'd prefer to chop off the end of one thing or the beginning of the
 other.  Someone mentioned that ABC scheduled 2 minutes off the hour
 on Wednesday, I don't see that here for last night or next week but
 all a care about on Wednesday is that I don't miss a minute of Beauty
 and the Geek. If the scheduler decided for me that it should cutoff
 the first two minutes for some ABC show, I'd be pissed.

Ah, the first 2 minutes is usually just a recap of the previous week... 
now, if I lost the *last* 2 minutes when they show the next week's 
previews, *then* I'd be pissed :-)

Cheers,

JAC
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-16 Thread Blammo
On 6/16/05, David Kyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I understand why there shouldn't be an automatic resolution of
 schedules involving different channels, but what about having an
 option to have conflicts on the same channel resolve automatically?
 If two programs on the same channel conflict by a few minutes, then
 just have the second one start late.  The second program will have
 it's beginning tacked onto the end of the first one, but it would be
 better than not recording at all.

In my case, that was the problem as well.. Two programs, back to back
on the same channel, 8 seconds offset, the 2nd one didn't record.

Seems like there must be a good way to handle that case, even if we
can't handle the other ones listed in this thread.

Something like:

[  ]  Overlap Control 
[  ]start early if needed by  minutes on the same channel
[  ]start late if needed  _ minutes on the same channel
[  ]start early if needed by  minutes on a different channel
[  ]start late if needed  _ minutes on a different channel


Options like this, it sounds like, would answer all the issues raised
in this thread so far.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-16 Thread Blammo
On 6/16/05, Bruce Markey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Joseph A. Caputo wrote:
 ...
  In general, it's rather unreasonable to expect users to go through their
  entire recording schedule looking for these scenarios, especially when
 
 It's very reasonable. You only need to look at today becaue the
 the listing update tomorrow may change things. I may see things
 a couple days ahead and tweak them but I don't fret too much until
 the day comes. There are lots of things that may need attention
 besides deciding what to do about these small overlaps and I
 know that I can set rules to normally do what I want and can tweak
 things to match what I'm thinking that the system can't possibly
 know until I tell it.
 If there is an overlap that results in a conflict (if it was really
 important to me, I'd buy a sixth card ;-) the system can't know if
 I'd prefer to chop off the end of one thing or the beginning of the
 other.  Someone mentioned that ABC scheduled 2 minutes off the hour
 on Wednesday, I don't see that here for last night or next week but
 all a care about on Wednesday is that I don't miss a minute of Beauty
 and the Geek. If the scheduler decided for me that it should cutoff
 the first two minutes for some ABC show, I'd be pissed.

The bugger, in my case, was the guide did not show a conflict, so
there was nothing I could have done to schedule this case
differently. Because the clocks were off (again, now resolved) the
MasterBackend though it could record, but the slave backend still had
tuner busy for 8 more seconds, causing the Master to completely give
up.

Making the scheduler retry when a tuner becomes free, and preventing
conflicts in advance are really two completely different issues.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-16 Thread William Powers
Am I missing something, or isn't it already possible to do this?  If, 
say, I prefer to always see the beginning of a program but don't mind 
missing the last minute, then I can (always) set programs to start on 
time (Start Early = 0) but end one minute early (End Late = -1).  If I 
then set the global  pre-roll to zero and the post-roll to sixty 
seconds, I will always get the whole program unless there's a conflict.  
If there is a conflict, it will release the tuner one minute earlier to 
the second program.  If I want, I can even increase the pre-roll and/or 
post-roll to further ensure I get the entire program in a no-conflict case.


If I always prefer to see the end (which would be my choice), I would 
just reverse the settings.


Frankly, this doesn't sound burdensome to me since I already set every 
program to start two minutes early and end two minutes late in order to 
guarantee I don't lose *either* end.


Even so, I am still hoping that Glenn Moloney follows through with his 
feature to allow overlapping recordings on the same channel with a 
single tuner.

___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


[mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-15 Thread Blammo
Ran into a problem tonight where the clock on one of the backends was
off 8 seconds from the master backend. As a result, the first program
recorded, but the program after it was deemed tuner busy and didn't
record.

Another example is several of the big networks making a program run
til, for example, 9:05pm This bumps a 9pm scheduled recording, when in
fact, I wouldn't mind missing the first 5 minutes to get the other 55.

Would would be nifty would be a configurable fudge factor, that you
could set, allowing the scheduler to pick up XXX minutes into the
program, as soon as the tuner became free. Or maybe, no fudge factor
at all. Maybe it checks every minute, and if a tuner suddenly became
free, it would start recording.

Thoughts?
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: allowable overlap for recordings?

2005-06-15 Thread Robert Tsai
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:14:55PM -0700, Blammo wrote:
 Ran into a problem tonight where the clock on one of the backends
 was off 8 seconds from the master backend. As a result, the first
 program recorded, but the program after it was deemed tuner busy
 and didn't record.

In this case, the solution is to run NTP on both machines to keep
their clocks in sync with each other.

 Another example is several of the big networks making a program run
 til, for example, 9:05pm This bumps a 9pm scheduled recording, when
 in fact, I wouldn't mind missing the first 5 minutes to get the
 other 55.

This scenario is quite normal, and easy to spot: in the listings data,
the show will run 8:05-9:05pm. In the USA, for example, ABC does this
on Wednesday evenings, running everything 2 minutes after the hour.

When setting up your Wednesday evening recording schedules (say)
simply set everything up to begin/end 2 minutes early (e.g., mentally
note that you want all your schedules to begin/end on the hour, unless
you know you don't have any conflicts).

 Would would be nifty would be a configurable fudge factor, that
 you could set, allowing the scheduler to pick up XXX minutes into
 the program, as soon as the tuner became free. Or maybe, no fudge
 factor at all. Maybe it checks every minute, and if a tuner suddenly
 became free, it would start recording.

You essentially have a conflict between a show that runs late and
another one that starts on time (or early), so you should fix your
schedules accordingly.

--Rob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


[mythtv-users] Feature Request -- Mythvideo

2005-06-07 Thread Ryan Pisani
Does anyone know if there is a way to do a bulk IMDB lookup on files in
mythvideo? I have a pretty large digital library and I was just wondering
if there is an easier way to do IMDB lookups?. Something as simple as
import new or the ability to select multiple files and do a single
lookup. At least that way you'd only have to do a manual selection for
titles that didn't match exactly to the filename - or if there were
multiple releases. Just wondering - thanks.

Ryan
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability

2005-05-27 Thread Richie Jarvis

Bryan Halter wrote:
A nice feature to have would be backwards compatability for the Mythtv 
protocol on either the backend or frontend.  One of the biggest hurdles 
for me as a Gentoo user is that I have to upgrade all my frontends and 
backends at the same time and restart.  If the frontend had barkwards 
compatability by 1 version a user could upgrade the frontends one by one 
as time permits and at the end upgrade the backend, likewise if the 
backend could support clients one revision back that could be upgraded 
without needing to upgrade all the frontends.


I don't know how much effort is involved in this or if it has been 
discussed previously, just an observation.
I too would like this feature - I have 3 Xbox frontends running 
XboxMyth, and having to do them all on the same day is somewhat of a pain...


Still, I can fully understand the dev's not wanting this!

Cheers,

Richie
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability

2005-05-19 Thread Chad
On 5/17/05, Bryan Halter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 A nice feature to have would be backwards compatability for the Mythtv
 protocol on either the backend or frontend.  One of the biggest hurdles
 for me as a Gentoo user is that I have to upgrade all my frontends and
 backends at the same time and restart.  If the frontend had barkwards
 compatability by 1 version a user could upgrade the frontends one by one
 as time permits and at the end upgrade the backend, likewise if the
 backend could support clients one revision back that could be upgraded
 without needing to upgrade all the frontends.
 
 I don't know how much effort is involved in this or if it has been
 discussed previously, just an observation.
 
 --Bryan

I feel for ya!  Although I do agree with the response that there are
far better things for the dev's to be doing I think this is truly
something to keep on a hot plate if not a back burner.

Sure sure, attack us Gentoo users, but there are other situations that
I can see people finding themselves in where this would be a great
benefit.

Backend running 0.18
Find a disc on the cover of Linux Media Magazine with MythTV
binaries on it running a slightly older knoppmyth 0.17  Decide to see
if knoppmyth is really all it's cracked up to be, only to find out
that your backend isn't going to play nice with it.  Stomp on the
disc, curse knoppmyth, and smile 18 hours later when your Gentoo
install finishes and 0.18 works as expected.

;)

Cool
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability

2005-05-19 Thread Mat Mrosko
On 5/19/05, Chad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Stomp on the
 disc, curse knoppmyth, and smile 18 hours later when your Gentoo
 install finishes and 0.18 works as expected.

18 hours?  What are you running Myth on? a 486? LoL

-Mat
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability

2005-05-18 Thread BP
Bryan Halter wrote:

 I am not sure that I understand. Why not wait to do the 'make install'
 on all the machines until the compiling is complete on all the machines?


 because Gentoo does both at the same time...we don't do ./configure 
 make  make install we do emerge -u mythtv :)
 


Have you tried emerge --help...  Look at the options for --buildpkg,
--buildpkgonly and --usepkg


___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability

2005-05-18 Thread Sasha Z
This is one of the reasons why package based distributions are
superior. They allow far more version flexibility and allow for faster
distribution and upgrades. While I try not to harp about the glory of
Arch linux too often, but I switched to it from a combination of
slackware and gentoo two years ago and never went back. It is package
base, but all the packages come with scripts that compile the package,
so if you're itching to have a greater optimization flag (why on
earth... I don't know, but you could) you could make world with that
flag. You can also take stored packages or freshly compiled ones and
move them around your network faster.

Version backwards compatibility is the wrong way to solve this
problem. That puts undue pressure on the devs to make something that
wouldn't appeal to many users and uses a ton of development time.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability

2005-05-18 Thread Jake
On 5/17/05, Bryan Halter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I have mythtv running on 3 platforms, thus 3 systems to compile.  Compiling
 it is not the hard part, once I make a switch to a new server version or
 switch one of the backends everything else must be in place.  Example my
 Xbox is much slower compiling than my p4 2.0.  If I could build the new
 server and continue to be able to use it with the old front end on the xbox
 it would mean much less downtime for that frontend.  Currently once I
 upgrade the server and the P4 frontend I can't watch TV on the xbox in my
 room until its finished compiling.
  
  --Bryan

even if you can't find a way to make it so gentoo won't install until
you are ready why not just compile the xbox and when it's done compile
the p4.  or, look into using distcc, that would surely speed things
up.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability

2005-05-18 Thread David Shay
- Original Message - 
From: Bryan Halter
To: Discussion about mythtv
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability


because Gentoo does both at the same time...we don't do ./configure  make
 make install we do emerge -u mythtv :)

You could use some of the emerge flags mentioned earlier (usepkg, etc.), but
you can also almost exactly replicate the steps above by using the ebuild
command.  These could be scripted, obviously...

ebuild /usr/portage/media-tv/mythtv/mythtv-0.18.ebuild setup
ebuild /usr/portage/media-tv/mythtv/mythtv-0.18.ebuild fetch
ebuild /usr/portage/media-tv/mythtv/mythtv-0.18.ebuild unpack
ebuild /usr/portage/media-tv/mythtv/mythtv-0.18.ebuild compile

Then, to actually install them, another script to do:

ebuild /usr/portage/media-tv/mythtv/mythtv-0.18.ebuild install
ebuild /usr/portage/media-tv/mythtv/mythtv-0.18.ebuild qmerge



___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability

2005-05-18 Thread BP
Jeff Simpson wrote:

 When I upgrade, I just emerge everything, frontend, backend, etc etc,
 but I just don't restart any of the software until I'm ready for the
 upgrade. Until the backend is actually restarted, it continues to run
 the old version, same with the frontend. Even tho the binary on the
 drive got replaced with the new version, the old one is still running
 in memory.

Don't you risk database corruption doing that?  The database is updated
(new tables and such might be added) during the install.  If a
significant enough change is made, you might create problems you don't
want to have when the backend inserts data.

___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability

2005-05-18 Thread Jeff Simpson
 Don't you risk database corruption doing that?  The database is updated
 (new tables and such might be added) during the install.  If a
 significant enough change is made, you might create problems you don't
 want to have when the backend inserts data.

oops

probably

 - Jeff
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability

2005-05-18 Thread Isaac Richards
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 10:43 pm, BP wrote:
 Jeff Simpson wrote:
  When I upgrade, I just emerge everything, frontend, backend, etc etc,
  but I just don't restart any of the software until I'm ready for the
  upgrade. Until the backend is actually restarted, it continues to run
  the old version, same with the frontend. Even tho the binary on the
  drive got replaced with the new version, the old one is still running
  in memory.

 Don't you risk database corruption doing that?  The database is updated
 (new tables and such might be added) during the install.  If a
 significant enough change is made, you might create problems you don't
 want to have when the backend inserts data.

It's not updated until during the install.

Isaac
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability

2005-05-17 Thread Jake
On 5/17/05, Bryan Halter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 protocol on either the backend or frontend.  One of the biggest hurdles
 for me as a Gentoo user is that I have to upgrade all my frontends and
 backends at the same time and restart.  If the frontend had barkwards

why is it hard to upgrade?  i compile from cvs and with one backend
and 3 frontends i just run a script when i have to upgrade.  if all
the frontends are same architecture it could be even easier, just
build on one machine, nfs export and install on all machines i would
think.

i'm using debian and don't know much about gentoo but it seems to me
that it's not much more work to upgrade multiple machines than it is
to upgrade one machine, work smarter not harder :).
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability

2005-05-17 Thread SB Childe Roland
Can you post your script here so I can have an example to work from??

On 5/17/05, Jake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 5/17/05, Bryan Halter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  protocol on either the backend or frontend.  One of the biggest hurdles
  for me as a Gentoo user is that I have to upgrade all my frontends and
  backends at the same time and restart.  If the frontend had barkwards
 
 why is it hard to upgrade?  i compile from cvs and with one backend
 and 3 frontends i just run a script when i have to upgrade.  if all
 the frontends are same architecture it could be even easier, just
 build on one machine, nfs export and install on all machines i would
 think.
 
 i'm using debian and don't know much about gentoo but it seems to me
 that it's not much more work to upgrade multiple machines than it is
 to upgrade one machine, work smarter not harder :).
 ___
 mythtv-users mailing list
 mythtv-users@mythtv.org
 http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
 


-- 
=
SB Childe Roland
I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability

2005-05-17 Thread Bryan Halter




I have mythtv running on 3 platforms, thus 3 systems to compile.
Compiling it is not the hard part, once I make a switch to a new server
version or switch one of the backends everything else must be in
place. Example my Xbox is much slower compiling than my p4 2.0. If I
could build the new server and continue to be able to use it with the
old front end on the xbox it would mean much less downtime for that
frontend. Currently once I upgrade the server and the P4 frontend I
can't watch TV on the xbox in my room until its finished compiling.

--Bryan

SB Childe Roland wrote:

  Can you post your script here so I can have an example to work from??

On 5/17/05, Jake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
On 5/17/05, Bryan Halter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  protocol on either the backend or frontend.  One of the biggest hurdles
for me as a Gentoo user is that I have to upgrade all my frontends and
backends at the same time and restart.  If the frontend had barkwards
  

why is it hard to upgrade?  i compile from cvs and with one backend
and 3 frontends i just run a script when i have to upgrade.  if all
the frontends are same architecture it could be even easier, just
build on one machine, nfs export and install on all machines i would
think.

i'm using debian and don't know much about gentoo but it seems to me
that it's not much more work to upgrade multiple machines than it is
to upgrade one machine, work smarter not harder :).
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


  
  

  



___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability

2005-05-17 Thread Paul Bender
Bryan Halter wrote:
I have mythtv running on 3 platforms, thus 3 systems to compile.  
Compiling it is not the hard part, once I make a switch to a new server 
version or switch one of the backends everything else must be in place.  
Example my Xbox is much slower compiling than my p4 2.0.  If I could 
build the new server and continue to be able to use it with the old 
front end on the xbox it would mean much less downtime for that 
frontend.  Currently once I upgrade the server and the P4 frontend I 
can't watch TV on the xbox in my room until its finished compiling.
I am not sure that I understand. Why not wait to do the 'make install' 
on all the machines until the compiling is complete on all the machines?
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability

2005-05-17 Thread Bryan Halter




because Gentoo does both at the same time...we don't do ./configure
 make  make install we do emerge -u mythtv :)

Paul Bender wrote:
Bryan
Halter wrote:
  
  I have mythtv running on 3 platforms, thus 3
systems to compile. Compiling it is not the hard part, once I make a
switch to a new server version or switch one of the backends everything
else must be in place. Example my Xbox is much slower compiling than
my p4 2.0. If I could build the new server and continue to be able to
use it with the old front end on the xbox it would mean much less
downtime for that frontend. Currently once I upgrade the server and
the P4 frontend I can't watch TV on the xbox in my room until its
finished compiling.

  
  
I am not sure that I understand. Why not wait to do the 'make install'
on all the machines until the compiling is complete on all the
machines?
  
  

___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
  



___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability

2005-05-17 Thread Paul Bender
Bryan Halter wrote:
because Gentoo does both at the same time...we don't do ./configure  
make  make install we do emerge -u mythtv :)
It sounds like the problem is with Gentoo. ;-)
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature request: backwards compatability

2005-05-17 Thread Mat Mrosko
On 5/17/05, Paul Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It sounds like the problem is with Gentoo. ;-)
 

how brazen looks like Paul wants to get flamed!!!  j/k LoL
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: Shoutcast streams and Apple trailers like on Xbox Media center.

2005-02-16 Thread Max Waterman




Wow, it can play BBC Radio? Awesome :D

(I see BBC7 and BBC Radio 1 listed in one of the screen shots)

Max.

  Here you go: 
http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~moongies/streamtuned.html



___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: Shoutcast streams and Apple trailers like on Xbox Media center.

2005-02-16 Thread Jesper Rasmussen
would it be possible to collect the links to the unofficial addons, on 
mythtv.org?

Max Waterman wrote:
Wow, it can play BBC Radio? Awesome :D
(I see BBC7 and BBC Radio 1 listed in one of the screen shots)
Max.
Here you go: 
http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~moongies/streamtuned.html


___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
--
mvh
Jesper
--
Be thankful you are not my student. You would not
get a high grade for such a design :-) - Andy Tanenbaum to Linus, Jan 
30 '92

___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: Shoutcast streams and Apple trailers like on Xbox Media center.

2005-02-16 Thread Ryszard
i downloaded this today in an attempt to get it to run.  i couldnt
even get it to make.  gotta say tho' i didnt try very hard (think i
had some dev packages missing)..


On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:07:44 -0800, Lonnie Borntreger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 23:49 -0500, Brad Benson wrote:
  Hmm, you do appear to be correct.  I know I saw something for myth
  that would play internet radio, but I can't for the life of me
  remember what it was, although I'm about 99% sure that it was
  something unofficial.  I'll have to look around a little bit and see
  what I can find.  If I turn up anything usefull I'll post it back
  here.
 
 Here you go:
 http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~moongies/streamtuned.html
 
 
 ___
 mythtv-users mailing list
 mythtv-users@mythtv.org
 http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
 
 

___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: Shoutcast streams and Apple trailers like on Xbox Media center.

2005-02-16 Thread Joseph A. Caputo
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 9:55, Ryszard wrote:
 On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:07:44 -0800, Lonnie Borntreger
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 23:49 -0500, Brad Benson wrote:
   Hmm, you do appear to be correct.  I know I saw something for myth
   that would play internet radio, but I can't for the life of me
   remember what it was, although I'm about 99% sure that it was
   something unofficial.  I'll have to look around a little bit and 
see
   what I can find.  If I turn up anything usefull I'll post it back
   here.
  
  Here you go:
  http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~moongies/streamtuned.html
  
  
 i downloaded this today in an attempt to get it to run.  i couldnt
 even get it to make.  gotta say tho' i didnt try very hard (think i
 had some dev packages missing)..


Built fine for me last night with current Myth CVS on FC1... though I 
have to say, the UI is quite confusing.

-JAC
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: Shoutcast streams and Apple trailers like on Xbox Media center.

2005-02-16 Thread Kevin Barsby
 would it be possible to collect the links to the unofficial addons, on 
 mythtv.org?

Add a page here: mythtv.info

It's the unofficial wiki for mythtv, sort of a scratchpad if you will.

I believe content from here has found it's way into the main site?

Cheers
Kev
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: Shoutcast streams and Apple trailers like on Xbox Media center.

2005-02-15 Thread Brad Benson
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 04:14:50 +0100, Robert Krig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I was over at a friends house the other day. He has a modded Xbox with
 Xbox Media Center running on it. Anyways, two features impressed me,
 which mythtv to my knowledge doesnt do.
 
 1. There was the possibility to navigate and select shoutcast.com and
 other internet radio sites to select a stream to listen to.
 
 2. There was also a feature so you could watch trailers from the apple
 quicktime trailer site.
 The trailer feature didnt show the apple webpage or anything, just a
 text list linking to the different movie trailers, upon selection, you
 could then choose the resolution, small, medium or Large.
 
 These two features dont seem to be too complicated and in my opinion
 would make a nice addition to MythTV.
 
 Just a thought at any rate.
 
 
 ___
 mythtv-users mailing list
 mythtv-users@mythtv.org
 http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
 
 
 

To my knowledge myth doesn't have anything like the Apple movie
trailers section, but there is a (AFAIK unsupported) myth plugin
called MythFM that plays internet radio.  I don't recall the URL for
it at the moment, but if you google on MythFM I'm sure you can turn it
up pretty easily.

Brad
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: Shoutcast streams and Apple trailers like on Xbox Media center.

2005-02-15 Thread Lonnie Borntreger
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 22:18 -0500, Brad Benson wrote:
 To my knowledge myth doesn't have anything like the Apple movie
 trailers section, but there is a (AFAIK unsupported) myth plugin
 called MythFM that plays internet radio.  I don't recall the URL for
 it at the moment, but if you google on MythFM I'm sure you can turn it
 up pretty easily.

According to its website, MythFM is for broadcast radio using a TV
card's FM tuner, not for Internet radio.

Lonnie


___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: Shoutcast streams and Apple trailers like on Xbox Media center.

2005-02-15 Thread Brad Benson
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:34:44 -0800, Lonnie Borntreger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 22:18 -0500, Brad Benson wrote:
  To my knowledge myth doesn't have anything like the Apple movie
  trailers section, but there is a (AFAIK unsupported) myth plugin
  called MythFM that plays internet radio.  I don't recall the URL for
  it at the moment, but if you google on MythFM I'm sure you can turn it
  up pretty easily.
 
 According to its website, MythFM is for broadcast radio using a TV
 card's FM tuner, not for Internet radio.
 
 Lonnie
 
 
 ___
 mythtv-users mailing list
 mythtv-users@mythtv.org
 http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
 
 
 

Hmm, you do appear to be correct.  I know I saw something for myth
that would play internet radio, but I can't for the life of me
remember what it was, although I'm about 99% sure that it was
something unofficial.  I'll have to look around a little bit and see
what I can find.  If I turn up anything usefull I'll post it back
here.

Brad
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] Feature Request: Shoutcast streams and Apple trailers like on Xbox Media center.

2005-02-15 Thread Lonnie Borntreger
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 23:49 -0500, Brad Benson wrote:
 Hmm, you do appear to be correct.  I know I saw something for myth
 that would play internet radio, but I can't for the life of me
 remember what it was, although I'm about 99% sure that it was
 something unofficial.  I'll have to look around a little bit and see
 what I can find.  If I turn up anything usefull I'll post it back
 here.

Here you go: 
http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~moongies/streamtuned.html


___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users