Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] SB-01 in use?

[Gary Wu]

Thanks for the confirmation.  Shutting down SB-01 now.

Thanks,
Gary

From: MCCRAY, CHRISTOPHER [mailto:cm6...@att.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2018 11:24 AM
To: LEFEVRE, CATHERINE ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Gary 
Wu 
Subject: RE: [integration] SB-01 in use?

Hi Gary,

ONAP components AAI, DMaaP, Portal, and VID confirmed they are not using SB-01 
as well. I believe its safe to proceed.

Best regards,
Christopher

From: LEFEVRE, CATHERINE
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2018 9:28 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; 
gary.i...@huawei.com<mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>
Cc: MCCRAY, CHRISTOPHER mailto:cm6...@att.com>>
Subject: RE: [integration] SB-01 in use?

Good morning Gary,

I confirm that the CLAMP, APPC teams are not using SB01.

Christopher will try to collect additional feedback before noon PST.

Best regards
Catherine

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Gary Wu
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2018 3:14 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [integration] SB-01 in use?

Is someone actively using Wind River Integration-SB-01?  There's an OOM 
instance there about a month old and its usage is not listed on 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Test+Labs<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Integration-2BTest-2BLabs&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=66ObImPAUA0o2f1hTGknnnv5ScXvX8EnREJCPHHBY5M&m=hxwo5IHYUfvLJYUup5PXO_boNYbJkzTTXZmdU_MEgqE&s=YAnG1JYxgaQk44__Hm4c7llQcRzVVmME2_8zrht6iW8&e=>.

Please reply to me by noon Pacific today if you need this instance retained.

Thanks,
Gary




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11799): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11799
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24239026/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Jira "Resolved Date" cannot be reset

[Gary Wu]

If a Jira issue was changed from Task to Story, this somehow sets the "Resolved 
Date" which cannot be undone.  Because the Resolved Date is set, now the issue 
ID appears with a strikethrough in the backlog lists.

Has anyone encountered this issue?  Is there a way to reset/clear the "Resolved 
Date" or otherwise remove the strikethrough?

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11882): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11882
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24528429/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] setting up local repository for OOM images

[Gary Wu]

Hi Vidhu,

I don't use nexus3.  I use docker's registry proxy cache.  Here is how to set 
it up:

Start with a clean install of Ubuntu 16.04.  Then run the following:

apt-get install docker.io
docker run -d -p 5000:5000 --restart=unless-stopped --name registry -e 
REGISTRY_PROXY_REMOTEURL=https://nexus3.onap.org:10001 registry:2


Thanks,
Gary

From: Vidhu Shekhar Pandey - ERS, HCL Tech [mailto:vidhu.pan...@hcl.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 7:53 AM
To: Borislav Glozman ; LUNANUOVA, DOMINIC 
(DOMINIC) ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: Mike Elliott ; Michael O'Brien 
; Gary Wu 
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] setting up local repository for OOM images

Thanks Borislav and Dominic for the information. Currently my problem is point 
number 1. I found two links related to this:


1.   https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Setting+up+a+Nexus+Proxy


2.   https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6590586.


Second link has a section "Setting up Nexus 2 and 3 OSS Repositories"

Would be great if Gary could suggest and recommend a quick way to set it up.

Thanks,
Vidhu

From: Borislav Glozman 
mailto:borislav.gloz...@amdocs.com>>
Sent: 16 August 2018 20:03
To: LUNANUOVA, DOMINIC (DOMINIC) 
mailto:d...@research.att.com>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Vidhu Shekhar 
Pandey - ERS, HCL Tech mailto:vidhu.pan...@hcl.com>>
Cc: Mike Elliott mailto:mike.elli...@amdocs.com>>; 
Michael O'Brien mailto:frank.obr...@amdocs.com>>; Gary 
Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] setting up local repository for OOM images

Dom, thank you for sharing this method.
Indeed during development your approach is convenient (we also use it).
Please notice these are two different problem. I am not sure which one of them 
Vidhu is trying to solve:

1.   speeding up deployment using local nexus3, preventing network traffic 
and pulling from slow onap nexus3

2.   dev existing or new docker images

Thanks,
Borislav Glozman
O:+972.9.776.1988
M:+972.52.2835726
[amdocs-a]
Amdocs a Platinum member of 
ONAP<https://apac01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.amdocs.com%2Fopen-network%2Fnfv-powered-by-onap&data=02%7C01%7Cvidhu.pandey%40hcl.com%7C95a4fb5154b54cb0f21b08d603852be4%7C189de737c93a4f5a8b686f4ca9941912%7C0%7C0%7C636700267852524290&sdata=kk9jpPkozSZF%2FRC5mi8vjmpB6yf86twn94xzy1ZpVk0%3D&reserved=0>

From: LUNANUOVA, DOMINIC (DOMINIC) [mailto:d...@research.att.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 5:16 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Borislav 
Glozman mailto:borislav.gloz...@amdocs.com>>; 
Vidhu Shekhar Pandey - ERS, HCL Tech 
mailto:vidhu.pan...@hcl.com>>
Cc: Mike Elliott mailto:mike.elli...@amdocs.com>>; 
Michael O'Brien mailto:frank.obr...@amdocs.com>>; Gary 
Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] setting up local repository for OOM images

Another approach here: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/questions/38118463/how-to-configure-a-kubernetes-cluster-to-use-a-local-insecure-registry<https://apac01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.onap.org%2Fdisplay%2FDW%2Fquestions%2F38118463%2Fhow-to-configure-a-kubernetes-cluster-to-use-a-local-insecure-registry&data=02%7C01%7Cvidhu.pandey%40hcl.com%7C95a4fb5154b54cb0f21b08d603852be4%7C189de737c93a4f5a8b686f4ca9941912%7C0%7C0%7C636700267852524290&sdata=gurwh0RVYA2OxWEBaaq0kGadhRJZ0xBnIZg4JrRUs78%3D&reserved=0>

-Dom

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Borislav Glozman
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 3:34 AM
To: Vidhu Shekhar Pandey - ERS, HCL Tech 
mailto:vidhu.pan...@hcl.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Mike 
Elliott mailto:mike.elli...@amdocs.com>>; Michael 
O'Brien mailto:frank.obr...@amdocs.com>>; Gary Wu 
mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] setting up local repository for OOM images

I am not aware of such document, I know integration team did that. Adding Gary.
You do not need to change the yaml file.
You can provide parameter to helm install/upgrade "--set 
global.repository=mynexus3.example.com:12345" that will override the default 
docker image registry (nexus3.onap.org:10001).

Thanks,
Borislav Glozman
O:+972.9.776.1988
M:+972.52.2835726
[amdocs-a]
Amdocs a Platinum member of 
ONAP<https://apac01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttps-3A__www.amdocs.com_open-2Dnetwork_nfv-2Dpowered-2Dby-2Donap%26d%3DDwMFAg%26c%3DLFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg%26r%3DTTiyLt3NmHhqJbSZsYv8tdAqTAgC-wtEx8NKq2P__08%26m%3D7whhn1l6LGxpgRWkneuDTkQeT0G4-zgJ-MTQGdSztjk%26s%3D-7rquLXsE-cYrN8lPrTnogNTqhFOIuIMhMHOjMZlP8A%26e%3D&data=02%7

Re: [onap-discuss] Docker images tagging rules for Casablanca #integration #oom #heat #docker

[Gary Wu]

There are two docker manifests: one for released images, one for staging 
images.  Each day, we use them to do two sets of deployments: release and 
staging, respectively.

The way it works for OOM is that we take the helm charts from oom repo master 
branch, and apply the docker image versions from the respective manifests above 
for the two sets of deployments.  So, the docker image versions actually 
checked-in to OOM are overridden during the deployment process.  This means 
that teams must keep the release and staging manifests up-to-date to ensure 
that the desired images are used for the daily deployment tests.

Likewise for HEAT.

The actual scripts used by the daily deployments to apply manifest versions 
into OOM/HEAT are 
https://git.onap.org/integration/tree/version-manifest/src/main/scripts/update-oom-image-versions.sh
 and
https://git.onap.org/integration/tree/version-manifest/src/main/scripts/update-heat-image-versions.sh
 respectively.  As we get close to the Casablanca release, I will also use 
these same scripts manually to sync-up the docker images versions in the OOM 
and HEAT templates vs. what’s specified in the release manifest.

Thanks,
Gary

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Brian
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 6:20 AM
To: 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' ; 
'eric.deb...@orange.com' 
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Docker images tagging rules for Casablanca 
#integration #oom #heat #docker

Gary would know for sure but I think this script updates helm chart images with 
manifest.csv values but not sure if its in use.

https://git.onap.org/integration/tree/version-manifest/src/main/scripts/update-oom-image-versions.sh

Brian


From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 9:19 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; 
eric.deb...@orange.com
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] Docker images tagging rules for Casablanca 
#integration #oom #heat #docker

Eric,

This is a good discussion.

The link you referenced was for the “release” version – at this point its 
Beijing.
The current development is the “staging” version
https://git.onap.org/integration/tree/version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest-staging.csv

This has the latest tags.

I will point out that some projects bury their tags in their deploy.sh scripts 
in HEAT (I found this in AAI) and we need to change that practice.

I thought we had an override script for OOM deployments that would set the 
image versions but I’m not as familiar with this part of the integration 
environment build process.

https://git.onap.org/integration/tree/version-manifest/src/main/scripts/add-images-from-oom.sh


Brian

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of 
Eric Debeau
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 9:09 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] Docker images tagging rules for Casablanca #integration 
#oom #heat #docker

Hello

The docker-manifest file is the placeholder to store the Docker images version 
associated with each release.
https://git.onap.org/integration/tree/version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv

Today, a script developed by Integration team is populating the Heat env file 
for the Heat based installation.
For OOM, I believe that each project is managing the values in their Chart Helm 
file, but as far as I know, there is no formal alignment between those values 
and the docker-manifest file.

I also noticed that there is no "latest" tags in the docker-manifest file

I would like to know the strategy for Docker images tagging for the master 
branch.

Thanks

Best Regards


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11928): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11928
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24612018/21656
Mute #integration: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=integration&subid=2740164
Mute #oom: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=oom&subid=2740164
Mute #heat: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=heat&subid=2740164
Mute #docker: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=docker&subid=2740164
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Missing docker images

[Gary Wu]

Hi helpdesk,

Currently the following docker images have gone missing:

onap/activity-spec:1.3.0 (note that this was NOT a released image)
onap/multicloud/vio:1.2.0-STAGING

Can you take a look?

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12057): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12057
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24946661/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration]Manifest Issue

[Gary Wu]

Looks like some docker images are disappearing from nexus3 again.  I’ve logged 
helpdesk ticket 60122 for this.

Thanks,
Gary

From: fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn [mailto:fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 1:19 AM
To: Gary Wu 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [integration]Manifest Issue


Hi Gary,



I updated the manifest files a little bit and submitted them 
(https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/61747/). But the Jenkins verification job keeps 
failing. The reason is that one component is missing from the nexus repo.



[ERROR] onap/activity-spec:1.3.0 not found



Since it's not our project, I've no idea on how to deal with that.



Could you please help to take a look at it?



Thanks,

Guangrong









-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12059): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12059
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24942770/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #60122] Missing docker images

[Gary Wu]

I don't have a record; probably need the respective teams to chime in.

Thanks,
Gary

-Original Message-
From: Jessica Wagantall via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org] 
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 1:23 PM
To: Gary Wu 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [ONAP Helpdesk #60122] Missing docker images

Is there a way we can know how old were these images?

We still have in place the task that cleans images after they were created
25 days ago. 

Thanks!
Jess

On Fri Aug 24 13:20:55 2018, gary.i...@huawei.com wrote:
> Hi helpdesk,
> 
> Currently the following docker images have gone missing:
> 
> onap/activity-spec:1.3.0 (note that this was NOT a released image) 
> onap/multicloud/vio:1.2.0-STAGING
> 
> Can you take a look?
> 
> Thanks,
> Gary
> 
> 




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12060): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12060
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24948060/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #60122] Missing docker images

[Gary Wu]

Can the teams that own the following missing docker images help to re-create 
them?

onap/activity-spec:1.3.0
onap/multicloud/vio:1.2.0-STAGING

Otherwise we will have to revert the versions back to the last release versions 
in the staging manifest in order to unblock other people's manifest changes.

Thanks,
Gary

-Original Message-
From: Jessica Wagantall via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org] 
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 1:23 PM
To: Gary Wu 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [ONAP Helpdesk #60122] Missing docker images

Is there a way we can know how old were these images?

We still have in place the task that cleans images after they were created
25 days ago. 

Thanks!
Jess

On Fri Aug 24 13:20:55 2018, gary.i...@huawei.com wrote:
> Hi helpdesk,
> 
> Currently the following docker images have gone missing:
> 
> onap/activity-spec:1.3.0 (note that this was NOT a released image) 
> onap/multicloud/vio:1.2.0-STAGING
> 
> Can you take a look?
> 
> Thanks,
> Gary
> 
> 




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12105): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12105
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/25041280/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [OOM] helm install local/onap fails

[Gary Wu]

I logged a Jira ticket on this issue a few days ago:  
https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-1364

Thanks,
Gary

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of James MacNider
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 5:23 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; georgehcl...@gmail.com; sd3...@intl.att.com
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [OOM] helm install local/onap fails

Hi George,

After a bit of digging, it looks like a recent merge in the Clamp helm chart 
(https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/63235) has created a nodePort conflict with 
Pomba.  Until this is resolved, the workaround is to disable one of them if 
don’t require both components.

As a reminder to all, when adding new nodePorts to charts, ensure that they are 
properly reserved and unique:  
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/OOM+NodePort+List

Thanks,
James

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of 
George Clapp
Sent: Monday, September 3, 2018 7:31 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [OOM] helm install local/onap fails

I am attempting for the first time to install ONAP using the instructions at 
“ONAP on Kubernetes with Rancher” and “OOM User Guide” in an OpenStack 
environment.  I got to the point of the command:

helm install local/onap --name development

And got these error messages:

% helm install local/onap --name development
Error: release development failed: Service "pomba-kibana" is invalid: 
spec.ports[0].nodePort: Invalid value: 30234: provided port is already allocated
% helm install local/onap --name development
Error: release development failed: secrets "development-aaf-cs" already exists

I searched but nothing came up about this error.  I would greatly appreciate 
any suggestions.

Thanks,
George

“Amdocs’ email platform is based on a third-party, worldwide, cloud-based 
system. Any emails sent to Amdocs will be processed and stored using such 
system and are accessible by third party providers of such system on a limited 
basis. Your sending of emails to Amdocs evidences your consent to the use of 
such system and such processing, storing and access”.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12233): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12233
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/25172114/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #60122] Missing docker images

[Gary Wu]

I actually could not find where the onap/activity-spec image was being used.  
We can leave it off for now until the team decides to add it back.

Thanks,
Gary

-Original Message-
From: Jessica Wagantall via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 2:01 PM
To: Gary Wu 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [ONAP Helpdesk #60122] Missing docker images

I noticed that multicloud recreated theirs, but
onap/activity-spec:1.3.0 is still missing.. 

Are we going to re-create it? or shall we move versions?

Please remember that Nexus3 only keeps snapshot images for 25 days. 
If we want to preserve a specific version we will need to release it which I am 
happy to help.

Thanks!
Jess

On Tue Aug 28 12:13:37 2018, gary.i...@huawei.com wrote:
> Can the teams that own the following missing docker images help to re- 
> create them?
> 
> onap/activity-spec:1.3.0
> onap/multicloud/vio:1.2.0-STAGING
> 
> Otherwise we will have to revert the versions back to the last release 
> versions in the staging manifest in order to unblock other people's 
> manifest changes.
> 
> Thanks,
> Gary
> 
> -Original Message-
>  From: Jessica Wagantall via RT [mailto:onap- 
> helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 1:23 PM
> To: Gary Wu 
> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> Subject: [ONAP Helpdesk #60122] Missing docker images
> 
> Is there a way we can know how old were these images?
> 
> We still have in place the task that cleans images after they were 
> created
>  25 days ago.
> 
> Thanks!
> Jess
> 
> On Fri Aug 24 13:20:55 2018, gary.i...@huawei.com wrote:
> > Hi helpdesk,
> >
> > Currently the following docker images have gone missing:
> >
> > onap/activity-spec:1.3.0 (note that this was NOT a released image) 
> > onap/multicloud/vio:1.2.0-STAGING
> >
> > Can you take a look?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gary
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12252): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12252
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/25041280/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] Problem with opening Jenkins logs

[Gary Wu]

Hi Marcin,

That link is not accessible due to enhanced Jenkins security requirements.  The 
workaround is as follows:


· Start from a particular build, e.g.: 
http://onapci.org/jenkins/job/windriver-oom-staging-daily/46/

· Click on “Browse results” (middle bottom) which goes to 
http://onapci.org/jenkins/job/windriver-oom-staging-daily/46/robot/

· Click on “Original result files” (middle of page), which goes to 
http://onapci.org/jenkins/job/windriver-oom-staging-daily/46/robot/report/

· Click on “all files in zip”

· Then you can open the output and log files from within the downloaded 
zip file.

Thanks,
Gary


From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Przybysz, Marcin (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw)
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 10:52 PM
To: Yunxia Chen ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: ONAP, ODIE-WRO (Nokia - Global) 
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration]  Problem with opening Jenkins 
logs

Hi Helen,
Thank you for answer.

Those logs are not exactly what I’m looking for.
There is a report generated by Robot from test execution, which contains each 
particular step from each keyword with all parameters , all variables and 
outputs from every single line executed during robot test case.
It’s some example:
[cid:image001.jpg@01D445B7.F9860A70]

This log should be accessible for each build exactly in mentioned by me space
[cid:image002.png@01D445B7.F9860A70]

Somehow it’s not accessible, probably because of Jenkins configuration.

BR
Marcin

From: Yunxia Chen mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 9:15 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Przybysz, 
Marcin (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) 
mailto:marcin.przyb...@nokia.com>>
Cc: ONAP, ODIE-WRO (Nokia - Global) 
mailto:odie-wro.o...@nokia.com>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration]  Problem with opening Jenkins 
logs

Hi, Marcin,

Could you try the following url? (That site was set privately, not from LF)

http://onapci.org/jenkins/

And from there, try the console output directly.
http://onapci.org/jenkins/job/windriver-sb02-oom-staging-manual/3/console

Or you could go to the real hosted site, those are from open labs, to find 
those logs as well.

Regards,

Helen Chen

From: onap-discuss 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> on behalf of 
"Przybysz, Marcin (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw)" 
mailto:marcin.przyb...@nokia.com>>
Reply-To: onap-discuss 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, 
"marcin.przyb...@nokia.com" 
mailto:marcin.przyb...@nokia.com>>
Date: Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 3:32 AM
To: onap-discuss 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: "ONAP, ODIE-WRO (Nokia - Global)" 
mailto:odie-wro.o...@nokia.com>>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [integration]  Problem with opening Jenkins logs

Hi,

I’m not able to view any Jenkins Robot report or log files from test execution. 
Example

I found out error message “Blocked script execution in '' because the 
document's frame is sandboxed and the 'allow-scripts' permission is not set.” 
in browser console and when I google it,  seems to be some lack of settings in 
Jenkins.

Are you familiar with this problem? Can someone help to solve it?

BR
Marcin



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12276): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12276
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/25210739/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [PTL] Guava changes

[Gary Wu]

Hi PTLs,

Just a reminder to please review the pending changes on Guava for your 
respective projects:

https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/q/status:open+INT-619

If it looks ok, please merge the pending changes.

If there are concerns, please add your comments and add a -1 vote to the change 
so we can follow up and address the concerns.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12277): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12277
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/25238669/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [ ONAP ] EXTAPI-122

[Gary Wu]

Hi Matthieu,

We deploy OOM once a day.  This chart shows, for each OOM deployment, the 
number of times your container got killed and restarted by Kubernetes.  It has 
nothing to do with gerrit.

If your container is getting killed/restarted by Kubernetes, it means that your 
liveness probe is configured incorrectly in your OOM helm chart.  The target is 
to fix the liveness probe configuration so that there are zero restarts even if 
the deployment environment is arbitrarily slow or congested on any particular 
day.

Thanks,
Gary

From: matthieu.geereba...@orange.com [mailto:matthieu.geereba...@orange.com]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 2:15 AM
To: Gary Wu 
Cc: NGUYEN Quoc Nghia IMT/OLS ; DEBEAU Eric 
IMT/OLN 
Subject: [ ONAP ] EXTAPI-122

Hi Gary,

About this ticket, I do not understand graph, externalapi compare to the other 
modules. Reboot seem to occures a lot some days while some other it's only 
few.. What should be the reasonable limit for nbi 3.0.0 latest ? ( 
externalapi/nbi :3.0.0-latest )

https://jira.onap.org/browse/EXTAPI-122

http://onapci.org/grafana/d/kRvfoqKmz/oom-container-restarts?orgId=1

Do you think we are facing an app instability ? is it relative to the use of 
some magic world we can use in gerrit or is it independant ?
Thank you for your advice



[logo Orange]<http://www.orange.com/>

Matthieu Geerebaert
Software architect
Product Owner API Designer
ORANGE/IMT/OLS/ARSEC/API

fixe :  +33 5 56 53 09 47 
<https://monsi.sso.francetelecom.fr/index.asp?target=http%3A%2F%2Fclicvoice.sso.francetelecom.fr%2FClicvoiceV2%2FToolBar.do%3Faction%3Ddefault%26rootservice%3DSIGNATURE%26to%3D+33%204%2037%2044%2050%2049%20>
mobile :  +33 6 79 16 83 23 
<https://monsi.sso.francetelecom.fr/index.asp?target=http%3A%2F%2Fclicvoice.sso.francetelecom.fr%2FClicvoiceV2%2FToolBar.do%3Faction%3Ddefault%26rootservice%3DSIGNATURE%26to%3D+33%206%2089%2075%2086%2014%20>
matthieu.geereba...@orange.com<mailto:matthieu.geereba...@orange.com>


_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12457): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12457
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/25725102/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] oparent 1.2.1 released

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

oparent 1.2.1 has been released.

Notable changes:

*   Additional standard 3rd party library versions courtesy of the PTL 
taskforce: https://git.onap.org/oparent/tree/dependencies/pom.xml
*   Nexus URL definitions have been refactored out of the oparent pom and 
are now expected in your build environment settings.xml.  This helps facilitate 
folks who need to do builds in a non-internet environment without having to 
recompile oparent.  For a sample ONAP settings.xml with the required 
properties, see https://git.onap.org/oparent/tree/settings.xml
*   JaCoCo bumped to version 0.8.2.

Please upgrade at your earliest convenience.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12487): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12487
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/25748514/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] oparent 1.2.1 released

[Gary Wu]

Hi Yan,

It’s recommended to upgrade oparent to 1.2.1; not a must.

The settings.xml should be placed in your local ~/.m2/ directory, where you 
should already have one; the change is just to add the additional property 
definitions.  LF has already taken care of doing this in the Maven build 
environments in Jenkins.

Thanks,
Gary

From: Yan Yang [mailto:yangya...@chinamobile.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 6:17 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Gary Wu 
Subject: 答复: [onap-discuss] oparent 1.2.1 released

Hi Gary,

I would like to know :

1.   If all components must upgrade oparent to 1.2.1 and add the 
settings.xml file

2.   Where does the setting.xml file need to be placed? Thanks.


Best Regards,
Yan
发件人: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] 代表 Gary Wu
发送时间: 2018年9月19日 2:00
收件人: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
主题: [onap-discuss] oparent 1.2.1 released

Hi all,

oparent 1.2.1 has been released.

Notable changes:

・ Additional standard 3rd party library versions courtesy of the PTL 
taskforce: https://git.onap.org/oparent/tree/dependencies/pom.xml
・ Nexus URL definitions have been refactored out of the oparent pom and 
are now expected in your build environment settings.xml.  This helps facilitate 
folks who need to do builds in a non-internet environment without having to 
recompile oparent.  For a sample ONAP settings.xml with the required 
properties, see https://git.onap.org/oparent/tree/settings.xml
・ JaCoCo bumped to version 0.8.2.

Please upgrade at your earliest convenience.

Thanks,
Gary




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12571): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12571
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/25842890/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [ci-management][integration] Jenkins Job Failure

[Gary Wu]

Hi Guangrong,

It depends on what you are trying to do.

If you are ready to release holmes-actions 1.2.0, you need to email LF helpdesk 
to ask that they release that artifact.  Once that’s done, the 1.2.0 artifact 
will become available in the releases repo.

If you’re trying to do some testing with holmes-actions 1.2.0 as a staging 
artifact, then you need to update your job to retrieve that artifact from the 
staging repo.

If you’re actually trying do something using holmes-actions 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT, 
then you need to update your job to retrieve that artifact from the staging 
repo.

Thanks,
Gary

From: Guangrong Fu [mailto:steven20...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 3:45 AM
To: Gary Wu 
Cc: onap-discuss ; fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn
Subject: [ci-management][integration] Jenkins Job Failure

Hi Gary,

The daily release jobs for Holmes have been failing for a long time.

Initially, it was because they depended on the snapshot version of the 
'holmes-actions' module. But after I changed the version of the dependency to 
'1.2.0', the compilation failure went on occurring. It seems that the artifact 
'org.onap.holmes.common:holmes-actions:1.2.0' is stored in the staging repo 
rather than the release one.

You could find the artifact at 
https://nexus.onap.org/content/groups/staging/org/onap/holmes/common/holmes-actions/.

The error of the Jenkins job is
[image.png]

Any thoughts about this? What am I supposed to do now?

Thanks a ton in advance.

BR,
Guangrong


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12637): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12637
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26221836/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [ci-management][integration] Jenkins Job Failure

[Gary Wu]

Hi Guangrong,

Sorry, I thought you were talking about docker builds, but looks like you’re 
talking about maven builds?

For maven build release jobs, it is correct that SNAPSHOT dependencies from 
outside the repo are not allowed.  So, as an example, for 
https://jenkins.onap.org/view/holmes/job/holmes-dsa-master-release-version-java-daily/
 to pass you must depend on a release version of the holmes-actions artifact.

Thanks,
Gary


From: Guangrong Fu [mailto:steven20...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 5:35 PM
To: Gary Wu 
Cc: onap-discuss ; fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [ci-management][integration] Jenkins Job Failure

Gary,

It'll be better for us to retrieve the artifact using its SNAPSHOT version. 
Some use cases are still being tested at the moment. Bugs could rise at any 
time. So changes for holmes-actions are inevitable.

But when I tried to compile other modules using holmes-actions 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT, 
the compiler complains that we are banned from using dependencies versioned as 
'SNAPSHOT'.

If I still want to use the snapshot version of some dependencies, what kind of 
changes shall I make in our Jenkins jobs?

Thanks,
Guangrong

Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>于2018年9月26日周三 
上午12:16写道：
Hi Guangrong,

It depends on what you are trying to do.

If you are ready to release holmes-actions 1.2.0, you need to email LF helpdesk 
to ask that they release that artifact.  Once that’s done, the 1.2.0 artifact 
will become available in the releases repo.

If you’re trying to do some testing with holmes-actions 1.2.0 as a staging 
artifact, then you need to update your job to retrieve that artifact from the 
staging repo.

If you’re actually trying do something using holmes-actions 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT, 
then you need to update your job to retrieve that artifact from the staging 
repo.

Thanks,
Gary

From: Guangrong Fu [mailto:steven20...@gmail.com<mailto:steven20...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 3:45 AM
To: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; 
fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn<mailto:fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn>

Subject: [ci-management][integration] Jenkins Job Failure

Hi Gary,

The daily release jobs for Holmes have been failing for a long time.

Initially, it was because they depended on the snapshot version of the 
'holmes-actions' module. But after I changed the version of the dependency to 
'1.2.0', the compilation failure went on occurring. It seems that the artifact 
'org.onap.holmes.common:holmes-actions:1.2.0' is stored in the staging repo 
rather than the release one.

You could find the artifact at 
https://nexus.onap.org/content/groups/staging/org/onap/holmes/common/holmes-actions/.

The error of the Jenkins job is
[image.png]

Any thoughts about this? What am I supposed to do now?

Thanks a ton in advance.

BR,
Guangrong


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12647): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12647
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26221836/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [ci-management][integration] Jenkins Job Failure

[Gary Wu]

Hi Guangrong,

Yes, you need to formally release the holmes-actions 1.2.0 artifact by emailing 
LF helpdesk.  After they’re done with the release process, then the artifact 
will become available in the releases repo.

Thanks,
Gary

From: Guangrong Fu [mailto:steven20...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 6:44 PM
To: Gary Wu 
Cc: onap-discuss ; fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [ci-management][integration] Jenkins Job Failure

Hi Gary,

Yes, I was talking about maven builds.

Although I've changed the version to 1.2.0, the artifact seemed to be pushed 
into the staging repo rather than the releases repo. That's how the error came 
into being.

You could find the following verify jobs are still failing due to the missing 
of holmes-actions:1.2.0 from the release repo.

https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/68791/
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/68793/
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/68789/

Do I have to inform the help desk to move the maven artifact into the releases 
repo as well as what we usually do to the docker artifacts?

Regards,
Guangrong

Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>于2018年9月26日周三 
上午9:18写道：
Hi Guangrong,

Sorry, I thought you were talking about docker builds, but looks like you’re 
talking about maven builds?

For maven build release jobs, it is correct that SNAPSHOT dependencies from 
outside the repo are not allowed.  So, as an example, for 
https://jenkins.onap.org/view/holmes/job/holmes-dsa-master-release-version-java-daily/
 to pass you must depend on a release version of the holmes-actions artifact.

Thanks,
Gary


From: Guangrong Fu [mailto:steven20...@gmail.com<mailto:steven20...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 5:35 PM

To: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; 
fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn<mailto:fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [ci-management][integration] Jenkins Job Failure

Gary,

It'll be better for us to retrieve the artifact using its SNAPSHOT version. 
Some use cases are still being tested at the moment. Bugs could rise at any 
time. So changes for holmes-actions are inevitable.

But when I tried to compile other modules using holmes-actions 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT, 
the compiler complains that we are banned from using dependencies versioned as 
'SNAPSHOT'.

If I still want to use the snapshot version of some dependencies, what kind of 
changes shall I make in our Jenkins jobs?

Thanks,
Guangrong

Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>于2018年9月26日周三 
上午12:16写道：
Hi Guangrong,

It depends on what you are trying to do.

If you are ready to release holmes-actions 1.2.0, you need to email LF helpdesk 
to ask that they release that artifact.  Once that’s done, the 1.2.0 artifact 
will become available in the releases repo.

If you’re trying to do some testing with holmes-actions 1.2.0 as a staging 
artifact, then you need to update your job to retrieve that artifact from the 
staging repo.

If you’re actually trying do something using holmes-actions 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT, 
then you need to update your job to retrieve that artifact from the staging 
repo.

Thanks,
Gary

From: Guangrong Fu [mailto:steven20...@gmail.com<mailto:steven20...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 3:45 AM
To: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; 
fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn<mailto:fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn>

Subject: [ci-management][integration] Jenkins Job Failure

Hi Gary,

The daily release jobs for Holmes have been failing for a long time.

Initially, it was because they depended on the snapshot version of the 
'holmes-actions' module. But after I changed the version of the dependency to 
'1.2.0', the compilation failure went on occurring. It seems that the artifact 
'org.onap.holmes.common:holmes-actions:1.2.0' is stored in the staging repo 
rather than the release one.

You could find the artifact at 
https://nexus.onap.org/content/groups/staging/org/onap/holmes/common/holmes-actions/.

The error of the Jenkins job is


Any thoughts about this? What am I supposed to do now?

Thanks a ton in advance.

BR,
Guangrong


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12648): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12648
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26221836/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Jenkins not working

[Gary Wu]

Hi helpdesk,

Jenkins has a huge backlog and minions are spawning.  Can you take a look?

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12660): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12660
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26231356/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [integration] CSIT repo relocation

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

To help facilitate the branching of CSIT tests, we will be moving everything 
currently under integration/test/csit into its own repo: integration/csit

This changeover should be completed by end of this week.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12701): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12701
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26337100/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] CSIT repo relocation

[Gary Wu]

Yes, they will be failing until the migration is fully completed; hopefully by 
end of this week.

Thanks,
Gary

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Pamela Dragosh
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 11:43 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] CSIT repo relocation

Gary,

So now all our verify jobs are failed. Will the triggered CSIT jobs also fail?

Pam

From: mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> on 
behalf of Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Reply-To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, 
"gary.i...@huawei.com<mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>" 
mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Date: Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 1:23 PM
To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [integration] CSIT repo relocation

Hi all,

To help facilitate the branching of CSIT tests, we will be moving everything 
currently under integration/test/csit into its own repo: integration/csit

This changeover should be completed by end of this week.

Thanks,
Gary




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12704): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12704
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26337100/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] CSIT repo relocation

[Gary Wu]

Yes, that’s the approach, except that it’s not just a simple copy; there are a 
lot of relative paths that need to be adjusted.  The verify jobs are being used 
to verify that the new repo setup is working correctly, so they will fail in 
the meantime.

Hopefully everything will be resolved soon.

Thanks,
Gary

From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D [mailto:bf1...@att.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 11:55 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Gary Wu ; DRAGOSH, PAM 

Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [integration] CSIT repo relocation

Cant we copy instead of move so that we dont break verify jobs ?

Brian


From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of 
Gary Wu
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 2:49 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; DRAGOSH, 
PAM mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] CSIT repo relocation

Yes, they will be failing until the migration is fully completed; hopefully by 
end of this week.

Thanks,
Gary

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Pamela Dragosh
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 11:43 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] CSIT repo relocation

Gary,

So now all our verify jobs are failed. Will the triggered CSIT jobs also fail?

Pam

From: mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> on 
behalf of Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Reply-To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, 
"gary.i...@huawei.com<mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>" 
mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Date: Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 1:23 PM
To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [integration] CSIT repo relocation

Hi all,

To help facilitate the branching of CSIT tests, we will be moving everything 
currently under integration/test/csit into its own repo: integration/csit

This changeover should be completed by end of this week.

Thanks,
Gary




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12707): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12707
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26337100/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] CSIT repo relocation

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

The migration of CSIT to the new integration/csit repo has been completed.  
Please use this new repo going forward.

Thanks,
Gary

_
From: Gary Wu
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 10:24 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [integration] CSIT repo relocation


Hi all,

To help facilitate the branching of CSIT tests, we will be moving everything 
currently under integration/test/csit into its own repo: integration/csit

This changeover should be completed by end of this week.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12715): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12715
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26337100/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Remove unused Beijing Jenkins jobs

[Gary Wu]

Hi PTLs,

There are still a large number of Jenkins jobs building beijing artifacts 
daily.  If you no longer need them, please remove the unused beijing jobs from 
Jenkins so we can lighten the load.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12735): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12735
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26378268/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Scheduling of Daily Jobs

[Gary Wu]

Hi PTLs,

Currently all of the Daily Jenkins jobs (Java/Docker release jobs) are 
scheduled for around noon UTC (8 AM Eastern), which imposes severe resource 
contention on nexus and nexus3 for the next several hours and causing some of 
them to fail due to timeouts.

To fix this, I will be submitting a change to spread the load throughout the 
day instead of having them all run at the same time.  Please let me know if you 
have any concerns.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12737): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12737
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26378993/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] Scheduling of Daily Jobs

[Gary Wu]

Hi Victor,

Gerrit was migrated to AWS on Friday.  I’m guessing that git.onap.org might not 
have been updated accordingly to reflect that change.  Please log a ticket with 
LF helpdesk.

Thanks,
Gary

From: Morales, Victor [mailto:victor.mora...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2018 8:14 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Gary Wu 
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Scheduling of Daily Jobs

Hey Gary,

I have some patchsets [1] that their changes are not merged into its 
repository.  They have merged status in Gerrit and Jenkins are not showing any 
building or merging error[2] but they’re not reflected in git.onap.org[3]. Do 
you know how can I fix this? Or retry again? I’ve tried with “please release” 
and “recheck” Gerrit comments but they’re in same status.

Thanks
Victor Morales

[1] 
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/q/owner:victor.morales%2540intel.com+status:merged+after:2018-09-28
[2] 
https://jenkins.onap.org/view/multicloud/job/multicloud-k8s-master-merge-golang/
[3] https://git.onap.org/multicloud/k8s/


From: mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> on 
behalf of Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Reply-To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, Gary Wu 
mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Date: Friday, September 28, 2018 at 10:29 AM
To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: [onap-discuss] Scheduling of Daily Jobs

Hi PTLs,

Currently all of the Daily Jenkins jobs (Java/Docker release jobs) are 
scheduled for around noon UTC (8 AM Eastern), which imposes severe resource 
contention on nexus and nexus3 for the next several hours and causing some of 
them to fail due to timeouts.

To fix this, I will be submitting a change to spread the load throughout the 
day instead of having them all run at the same time.  Please let me know if you 
have any concerns.

Thanks,
Gary




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12770): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12770
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26378993/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Anyone using ONAP-vCPE tenant?

[Gary Wu]

Is anyone actively using the ONAP-vCPE tenant in Wind River lab?

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12791): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12791
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26660217/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] Anyone using ONAP-vCPE tenant?

[Gary Wu]

Yes, that would be great.  Thanks!

-Gary

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Multanen, Eric W
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 10:49 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Gary Wu 
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Anyone using ONAP-vCPE tenant?

I don't believe any of us are at the moment.  I can delete a bunch of the 
stacks (I assume you're looking to free up resources).

Eric

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Gary Wu
Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 9:59 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: [onap-discuss] Anyone using ONAP-vCPE tenant?

Is anyone actively using the ONAP-vCPE tenant in Wind River lab?

Thanks,
Gary




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12794): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12794
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26660217/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #61676] gerrit down

[Gary Wu]

It seems like nexus and nexus3 are suffering severe congestion right now, so 
the jobs are spending a long time trying to download artifacts.

Maybe we should consider migrating those systems to AWS as well?

Thanks,
Gary

-Original Message-
From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Pamela Dragosh
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 10:12 AM
To: onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #61676] gerrit down

This just started this morning. Seems to have been resolved as folks can now 
submit changes. 

Nobody hard codes any IP address, their environments haven’t changed in months. 
These were separate firewalls.

But jenkins is really, really slow today and failing to finish verify and merge 
jobs.

Pam

On 10/2/18, 11:49 AM, "Andrew Grimberg via RT" 
 wrote:

On 10/02/2018 06:56 AM, pdrag...@research.att.com via RT wrote:
> 
> It seems that multiple folks on my team across the US cannot submit a
> gerrit review. It either hangs or gives a connection refused.
> 

Greetings Pam,

Is this a problem that people have been having (and are still having)
since the maintenance of Gerrit on Friday?

If so, it sounds like there's possibly corporate firewalls blocking
access then as the ONAP Gerrit system is working just fine for me and
I've seen no alarms from our monitoring.

The new system is now behind an Amazon ELB and does not have hard and
firm IP addresses. My experience with these sorts of systems is that the
addresses will change with no notice and no control on our part but as
Amazon remanages the addresses in their own system.

The _current_ IP addresses are: 35.166.47.83 and 35.164.144.118

-Andy-

-- 
Andrew J Grimberg
Manager Release Engineering
The Linux Foundation








-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12795): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12795
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26661009/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] Release procedure for repos with a pom hierarchy that includes multiple war/jars per repo #logging #pomba #release

[Gary Wu]

The ONAP way of doing releases is probably different from what you'd expect.  
This is how it's typically done right now:


1.   We don't commit a change of the pom version to remove the "-SNAPSHOT" 
version; the "-SNAPSHOT" is left as-is in source control.

2.A separate daily job usually with "-version-" in the name runs a "mvn 
versions:set" to strip the "-SNAPSHOT" version at job build time, resulting in 
artifacts that are release-versioned and pushed to the nexus staging repo.

3.   The "mvn versions:set" command is typically run against the root pom, 
and is smart enough to recursively make the same change through all its 
children/subtree poms, IF the children/subtree poms are set up correctly to 
have their versions inherited from the root pom.

4.   Given the above, it is fine for the "-version-" job to do a staging 
build of multiple simultaneous artifacts from an entire tree.

This should work if all your artifact versions can be the same.  I don't know 
the specifics of your docker job, but if the above works for you on the 
Java/Maven side then maybe what you need is to run the "mvn versions:set" 
command within the docker job to strip the "-SNAPSHOT" from the poms like how 
it's done for the Java builds.

Thanks,
Gary

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Michael O'Brien
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 12:46 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: Prudence Au ; Jessica Wagantall 

Subject: [onap-discuss] Release procedure for repos with a pom hierarchy that 
includes multiple war/jars per repo #logging #pomba #release

Team,
 Bringing this up to the community because we have a couple general 
questions around how to release projects with many artifacts per repo.
 Running into an issue where I need to 1 artifact at a time but the jobs 
and my pom structure is set for a single global build.
 Prudence, Jessica and I are looking into this - adding community - if 
there are any others with my same issue.
 Either I need to flatten and disassociate my pom tree or find a way to 
build specifically at folder level - not from the root pom.xml of the repo.
Release a specific jar
https://git.onap.org/logging-analytics/tree/reference/logging-slf4j/pom.xml
instead of the default root which builds 5 jars and 1 war (leaving out the 
non-java pom projects for python, kubernetes and docker
https://git.onap.org/logging-analytics/tree/pom.xml

 We are working very closely with Jessica right now and in the past on our 
repos and now on our release of the 2 projects logging and pomba - but running 
into issues with the release job failing because I have one release job for all 
my artifacts.
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/69618/

 This is the first release of either project (pomba is new, logging has a 
deep pom structure in Casablanca)
 We are having an issue with a conflict between the release job expecting a 
single root pom.xml
Pom structure
logging-analytics (root) (pom)
+ logging-reference (pom)
+  logging-demo
+  logging-docker-root
+  logging-kubernetes
+  logging-library
+  logging-mock-service
+  logging-slf4j
+ logging-sl4fj-demo

+ logging-pylog (pom)

Jar/war dependencies

+  logging-demo

+  logging-library (can be removed)

+  logging-mock-service

+ logging-library

+ logging-slf4j

+ logging-sl4fj-demo

+ logging-sl4j

  The issue is how do we deal with projects that have multiple artifacts 
per repo (1:m)?  I may have created a special case where I use 1 repo to create 
a war and several dependent jars - where I should have requested more repos to 
keep it (1:1)
  In pomba there are several repos each with one pom and one artifact - 
this is good.
  In logging because there is only one repo - there is a tree of folders 
each with their own pom with pom, war and jar artifacts like the following

  The logging project follows a similar but different structure to 
ccsdk/slk and sdnc/oam for example - except that my root pom's parent is 
oparent.
  Ccsdk and sdnc all reference their parents to odlparent-* whether 1 or 2 
levels deep in the project.
  So I am also wondering if there are any other projects out there 
following a pom.xml structure where there is a single root with multiple levels 
of subchild poms where each level references the level above - not the same 
root level 0

  Others:
  Root
  +  child-level1 - references root
   + child-level2 - references root

   Mine:
  Root
  +  child-level1 - references root
   + child-level2 - references "child-level1"

  It is also significant whether the child/subfolder poms are pom 
artifacts or war/jar artifacts.
  I tried
-Adjusting the version (1.2.2-SNAPSHOT to 1.2.2) from the root down - this 
wo

[onap-discuss] [dcae] vescollector:1.3.1 docker image missing

[Gary Wu]

Hi DCAE team,

The vescollector:1.3.1 docker image as specified on the staging manifest is 
missing from nexus3.onap.org.  Can you help rebuild that image if that tag is 
still correct, or update the staging manifest if not?

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12801): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12801
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26676198/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] nexus and nexus3 bottleneck

[Gary Wu]

Hi helpdesk,

nexus and nexus3 have been exceedingly slow all day, which is causing many jobs 
to either take a long time or time-out outright.  Can you take a look?

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12803): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12803
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26684395/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #61706] nexus and nexus3 bottleneck

[Gary Wu]

Hi Jess,

Looks like nexus/nexus3 are again bogged down today.  Can you take a look?  
This is a showstopper.

Thanks,
Gary

-Original Message-
From: Jessica Wagantall via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 4:05 PM
To: Gary Wu 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [ONAP Helpdesk #61706] nexus and nexus3 bottleneck

Looks like there might be a noisy neighbor using up a bunch of bandwidth which 
Ryan was able to detect. 

We are escalating this to our provider now. 

thanks!
Jess

On Tue Oct 02 18:46:46 2018, jwagantall wrote:
> Thanks for reporting this Gary.
> 
> I am looking into it with Ryan.
> I also noticed little bit slower since I was running a release of 8 
> binaries at once..
> 
> I will let you know for any updates from our findings.
> 
> thanks!
> Jess
> 
> On Tue Oct 02 17:57:04 2018, gary.i...@huawei.com wrote:
> > Hi helpdesk,
> >
> > nexus and nexus3 have been exceedingly slow all day, which is 
> > causing many jobs to either take a long time or time-out outright.  
> > Can you take a look?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gary




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12818): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12818
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26718663/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #61676] gerrit down

[Gary Wu]

The use of http on port 80 seems to be defined in the distributionManagement 
block in CCSDK here: 
https://git.onap.org/ccsdk/parent/tree/odlparent/odlparent-lite/pom.xml?id=c3dde295948318a40bd1a78319e197299b47e153

Thanks,
Gary

-Original Message-
From: TIMONEY, DAN [mailto:dt5...@att.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 12:06 PM
To: onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Gildas Lanilis ; agrimb...@linuxfoundation.org; 
FREEMAN, BRIAN D ; Gary Wu ; LEFEVRE, 
CATHERINE ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [ONAP Helpdesk #61676] gerrit down

Jess,

I took a closer look at that error below.  Not only is the staging plugin using 
port 80, but it's using http, not https.  I checked my configuration and 
verified that I'm using https://nexus.onap.org   not http://nexus.onap.org.  I 
have no clue where that's coming from, unless our settings.xml in Jenkins is 
somehow messed up (I can't see that directly)

Dan

-- 
Dan Timoney
SDN-CP Development
ONAP Project Technical Lead : CCSDK and SDNC 
 
Please go to  D2 ECOMP Release Planning Wiki 
<https://wiki.web.att.com/display/DERP/D2+ECOMP+Release+Planning+Home> for D2 
ECOMP Project In-take, 2016 Release Planning, Change Management, and find key 
Release Planning Contact Information.
 

On 10/3/18, 11:26 AM, "TIMONEY, DAN"  wrote:

Jess,

I'm still seeing this problem this morning.

You ask an excellent question about port 80.  I checked my configuration 
and verified that we're using https://nexus.onap.org with no port specified - 
so it should be port 443, not 80.  This error is happening within the staging 
plugin, which I personally have been railing against for over a year now ... 
this is just the latest in a series of problems with that wonderful plugin, the 
others being:

1) It occasionally loses track of which is the latest version of a jar 
file (which I think Andrew created a workaround for last year).
2) For zip files (which we use as installation bundles), if you try to 
pull a specific version from the staging repository, you'll consistently get 
the very first copy ever pushed, not the latest.  You can see that actually if 
you look at the artifacts in the nexus web page  - for jar files, you'll see a 
list of autogenerated repos but for zip files you'll only see the first.

So, it looks like yet another issue in the staging plugin  if you don't 
explicitly provide a port, it defaults to 80 even for https, which is just 
plain wrong.

I'll try seeing if I can get around this by explicitly setting the port to 
443 in the staging url, but if that's the problem ,we should really get 
Sonatype to fix it.  

Dan
-- 
Dan Timoney
SDN-CP Development
ONAP Project Technical Lead : CCSDK and SDNC 
 
Please go to  D2 ECOMP Release Planning Wiki 
<https://wiki.web.att.com/display/DERP/D2+ECOMP+Release+Planning+Home> for D2 
ECOMP Project In-take, 2016 Release Planning, Change Management, and find key 
Release Planning Contact Information.
 

On 10/2/18, 6:49 PM, "Jessica Wagantall via RT" 
 wrote:

Hi Dan, 

Looking into this issue. 

Why are we using port 80? : 

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__nexus.onap.org-3A80&d=DwIDaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Ms-DNhR23dO4sQFfYRm4ow&m=9BsdxCi7UWgNWFeVZnwuitt1LsK6wdh0bsG3J-s2mTE&s=8qfiU_gE41IyWoPbuFI1liIVFnxglXe9ybT4xnDI4Vo&e=:

Nothing changed for Nexus servers on Friday. The only migration that 
happened was for Gerrit. 

thanks a ton!
Jess

On Tue Oct 02 15:03:09 2018, dt5...@att.com wrote:
> All,
> 
> FYI - I hoped to work around this issue by commenting out a module
> that isn't critical from our build, hoping to reduce load.  Didn't
> help - just moved the problem to someplace else.
> 
> Here's the error I'm getting:
> 
> 18:43:05 [INFO] Installing /w/workspace/sdnc-oam-master-merge-
> java/pom.xml to /w/workspace/sdnc-oam-master-merge-
> java/admportal/target/nexus-staging/deferred/org/onap/sdnc/oam/sdnc-
> oam/1.4.0-SNAPSHOT/sdnc-oam-1.4.0-SNAPSHOT.pom
> 18:43:05 [INFO] Deploying remotely...
>  18:43:05 [INFO] Bulk deploying locally gathered artifacts from
> directory:
> 18:43:05 [INFO]  * Bulk deploying locally gathered snapshot artifacts
> 18:45:14 Oct 02, 2018 6:45:14 PM
> 
org.apache.maven.wagon.providers.http.httpclient.impl.execchain.RetryExec
> execute
> 18:45:14 INFO: I/O exception (java.net.SocketException) caught when
> processing request to 
{}->https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2

[onap-discuss] [integration] integration/csit has been branched

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

The integration/csit repo has been branched.  Please feel free to start working 
on post-casablanca CSIT test changes there.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12824): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12824
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26727945/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [integration] Who is using SB-01?

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

Who is using the Integration-SB-01 tenant in Wind River?  If you need an 
Integration tenant to run ONAP, please check with the Integration team first, 
and then put your name against your assigned tenant here: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Test+Labs so that we know whom to 
contact.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12922): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12922
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27158071/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] Who is using SB-01?

[Gary Wu]

Since no one responded, we will be shutting down the SB-01 instance in a couple 
of hours.

Thanks,
Gary

_
From: Gary Wu
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 8:26 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [integration] Who is using SB-01?


Hi all,

Who is using the Integration-SB-01 tenant in Wind River?  If you need an 
Integration tenant to run ONAP, please check with the Integration team first, 
and then put your name against your assigned tenant here: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Test+Labs so that we know whom to 
contact.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12955): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12955
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27158071/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Reminder to update both docker manifests

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

Reminder:  As you release your docker images, please be sure to update both 
docker manifests (release and staging).

As an example, if you release 1.3.0, please update the release manifest to 
1.3.0, and also remember to bump the staging manifest to the next version (e.g. 
1.3.1-STAGING-latest).

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12972): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12972
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27261332/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [integration] Beijing images in Casablanca Release manifest

[Gary Wu]

The following entries in the Release docker manifest have not been updated 
since Beijing.

If any entry below is no longer applicable for Casablanca, pleased it from the 
manifest.
Otherwise, unless you're intending to deliver the same Beijing docker image for 
Casablanca, please release your new images ASAP and update the manifests 
accordingly.

onap/aaf/sms,2.0.0
onap/aaf/smsquorumclient,2.0.0
onap/aai/esr-gui,1.1.0
onap/aai/esr-server,1.1.0
onap/admportal-sdnc-image,1.3.4
onap/cli,2.0.2
onap/msb/msb_apigateway,1.1.0
onap/msb/msb_discovery,1.1.0
onap/multicloud/vio-vesagent,1.0.0
onap/music/cassandra_music,3.0.0
onap/music/music,2.5.3
onap/oom/kube2msb,1.1.0
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.deployments.bootstrap,1.1.3
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.deployments.redis-cluster-container,1.0.0
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.deployments.tca-cdap-container,1.1.0
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.platform.cdapbroker,4.1.0
onap/sdc-api-tests,1.2.0
onap/sdc-backend,1.2.0
onap/sdc-backend-init,1.2.0
onap/sdc-cassandra,1.2.0
onap/sdc-cassandra-init,1.2.0
onap/sdc-elasticsearch,1.2.0
onap/sdc-frontend,1.2.0
onap/sdc-init-elasticsearch,1.2.0
onap/sdc-kibana,1.2.0
onap/sdc-onboard-backend,1.2.0
onap/sdc-onboard-cassandra-init,1.2.0
onap/sdc-simulator,1.2.0
onap/sdc-ui-tests,1.2.0
onap/sdc/sdc-workflow-designer,1.1.0
onap/sniroemulator,1.0.0
onap/usecase-ui,1.1.1
onap/usecase-ui/usecase-ui-server,1.1.1
onap/vfc/nfvo/svnfm/nokia,1.1.0
onap/vnfsdk/ice,1.1.0
onap/vnfsdk/vnftest,1.1.0


Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13113): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13113
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27400125/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Images missing from Release manifest

[Gary Wu]

The following docker images only exist in the staging manifest, with no 
corresponding entries in the release manifest.  Please release them ASAP and 
add the respective entries to the release manifest.

onap/aaf/aaf_cass,2.1.5-SNAPSHOT
onap/aaf/aaf_config,2.1.5-SNAPSHOT
onap/aaf/abrmd,latest
onap/aaf/distcenter,latest
onap/aaf/testcaservice,latest
onap/ccsdk-controllerblueprints,latest
onap/ccsdk-odl-image,0.3-STAGING-latest
onap/dmaap/kafka01101,0.0.1
onap/fproxy,2.1-STAGING-latest
onap/multicloud/azure,1.2.1-SNAPSHOT
onap/music/prom,1.0.5-latest
onap/network-discovery,latest
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.services.heartbeat,1.3.0
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.services.mapper.vesadapter.snmpmapper,latest
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.services.mapper.vesadapter.universalvesadaptor,latest
onap/pomba-network-discovery-context-builder,latest
onap/rproxy,2.1-STAGING-latest
onap/service-decomposition,latest
onap/so/sdc-controller,1.3.0-STAGING-latest
onap/so/so-monitoring,latest
onap/spike,1.0-STAGING-latest
onap/tproxy-config,2.1-STAGING-latest
onap/workflow-backend,latest
onap/workflow-frontend,latest
onap/workflow-init,1.3.0-SNAPSHOT

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13114): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13114
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27400132/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

[Gary Wu]

Hi Steve,

After pulling the latest SO staging images, we’re now getting the following 
errors.  Might be related to the hard-coding of “att-aic” or IP address of 
“1.2.3.4”?  Where can we configure SO to use a different cloud owner?

http://so.onap:8080 "GET 
/onap/so/infra/orchestrationRequests/v6/01de2256-fdcc-4c9f-b7cc-be6b04dd2d06 
HTTP/1.1" 200 2794

Arguments: [ 
'{"request":{"requestId":"01de2256-fdcc-4c9f-b7cc-be6b04dd2d06","startTime":"Mon,
 22 Oct 2018 17:02:32 
GMT","requestScope":"vfModule","requestType":"createInstance","requestDetails":{"modelInfo":{"modelCustomizationName":"23461bd9C51544a3Ae72..base_vfw..module-0","modelInvariantId":"15724172-62e9-4ef8-b57a-31c166b7b04c","modelType":"vfModule","modelName":"23461bd9C51544a3Ae72..base_vfw..module-0","modelVersion":"1","modelCustomizationUuid":"0f2d6f1a-2d1a-454c-a11b-d41b8dcea0df","modelVersionId":"4402746d-6bea-444d-a61a-008839e123f4","modelCustomizationId":"0f2d6f1a-2d1a-454c-a11b-d41b8dcea0df","modelUuid":"4402746d-6bea-444d-a61a-008839e123f4","modelInvariantUuid":"15724172-62e9-4ef8-b57a-31c166b7b04c","modelInstanceName":"23461bd9C51544a3Ae72..base_vfw..module-0"},"requestInfo":{"source":"VID","instanceName":"Vfmodule_Ete_vFW_b96e3a89-fc1f-4f8c-b5a3-e7fcb21e1d38","suppressRollback":false,"requestorId":"demo"},"relatedInstanceList":[{"relatedInstance":{"instanceId":"58b07f74-9671-41f1-8c4e-14efcbe6bfb0","modelInfo":{"modelInvariantId":"1fa1465c-65b4-437e-8c3a-93d075b8c4af","modelType":"service","modelName":"vFW
 2018-10-22 
16:58:04","modelVersion":"1.0","modelVersionId":"40f9ff89-8f74-4a40-aa62-98f1511656bd","modelUuid":"40f9ff89-8f74-4a40-aa62-98f1511656bd","modelInvariantUuid":"1fa1465c-65b4-437e-8c3a-93d075b8c4af"}}},{"relatedInstance":{"instanceId":"a2d09fed-4a98-4aff-8a5d-950e67b3565d","modelInfo":{"modelCustomizationName":"23461bd9-c515-44a3-ae72
 
0","modelInvariantId":"2221b622-ab08-46e2-9f3b-3d36db32cd56","modelType":"vnf","modelName":"23461bd9-c515-44a3-ae72","modelVersion":"1.0","modelCustomizationUuid":"06f3330e-8ad4-46ce-8ed6-0e5353b0e79a","modelVersionId":"b4a92b67-f709-4e56-930d-790fd5337424","modelCustomizationId":"06f3330e-8ad4-46ce-8ed6-0e5353b0e79a","modelUuid":"b4a92b67-f709-4e56-930d-790fd5337424","modelInvariantUuid":"2221b622-ab08-46e2-9f3b-3d36db32cd56","modelInstanceName":"23461bd9-c515-44a3-ae72
 
0"}}}],"cloudConfiguration":{"tenantId":"ebb0ea7144004bacac1e39ff23105fa7","cloudOwner":"att-aic","lcpCloudRegionId":"RegionOne"},"requestParameters":{"testApi":"VNF_API","usePreload":true}},"instanceReferences":{"serviceInstanceId":"58b07f74-9671-41f1-8c4e-14efcbe6bfb0","vnfInstanceId":"a2d09fed-4a98-4aff-8a5d-950e67b3565d","vfModuleInstanceId":"64b092d3-fc50-403f-9256-af7f06d5bc3e","vfModuleInstanceName":"Vfmodule_Ete_vFW_b96e3a89-fc1f-4f8c-b5a3-e7fcb21e1d38","requestorId":"demo"},"requestStatus":{"requestState":"FAILED","statusMessage":"Received
 vfModuleException from VnfAdapter: category=\'INTERNAL\' 
message=\'org.onap.so.openstack.exceptions.MsoIOException: Connect to 
1.2.3.4:5000 [/1.2.3.4] failed: Operation timed out (Connection timed out)\' 
rolledBack=\'true\'","percentProgress":100,"finishTime":"Mon, 22 Oct 2018 
17:04:57 GMT"}}}' | 'FAILED' ]

'{"request":{"requestId":"01de2256-fdcc-4c9f-b7cc-be6b04dd2d06","startTime":"Mon,
 22 Oct 2018 17:02:32 
GMT","requestScope":"vfModule","requestType":"createInstance","requestDetails":{"modelInfo":{"modelCustomizationName":"23461bd9C51544a3Ae72..base_vfw..module-0","modelInvariantId":"15724172-62e9-4ef8-b57a-31c166b7b04c","modelType":"vfModule","modelName":"23461bd9C51544a3Ae72..base_vfw..module-0","modelVersion":"1","modelCustomizationUuid":"0f2d6f1a-2d1a-454c-a11b-d41b8dcea0df","modelVersionId":"4402746d-6bea-444d-a61a-008839e123f4","modelCustomizationId":"0f2d6f1a-2d1a-454c-a11b-d41b8dcea0df","modelUuid":"4402746d-6bea-444d-a61a-008839e123f4","modelInvariantUuid":"15724172-62e9-4ef8-b57a-31c166b7b04c","modelInstanceName":"23461bd9C51544a3Ae72..base_vfw..module-0"},"requestInfo":{"source":"VID","instanceName":"Vfmodule_Ete_vFW_b96e3a89-fc1f-4f8c-b5a3-e7fcb21e1d38","suppressRollback":false,"requestorId":"demo"},"relatedInstanceList":[{"relatedInstance":{"instanceId":"58b07f74-9671-41f1-8c4e-14efcbe6bfb0","modelInfo":{"modelInvariantId":"1fa1465c-65b4-437e-8c3a-93d075b8c4af","modelType":"service","modelName":"vFW
 2018-10-22 
16:58:04","modelVersion":"1.0","modelVersionId":"40f9ff89-8f74-4a40-aa62-98f1511656bd","modelUuid":"40f9ff89-8f74-4a40-aa62-98f1511656bd","modelInvariantUuid":"1fa1465c-65b4-437e-8c3a-93d075b8c4af"}}},{"relatedInstance":{"instanceId":"a2d09fed-4a98-4aff-8a5d-950e67b3565d","modelInfo":{"modelCustomizationName":"23461bd9-c515-44a3-ae72
 
0","modelInvariantId":"2221b622-ab08-46e2-9f3b-3d36db32cd56","modelType":"vnf","modelName":"23461bd9-c515-44a3-ae72","modelVersion":"1.0","modelCustomizationUuid":"06f3330e-8ad4-46ce-8ed6-0e5353b0e79a","modelVersionId":"b4a92b67-f709-4e56-930d-790fd5337424","modelCustomizationId":"06f3330e-8ad4-46ce-8ed6-0e5353b0

[onap-discuss] [integration][ptl] Beijing images in Casablanca Release manifest

[Gary Wu]

Hi PTLs,

The following entries in the release manifest have not been updated for 
Casablanca.  If you are intending to deliver the same Beijing images for 
Casablanca, can you reply to this thread to confirm?  Otherwise, can you 
provide an ETA for when your Casablanca images will be released?


c033a9ef version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gildas 
Lanilis 5 months ago18) onap/aai/esr-gui,1.1.0
c033a9ef version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gildas 
Lanilis 5 months ago19) 
onap/aai/esr-server,1.1.0
c7931b9f version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (jmac  
 5 months ago20) onap/admportal-sdnc-image,1.3.4
783526e4 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gary Wu   
 5 months ago57) onap/oom/kube2msb,1.1.0
5ae67b78 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gary Wu   
 5 months ago64) 
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.deployments.bootstrap,1.1.3
6af0101d version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Lusheng Ji
 5 months ago68) 
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.deployments.redis-cluster-container,1.0.0
6af0101d version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Lusheng Ji
 5 months ago69) 
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.deployments.tca-cdap-container,1.1.0
6af0101d version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Lusheng Ji
 5 months ago71) 
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.platform.cdapbroker,4.1.0
2f55cbd7 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gary Wu   
 5 months ago89) onap/sdc-api-tests,1.2.0
2f55cbd7 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gary Wu   
 5 months ago90) onap/sdc-backend,1.2.0
2f55cbd7 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gary Wu   
 5 months ago91) onap/sdc-backend-init,1.2.0
2f55cbd7 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gary Wu   
 5 months ago92) onap/sdc-cassandra,1.2.0
2f55cbd7 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gary Wu   
 5 months ago93) onap/sdc-cassandra-init,1.2.0
2f55cbd7 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gary Wu   
 5 months ago94) onap/sdc-elasticsearch,1.2.0
2f55cbd7 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gary Wu   
 5 months ago95) onap/sdc-frontend,1.2.0
2f55cbd7 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gary Wu   
 5 months ago96) 
onap/sdc-init-elasticsearch,1.2.0
2f55cbd7 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gary Wu   
 5 months ago97) onap/sdc-kibana,1.2.0
2f55cbd7 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gary Wu   
 5 months ago98) onap/sdc-onboard-backend,1.2.0
2f55cbd7 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gary Wu   
 5 months ago99) 
onap/sdc-onboard-cassandra-init,1.2.0
2f55cbd7 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gary Wu   
 5 months ago   100) onap/sdc-simulator,1.2.0
2f55cbd7 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gary Wu   
 5 months ago   101) onap/sdc-ui-tests,1.2.0
345d5756 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Michael Lando 
 5 months ago   102) 
onap/sdc/sdc-workflow-designer,1.1.0
ca86676c version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Gary Wu   
 5 months ago   108) onap/sniroemulator,1.0.0
538ca588 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (zhangab   
 5 months ago   118) onap/usecase-ui,1.1.1
538ca588 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (zhangab   
 5 months ago   119) 
onap/usecase-ui/usecase-ui-server,1.1.1
e5d27485 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Chris Donley  
 5 months ago   140) onap/vnfsdk/ice,1.1.0
e5d27485 version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv (Chris Donley  
 5 months ago   143) onap/vnfsdk/vnftest,1.1.0


Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13184): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13184
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27500675/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

[Gary Wu]

Confirmed that even with the overrides properly set at the so-openstack-adapter 
level, it’s still timing out on connection to 1.2.3.4:5000.  SO is behaving 
like the 1.2.3.4:5000 is hard-coded.

Thanks,
Gary

From: SMOKOWSKI, STEVEN [mailto:ss8...@att.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 10:38 AM
To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D ; Gary Wu ; 
'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' ; Yunxia Chen 

Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

No that should work, you can check the database, as the yaml is stored into the 
catalog-db tables.  Ensure the substitution worked?

Thanks

-Steve


From: "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" mailto:bf1...@att.com>>
Date: Monday, October 22, 2018 at 1:34 PM
To: 'Gary Wu' mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>, 
"'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org'" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, "SMOKOWSKI, 
STEVEN" mailto:ss8...@att.com>>, 'Yunxia Chen' 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

Integration-override.yaml has to override the values in so-openstack-adapter so 
perhaps it needs to be indented from so-openstack-adapter not just so ?

Brian


From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 1:30 PM
To: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; SMOKOWSKI, 
STEVEN mailto:ss8...@att.com>>; Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

Gary,

That should be in the integration-override.yaml perhaps the json path changed 
with the vnf-adapter (override.yaml)
We can always change it byhand in make so, make onap and then redploy SO.

Brian

so:
  config:
openStackUserName: "demo"
openStackKeyStoneUrl: "http://10.12.25.2:5000";
openStackEncryptedPasswordHere: "bbaef6cd76625ab9eb60deedeae7dbb9"

vs
cloud_config:
  identity_services:
RAX_KEYSTONE:
  identity_url: "https://identity.api.rackspacecloud.com/v2.0";
  mso_id: "RACKSPACE_ACCOUNT_ID"
  mso_pass: "RACKSPACE_ACCOUNT_APIKEY"
  admin_tenant: "{{ .Values.config.openStackServiceTenantName }}"
  member_role: "admin"
  tenant_metadata: true
  identity_server_type: "KEYSTONE"
  identity_authentication_type: "RACKSPACE_APIKEY"
DEFAULT_KEYSTONE:
  identity_url: "{{ .Values.config.openStackKeyStoneUrl }}"
  mso_id: "{{ .Values.config.openStackUserName }}"
  mso_pass: "{{ .Values.config.openStackEncryptedPasswordHere }}"
  admin_tenant: "{{ .Values.config.openStackServiceTenantName }}"
  member_role: "admin"
  tenant_metadata: true
  identity_server_type: "KEYSTONE"
  identity_authentication_type: "USERNAME_PASSWORD"

~/oom/kubernetes/so/charts/so-openstack-adapter: values.yaml
...
config:
  openStackUserName: "vnf_user"
  openStackRegion: "RegionOne"
  openStackKeyStoneUrl: "http://1.2.3.4:5000/v2.0";
  openStackServiceTenantName: "service"
  openStackEncryptedPasswordHere: "c124921a3a0efbe579782cde8227681e"
  openStackTenantId: "d570c718cbc545029f40e50b75eb13df"



From: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 1:12 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; SMOKOWSKI, 
STEVEN mailto:ss8...@att.com>>; FREEMAN, BRIAN D 
mailto:bf1...@att.com>>; Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

Hi Steve,

After pulling the latest SO staging images, we’re now getting the following 
errors.  Might be related to the hard-coding of “att-aic” or IP address of 
“1.2.3.4”?  Where can we configure SO to use a different cloud owner?

http://so.onap:8080<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__so.onap-3A8080&d=DwQGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=e3d1ehx3DI5AoMgDmi2Fzw&m=eT0V7lP-NyPi_C3HYeT3IzBpMqMODaYlG6Tu6flfzXA&s=PE84kZn-UNGMVpQ8Sx-VZsV4sdVPuGbMIWGKQen2cEM&e=>
 "GET 
/onap/so/infra/orchestrationRequests/v6/01de2256-fdcc-4c9f-b7cc-be6b04dd2d06 
HTTP/1.1" 200 2794

Arguments: [ 
'{"request":{"requestId":"01de2256-fdcc-4c9f-b7cc-be6b04dd2d06","startTime":"Mon,
 22 Oct 2018 17:02:32 
GMT","requestScope":"vfModule","requestType":"createInstance","requestDetails":{"modelInfo":{"modelCustomizationName":"23461bd9C51544a3Ae72..base_vfw..module-0","modelInvariantId":"15724172-62e9-4ef8-b57a-31c166b7b04c","modelType":"vfModule",

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

[Gary Wu]

Which table should I be looking at?

Thanks,
Gary

From: SMOKOWSKI, STEVEN [mailto:ss8...@att.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 12:51 PM
To: Gary Wu ; FREEMAN, BRIAN D ; 
'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' ; Yunxia Chen 

Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

It reads the database, what is in the database?  The integration-yaml only 
seeds the database,  unless you wipe it it will retain the original values.

Thanks

-Steve


From: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Date: Monday, October 22, 2018 at 3:47 PM
To: "SMOKOWSKI, STEVEN" mailto:ss8...@att.com>>, "FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D" mailto:bf1...@att.com>>, 
"'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org'" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

Confirmed that even with the overrides properly set at the so-openstack-adapter 
level, it’s still timing out on connection to 1.2.3.4:5000.  SO is behaving 
like the 1.2.3.4:5000 is hard-coded.

Thanks,
Gary

From: SMOKOWSKI, STEVEN [mailto:ss8...@att.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 10:38 AM
To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D mailto:bf1...@att.com>>; Gary Wu 
mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>; 
'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

No that should work, you can check the database, as the yaml is stored into the 
catalog-db tables.  Ensure the substitution worked?

Thanks

-Steve


From: "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" mailto:bf1...@att.com>>
Date: Monday, October 22, 2018 at 1:34 PM
To: 'Gary Wu' mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>, 
"'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org'" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, "SMOKOWSKI, 
STEVEN" mailto:ss8...@att.com>>, 'Yunxia Chen' 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

Integration-override.yaml has to override the values in so-openstack-adapter so 
perhaps it needs to be indented from so-openstack-adapter not just so ?

Brian


From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 1:30 PM
To: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; SMOKOWSKI, 
STEVEN mailto:ss8...@att.com>>; Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

Gary,

That should be in the integration-override.yaml perhaps the json path changed 
with the vnf-adapter (override.yaml)
We can always change it byhand in make so, make onap and then redploy SO.

Brian

so:
  config:
openStackUserName: "demo"
openStackKeyStoneUrl: 
"http://10.12.25.2:5000<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__10.12.25.2-3A5000&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=shs6nPzThSiGJml9VXN0Eg&m=ggFGFA5CIke01nEQuytHAg-4AXozRBzMp2d2MH6r-pI&s=uQV7QjeJ8e7m0xwYVigGzNXKPJ8ntknK7fHQ-6Znw3c&e=>"
openStackEncryptedPasswordHere: "bbaef6cd76625ab9eb60deedeae7dbb9"

vs
cloud_config:
  identity_services:
RAX_KEYSTONE:
  identity_url: 
"https://identity.api.rackspacecloud.com/v2.0<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__identity.api.rackspacecloud.com_v2.0&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=shs6nPzThSiGJml9VXN0Eg&m=ggFGFA5CIke01nEQuytHAg-4AXozRBzMp2d2MH6r-pI&s=Zx2b7_44Ramz1coYOpqrcue3yl4y3GveNoYxTDPCqGg&e=>"
  mso_id: "RACKSPACE_ACCOUNT_ID"
  mso_pass: "RACKSPACE_ACCOUNT_APIKEY"
  admin_tenant: "{{ .Values.config.openStackServiceTenantName }}"
  member_role: "admin"
  tenant_metadata: true
  identity_server_type: "KEYSTONE"
  identity_authentication_type: "RACKSPACE_APIKEY"
DEFAULT_KEYSTONE:
  identity_url: "{{ .Values.config.openStackKeyStoneUrl }}"
  mso_id: "{{ .Values.config.openStackUserName }}"
  mso_pass: "{{ .Values.config.openStackEncryptedPasswordHere }}"
  admin_tenant: "{{ .Values.config.openStackServiceTenantName }}"
  member_role: "admin"
  tenant_metadata: true
  identity_server_type: "KEYSTONE"
  identity_authentication_type: "USERNAME_PASSWORD"

~/oom/kubernetes/so/charts/so-openstack-adapter: values.yaml
...
config:
  openStackUserName: "vnf_user"
  openStackRegion: "RegionOne"
  openStackKeyStoneUrl: 
"http://1.2.3.4:5000/v2.0<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__1.2.3.4-3A5000_v2.0&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=shs6nPzThSiGJml9VXN0Eg&m=ggFGFA5CIke

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

[Gary Wu]

Looks like the DB contains the wrong URL.  I’ll try a clean redeploy of SO 
again and see what happens.

Thanks,
Gary

From: SMOKOWSKI, STEVEN [mailto:ss8...@att.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 12:58 PM
To: Gary Wu ; FREEMAN, BRIAN D ; 
'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' ; Yunxia Chen 

Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

Catalogdb.cloud_sites and catalogdb.identity_services.

Thanks

-Steve


From: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Date: Monday, October 22, 2018 at 3:55 PM
To: "SMOKOWSKI, STEVEN" mailto:ss8...@att.com>>, "FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D" mailto:bf1...@att.com>>, 
"'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org'" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

Which table should I be looking at?

Thanks,
Gary

From: SMOKOWSKI, STEVEN [mailto:ss8...@att.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 12:51 PM
To: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>; FREEMAN, BRIAN 
D mailto:bf1...@att.com>>; 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

It reads the database, what is in the database?  The integration-yaml only 
seeds the database,  unless you wipe it it will retain the original values.

Thanks

-Steve


From: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Date: Monday, October 22, 2018 at 3:47 PM
To: "SMOKOWSKI, STEVEN" mailto:ss8...@att.com>>, "FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D" mailto:bf1...@att.com>>, 
"'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org'" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

Confirmed that even with the overrides properly set at the so-openstack-adapter 
level, it’s still timing out on connection to 1.2.3.4:5000.  SO is behaving 
like the 1.2.3.4:5000 is hard-coded.

Thanks,
Gary

From: SMOKOWSKI, STEVEN [mailto:ss8...@att.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 10:38 AM
To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D mailto:bf1...@att.com>>; Gary Wu 
mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>; 
'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

No that should work, you can check the database, as the yaml is stored into the 
catalog-db tables.  Ensure the substitution worked?

Thanks

-Steve


From: "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" mailto:bf1...@att.com>>
Date: Monday, October 22, 2018 at 1:34 PM
To: 'Gary Wu' mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>, 
"'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org'" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, "SMOKOWSKI, 
STEVEN" mailto:ss8...@att.com>>, 'Yunxia Chen' 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

Integration-override.yaml has to override the values in so-openstack-adapter so 
perhaps it needs to be indented from so-openstack-adapter not just so ?

Brian


From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 1:30 PM
To: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; SMOKOWSKI, 
STEVEN mailto:ss8...@att.com>>; Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

Gary,

That should be in the integration-override.yaml perhaps the json path changed 
with the vnf-adapter (override.yaml)
We can always change it byhand in make so, make onap and then redploy SO.

Brian

so:
  config:
openStackUserName: "demo"
openStackKeyStoneUrl: 
"http://10.12.25.2:5000<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__10.12.25.2-3A5000&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=shs6nPzThSiGJml9VXN0Eg&m=ggFGFA5CIke01nEQuytHAg-4AXozRBzMp2d2MH6r-pI&s=uQV7QjeJ8e7m0xwYVigGzNXKPJ8ntknK7fHQ-6Znw3c&e=>"
openStackEncryptedPasswordHere: "bbaef6cd76625ab9eb60deedeae7dbb9"

vs
cloud_config:
  identity_services:
RAX_KEYSTONE:
  identity_url: 
"https://identity.api.rackspacecloud.com/v2.0<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__identity.api.rackspacecloud.com_v2.0&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=shs6nPzThSiGJml9VXN0Eg&m=ggFGFA5CIke01nEQuytHAg-4AXozRBzMp2d2MH6r-pI&s=Zx2b7_44Ramz1coYOpqrcue3yl4y3GveNoYxTDPCqGg&e=>"
  mso_id: "RACKSPACE_ACCOUNT_ID"
  mso_pass: "RACKSPACE_ACCOUNT_APIKEY"
  admin_tenant: "{{ .Values.config.openStackServiceTenantName }}"
  member_role: &qu

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

[Gary Wu]

A clean redeploy of SO has put in the right URL to the DB, and gotten us past 
that error.  Thanks.

Now we’re getting:

Exception during create VF 0 : Stack error (CREATE_FAILED): Resource CREATE 
failed: EntityNotFound: resources.vsn_private_1_port: The Resource (PUT THE 
ONAP SECURITY GROUP HERE) could not be found. - stack successfully deleted

This is probably a robot issue.  Will have to dig around.

Thanks,
Gary

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Gary Wu
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 1:03 PM
To: SMOKOWSKI, STEVEN ; FREEMAN, BRIAN D ; 
'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' ; Yunxia Chen 

Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

Looks like the DB contains the wrong URL.  I’ll try a clean redeploy of SO 
again and see what happens.

Thanks,
Gary

From: SMOKOWSKI, STEVEN [mailto:ss8...@att.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 12:58 PM
To: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>; FREEMAN, BRIAN 
D mailto:bf1...@att.com>>; 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

Catalogdb.cloud_sites and catalogdb.identity_services.

Thanks

-Steve


From: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Date: Monday, October 22, 2018 at 3:55 PM
To: "SMOKOWSKI, STEVEN" mailto:ss8...@att.com>>, "FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D" mailto:bf1...@att.com>>, 
"'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org'" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

Which table should I be looking at?

Thanks,
Gary

From: SMOKOWSKI, STEVEN [mailto:ss8...@att.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 12:51 PM
To: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>; FREEMAN, BRIAN 
D mailto:bf1...@att.com>>; 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

It reads the database, what is in the database?  The integration-yaml only 
seeds the database,  unless you wipe it it will retain the original values.

Thanks

-Steve


From: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Date: Monday, October 22, 2018 at 3:47 PM
To: "SMOKOWSKI, STEVEN" mailto:ss8...@att.com>>, "FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D" mailto:bf1...@att.com>>, 
"'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org'" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

Confirmed that even with the overrides properly set at the so-openstack-adapter 
level, it’s still timing out on connection to 1.2.3.4:5000.  SO is behaving 
like the 1.2.3.4:5000 is hard-coded.

Thanks,
Gary

From: SMOKOWSKI, STEVEN [mailto:ss8...@att.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 10:38 AM
To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D mailto:bf1...@att.com>>; Gary Wu 
mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>; 
'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

No that should work, you can check the database, as the yaml is stored into the 
catalog-db tables.  Ensure the substitution worked?

Thanks

-Steve


From: "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" mailto:bf1...@att.com>>
Date: Monday, October 22, 2018 at 1:34 PM
To: 'Gary Wu' mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>, 
"'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org'" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, "SMOKOWSKI, 
STEVEN" mailto:ss8...@att.com>>, 'Yunxia Chen' 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

Integration-override.yaml has to override the values in so-openstack-adapter so 
perhaps it needs to be indented from so-openstack-adapter not just so ?

Brian


From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 1:30 PM
To: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; SMOKOWSKI, 
STEVEN mailto:ss8...@att.com>>; Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdnc][so] Integration Working Session

Gary,

That should be in the integration-override.yaml perhaps the json path changed 
with the vnf-adapter (override.yaml)
We can always change it byhand in make so, make onap and then redploy SO.

Brian

so:
  config:
openStackUserName: "demo"
openStackKeyStoneUrl: 
"http://10.12.25.2:5000<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__10.12.25.2-3A5000&

[onap-discuss] Unstable Jenkins jobs

[Gary Wu]

Hi helpdesk,

All the Jenkins jobs keep returning Unstable status.  Can you take a look?

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13204): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13204
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27549561/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Images Missing in Release Manifest

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

The following images are used in the OOM helm charts but do not have a 
corresponding entry in the release manifest.  Can you please add the 
appropriate release images to the release manifest?

onap/aaf/aaf_cass,2.1.5-SNAPSHOT
onap/aaf/aaf_config,2.1.5-SNAPSHOT
onap/ccsdk-controllerblueprints,latest
onap/fproxy,2.1-STAGING-latest
onap/multicloud/azure,1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
onap/music/cassandra_music,3.0.0
onap/music/prom,1.0.5-latest
onap/network-discovery,latest
onap/rproxy,2.1-STAGING-latest
onap/service-decomposition,latest
onap/spike,1.0-STAGING-latest
onap/tproxy-config,2.1-STAGING-latest
onap/usecase-ui/usecase-ui-server,1.1.1

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13272): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13272
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27621523/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][portal] Portal app is in infinite Waiting: PodInitializing state

[Gary Wu]

portal-db had issues where it was taking so long to initialize that it aborted 
halfway, leaving the DB files in a corrupted state.  The quickest workaround is 
to delete the mysql directory under /dockerdata-nfs/dev-portal/ and then 
deleting the portal-db pod to allow it to redo the DB initialization.

The same issue can potentially occur for any of ONAP's mysql databases.

Thanks,
Gary

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Krzysztof Kuzmicki
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 7:32 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: Przybysz, Marcin (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) ; Pondel, 
Marek (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) ; Yunxia Chen 

Subject: [onap-discuss] [integration][portal] Portal app is in infinite 
Waiting: PodInitializing state


Hi



I have installed newest OOM staging release for Casablanca and portal app is 
not working after several undeployments and deployments of whole dev-portal 
releas.

I think that thi issue is cause by dev-portal-portal-db-config pod that doesn't 
finish successfully,

After couple of retries, when it is able to connect to dev-portal-portal-db, 
executed script doesn't introduce any changes and all inserts finish with error 
similar to :
ERROR 1046 (3D000) at line 363: No database selected

As I checked in portal-db pod following databases are available:
MariaDB [(none)]> show databases;
++
| Database   |
++
| information_schema |
| mysql  |
| performance_schema |
| test   |
++
4 rows in set (0.006 sec)

MariaDB [(none)]>

Maybe  there is some issue with portal-db initialization ?
Has anybody observed similar issue? Maybe somebody has some WA for that.

br,
Krzysztof








-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13397): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13397
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27792647/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][portal] Portal app is in infinite Waiting: PodInitializing state

[Gary Wu]

The main difference is that Wind River runs on SSDs, while TLAB runs on 
spinning disks.  So we see much heavier disk contention issues in TLAB.

Thanks,
Gary

From: TALASILA, MANOOP (MANOOP) [mailto:talas...@research.att.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 8:04 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Gary Wu ; 
krzysztof.kuzmi...@nokia.com
Cc: Przybysz, Marcin (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) ; Pondel, 
Marek (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) ; Yunxia Chen 

Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][portal] Portal app is in infinite 
Waiting: PodInitializing state

Thanks Gary for detailing the work around.

For some reason, we do not see this issue in Windriver lab environment (SB04 
instance) while doing integration/pairwise testing. There everything works.

However, we have seen this issue consistently in TLab environment. The Portal 
team is investigating to find any alternatives for avoiding the db-config pod 
initialization failures. It is tracked here - 
https://jira.onap.org/browse/PORTAL-399

Manoop

From: mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> on 
behalf of Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Reply-To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, 
"gary.i...@huawei.com<mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>" 
mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 10:50 AM
To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, 
"krzysztof.kuzmi...@nokia.com<mailto:krzysztof.kuzmi...@nokia.com>" 
mailto:krzysztof.kuzmi...@nokia.com>>
Cc: "Przybysz, Marcin (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw)" 
mailto:marcin.przyb...@nokia.com>>, "Pondel, Marek 
(Nokia - PL/Wroclaw)" mailto:marek.pon...@nokia.com>>, 
Yunxia Chen mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][portal] Portal app is in infinite 
Waiting: PodInitializing state

portal-db had issues where it was taking so long to initialize that it aborted 
halfway, leaving the DB files in a corrupted state.  The quickest workaround is 
to delete the mysql directory under /dockerdata-nfs/dev-portal/ and then 
deleting the portal-db pod to allow it to redo the DB initialization.

The same issue can potentially occur for any of ONAP’s mysql databases.

Thanks,
Gary

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Krzysztof Kuzmicki
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 7:32 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Cc: Przybysz, Marcin (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) 
mailto:marcin.przyb...@nokia.com>>; Pondel, Marek 
(Nokia - PL/Wroclaw) mailto:marek.pon...@nokia.com>>; 
Yunxia Chen mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [integration][portal] Portal app is in infinite 
Waiting: PodInitializing state


Hi



I have installed newest OOM staging release for Casablanca and portal app is 
not working after several undeployments and deployments of whole dev-portal 
releas.

I think that thi issue is cause by dev-portal-portal-db-config pod that doesn't 
finish successfully,

After couple of retries, when it is able to connect to dev-portal-portal-db, 
executed script doesn't introduce any changes and all inserts finish with error 
similar to :
ERROR 1046 (3D000) at line 363: No database selected

As I checked in portal-db pod following databases are available:
MariaDB [(none)]> show databases;
++
| Database   |
++
| information_schema |
| mysql  |
| performance_schema |
| test   |
++
4 rows in set (0.006 sec)

MariaDB [(none)]>

Maybe  there is some issue with portal-db initialization ?
Has anybody observed similar issue? Maybe somebody has some WA for that.

br,
Krzysztof








-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13399): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13399
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27792647/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Cannot see gerrit changes in Jira

[Gary Wu]

Hi helpdesk,

I cannot seem to see any related gerrit changes in Jira tickets.  Can you take 
a look?

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13441): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13441
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27810266/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #62980] Cannot see gerrit changes in Jira

[Gary Wu]

Sometimes it seems that it would mostly work again if Jira gets bounced.  Can 
we try that?

Thanks,
Gary

-Original Message-
From: Jessica Wagantall via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 3:08 PM
To: Gary Wu 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [ONAP Helpdesk #62980] Cannot see gerrit changes in Jira

Hi Gary, 

This issue is related directly with the Jira Gerrit plugin.
We have seen that sometimes the Gerrits will not be properly displayed but this 
is an issue with the plugin itself which is not something we maintain. 

Is best to always keep the Gerrits listed in the comments. 

Thanks!
Jess

On Wed Oct 31 17:48:44 2018, gary.i...@huawei.com wrote:
> Hi helpdesk,
> 
> I cannot seem to see any related gerrit changes in Jira tickets.  Can 
> you take a look?
> 
> Thanks,
> Gary




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13443): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13443
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27811383/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #62980] Cannot see gerrit changes in Jira

[Gary Wu]

Already tried that but it didn't work.  As an example, 
https://jira.onap.org/browse/APPC-1225 should have a couple of gerrit changes 
listed.

If this integration doesn't work then we lose a lot of the benefits of 
requiring a Jira ticket in the gerrit commit message.

Thanks,
Gary

-Original Message-
From: Andrew Grimberg via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org] 
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2018 9:44 AM
To: Gary Wu 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [ONAP Helpdesk #62980] Cannot see gerrit changes in Jira

No need to bounce JIRA. Just toggle through some of the options in the Gerrit 
display.

Doing this forces the plugin to refresh the cache that it has of changes.

-Andy-

On 10/31/2018 05:08 PM, Gary Wu via RT wrote:
> 
> Sometimes it seems that it would mostly work again if Jira gets bounced.  Can 
> we try that?
> 
> Thanks,
> Gary
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Jessica Wagantall via RT 
> [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 3:08 PM
> To: Gary Wu 
> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> Subject: [ONAP Helpdesk #62980] Cannot see gerrit changes in Jira
> 
> Hi Gary,
> 
> This issue is related directly with the Jira Gerrit plugin.
> We have seen that sometimes the Gerrits will not be properly displayed but 
> this is an issue with the plugin itself which is not something we maintain. 
> 
> Is best to always keep the Gerrits listed in the comments. 
> 
> Thanks!
> Jess
> 
> On Wed Oct 31 17:48:44 2018, gary.i...@huawei.com wrote:
>> Hi helpdesk,
>>
>> I cannot seem to see any related gerrit changes in Jira tickets.  Can 
>> you take a look?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gary
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Andrew J Grimberg
Manager Release Engineering
The Linux Foundation



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13457): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13457
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27811383/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #62980] Cannot see gerrit changes in Jira

[Gary Wu]

Confirmed that it's working again.  Thanks!

-Gary

-Original Message-
From: Andrew Grimberg via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org] 
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2018 10:52 AM
To: Gary Wu 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [ONAP Helpdesk #62980] Cannot see gerrit changes in Jira

Looks like that move of Gerrit to AWS broke the integration. We were still 
using the very old name of gerrit.openecomp.org for the connection! Since that 
DNS entry didn't get updated, the plugin was broken. I've corrected the 
connector and everything is working again.

Sorry about that!

-Andy-

On 11/01/2018 09:47 AM, Gary Wu via RT wrote:
> 
> Already tried that but it didn't work.  As an example, 
> https://jira.onap.org/browse/APPC-1225 should have a couple of gerrit changes 
> listed.
> 
> If this integration doesn't work then we lose a lot of the benefits of 
> requiring a Jira ticket in the gerrit commit message.
> 
> Thanks,
> Gary
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Grimberg via RT 
> [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2018 9:44 AM
> To: Gary Wu 
> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> Subject: Re: [ONAP Helpdesk #62980] Cannot see gerrit changes in Jira
> 
> No need to bounce JIRA. Just toggle through some of the options in the Gerrit 
> display.
> 
> Doing this forces the plugin to refresh the cache that it has of changes.
> 
> -Andy-
> 
> On 10/31/2018 05:08 PM, Gary Wu via RT wrote:
>>
>> Sometimes it seems that it would mostly work again if Jira gets bounced.  
>> Can we try that?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gary
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jessica Wagantall via RT
>> [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 3:08 PM
>> To: Gary Wu 
>> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
>> Subject: [ONAP Helpdesk #62980] Cannot see gerrit changes in Jira
>>
>> Hi Gary,
>>
>> This issue is related directly with the Jira Gerrit plugin.
>> We have seen that sometimes the Gerrits will not be properly displayed but 
>> this is an issue with the plugin itself which is not something we maintain. 
>>
>> Is best to always keep the Gerrits listed in the comments. 
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Jess
>>
>> On Wed Oct 31 17:48:44 2018, gary.i...@huawei.com wrote:
>>> Hi helpdesk,
>>>
>>> I cannot seem to see any related gerrit changes in Jira tickets.  
>>> Can you take a look?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gary
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> --
> Andrew J Grimberg
> Manager Release Engineering
> The Linux Foundation
> 
> 
> 

--
Andrew J Grimberg
Manager Release Engineering
The Linux Foundation



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13458): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13458
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27811383/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Avoid using openstack VNC console

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

Please refrain from using the openstack horizon VNC console to connect to the 
VMs, as this places extra burden on the openstack controller.  Instead, please 
connect to the VMs using ssh.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13473): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13473
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27829719/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Who is using SB-01?

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

Who is using the ONAP instance in Wind River Integration-SB-01?  Please 
remember to check with the Integration team before using any of the Integration 
tenants listed here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Test+Labs, 
and to add yourself as a contact for a tenant once you've been assigned one.

If we don't hear back in the next couple of hours, SB-01 will be shut down in 
order to free up resources for other testing.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13505): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13505
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27860234/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Please delete unused VMs in Wind River

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

We are running out of resources in Wind River lab.  If you have any VMs or ONAP 
instances in Wind River that you're not currently using, can you please 
terminate them?

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13508): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13508
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27861453/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] oparent 1.2.2 released

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

oparent 1.2.2 has been released.  This release primarily addresses the CLM 
issues reported against the default versions of spring libraries.  If this 
applies to your project, please upgrade at your earliest convenience.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13712): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13712
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28126042/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Anyone using SB07?

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

Is anyone still using SB07 the HEAT environment?  If not, we would like to shut 
down the instance to help free up resources for facilitate some lab upgrades in 
Wind River.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13735): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13735
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28135690/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Please delete failed/unused VMs on Wind River

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

The last couple of days the Wind River lab ran into vswitch issues that broke a 
number of VMs running in the lab.  To fix this, we need to free up sufficient 
RAM in the lab to facilitate graceful VM migrations.

If you have VMs or ONAP instances running in Wind River lab, can you check to 
see if:

1.  If it's useable or recoverable, and
2.  Whether you still need it running.

If it's broken or no longer needed, please shut it down to help facilitate the 
VM migration process.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13736): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13736
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28135998/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Images Missing in Release Manifest

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

The following images are used in the OOM helm charts but do not have a 
corresponding entry in the release manifest.  Can you please add the 
appropriate release images to the release manifest?

onap/aaf/aaf_cass,2.1.7
onap/ccsdk-controllerblueprints,latest
onap/dcae-be,1.3-STAGING-latest
onap/dcae-dt,1.2-STAGING-latest
onap/dcae-fe,1.3-STAGING-latest
onap/dcae-tools,1.3-STAGING-latest
onap/dcae-tosca-app,1.3-STAGING-latest
onap/fproxy,2.1-STAGING-latest
onap/music/cassandra_music,3.0.0
onap/music/prom,1.0.5-latest
onap/network-discovery,latest
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.deployments.pnda-bootstrap-container,5.0.0
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.deployments.pnda-mirror-container,5.0.0
onap/rproxy,2.1-STAGING-latest
onap/service-decomposition,latest
onap/spike,1.0-STAGING-latest
onap/tproxy-config,2.1-STAGING-latest

Thanks,
Gary




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13742): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13742
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28140417/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Wind River daily deployment tests suspended

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

Due to Wind River lab infrastructure issues, we need to suspend the daily 
Release and Staging deployment tests until further notice.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13824): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13824
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28194688/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] Wind River daily deployment tests suspended

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

The Wind River daily Release and Staging deployment tests have been restored.

Thanks,
Gary

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Gary Wu
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2018 8:31 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-rele...@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] Wind River daily deployment tests suspended

Hi all,

Due to Wind River lab infrastructure issues, we need to suspend the daily 
Release and Staging deployment tests until further notice.

Thanks,
Gary




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13836): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13836
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28194688/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] Images Missing in Release Manifest

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

As of now the following images are still NOT accounted for, i.e. neither 
released nor declared to be unused for Casablanca:

onap/dcae-tools,1.3-STAGING-latest
onap/network-discovery,latest
onap/service-decomposition,latest
onap/spike,1.0-STAGING-latest

Would the owners please respond with your dispositions on these images above?

Thanks,
Gary

_
From: Gary Wu
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 2:59 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Group ; 
onap-rele...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Images Missing in Release Manifest


Hi all,

The following images are used in the OOM helm charts but do not have a 
corresponding entry in the release manifest.  Can you please add the 
appropriate release images to the release manifest?

onap/aaf/aaf_cass,2.1.7
onap/ccsdk-controllerblueprints,latest
onap/dcae-be,1.3-STAGING-latest
onap/dcae-dt,1.2-STAGING-latest
onap/dcae-fe,1.3-STAGING-latest
onap/dcae-tools,1.3-STAGING-latest
onap/dcae-tosca-app,1.3-STAGING-latest
onap/fproxy,2.1-STAGING-latest
onap/music/cassandra_music,3.0.0
onap/music/prom,1.0.5-latest
onap/network-discovery,latest
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.deployments.pnda-bootstrap-container,5.0.0
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.deployments.pnda-mirror-container,5.0.0
onap/rproxy,2.1-STAGING-latest
onap/service-decomposition,latest
onap/spike,1.0-STAGING-latest
onap/tproxy-config,2.1-STAGING-latest

Thanks,
Gary




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13910): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13910
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28140417/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][sdc] SDC images

[Gary Wu]

I’ve submitted the manifest change.

Thanks,
Gary

From: Gildas Lanilis
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 4:34 PM
To: Jessica Wagantall ; Yunxia Chen 
; Gary Wu 
Cc: michael.la...@intl.att.com; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; 
catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com; BRIAN D FREEMAN ; Yang Xu 
(Yang, Fixed Network) 
Subject: RE: [integration][sdc] SDC images

Helen, Gary,

The docker-manifect for SDC is not updated yet.
According the commit https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/73302/ that generated the 
build and the docker image, the new version is 1.3.5.

Could we do something to move forward?

Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287

From: Jessica Wagantall [mailto:jwagant...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 3:24 PM
To: Yunxia Chen mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Cc: michael.la...@intl.att.com<mailto:michael.la...@intl.att.com>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Gildas Lanilis 
mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com>>; 
catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com<mailto:catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com>; BRIAN D 
FREEMAN mailto:bf1...@att.com>>; Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network) 
mailto:yang@huawei.com>>
Subject: Re: [integration][sdc] SDC images

Thanks for this Michael. I have now released all the SDC dockers

Let me know if I can help on anything else

Jess

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 2:47 PM Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Thank you Michael !

Please also submit the manifest change request and we will merge it once the 
release image is available.

Regards,

Helen Chen

From: "Lando,Michael" 
mailto:michael.la...@intl.att.com>>
Date: Monday, November 26, 2018 at 2:35 PM
To: Jessica Wagantall 
mailto:jwagant...@linuxfoundation.org>>, Helen 
Chen 00725961 mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, Gildas 
Lanilis mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com>>, 
"Lefevre, Catherine" 
mailto:catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com>>, 
"FREEMAN, BRIAN D" mailto:bf1...@att.com>>, "Yang Xu (Yang, 
Fixed Network)" mailto:yang@huawei.com>>
Subject: RE: [integration][sdc] SDC images

Hi,

Yes I have created the dockers.
https://jenkins.onap.org/view/sdc/job/sdc-casablanca-docker-version-java-daily/17/console

and if Jessica can help me with creating the release ONAP Helpdesk #64352
they will be in your hands as soon as she is done 😊

> onap/sdc-kibana
>
> onap/sdc-elasticsearch
>
> onap/sdc-init-elasticsearch
>
> onap/sdc-cassandra
>
> onap/sdc-cassandra-init
>
> onap/sdc-onboard-cassandra-init
>
> onap/sdc-onboard-backend
>
> onap/sdc-backend
>
> onap/sdc-backend-init
>
> onap/sdc-frontend
>
> onap/sdc-api-tests
>
> onap/sdc-ui-tests










BR,

[ichael Lando]

AT&T Network Application Development · NetCom
Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago
···
Office: +972 (3) 5451487
Mobile: +972 (54) 7833603
e-mail: michael.la...@intl.att.com<mailto:michael.la...@intl.att.com>

From: Jessica Wagantall 
mailto:jwagant...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 23:03
To: Yunxia Chen mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Cc: Lando,Michael 
mailto:michael.la...@intl.att.com>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Gildas Lanilis 
mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com>>; Lefevre, 
Catherine 
mailto:catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com>>; 
FREEMAN, BRIAN D mailto:bf1...@att.com>>; Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed 
Network) mailto:yang@huawei.com>>
Subject: Re: [integration][sdc] SDC images

I wonder if he refered to 
https://jenkins.onap.org/view/sdc-sdc-tosca/job/sdc-sdc-tosca-master-release-version-java-daily/1/console<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jenkins.onap.org_view_sdc-2Dsdc-2Dtosca_job_sdc-2Dsdc-2Dtosca-2Dmaster-2Drelease-2Dversion-2Djava-2Ddaily_1_console&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=FYvXSElfSmWIXOeZxWIxQysejuz9-TXmaL6uftBh8MY&m=0uk-SRcBkaUFRKi5XZ3hEBU3FDxMqBLvNkGns6T5gSY&s=_PNFhzN5Q8nK5tQKamZ8NDITFe7fluxKYys7PUXWZfQ&e=>

This is the one I released this morning

thanks1
Jess

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:59 PM Yunxia Chen 
mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hi, Michael,

I know you have been worked so hard. But I still have to ask: have you released 
the image we talked this morning? Need it for retesting stability. If not yet, 
could we do the same thing as SO image just document it? Please let us know.

Regards,
Helen Chen

Principal Architect, Open Orchestration
Huawei US R&D Center
Futurewei Technologies, Inc.

2330 Central Expressway, C2-16
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Tel: (408) 330-4696
Cell: (510) 825-7348

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#14073): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/14073
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28325355/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Anyone still using SB02, SB04, SB06?

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

Is anyone still using the following Wind River environments?

Integration-SB-02
Integration-SB-04
Integration-SB-06

If not, we'd like to shut them down to reduce the load in the lab.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#14106): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/14106
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28375067/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] onapci.org maintenance

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

onapci.org will be undergoing maintenance and upgrades this week.  During this 
time, onapci.org Jenkins will be placed into read-only mode, and Grafana will 
be unavailable.  This also means that the daily deployment tests will be 
suspended for the rest of the week.

I hope to have everything up and running again before Monday.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#14290): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/14290
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28613126/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] Emergency Nexus 3 restart

[Gary Wu]

It’s working much better now.

Thanks,
Gary

From: onap-...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of 
Jessica Wagantall
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2018 3:59 PM
To: onap-tsc ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; 
onap-release ; onap-lf-annou...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Emergency Nexus 3 restart

Completed..

Gary, will re-run your job..

Tahnsk1
Jess

On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 3:37 PM Jessica Wagantall 
mailto:jwagant...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
Dear ONAP team.

Looks like we need to do a quick Nexus3 restart right now.

We are seeing a lot of timeouts in this particular job:
https://jenkins.onap.org/job/integration-master-version-manifest-verify-java/

We need to see if a timeout can help unblocking.

Thanks!
Jess


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#12903): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12903
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27150523/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] onapci.org maintenance

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

onapci.org has been restored, and daily deployment test have also been resumed 
over the weekend.

Thanks,
Gary

_
From: Gary Wu
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2018 9:25 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: onapci.org maintenance


Hi all,

onapci.org will be undergoing maintenance and upgrades this week.  During this 
time, onapci.org Jenkins will be placed into read-only mode, and Grafana will 
be unavailable.  This also means that the daily deployment tests will be 
suspended for the rest of the week.

I hope to have everything up and running again before Monday.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#14361): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/14361
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28613126/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Missing docker images for Dublin

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

The following Staging images for Dublin (integration repo master branch) have 
gone missing from nexus3.  Would the respective teams please help to 
re-generate them or update the Staging manifest as appropriate?

16:04:53 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/azure:1.2.2-SNAPSHOT not found
16:04:54 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/vio:1.2.2-STAGING not found
16:05:47 [ERROR] onap/workflow-backend:1.3.2-SNAPSHOT not found
16:05:48 [ERROR] onap/workflow-frontend:1.3.2-SNAPSHOT not found
16:05:53 [ERROR] onap/workflow-init:1.3.2-SNAPSHOT not found

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#15025): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15025
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29188938/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss][integration] anything wrong with integration repo?

[Gary Wu]

Hi Bin,

I have not.  Do you perhaps have some sort of user- or system-level settings on 
linefeed corrections (core.autocrlf) on PNG files?  What happens if you do git 
reset --hard ?

Thanks,
Gary

From: Yang, Bin [mailto:bin.y...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2019 4:57 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Gary Wu ; Yang Xu (Yang, 
Fixed Network) 
Subject: [onap-discuss][integration] anything wrong with integration repo?

Hi Integration team,

Have you ever observed following issue while cloning git repo of integration 
project? The git status indicates there are modified files as below even with a 
fresh 'git clone' operation?  And the status prevents me from stash/checkout 
branch.

BTW: I am not the only one to observe such issue, anyone could help?

Thanks

root@cc1c32311231:~/integration# git status
On branch master
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'.
Changes not staged for commit:
  (use "git add ..." to update what will be committed)
  (use "git checkout -- ..." to discard changes in working directory)

modified:   docs/files/figure1.png
modified:   docs/files/figure10.png
modified:   docs/files/figure11.png
modified:   docs/files/figure12.png
modified:   docs/files/figure13.png
modified:   docs/files/figure2.png
modified:   docs/files/figure3.png
modified:   docs/files/figure4.png
modified:   docs/files/figure5.png
modified:   docs/files/figure6.png
   modified:   docs/files/figure7.png
modified:   docs/files/figure8.png
modified:   docs/files/figure9.png
modified:   test/postman/images/collection-detail-test.png
modified:   test/postman/images/collection-detail.png
modified:   test/postman/images/collections.png
modified:   test/postman/images/globals.png
modified:   test/postman/images/import.png
modified:   test/postman/images/run.png
modified:   test/postman/images/zipfile.png




Best Regards,
Bin Yang,Solution Engineering Team,Wind River
ONAP Multi-VIM/Cloud PTL
Direct +86,10,84777126Mobile +86,13811391682Fax +86,10,64398189
Skype: yangbincs993


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#15220): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15220
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29589343/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] Missing docker images for Dublin

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

The following docker images are still missing on nexus3.  Can the respective 
teams please rebuild them?

20:08:28 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/azure:1.2.2-SNAPSHOT not found
20:08:28 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/openstack-newton:1.2.3-STAGING not found
20:08:28 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/openstack-ocata:1.2.3-STAGING not found
20:08:29 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/openstack-pike:1.2.3-STAGING not found
20:08:29 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/openstack-windriver:1.2.3-STAGING not found
20:08:29 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/vio:1.2.2-STAGING not found

20:08:51 [ERROR] onap/workflow-backend:1.3.2-SNAPSHOT not found

20:08:52 [ERROR] onap/workflow-frontend:1.3.2-SNAPSHOT not found

20:08:52 [ERROR] onap/workflow-init:1.3.2-SNAPSHOT not found

Thanks,
Gary

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Gary Wu
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 11:40 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-rele...@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] Missing docker images for Dublin

Hi all,

The following Staging images for Dublin (integration repo master branch) have 
gone missing from nexus3.  Would the respective teams please help to 
re-generate them or update the Staging manifest as appropriate?

16:04:53 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/azure:1.2.2-SNAPSHOT not found
16:04:54 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/vio:1.2.2-STAGING not found
16:05:47 [ERROR] onap/workflow-backend:1.3.2-SNAPSHOT not found
16:05:48 [ERROR] onap/workflow-frontend:1.3.2-SNAPSHOT not found
16:05:53 [ERROR] onap/workflow-init:1.3.2-SNAPSHOT not found

Thanks,
Gary




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#15375): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15375
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29188938/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] Missing docker images for Dublin

[Gary Wu]

In order to unblock the rest of the teams, we are reverting the following 
missing images to their Casablanca released versions.

https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/78076/1/version-manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest-staging.csv

For the teams below, please update the staging manifest accordingly once your 
builds have been sorted out.

Thanks,
Gary

From: Gary Wu
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2019 4:14 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Gary Wu ; 
onap-rele...@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Missing docker images for Dublin

Hi all,

The following docker images are still missing on nexus3.  Can the respective 
teams please rebuild them?

20:08:28 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/azure:1.2.2-SNAPSHOT not found
20:08:28 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/openstack-newton:1.2.3-STAGING not found
20:08:28 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/openstack-ocata:1.2.3-STAGING not found
20:08:29 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/openstack-pike:1.2.3-STAGING not found
20:08:29 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/openstack-windriver:1.2.3-STAGING not found
20:08:29 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/vio:1.2.2-STAGING not found

20:08:51 [ERROR] onap/workflow-backend:1.3.2-SNAPSHOT not found

20:08:52 [ERROR] onap/workflow-frontend:1.3.2-SNAPSHOT not found

20:08:52 [ERROR] onap/workflow-init:1.3.2-SNAPSHOT not found

Thanks,
Gary

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Gary Wu
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 11:40 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; 
onap-rele...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>
Subject: [onap-discuss] Missing docker images for Dublin

Hi all,

The following Staging images for Dublin (integration repo master branch) have 
gone missing from nexus3.  Would the respective teams please help to 
re-generate them or update the Staging manifest as appropriate?

16:04:53 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/azure:1.2.2-SNAPSHOT not found
16:04:54 [ERROR] onap/multicloud/vio:1.2.2-STAGING not found
16:05:47 [ERROR] onap/workflow-backend:1.3.2-SNAPSHOT not found
16:05:48 [ERROR] onap/workflow-frontend:1.3.2-SNAPSHOT not found
16:05:53 [ERROR] onap/workflow-init:1.3.2-SNAPSHOT not found

Thanks,
Gary




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#15406): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15406
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29188938/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [Onap-release] [onap-discuss] [oom] [integration] Is casablanca 3.0.1 signed-off ?

[Gary Wu]

For each release, all gerrit repos that participated in the release are 
supposed to be tagged accordingly to mark exactly what was released.

For Casablanca, the tag was 3.0.0-ONAP.

For Casablanca MR, the tag should be 3.0.1-ONAP.  It does not appear that any 
repo has had this tag created yet.

Thanks,
Gary

-Original Message-
From: onap-rele...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Catherine LEFEVRE
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 1:43 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network) 
; m.pta...@partner.samsung.com; Jim Baker 
; onap-rele...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [Onap-release] [onap-discuss] [oom] [integration] Is casablanca 
3.0.1 signed-off ?

Hi Yang, Michal,

I am not sure what you mean by LF doing 3.0.1 Tagging.
3.0.1 is the release version that we agreed for the Casablanca Maintenance 
Release
https://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/release/index.html#casablanca-maintenance-release-3-0-1

The Casablanca Maintenance Release has been signed - off on 1/31/2019 based on 
the set of containers that the Integration Team has validated.
I have sent an e-mail last week to perform a final review of the Casablanca 
Maintenance release note including Release Manifest, Nexus Release Artifacts 
and Docker Release based on the what has been validated since we have 
discovered an issue with the release note.
https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-release/message/1023

As discussed today during the PTLs call, although PTLs have submitted their 
changes regarding their project specific release note, the changes are not 
reflected correctly on each Project Specific Release Notes 
https://docs.onap.org/en/casablanca/release/releaserepos.html#doc-releaserepos 
- OOM being one of these projects ...

The Documentation team is actively working to fix any identified issue.
As soon as all the changes are correctly  then I will send a communication to 
all the ONAP distro list.

Any new commit in review which are promoting some images to newer version 
inside Casablanca branch should be rejected by reviewer, committer or PTL!

Hope it clarifies the current situation.

Best regards
Catherine

-Original Message-
From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Yang Xu
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 9:01 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; m.pta...@partner.samsung.com; Jim Baker 

Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [oom] [integration] Is casablanca 3.0.1 signed-off ?

Hi Jim,

Is LF doing 3.0.1 tagging?

Thanks,
-Yang 

-Original Message-
From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Michal Ptacek
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 12:56 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [oom] [integration] Is casablanca 3.0.1 signed-off ?

Dear ONAP friends,

I am searching for information whether we already have official Casablanca 
Maintenance Release ready for deployment, according to schedule it was 
signed-off on 31th January

I also don't see any outstanding issues in report page maintained by 
integration team 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Casablanca-2BMaintenance-2BRelease-2BIntegration-2BTesting-2BStatus&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=U2Cqqtov4GYQw6pJC_u_Q72jDYcKcnDrCsw3vjwDzYY&s=0rWoGZIIWctsZXa0BuDgOElnBnl3iT4CC2n7VO6D09g&e=

but OOM project still don't have this 3.0.1 tag and also I see few more commits 
in review which are promoting some images to newer version inside Casablanca 
branch

So the question is, whether official Casablanca Maintenance Release is now 
available for installation ?

Thank you,
Michal











-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#15479): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15479
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29741058/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] URGENT - Casablanca Maintenance - Formally release the artifacts !!!!

[Gary Wu]

I think all the Casablanca MR artifacts have already been released.  What is 
missing is the "3.0.1-ONAP" tag on the gerrit repos.

Thanks,
Gary

-Original Message-
From: Lefevre, Catherine [mailto:catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 3:53 AM
To: onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org; onap-rele...@lists.onap.org
Cc: Michal Ptacek ; Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network) 
; Gary Wu ; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; 'Jim Baker' ; 
mike.elli...@amdocs.com
Subject: URGENT - Casablanca Maintenance - Formally release the artifacts 
Importance: High

Thank you all for the clarifications.
I have got it now
I thought that this process was already triggered by each PTL with the LF 
Helpdesk.


Dear PTLs,

Please provide urgently the necessary information to LF Helpdesk creating a 
ticket to release formally the Casablanca Maintenance Containers certified by 
the Integration Team - thank you

Staging repo :
GroupId:ArtifactsId : org.onap.:xxx Version : x.x.x

Docker build
https://jenkins.onap.org/view//job/-master-docker-java-properties-daily//

Docker Staging image: 

Please also check 
https://docs.onap.org/en/casablanca/release/release-manifest.html#doc-release-manifest
·Release Manifest
·Nexus Release Artifacts nexus.onap.org
·Docker Release Images nexus3.onap.org

Many thanks & regards
Catherine

-Original Message-
From: Michal Ptacek [mailto:m.pta...@partner.samsung.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 7:41 AM
To: 'Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network)' ; 'Gary Wu' 
; Lefevre, Catherine ; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; 'Jim Baker' ; 
onap-rele...@lists.onap.org; mike.elli...@amdocs.com
Subject: RE: [Onap-release] [onap-discuss] [oom] [integration] Is casablanca 
3.0.1 signed-off ?

Thank you all for detailed clarification, 

From the OOM perspective I see following commits to be merged (must have) 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_-23_c_75897_&d=DwIFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=t6FOyaXpMIZln-PZEccAyfkGPFdGe-b7wGaF3CMiuxw&s=-7EZI_dou0lz585zGX4TyMVNHeF7XzGtAl1Bd3sF6X4&e=
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_-23_c_76318_&d=DwIFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=t6FOyaXpMIZln-PZEccAyfkGPFdGe-b7wGaF3CMiuxw&s=IJ_Dq5kk2nX04Q1_k4eaFNj7j0lGM9NHpqL2D60PgRA&e=
(optionally)
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_-23_c_78216_&d=DwIFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=t6FOyaXpMIZln-PZEccAyfkGPFdGe-b7wGaF3CMiuxw&s=WK6tpoXoTPX3nY26HfVum5Fwz0ImOzFGkxIuHLJvpG0&e=

before declaring 3.0.1 tag into OOM ... because they contains images versions 
mentioned in release manifest 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.onap.org_en_casablanca_release_release-2Dmanifest.html-23doc-2Drelease-2Dmanifest&d=DwIFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=t6FOyaXpMIZln-PZEccAyfkGPFdGe-b7wGaF3CMiuxw&s=IPgNNM9Dc8EtvU2U4B2SBCAN5AgDVDiEovmUDCazTz4&e=

can we do it today ?
I would like to take "official 3.0.1 release" for offline deployments

We can also check if there are more differences between versions from 
release-manifest 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.onap.org_en_casablanca_release_release-2Dmanifest.html-23doc-2Drelease-2Dmanifest&d=DwIFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=ZglJ8LOeAfevY7wWaSximhFMAzXaMdza5QYCg-DW6SU&m=t6FOyaXpMIZln-PZEccAyfkGPFdGe-b7wGaF3CMiuxw&s=IPgNNM9Dc8EtvU2U4B2SBCAN5AgDVDiEovmUDCazTz4&e=
and current OOM casablanca images in chart files, I expect there should be none.

Thank you,
Michal

-Original Message-
From: Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network) [mailto:yang@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 12:05 AM
To: Gary Wu ; Catherine LEFEVRE 
; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; 
m.pta...@partner.samsung.com; Jim Baker ; 
onap-rele...@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [Onap-release] [onap-discuss] [oom] [integration] Is casablanca 
3.0.1 signed-off ?

Catherine,

There has been no new change merged in Casablanca Maintenance release since 
1/31. As Gary explained, we need 3.0.1 tagging for each project. LF used to do 
that for all projects based on project input. 

Regards,
-Yang  

-Original Message-
From: Gary Wu
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 5:34 PM
To: Catherine LEFEVRE ; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network) 
; m.pta...@partner.samsung.com; Jim Baker 
; onap-rele...@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [Onap-release] [onap-discuss] [oom] [integration] Is casablanca 
3.0.1 signed-off ?

For each release, all gerrit repos that participated in the release are 
supposed to be tagged accordingly to mark exactly what was released.

For Casablanca, the tag was 

Re: [onap-discuss][oom] arm64 docker containers deploy

[Gary Wu]

Hi Paul,

We use Rancher to deploy the Kubernetes cluster on OpenStack, then use helm to 
deploy ONAP on the k8s cluster.  If you're able to deploy k8s on arm64 using 
some other tool, you don't need to use Rancher.

Thanks,
Gary

From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Paul Vaduva
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2019 8:09 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: mike.elli...@amdocs.com
Subject: [onap-discuss][oom] arm64 docker containers deploy

Hi Guys,

We want to try an arm64 build of ONAP docker containers minimum deployment 
maybe also vFW usecase necessary docker images, and we have to deploy them on 
an arm64 openstack deployment environment for the integration testing vFW 
usecase test. I am aware that on x86_64 you use rancher to deploy but rancher 
does not have arm64 support, so I was wondering if we could (would be 
acceptable) to use helm instead. Please share with me your thoughts.

Best Regards,
Paul Vaduva

This message, including attachments, is CONFIDENTIAL. It may also be privileged 
or otherwise protected by law. If you received this email by mistake please let 
us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy it or 
disclose its contents to anyone. All messages sent to and from Enea may be 
monitored to ensure compliance with internal policies and to protect our 
business. Emails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as 
they can be intercepted, a mended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. The 
sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the 
contents of this message, which arise as a result of email transmission. Anyone 
who communicates with us by email accepts these risks.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#15587): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15587
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/29863344/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] oparent 1.2.3 released

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

oparent 1.2.3 has been released.

This version incorporates the following updates:
*   Dependency library versions updated as provided by Amy Zwarico: 
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/78239/1/dependencies/pom.xml
*   Checkstyle fixes

Please update your pom files to use oparent 1.2.3 at your earliest convenience.

FYI, the next version of oparent will be 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT as some breaking 
changes may be required to support Jessica/LF's migration of staging jobs to 
the new global gerrit-maven-stage JJB template.  If your project is planning to 
adopt this migration in Dublin, you may decide to wait for oparent 2.0.0 
instead.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#15954): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/15954
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/30388490/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] oparent 1.2.3 released

[Gary Wu]

Hi Pam,

The Jira for the LF migration to the new global gerrit-maven-stage is 
https://jira.onap.org/browse/CIMAN-234.  We don’t otherwise have a separate 
Jira for oparent 2.0.0 at this time.

Thanks,
Gary

From: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) [mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 6:59 AM
To: Gary Wu ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; 
onap-rele...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [Onap-release] oparent 1.2.3 released

Gary,

Is there a JIRA in Integration for the 2.0.0 release? I’d like to watch that 
and link it.

Thanks,

Pam

From: mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>> on 
behalf of Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Date: Monday, March 11, 2019 at 10:47 AM
To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, 
"onap-rele...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>" 
mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: [Onap-release] oparent 1.2.3 released

Hi all,

oparent 1.2.3 has been released.

This version incorporates the following updates:
·   Dependency library versions updated as provided by Amy Zwarico: 
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/78239/1/dependencies/pom.xml<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_-23_c_78239_1_dependencies_pom.xml&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=jwTiArcEj6aUX0HjV0M3dT12gUtk7rC07xpgpVZkS_4&m=rzLsJxYog_zip7srIqOMzdJSp0L4CfYJ1g6OmTQKfmQ&s=N7HDP3gyYfQvFN3k105wAT0WPhU6M03AI9Posfg6LIg&e=>
·   Checkstyle fixes

Please update your pom files to use oparent 1.2.3 at your earliest convenience.

FYI, the next version of oparent will be 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT as some breaking 
changes may be required to support Jessica/LF’s migration of staging jobs to 
the new global gerrit-maven-stage JJB template.  If your project is planning to 
adopt this migration in Dublin, you may decide to wait for oparent 2.0.0 
instead.

Thanks,
Gary




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#16190): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/16190
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/30474229/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] oparent 1.2.3 released

[Gary Wu]

Hi Matthieu,

oparent 2.0.0 has not been released yet; it was mistakenly pushed to the 
releases repo during the Jenkins job refactoring.  For the time being, please 
build against oparent 1.2.3.

Thanks,
Gary

From: matthieu.geereba...@orange.com [mailto:matthieu.geereba...@orange.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 6:36 AM
To: Gary Wu ; pdrag...@research.att.com; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-rele...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [Onap-release] oparent 1.2.3 released

Hi,

We saw oparent 2.0.0 in maven repository few days ago, our project were able to 
build perfectly, but it seems the link is now broken, may be a wrong release ?

https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.onap.oparent/version/2.0.0
Files point to a dead link here:
https://nexus.onap.org/content/repositories/releases/org/onap/oparent/version/2.0.0

Should we link our parent to to the 1.2.3 or to the 2.0.0.SNAPSHOT ?

Regards
Matthieu


On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 19:48 +, Gary Wu wrote:
Hi Pam,

The Jira for the LF migration to the new global gerrit-maven-stage is 
https://jira.onap.org/browse/CIMAN-234.  We don’t otherwise have a separate 
Jira for oparent 2.0.0 at this time.

Thanks,
Gary

From: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) [mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 6:59 AM
To: Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; 
onap-rele...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [Onap-release] oparent 1.2.3 released

Gary,

Is there a JIRA in Integration for the 2.0.0 release? I’d like to watch that 
and link it.

Thanks,

Pam

From: mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>> on 
behalf of Gary Wu mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>
Date: Monday, March 11, 2019 at 10:47 AM
To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, 
"onap-rele...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>" 
mailto:onap-rele...@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: [Onap-release] oparent 1.2.3 released

Hi all,

oparent 1.2.3 has been released.

This version incorporates the following updates:
·   Dependency library versions updated as provided by Amy Zwarico: 
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/78239/1/dependencies/pom.xml<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_-23_c_78239_1_dependencies_pom.xml&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=jwTiArcEj6aUX0HjV0M3dT12gUtk7rC07xpgpVZkS_4&m=rzLsJxYog_zip7srIqOMzdJSp0L4CfYJ1g6OmTQKfmQ&s=N7HDP3gyYfQvFN3k105wAT0WPhU6M03AI9Posfg6LIg&e=>
·   Checkstyle fixes

Please update your pom files to use oparent 1.2.3 at your earliest convenience.

FYI, the next version of oparent will be 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT as some breaking 
changes may be required to support Jessica/LF’s migration of staging jobs to 
the new global gerrit-maven-stage JJB template.  If your project is planning to 
adopt this migration in Dublin, you may decide to wait for oparent 2.0.0 
instead.

Thanks,
Gary




_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#16352): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/16352
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/30474229/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] CSIT dublin branch created

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

A "dublin" branch has been created for the integration/csit repo.  Please 
proceed with the creation of your dublin CSIT jobs whenever your project is 
ready to branch your CSIT tests.

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#16663): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/16663
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/31316414/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] RKE HA collaboration for Kubernetes/Helm/Docker alignment #oom #integration #documentation

[Gary Wu]

Hi Michael,

I have updated the integration scripts to use the following versions (also 
updated OOM-1598 with this info):


·   ubuntu 18.04

·   docker 18.09.5

·   rke 0.2.1

·   rke kubernetes_version: v1.13.5-rancher1-2

·   helm 2.12.3

·   kubectl 1.13.5

helm 2.12.5 did not appear to exist, so I lowered it to the latest 2.12.x that 
I could find which was helm 2.12.3.

Our k8s cluster layout is currently as follows:

·   12 x (16 GB RAM, 8 vCPUs) running the worker role

·   3 x (8 GB RAM, 4 vCPUs), each running both controlplane and etcd roles

·   1 x (8 GB RAM, 4 vCPUs) functioning purely as the shared NFS server for 
/dockerdata-nfs/.

Thanks,
Gary

From: Michael O'Brien [mailto:frank.obr...@amdocs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 11:11 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Gary Wu ; Yang Xu (Yang, 
Fixed Network) ; Brian Freeman (Confluence) 
; Mike Elliott 
Cc: Soleil, Alain ; sylvain.desbure...@orange.com; 
sofia.wal...@est.tech; James MacNider ; Prudence Au 
; Tcherniavski, Igor ; 
michel.ngu...@bell.ca; eric.deb...@orange.com; morgan.richo...@orange.com; 
Adolfo Perez-Duran ; Beejal Shah 
; m.pta...@partner.samsung.com; 
p.osp...@partner.samsung.com
Subject: RKE HA collaboration for Kubernetes/Helm/Docker alignment #oom 
#integration #documentation

Gary,
   Hi, we (OOM) would like to continue our collaboration with yourself, Brian, 
Yang, Alain, Mike, Sylvain, Morgan, Eric, …and others inside devops teams on 
getting an HA deployment of RKE aligned via a 
script/template/documentation-procedure up for RC0.
   The goal/deliverables will be as we did together before for Rancher 1.6.25 
in Casablanca – but this time for Dublin around RKE as a replacement for 
Rancher.
-  Community based RI for RKE to be used for staging/testing and 
production readiness
-  Alignment on the k8s/helm/docker versions

   We have the following merged collocated/single-node script based on the 2 
month old RKE 0.1.17 that we will be upgrading to RKE 2.1.x to leverage fixes 
in the move from Docker 17.03/18.06 to 18.09, Helm 2.9.1 to 2.12.5 and 
Kubernetes 1.11.5 to 1.13.5 – some of these moves solve critical 
vulnerabilities.
https://git.onap.org/oom/tree/kubernetes/contrib/tools/rke/rke_setup.sh#n98

Tracking via https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-1598
Preliminary docs to be rewritten for RTD via 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/OOM+RKE+Kubernetes+Deployment

   I understand you are actively testing a larger cluster and script and 
distributing the 3 roles (controlplane, worker, etcd) – which I currently run 
on a single node.   We would like to align with your proposed VM distribution 
of these 3 roles (like we did for rancher on the 13+1 cluster).  We will then 
do a 2 step distribution of the yaml to documentation for RC0 with full script 
retrofit for RC1+
   Did a quick check in git and I will look through your 
https://git.onap.org/integration/tree/deployment/heat/onap-rke for the 
yaml/role profile.

   Thank you
   /michael

This email and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential 
and subject to the Amdocs Email Terms of Service, which you may review at 
https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-terms-of-service

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#16700): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/16700
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/31313969/21656
Mute #integration: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=integration&subid=2740164
Mute #oom: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=oom&subid=2740164
Mute #documentation: 
https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=documentation&subid=2740164
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] oparent 2.0.0 released

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,
oparent 2.0.0 has been released.
This version supports LF’s new global gerrit-maven-stage JJB template.

If your project is migrating to this new staging job template in Dublin, please 
upgrade to oparent 2.0.0 at your convenience.  Otherwise, you may continue 
using oparent 1.2.3.

Thanks,
Gary


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#16846): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/16846
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/31425536/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Out-of-date versions in docker staging manifest

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

The following versions in the docker staging manifest are out-of-date vs. the 
release versions already committed to oom.  If you are expecting to release 
additional version(s) for dublin, please update the staging manifest with the 
correct staging versions.  Otherwise, please update the staging manifest with 
the release version tags as committed in oom.

[ERROR] onap/aaf/abrmd:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT-latest is out-of-date vs. release (4.0.0).
[ERROR] onap/aaf/distcenter:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT-latest is out-of-date vs. release 
(4.0.0).
[ERROR] onap/aaf/sms:3.0.1-SNAPSHOT-latest is out-of-date vs. release (4.0.0).
[ERROR] onap/aaf/smsquorumclient:3.0.1-SNAPSHOT-latest is out-of-date vs. 
release (4.0.0).
[ERROR] onap/aaf/testcaservice:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT-latest is out-of-date vs. release 
(4.0.0).
 [ERROR] onap/dmaap/datarouter-node:2.1.0-SNAPSHOT-latest is out-of-date vs. 
release (2.1.0).
[ERROR] onap/dmaap/datarouter-prov:2.1.0-SNAPSHOT-latest is out-of-date vs. 
release (2.1.0).
[ERROR] onap/dmaap/dmaap-mr:1.1.14-SNAPSHOT-latest is out-of-date vs. release 
(1.1.14).
[ERROR] onap/dmaap/kafka111:1.0.1-SNAPSHOT-latest is out-of-date vs. release 
(1.0.1).
[ERROR] onap/dmaap/zookeeper:6.0.0-SNAPSHOT-latest is out-of-date vs. release 
(6.0.0).
[ERROR] onap/optf-has:1.2.5-SNAPSHOT-latest is out-of-date vs. release (1.2.5).
[ERROR] onap/optf-osdf:1.2.4-SNAPSHOT-latest is out-of-date vs. release (1.2.4).
[ERROR] 
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.collectors.hv-ves.hv-collector-main:1.1.0-SNAPSHOT is 
out-of-date vs. release (1.1.0).
[ERROR] onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.collectors.ves.vescollector:1.4.3-SNAPSHOT is 
out-of-date vs. release (1.4.4).
[ERROR] onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.deployments.cm-container:1.6.2-STAGING-latest is 
out-of-date vs. release (1.6.2).
[ERROR] 
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.deployments.healthcheck-container:1.2.4-STAGING-latest 
is out-of-date vs. release (1.2.4).
[ERROR] 
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.deployments.k8s-bootstrap-container:1.4.15-STAGING-latest
 is out-of-date vs. release (1.4.16).
[ERROR] onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.platform.policy-handler:5.0.0-STAGING-latest is 
out-of-date vs. release (5.0.0).
[ERROR] onap/pomba-context-aggregator:1.4.0-SNAPSHOT-latest is out-of-date vs. 
release (1.4.0).
[ERROR] onap/search-data-service:1.4.3 is out-of-date vs. release 
(1.4-STAGING-latest).
[ERROR] onap/usecase-ui:1.2.2-STAGING-latest is out-of-date vs. release (1.2.2).
[ERROR] onap/usecase-ui-server:1.2.1-STAGING-latest is out-of-date vs. release 
(1.2.1).
[ERROR] onap/vfc/catalog:1.3.0-STAGING-latest is out-of-date vs. release 
(1.3.0).
[ERROR] onap/vfc/emsdriver:1.3.0-STAGING-latest is out-of-date vs. release 
(1.3.0).
[ERROR] onap/vfc/gvnfmdriver:1.3.0-STAGING-latest is out-of-date vs. release 
(1.3.0).
[ERROR] onap/vfc/jujudriver:1.3.0-STAGING-latest is out-of-date vs. release 
(1.3.0).
[ERROR] onap/vfc/multivimproxy:1.3.0-STAGING-latest is out-of-date vs. release 
(1.3.0).
[ERROR] onap/vfc/nfvo/svnfm/huawei:1.3.0-STAGING-latest is out-of-date vs. 
release (1.3.0).
[ERROR] onap/vfc/nslcm:1.3.0-STAGING-latest is out-of-date vs. release (1.3.0).
[ERROR] onap/vfc/resmanagement:1.3.0-STAGING-latest is out-of-date vs. release 
(1.3.0).
[ERROR] onap/vfc/vnflcm:1.3.0-STAGING-latest is out-of-date vs. release (1.3.0).
[ERROR] onap/vfc/vnfmgr:1.3.0-STAGING-latest is out-of-date vs. release (1.3.0).
[ERROR] onap/vfc/vnfres:1.3.0-STAGING-latest is out-of-date vs. release (1.3.0).
[ERROR] onap/vfc/wfengine-activiti:1.3.0-STAGING-latest is out-of-date vs. 
release (1.3.0).
[ERROR] onap/vfc/wfengine-mgrservice:1.3.0-STAGING-latest is out-of-date vs. 
release (1.3.0).
[ERROR] onap/vfc/ztesdncdriver:1.3.0-STAGING-latest is out-of-date vs. release 
(1.3.0).
[ERROR] onap/vfc/ztevnfmdriver:1.3.0-STAGING-latest is out-of-date vs. release 
(1.3.0).

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#16990): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/16990
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/31570436/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Unreleased images in oom

[Gary Wu]

The following docker images are still not released in oom master branch.  Can 
the respective teams provide a timeline for when the release images will be 
available?

[ERROR] kubernetes/aai/values.yaml:39: onap/fproxy:2.1-STAGING-latest not 
released
[ERROR] kubernetes/aai/values.yaml:45: onap/rproxy:2.1-STAGING-latest not 
released
[ERROR] kubernetes/aai/values.yaml:50: onap/tproxy-config:2.1-STAGING-latest 
not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/dcaegen2/charts/dcae-bootstrap/values.yaml:100: 
onap/holmes/rule-management:1.2.6-STAGING-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/dcaegen2/charts/dcae-bootstrap/values.yaml:101: 
onap/holmes/engine-management:1.2.5-STAGING-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/dcaegen2/charts/dcae-bootstrap/values.yaml:99: 
onap/org.onap.ccsdk.dashboard.ccsdk-app-os:1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/modeling/charts/modeling-genericparser/values.yaml:32: 
onap/modeling/genericparser:1.0.1-STAGING-latest not released
[ERROR] 
kubernetes/oof/charts/oof-cmso/charts/oof-cmso-optimizer/values.yaml:28: 
onap/optf-cmso-optimizer:latest not released
[ERROR] 
kubernetes/oof/charts/oof-cmso/charts/oof-cmso-optimizer/values.yaml:33: 
onap/optf-cmso-dbinit:latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/oof/charts/oof-cmso/charts/oof-cmso-service/values.yaml:30: 
onap/optf-cmso-service:latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/oof/charts/oof-cmso/charts/oof-cmso-service/values.yaml:35: 
onap/optf-cmso-dbinit:latest not released
[ERROR] 
kubernetes/oof/charts/oof-cmso/charts/oof-cmso-ticketmgt/values.yaml:29: 
onap/optf-cmso-ticketmgt:latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/oof/charts/oof-cmso/charts/oof-cmso-topology/values.yaml:28: 
onap/optf-cmso-topology:latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/pnda/charts/dcae-pnda-bootstrap/values.yaml:74: 
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.deployments.pnda-bootstrap-container:5.0.0 not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/pnda/charts/dcae-pnda-mirror/values.yaml:34: 
onap/org.onap.dcaegen2.deployments.pnda-mirror-container:5.0.0 not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/policy/charts/brmsgw/values.yaml:29: 
onap/policy-pe:1.4-SNAPSHOT-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/policy/charts/drools/values.yaml:31: 
onap/policy-pdpd-cl:1.4-SNAPSHOT-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/policy/charts/pdp/values.yaml:31: 
onap/policy-pe:1.4-SNAPSHOT-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/policy/charts/policy-apex-pdp/values.yaml:31: 
onap/policy-apex-pdp:2.1-SNAPSHOT-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/policy/charts/policy-api/values.yaml:31: 
onap/policy-api:2.0.0-SNAPSHOT-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/policy/charts/policy-distribution/values.yaml:30: 
onap/policy-distribution:2.1.0-SNAPSHOT-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/policy/charts/policy-pap/values.yaml:30: 
onap/policy-pap:2.0.0-SNAPSHOT-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/policy/charts/policy-xacml-pdp/values.yaml:30: 
onap/policy-xacml-pdp:2.0.0-SNAPSHOT-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/policy/values.yaml:44: onap/policy-pe:1.4-SNAPSHOT-latest 
not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/pomba/charts/pomba-networkdiscovery/values.yaml:27: 
onap/network-discovery:1.5.0-SNAPSHOT-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/pomba/charts/pomba-servicedecomposition/values.yaml:27: 
onap/service-decomposition:1.5.0-SNAPSHOT-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/portal/charts/portal-app/values.yaml:31: 
onap/portal-app:2.5.0-STAGING-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/portal/charts/portal-mariadb/values.yaml:27: 
onap/portal-db:2.5.0-STAGING-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/portal/charts/portal-sdk/values.yaml:31: 
onap/portal-sdk:2.5.0-STAGING-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/portal/charts/portal-widget/values.yaml:32: 
onap/portal-wms:2.5.0-STAGING-latest not released


Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#17042): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/17042
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/31630973/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [so] SO staging image versions out-of-date

[Gary Wu]

Hi Seshu and SO team,

It has come to our attention that even though SO has released version 1.4.1 of 
docker images, the dublin staging builds are continuing to build 
1.4.1-STAGING-latest which is out-of-date; they should be 1.4.2-STAGING-latest 
going forward.  Can you please bump your staging docker image versions?

Thanks,
Gary



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#17084): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/17084
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/31641542/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Unreleased images in oom

[Gary Wu]

The following docker images are still not released in oom master branch.


[ERROR] kubernetes/dcaegen2/charts/dcae-bootstrap/values.yaml:100: 
onap/holmes/rule-management:1.2.6-STAGING-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/dcaegen2/charts/dcae-bootstrap/values.yaml:101: 
onap/holmes/engine-management:1.2.5-STAGING-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/dcaegen2/charts/dcae-bootstrap/values.yaml:99: 
onap/org.onap.ccsdk.dashboard.ccsdk-app-os:1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-latest not released
[ERROR] kubernetes/modeling/charts/modeling-genericparser/values.yaml:32: 
onap/modeling/genericparser:1.0.1-STAGING-latest not released


Please update them ASAP, or we will need a contingency plan soon (e.g. roll 
back to the prior release version).

Thanks,
Gary


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#17152): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/17152
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/31698543/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] #sdc #integration New CSIT Jenkins job for SDC DCAE-DS

[Gary Wu]

Yes, ideally you should add all of the dependencies for any docker images that 
are used by your test.  Besides any explicit dependencies, CSIT jobs are 
automatically run daily in any case.

Thanks,
Gary


From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org  on behalf of 
Lasse Kaihlavirta via Lists.Onap.Org 

Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 1:19 AM
To: onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] #sdc #integration New CSIT Jenkins job for SDC DCAE-DS


Hi,



I pushed a WIP commit for defining a new  CSIT Jenkins job for SDC DCAE-DS: 
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/ci-management/+/90219/
 (this would run the new plan that is being added under 
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/integration/csit/+/89806/)



…but I’m wondering about the jobs that should trigger this; I am now having it 
triggered only by 
sdc-dcae-d-dt-be-main-master-docker-version-java-daily,
 but should this run also whenever any of the related docker images (frontend, 
tosca-lab, dt) are generated?



br,



Lasse



 [cid:cafe_image_0@s-core.co.kr]




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#17668): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/17668
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/32141810/21656
Mute #integration: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=integration&subid=2740164
Mute #sdc: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=sdc&subid=2740164
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] Wind River Lab re-opened for business

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

The Integration team has completed the stability and resilience tests for the 
Dublin release.  You may now restart your VMs as needed, and please delete any 
VMs that you no longer need.  Thank you all for your cooperation.

Thanks,
Gary


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#17674): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/17674
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/32156057/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] [integration][oom] Decommissioning docker-staging-manifest.csv and java-manifest.csv

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

Now that OOM has a "staging" branch, we are decommissioning the use of the 
docker-staging-manifest.csv in the integration repo.

Going forward, please put your staging docker image versions directly into the 
oom staging branch.

The java-manifest.csv is also decommissioned due to lack of use.

Thanks,
Gary


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#17809): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/17809
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/32236657/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[onap-discuss] IMPORTANT: Deleting old shutoff VMs in Wind River

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

The following VMs in Wind River have been shutoff since June 17th (3+ weeks).  
Unfortunately, shutoff VMs still reserve vCPU and RAM allocations, and as such 
we would like to delete VMs that are no longer needed so that we can reorganize 
the lab capacity for El Alto.

Please check the following list and see if you have any data that you need to 
backup from the following VMs.  We would like to proceed with their deletion by 
Monday (July 15th) morning Pacific time.

Thanks,
Gary


A & AI
+--+---+-+-+--+---+
| ID   | Name  | Status  | Networks 
   | Image| Flavor|
+--+---+-+-+--+---+
| c33db10d-cd3b-4776-a5df-dd267196e2cd | sb4-k8s   | SHUTOFF | 
oam_network_bxun=10.0.0.26, 10.12.5.26  | ubuntu-16-04-cloud-amd64 | m2.xlarge |
| f74a6d67-29f3-4400-aaae-a1a9da4c9aaa | sb4-rancher   | SHUTOFF | 
oam_network_bxun=10.0.0.19, 10.12.5.51  | ubuntu-16-04-cloud-amd64 | m1.xlarge |
| e1031cd8-8a5c-4723-a0db-c57fbc69bfea | Valet-SK  | SHUTOFF | 
oam_network_bxun=10.0.0.27, 10.12.6.154 | ubuntu-16-04-cloud-amd64 | m3.xlarge |
| ef814b62-4f8e-48a9-b5f9-ec54dc7b9116 | valet-install | SHUTOFF | 
oam_network_bxun=10.0.0.22, 10.12.5.157 | ubuntu-16-04-cloud-amd64 | m1.xlarge |
| 626445c7-a833-4399-82eb-19f6ab9d0b4a | valet | SHUTOFF | 
oam_network_bxun=10.0.0.7, 10.12.5.41   | ubuntu-16-04-cloud-amd64 | m1.xlarge |
+--+---+-+-+--+---+

AAF
+--+-+-+--+--+---+
| ID   | Name| Status  | Networks   
  | Image| Flavor|
+--+-+-+--+--+---+
| 95e628af-bf51-4f42-ab6f-b64cf9dc938d | Sai-OOM-K8  | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.6.59  |  | m2.xlarge |
| d54e5131-d017-456e-94fd-2637db1b5232 | aaf-oom | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.6.176 |  | m1.xlarge |
| e74c361e-d2d7-493d-b4e8-047ef848e54d | Sai-OOM-Rancher | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.6.175 |  | m3.xlarge |
| 9311b5be-7170-4b07-898e-caa967d8006a | mr-k8s2-2   | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.6.98  |  | m2.xlarge |
| 1cc0486c-5a1b-44af-b79f-052d557d117a | mr-k8s2-1   | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.5.130 |  | m2.xlarge |
| a51e9706-da8f-46f7-aae5-dbee61e24517 | mr-k8s  | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.7.22  | ubuntu-16-04-cloud-amd64 | m3.xlarge |
| d42ecbe3-9dff-443f-89ff-73c83f06780f | mr_rauncher | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.7.5   |  | m3.xlarge |
| 8bc0ea2b-83e9-4ce1-824a-9f2944145f12 | MR TEST | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.5.108 |  | m3.xlarge |
+--+-+-+--+--+---+

APPC
+--++-+--+---+---+
| ID   | Name   | Status  | 
Networks
 | Image
 | Flavor|
+--++-+--+---+---+
| c5d2ca68-6c61-44f7-93df-1d05da787fe4 | appcpgn01  | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.6.104; vFW_appcfwl01_unprotected=192.168.30.200; 
oam_onap_LH2Z=10.0.100.12| 
ubuntu-14-04-cloud-amd64  | m1.medium |
| 5bfc1e4b-be1e-4b2c-93a4-d4d7cfd99760 | appcsnk01  | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.6.129; vFW_appcfwl01_protected=192.168.40.250; 
oam_onap_LH2Z=10.0.100.13  | 
ubuntu-14-04-cloud-amd64  | m1.medium |
| 299cf684-b820-4698-8ae9-6c0735403ff7 | appcfwl01  | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.6.65; vFW_appcfwl01_unprotected=192.168.30.100; 
vFW_appcfwl01_protected=192.168.40.100; oam_onap_LH2Z=10.0.100.

Re: [onap-discuss] Deleting old shutoff VMs in Wind River

[Gary Wu]

The deletion of the old shutoff VMs below has been completed.  Thank you all 
for your cooperation.

Thanks,
Gary



From: Gary Wu
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 8:11 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org ; 
onap-rele...@lists.onap.org 
Subject: IMPORTANT: Deleting old shutoff VMs in Wind River

Hi all,

The following VMs in Wind River have been shutoff since June 17th (3+ weeks).  
Unfortunately, shutoff VMs still reserve vCPU and RAM allocations, and as such 
we would like to delete VMs that are no longer needed so that we can reorganize 
the lab capacity for El Alto.

Please check the following list and see if you have any data that you need to 
backup from the following VMs.  We would like to proceed with their deletion by 
Monday (July 15th) morning Pacific time.

Thanks,
Gary


A & AI
+--+---+-+-+--+---+
| ID   | Name  | Status  | Networks 
   | Image| Flavor|
+--+---+-+-+--+---+
| c33db10d-cd3b-4776-a5df-dd267196e2cd | sb4-k8s   | SHUTOFF | 
oam_network_bxun=10.0.0.26, 10.12.5.26  | ubuntu-16-04-cloud-amd64 | m2.xlarge |
| f74a6d67-29f3-4400-aaae-a1a9da4c9aaa | sb4-rancher   | SHUTOFF | 
oam_network_bxun=10.0.0.19, 10.12.5.51  | ubuntu-16-04-cloud-amd64 | m1.xlarge |
| e1031cd8-8a5c-4723-a0db-c57fbc69bfea | Valet-SK  | SHUTOFF | 
oam_network_bxun=10.0.0.27, 10.12.6.154 | ubuntu-16-04-cloud-amd64 | m3.xlarge |
| ef814b62-4f8e-48a9-b5f9-ec54dc7b9116 | valet-install | SHUTOFF | 
oam_network_bxun=10.0.0.22, 10.12.5.157 | ubuntu-16-04-cloud-amd64 | m1.xlarge |
| 626445c7-a833-4399-82eb-19f6ab9d0b4a | valet | SHUTOFF | 
oam_network_bxun=10.0.0.7, 10.12.5.41   | ubuntu-16-04-cloud-amd64 | m1.xlarge |
+--+---+-+-+--+---+

AAF
+--+-+-+--+--+---+
| ID   | Name| Status  | Networks   
  | Image| Flavor|
+--+-+-+--+--+---+
| 95e628af-bf51-4f42-ab6f-b64cf9dc938d | Sai-OOM-K8  | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.6.59  |  | m2.xlarge |
| d54e5131-d017-456e-94fd-2637db1b5232 | aaf-oom | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.6.176 |  | m1.xlarge |
| e74c361e-d2d7-493d-b4e8-047ef848e54d | Sai-OOM-Rancher | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.6.175 |  | m3.xlarge |
| 9311b5be-7170-4b07-898e-caa967d8006a | mr-k8s2-2   | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.6.98  |  | m2.xlarge |
| 1cc0486c-5a1b-44af-b79f-052d557d117a | mr-k8s2-1   | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.5.130 |  | m2.xlarge |
| a51e9706-da8f-46f7-aae5-dbee61e24517 | mr-k8s  | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.7.22  | ubuntu-16-04-cloud-amd64 | m3.xlarge |
| d42ecbe3-9dff-443f-89ff-73c83f06780f | mr_rauncher | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.7.5   |  | m3.xlarge |
| 8bc0ea2b-83e9-4ce1-824a-9f2944145f12 | MR TEST | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.5.108 |  | m3.xlarge |
+--+-+-+--+--+---+

APPC
+--++-+--+---+---+
| ID   | Name   | Status  | 
Networks
 | Image
 | Flavor|
+--++-+--+---+---+
| c5d2ca68-6c61-44f7-93df-1d05da787fe4 | appcpgn01  | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.6.104; vFW_appcfwl01_unprotected=192.168.30.200; 
oam_onap_LH2Z=10.0.100.12| 
ubuntu-14-04-cloud-amd64  | m1.medium |
| 5bfc1e4b-be1e-4b2c-93a4-d4d7cfd99760 | appcsnk01  | SHUTOFF | 
external=10.12.6.129; vFW_appcfwl01_protected=192.168.40

Re: [onap-discuss] Upgrade python version from 2 to 3

[Gary Wu]

Hi Haibin,

I think you need to modify your tox.ini to specify the python environment that 
you need.  Currently it lists py27.  Maybe change that to py36 or whichever 
python3 version is appropriate for you?

Thanks,
Gary


From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org  on behalf of 
haibin via Lists.Onap.Org 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2019 11:18 PM
To: gary.i...@huawei.com ; Yang, Bin 

Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org 
Subject: [onap-discuss] Upgrade python version from 2 to 3


Hi Gray,



We must upgrading Django from version 1.9.6 to 2.2.3 because security issue [1].

Bin Yang passed on the message from the TSC meeting that we need to fix [1] in 
E release, otherwise we won’t be able to publish the Plugin.

The last version to support Python 2.7 is Django 1.11 LTS, so we must upgrade 
Python2 to Python3.



I change code and test successfully in local, but when I submitted the code and 
built by Gerrit Jenkins get error.

I checked log [2] and found the python version is python 2.7, how can I change 
the python version which is installed by Jenkins [1].

I also didn’t find “python-tools-install.sh”.



[1] 
https://jenkins.onap.org/job/multicloud-openstack-master-pike-verify-python/configure

[2] 
https://jenkins.onap.org/job/multicloud-openstack-master-pike-verify-python/138/console



Thank you!

Best Regards

---

Huang.haibin

11628530

86+18106533356





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#18116): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/18116
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/32487216/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] Upgrade python version from 2 to 3

[Gary Wu]

Hi Haibin,

Probably the best way to solve this would be to verify that you can run "mvn 
clean install" for this project on a clean ubuntu 16.04 environment, and figure 
out exactly what apt-get packages are required to for everything to pass.  Then 
we can submit a LF request to ensure that the necessary packages are installed 
for the jenkins slave VMs that run these jobs.

Thanks,
Gary

From: Huang, Haibin 
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 5:28 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org ; Gary Wu 
; Yang, Bin 
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] Upgrade python version from 2 to 3


Hi Gary,



Actually, I had changed to py35 in the patch.

https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/multicloud/openstack/+/91230/4/pike/tox.ini<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Fmulticloud%2Fopenstack%2F%2B%2F91230%2F4%2Fpike%2Ftox.ini&data=02%7C01%7Cgary.wu%40futurewei.com%7C922204bdb70041b831bf08d70a4dc4f8%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C636989201444615767&sdata=GAd3SeWupP5LlffPOqVk036gTCo7PuiDPINeM%2Baw2x8%3D&reserved=0>



From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Gary Wu
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 3:38 AM
To: Yang, Bin ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Huang, 
Haibin 
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Upgrade python version from 2 to 3



Hi Haibin,



I think you need to modify your tox.ini to specify the python environment that 
you need.  Currently it lists py27.  Maybe change that to py36 or whichever 
python3 version is appropriate for you?



Thanks,

Gary





From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> on behalf of 
haibin via Lists.Onap.Org 
mailto:haibin.huang=intel@lists.onap.org>>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2019 11:18 PM
To: gary.i...@huawei.com<mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com> 
mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>; Yang, Bin 
mailto:bin.y...@windriver.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: [onap-discuss] Upgrade python version from 2 to 3



Hi Gray,



We must upgrading Django from version 1.9.6 to 2.2.3 because security issue [1].

Bin Yang passed on the message from the TSC meeting that we need to fix [1] in 
E release, otherwise we won’t be able to publish the Plugin.

The last version to support Python 2.7 is Django 1.11 LTS, so we must upgrade 
Python2 to Python3.



I change code and test successfully in local, but when I submitted the code and 
built by Gerrit Jenkins get error.

I checked log [2] and found the python version is python 2.7, how can I change 
the python version which is installed by Jenkins [1].

I also didn’t find “python-tools-install.sh”.



[1] 
https://jenkins.onap.org/job/multicloud-openstack-master-pike-verify-python/configure<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjenkins.onap.org%2Fjob%2Fmulticloud-openstack-master-pike-verify-python%2Fconfigure&data=02%7C01%7Cgary.wu%40futurewei.com%7C922204bdb70041b831bf08d70a4dc4f8%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C636989201444625766&sdata=y2Z7mUdPdGyljH95vjNj7BiUhTkvGHragT5Oa8KNwfU%3D&reserved=0>

[2] 
https://jenkins.onap.org/job/multicloud-openstack-master-pike-verify-python/138/console<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjenkins.onap.org%2Fjob%2Fmulticloud-openstack-master-pike-verify-python%2F138%2Fconsole&data=02%7C01%7Cgary.wu%40futurewei.com%7C922204bdb70041b831bf08d70a4dc4f8%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C636989201444635756&sdata=G6TvsQ0Fq%2BhOtua1goCM%2BpnRvXvwYzRaLFil4KMic5s%3D&reserved=0>



Thank you!

Best Regards

---

Huang.haibin

11628530

86+18106533356





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#18125): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/18125
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/32487216/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] Upgrade python version from 2 to 3

[Gary Wu]

Installing python3.5 should be fine, but if you need to modify how the tox 
command is invoked then you need to change your maven pom file.

Can someone else chime in if you think this might cause conflicts with any 
existing python3 projects?

Thanks,
Gary


From: Huang, Haibin 
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 11:54 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org ; Gary Wu 
; Yang, Bin 
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] Upgrade python version from 2 to 3


Hi Gary,



I have debugged and found root cause which is ubuntu1604 guest default install 
python2.7.

So,  we need make image including python3.5 environment. I think we have two 
methods to solve this problem.

First, we add the steps for installing change in [1].

  # apt-get install python3.5

  # apt-get install python3-pip

  # pip3 install virtualenv

  # python3 -m venv venv-tox

 Use “# virtualenv -p /usr/bin/python3.5 $WORKSPACE/venv-tox” to replace “# 
virtualenv $WORKSPACE/venv-tox”



Second, we make new image including python3.5, pip and virtualenv to replace 
ubuntu1604 image.

Anyway, we need your confirmation whether we modify it in that way.



[1] 
https://git.onap.org/ci-management/tree/jjb/global-templates-python.yaml<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.onap.org%2Fci-management%2Ftree%2Fjjb%2Fglobal-templates-python.yaml&data=02%7C01%7Cgary.wu%40futurewei.com%7C2c96ef97d90145e4b99e08d70b4cc699%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C636990296695912257&sdata=2EiGA0EAdlHLNHmLQrp4PZH4iDsX8FnrtX3Zu2tN92s%3D&reserved=0>



From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On 
Behalf Of Gary Wu
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 12:25 PM
To: Huang, Haibin ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Yang, 
Bin 
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Upgrade python version from 2 to 3



Hi Haibin,



Probably the best way to solve this would be to verify that you can run "mvn 
clean install" for this project on a clean ubuntu 16.04 environment, and figure 
out exactly what apt-get packages are required to for everything to pass.  Then 
we can submit a LF request to ensure that the necessary packages are installed 
for the jenkins slave VMs that run these jobs.

Thanks,

Gary



From: Huang, Haibin mailto:haibin.hu...@intel.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 5:28 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; Gary Wu 
mailto:gary...@futurewei.com>>; Yang, Bin 
mailto:bin.y...@windriver.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] Upgrade python version from 2 to 3



Hi Gary,



Actually, I had changed to py35 in the patch.

https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/multicloud/openstack/+/91230/4/pike/tox.ini<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.onap.org%2Fr%2Fc%2Fmulticloud%2Fopenstack%2F%2B%2F91230%2F4%2Fpike%2Ftox.ini&data=02%7C01%7Cgary.wu%40futurewei.com%7C2c96ef97d90145e4b99e08d70b4cc699%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C636990296695912257&sdata=sPsI8zwdu0y0qXzHBnsSmveiK10JUbG2yDKYHsbBqZE%3D&reserved=0>



From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Gary Wu
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 3:38 AM
To: Yang, Bin mailto:bin.y...@windriver.com>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Huang, Haibin 
mailto:haibin.hu...@intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Upgrade python version from 2 to 3



Hi Haibin,



I think you need to modify your tox.ini to specify the python environment that 
you need.  Currently it lists py27.  Maybe change that to py36 or whichever 
python3 version is appropriate for you?



Thanks,

Gary





From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> on behalf of 
haibin via Lists.Onap.Org 
mailto:haibin.huang=intel@lists.onap.org>>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2019 11:18 PM
To: gary.i...@huawei.com<mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com> 
mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>; Yang, Bin 
mailto:bin.y...@windriver.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: [onap-discuss] Upgrade python version from 2 to 3



Hi Gray,



We must upgrading Django from version 1.9.6 to 2.2.3 because security issue [1].

Bin Yang passed on the message from the TSC meeting that we need to fix [1] in 
E release, otherwise we won’t be able to publish the Plugin.

The last version to support Python 2.7 is Django 1.11 LTS, so we must upgrade 
Python2 to Python3.



I change code and test successfully in local, but when I submitted the code and 
built by Gerrit Jenkins get error.

I checked log [2] and found the python version is python 2.7, how can I change 
the python version which is i

[onap-discuss] My new email address

[Gary Wu]

Hi all,

Due to recent changes in the business environment, my participation in ONAP
as a Huawei employee has ended as of this past Monday.  I will spend some
personal time in the coming days to ensure a smooth transition of my ONAP
knowledge and responsibilities to the community.

As part of this change, please note that my email address is now
gary...@gmail.com.  My previous email addresses @huawei.com and @
futurewei.com are no longer valid but may not be bouncing properly, so if
you have sent me emails recently please forward them to the new address.
If you need to contact me, please reach me via this email address or via
RocketChat.

It's been a great pleasure working with each of you, and I hope we may
cross paths again in the future.

Thanks,
Gary

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#18274): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/18274
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/32591751/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #43030] [integration] Jenkins jobs not updating Gerrit

[Gary Wu via RT]

Hi Jess,

Seems it is working again now.  If you look at e.g. 
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/5789/ you can see that the first couple of jobs 
that got triggered did not update Gerrit, but the final "recheck" did.

Thanks,
Gary

-Original Message-
From: Jessica Wagantall via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org] 
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 4:48 PM
To: Gary Wu 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [ONAP Helpdesk #43030] [integration] Jenkins jobs not updating Gerrit

Dear Gary, 

Can you please let me know which job are you wanting to see updates from? 

Thansk a ton
Jess. 

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #43359] Jenkins is down

[Gary Wu via RT]

Looks like it's working now.  Thanks!
-Gary

-Original Message-
From: Andrew Grimberg via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org] 
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 11:02 AM
To: Gary Wu 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [ONAP Helpdesk #43359] Jenkins is down

On Fri Jul 21 13:21:36 2017, agrimberg wrote:
> On 07/21/2017 10:11 AM, Gary Wu via RT wrote:
> 
> > Hi helpdesk,
> > 
> > http://jenkins.onap.org/ is not responding.  Can you take a look?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Gary
> 
> Greetings Gary,
> 
> It looks like we are, or were having some issues getting to the 
> provider [0]. I suggest you subscribe to our master status page [1]. 
> At some point ONAP will likely get it's own dedicated page, but right 
> now this is the best option.
> 
> -Andy-
> 
> [0] https://status.linuxfoundation.org/incidents/b1sv4m6zb7tr
> [1] https://status.linuxfoundation.org/

As of 20 minutes ago this issue should be fully resolved.

-Andy-

--
Andrew Grimberg
The Linux Foundation

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [linuxfoundation.org #43994] RE: [ONAP Helpdesk #43994] RE: 答复：[integration] Jenkins Merge Failure

[Gary Wu via RT]

Hi Jessica,

Am I supposed to be able to access that link?  If not yet, can I be granted 
read access?

Thanks,
Gary

-Original Message-
From: Jessica Wagantall via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org] 
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 1:57 PM
To: Gary Wu 
Cc: fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [ONAP Helpdesk #43994] RE: 答复：[integration] Jenkins Merge Failure

Duplicate of https://rt-sso.linuxfoundation.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=43995

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [linuxfoundation.org #44094] RE: [ONAP Helpdesk #44094] 答复: Re: 答复: [integration] RE: About CI job Script for python project in ONAP

[Gary Wu via RT]

Sorry about that.  I’ve submitted a fix into ci-management: 
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/7229/

Thanks,
Gary

From: fu.jin...@zte.com.cn [mailto:fu.jin...@zte.com.cn]
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 5:54 PM
To: onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org
Cc: zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn; Gary Wu ; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: 答复: [ONAP Helpdesk #44094] 答复: Re: [onap-discuss]答复: [integration] RE: 
About CI job Script for python project in ONAP


Hi Jess,

I think Gary's script has some mistakes, you can see the following log

18:13:06 openstack: mv: cannot stat '/tmp/redis-4.0.1/redis-server': No 
such file or directory

Gary's Scripts(Path of redis-server and redis.conf are wrong)

   # 2. set conf file and init script

mv /tmp/redis-4.0.1/redis-server /etc/init.d/redis-server

chmod +x /etc/init.d/redis-server

mv /tmp/redis-4.0.1/redis.conf /etc/redis.conf



Thanks,

Jinhua






原始邮件
发件人： 
mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org>>;
收件人：张茂鹏10030173;
抄送人：傅锦华10108953; mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>>; 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>;
日 期 ：2017年08月10日 07:01
主 题 ：[ONAP Helpdesk #44094] 答复: Re: [onap-discuss]答复: [integration] RE: About 
CI job Script for python project in ONAP


Dear Maopeng,

I am currently working on this.
Looking at the current failures found here:
https://jenkins.onap.org/job/ci-management-merge-packer-ubuntu-16.04-redis/1/console

Will let you know once I get this resolved

Thanks!
Jess





___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [linuxfoundation.org #44094] RE: [linuxfoundation.org #44094] Re: [linuxfoundation.org #44094] RE: [ONAP Helpdesk #44094] 答复: Re: 答复: [integration] RE: About CI job Script for python pr

[Gary Wu via RT]

Andrew/Jess, since we don't have direct access to these environments, can you 
help check them to see if redis is running?

Thanks,
Gary

-Original Message-
From: fu.jin...@zte.com.cn via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org] 
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 5:52 PM
To: zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn
Cc: Gary Wu ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: 答复: [linuxfoundation.org #44094] Re: [linuxfoundation.org #44094] RE: 
[ONAP Helpdesk #44094] 答复: Re: [onap-discuss]答复: [integration] RE: About CI job 
Script for python project in ONAP

Hi Andrew,Jess and Gary:

Thanks for your help, I can see the node for redis in Jenkins now.

But unit test for vfc-nfvo-lcm still can not passed, from the log in jenkins, I 
think redis is not started in the redis node, can you help me to check it?

Thanks,

Jinhua










原始邮件



发件人： 
收件人：张茂鹏10030173
抄送人：傅锦华10108953  
日 期 ：2017年08月11日 02:09
主 题 ：[linuxfoundation.org #44094] Re: [linuxfoundation.org #44094] RE: [ONAP 
Helpdesk #44094] 答复: Re: [onap-discuss]答复: [integration] RE: About CI job 
Script for python project in ONAP





Gary's changes have been merged in and the redis image has been built.
I've added a new minion template to allow the image to come online.

-Andy-

On 08/10/2017 09:55 AM, Gary Wu via RT wrote:
> 
> Sorry about that.  I’ve submitted a fix into ci-management: 
> https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/7229/
> 
> Thanks,
> Gary
> 
> From: fu.jin...@zte.com.cn [mailto:fu.jin...@zte.com.cn]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 5:54 PM
> To: onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org
> Cc: zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn Gary Wu  
> onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> Subject: 答复: [ONAP Helpdesk #44094] 答复: Re: [onap-discuss]答复: [integration] 
> RE: About CI job Script for python project in ONAP
> 
> 
> Hi Jess,
> 
> I think Gary's script has some mistakes, you can see the following log
> 
> 18:13:06 openstack: mv: cannot stat '/tmp/redis-4.0.1/redis-server': No 
> such file or directory
> 
> Gary's Scripts(Path of redis-server and redis.conf are wrong)
> 
># 2. set conf file and init script
> 
> mv /tmp/redis-4.0.1/redis-server /etc/init.d/redis-server
> 
> chmod +x /etc/init.d/redis-server
> 
> mv /tmp/redis-4.0.1/redis.conf /etc/redis.conf
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jinhua
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 原始邮件
> 发件人： 
> mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org>>
> 收件人：张茂鹏10030173
> 抄送人：傅锦华10108953 mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>> 
> mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
> 日 期 ：2017年08月10日 07:01
> 主 题 ：[ONAP Helpdesk #44094] 答复: Re: [onap-discuss]答复: [integration] RE: About 
> CI job Script for python project in ONAP
> 
> 
> Dear Maopeng,
> 
> I am currently working on this.
> Looking at the current failures found here:
> https://jenkins.onap.org/job/ci-management-merge-packer-ubuntu-16.04-redis/1/console
> 
> Will let you know once I get this resolved
> 
> Thanks!
> Jess
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Andrew J Grimberg
Lead, IT Release Engineering
The Linux Foundation

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss