Re: Pentax KZ

2002-04-07 Thread Andreas

On 6 Apr 2002, at 11:10, Andreas Wirtz wrote:

  And don't forget eyeglasses at home again
 Andreas Wirtz

Well thanks Andreas W
maybe I had my sun glasses on last week :-)

I have looked at the pictures of the K2 at the web and there is a clear
down line at the upper left corner of the '2'. The only possibility would
be that only the black paint of this little line worn off !? I will tell
you next week.

Andreas B
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




M 4/20mm quality

2002-04-07 Thread Frantisek Vlcek

Hi,
   anybody has this smallest 20mm lens I have ever seen? I am building
   a kit along an LX for small lenses - landscapes and such where I
   can sacrifice some speed, as my current 20mm is a 2.8 Zeiss Jena
   Flektogon adapted to K (stopdown), which is very big (67mm filters)
   although good.

   I read mixed reviews about the M 20/4 on Stan's page and others,
   some say it's got horrible double distortion - that isn't that of a
   concern for landscapes and people, but I would like it to be
   decently sharp at 5.6 and very sharp at 8, is that so? How about
   compared to other 20mm lenses, the Mir and the Zeiss Jena? I
   usually enlarge 135 format up to 30x40cm (and would even bigger if
   I had big enough trays and easel), of course I can (and have)
   medium format but lots of times I want to carry only small stuff.

   Thanks!

Good light,
 Frantisek Vlcek
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Studio Band info

2002-04-07 Thread Cotty

Just want to do a good job,who knows were this 
may go.Going to try Cotty's plastic bouncy 
thingy,made one today.When i checked the flash
(af280t)on the minolta iv meter there was a 1 
stop difference from no plastic bouncy to 
bouncy.

Ta da! Fame at last!

I like a bit of plastic bouncy meself...

Good luck with the shoot - the most important thing is to enjoy yourself 
and have some fun - nobs to the pics! There ain't no justice anyway - 
they'll end up picking the ones you would have binned. Musicians.

8-)

Cotty


___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads 
http://www.macads.co.uk
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: OT: Yashica MF lenses

2002-04-07 Thread ukasz Kacperczyk

But isn't Xenotar the same as the Planar only made by Schneider?
ukasz
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Studio Band info

2002-04-07 Thread David Brooks

Probably will take the ones i don't like.If any of them are worthy of
posting i'll put a credit for your plastic bouncy thingyG
This should be fun,same studio and producer as 2 of Big Sugar's CD's.

Dave
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: Studio Band info


 Just want to do a good job,who knows were this
 may go.Going to try Cotty's plastic bouncy
 thingy,made one today.When i checked the flash
 (af280t)on the minolta iv meter there was a 1
 stop difference from no plastic bouncy to
 bouncy.

 Ta da! Fame at last!

 I like a bit of plastic bouncy meself...

 Good luck with the shoot - the most important thing is to enjoy yourself
 and have some fun - nobs to the pics! There ain't no justice anyway -
 they'll end up picking the ones you would have binned. Musicians.

 8-)

 Cotty


 ___
 Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Check out the UK Macintosh ads
 http://www.macads.co.uk
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Tartan Day, Washington, DC

2002-04-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Just a quick heads-up in case anyone from the mailing list is
going to be at the National Tartan Day event on the Mall in
Washington, DC (USA) today (Sunday):  I'll be performing at
11:15 and 2:45 in the Music Tent with The Homespun Ceilidh Band.
Come listen to us and then introduce yourself, eh?  I'll be the
tired, sweaty guitarist in a slightly-too-short Black Watch kilt
(which may not be sufficient information to ID me if you're
looking for me when I'm not on stage, mind you).

Event details:  http://www.tartanday.org/dc_mall.htm

(Also, our much-delayed CD (long, off-topic story involving The
Harry Fox Agency) is finally out!  Apparently we won't be
allowed to sell it at this event because of the location, but I
guess one of the things we'll be doing this morning is to ask
whether there's a legal workaround for that...)

The band could use some good concert photos ... so far I haven't
been terribly effective at photographing the band at the same
time as I'm playing in it.  ;-)

Band page:  http://www.radix.net/~dglenn/bands/hcb.html

Yeah, I know this is short notice -- I've been kind of swamped
lately, including a grueling 7-hour rehearsal for another band
yesterday that wiped me out.  Hoping that someone from the list
was already planning on going and happens to check their email
before heading out.

-- Glenn
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: OT: Yashica MF lenses

2002-04-07 Thread Shel Belinkoff

I'm just now going through the Xenotar-Planar machinations wrt a
possible Rolleiflex purchase.  These pages may be of some interest.

http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=001CtQ
http://www.foto.no/rolleiflex/Rollei-9.html

£ukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
 
 But isn't Xenotar the same as the Planar only made by Schneider?

-- 
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: OT: Yashica MF lenses

2002-04-07 Thread Frantisek Vlcek

Sunday, April 07, 2002, 1:46:54 PM, ukasz wrote:
K But isn't Xenotar the same as the Planar only made by Schneider?
K ukasz

Well, It's like saying all Tessars are the same... While the original
Tessar was f/6.8, later tweaked to get f/4.5 and even f/2.8, all by
changing the diopter strengths and spacing of the various elements. So
now, some tessars are simply much better than others. Also, remember
that it can be complicated by using strange glass types, like
rare-earth Lanthanum glass, to improve the element refraction index.
IIRC Kodak used such glass in some Tessar formula lenses Ektars, and
one USSR made Tessar used La glass too, to improve it a lot.

A planar is similar, the original Planar developed by Rudolph
soemitime in 1890s evolved into different planars... the Zeiss one,
the Zeiss Jena Biometar (which has different split element into group.
Some say the Biometar 2.8/80 is better than the Planar 2.8/80...). The
Xenotar, etc... All might be derived from the same old Rudolph's
Planar, but vary slightly or more.

And the Russian lenses, most of the Helioses are Leitz Summilux copies
IIRC, but more or less tweaked...

As well as almost all 1.4/50 lenses are of quite generic gaussian design, but
they can differ a lot in quality between manufacturers.

Good light,
   Frantisek Vlcek
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Ugly bokeh from FA43/1.9

2002-04-07 Thread Paul F. Stregevsky

Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that some other examples were shown, as well. Maybe it was the 
50/1.2 that was discussed ... don't recall.

Indeed, Shel, I've taken only a dozen or so pics with my 50/1.2 PKA, but as 
soon as I saw the bokeh in the bug photo, I thought, Hlike my 
50/1.2A. (And the A is supposed to have better bokeh than the K.)

Paul Franklin Stregevsky
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: M 4/20mm quality

2002-04-07 Thread Hans-Bernhard Beykirch

I have both the M 4/20mm and the FA* 2/24 mm. In a comparision of these
lenses for nature photography I can say that the distortion of the 20 is
definitly larger than of the 24.

Concerning sharpness, between f5.6 and f16 the 24 is sharper, but this
does not mean that the 20 is not sharp. For landscapes with a very near
foreground the sharpness is good enough for large prints (from Velvia
and Provia F which I use).

There is only one drawback. If you would like to use it for hiking, from
the first point of view, the 20 seems to be very small and fits in a
very small bag. But if you use filters forget about using a 49 which
fits right in. It will cause huge vignetting. I use my 67 filters from
the 24 with a 49-67 step-up ring, that works with one filter (even with
a thick polarizer), but it enlarges the diameter of the lens which
prevents using a really small bag.

Regards

Bernd
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Submission to pug

2002-04-07 Thread HARRY BAUGHMAN

This is the second time I have tried to e-mail the member who is taken care of
the pug site. I get the e-mail back that it won't accept submissions or
messages from msn.com.
What do I do now?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: Tartan Day, Washington, DC

2002-04-07 Thread Amita Guha

 Just a quick heads-up in case anyone from the mailing list is
 going to be at the National Tartan Day event on the Mall in
 Washington, DC (USA) today (Sunday):  I'll be performing at
 11:15 and 2:45 in the Music Tent with The Homespun Ceilidh Band.

Glenn, that's so cool that you're in a piper's band. Do you play the
pipes or the drums? I went to the Pipefest parade here in NY
yesterday, and my friend and I decided we want to learn to play the
drums. :)

Hopefully got some good pictures of the parade (and of Sean Connery
leading it), though nothing terribly creative...I'm still trying to
get used to my new zoom lens.

--Amita
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: M 4/20mm quality

2002-04-07 Thread Gianfranco Irlanda

Frantisek Vlcek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

Hi Frantisek,

anybody has this smallest 20mm lens I have ever seen?
(...)
I read mixed reviews about the M 20/4 on Stan's page and
others,
some say it's got horrible double distortion - that isn't
that of a
concern for landscapes and people, but I would like it to
be
decently sharp at 5.6 and very sharp at 8, is that so? How
about
compared to other 20mm lenses, the Mir and the Zeiss Jena?

The M 20/4 is my only original Pentax 20mm (I do have the Mir
and I had for a while the 20/2.5).
I can say that it is reasonably sharp starting from f/5.6,
although the borders become sharp only from f/8.
The big problem with this lens is the huge vignetting wide open.
It disappears when stopped down (from f/8, more or less).
The great advantage over the other lenses you mention is its
size. It can't be beat in this regard. I think it is the shorter
M lens with the exception of the 40/2.8, which says a lot.
It is of course less prone to flare than the Mir (I don't know
about the Flektogon).
I have never experienced the double distorsion you mention. I
never made a real test to verify its distorsion (or lack of),
but I have always found the lens well corrected (I don't
actually shot buildings with it, but I can test it if you need).

I usually enlarge 135 format up to 30x40cm (and would even
bigger if
I had big enough trays and easel), of course I can (and
have)
medium format but lots of times I want to carry only small
stuff.

You won't be disappointed if you use it stopped down enough. The
center is quite sharp even at f/4, but I don't know if a picture
taken at that aperture can be enlarged with satisfaction up to
30x40.  

Thanks!

You are welcome!

Gianfranco


=
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Using MZ-M with Non-Dedicated Flash

2002-04-07 Thread Jeffrey Schneider

I've noticed a problem using my Vivitar 285HV on this camera that I don't
seem to have using it with any of my older cameras.  Using the flash, there
seems to be a long time delay between the mirror moving up and the shutter
actually firing.  When I remove the flash, the camera works normally, with
no noticeable delay.

Has anyone had a similar experience?  Can you explain why this happens?

Thanks in advance.

Jeff
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




OT: Rolleicord focusing screen - question

2002-04-07 Thread Mike Ignatiev

With the recent discussion of Tessars/Xenars/Planars/whatnot, I guess some
folks here have quite a bit experience with TLRs.
Does anyone know how difficult is to change on on a 'cord Va (viewving hood
is nonremovable' -- held in place by a few screws). The original screen
sucks a lot -- the edges are almost impossible to see.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Encouraging the bubbahood

2002-04-07 Thread Mike Ignatiev

 Difficulty in getting convenient processing is one reason. Many years
 ago, when my Rolleiflex TLR was the only camera I had, I could drop film
 off at a drug store or whatever and get back machine prints of snaps and
 travel photos. Can't do that today. Maybe there are some 1-hour places
 or the like that do 120 film, but I do not know of any. When I use the
 Rollei now -- rarely -- I have to either go to a pro lab or find a
 darkroom to work in myself.

In downtown Boston there are at least two a few hours places that do MF
chromes, I drop the film off on my way to work and pick it up at lunch. The
price is $6 for a roll of 120 film, which I think is quite reasonable. None
of them does enlargements though. OTOH, I doubt that the drug stores used to
make 16x20 prints even many years ago, and for contact sheets, scanning on
a cheap flat bad is good enough (and hard to beat the price!) The only real
hassle, in my view, is lack of availability of 120 film -- there's no Kodak
Supra/Royal Gold  analog as far as I know, and of course, the only places
you can buy it are pro stores, so if you run out of film, say, in Bryce
Canyon -- tough luck.

 But you do not need high end SLRs for casual use anyway; It is easy to
 do what most folks do, use a 35mm PS (or even drag out the PZ1-p) or LX
 for snaps.

What I seem to be ending up with is PS for snapshots (Olympus Stylus
Epic -- wonderful little camera, albeit with its limitations), LX for
special needs, like macro, available light/darkness, very wide angle or long
tele, and MF for pretty much anything else -- P6x7, or 'cord for hikes.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Pentax Auto 110 winder question

2002-04-07 Thread Carlos Royo

The Winder II was the model released with the improved version of the
Pentax 110, called Auto 110 Super.
This winder allows continuous shooting at 1.5 frames per second. The
first winder was single shot only. I also have one of those Winder II,
by the way. It is a cute little thing, but very noisy.

--
Carlos Royo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zaragoza (Aragon) - Spain
--
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




equipment bashing update

2002-04-07 Thread tom

These days I use the MZ-S/28-70/2.8/AF500FTZ/Press-T for about 90% of 
the reception shots. Sometimes I take that rig and stick it on a 
tripod for some available light stuff, like the cake or centerpieces.

Well, last night I thought the damned thing was attached to the head 
as I went walking off. Was it? Noooagain, I've got an 
airborne camera unit.

It came down on the lens, except this time I had the hood attached - 
the hood broke, but the lens was fine. Score one for cheap plastic 
hoods.

The flash didn't fare so well...the hot shoe broke. This is my 4th 
broken flash in the last 9 months or so.

Maybe I shouldn't be telling you guys this stuff...you'll never buy 
any of my used gear!

tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Af 360 FGZ question

2002-04-07 Thread Emilio Puga

Anyone knows what´s the highest sync speed that Mz-s and Af 360 fgz can
be used at gíreles mode with the camera flash as a main flash??
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Using MZ-M with Non-Dedicated Flash

2002-04-07 Thread Brendan

Try new batteries, I have noticed that with the
Achiever flash set to
manual it slowed down my MZ-M. I do not know why but
it does seem
that the camera knows there is a flash there once a
connection is made
on the hot shoe and it tries to communicate, using a
bit of power
doing so. I have not had that problem with the battery
pack fg.


--- Jeffrey Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've noticed a problem using my Vivitar 285HV on
 this camera that I don't
 seem to have using it with any of my older cameras. 
 Using the flash, there
 seems to be a long time delay between the mirror
 moving up and the shutter
 actually firing.  When I remove the flash, the
 camera works normally, with
 no noticeable delay.
 
 Has anyone had a similar experience?  Can you
 explain why this happens?
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 Jeff
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. 
 To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
 Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
 http://pug.komkon.org .
 


__ 
Music, Movies, Sports, Games! http://entertainment.yahoo.ca
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: New lens

2002-04-07 Thread William Robb

- Original Message -
From: Artur Ledóchowski
Subject: Re: New lens


 Is your Zenitar also unable to focus on infinity?
 Mine is:( I have a recently-bought K-mount version and when
wide open and focused on infinity, all distant elements look
unsharp. Strange that when I use any
 aperture smaller than f8 and use DOF preview, those elements
do look sharp. I test the first roll of film with this lens so I
have no results so far but it seems to me that
 on small apertures the infinity is covered by DOF. Perhaps
this will be even more advantageous - I suspect that the lens
may be actually focused on the hiperfocal
 distance in such case. However, it seems to be no way to use
large apertures (below f/8)

Sounds like the mount isn't shimmed correctly. I bet putting
another few thousandth of an inch os shim in there would fix it
up for you.

William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




MX Drive and NiCad, 2 auctions...

2002-04-07 Thread Cotty

No bids yet, fair game. Relisted with realistic starts and BINs.

Motor Drive MX:

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1344753755

NiCad Pack MX plus charger:

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1344755197

Hope you all had a good weekend,

Cotty

___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads 
http://www.macads.co.uk
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: This is a manager?

2002-04-07 Thread Brendan

This explains why it took a lab 3 tries to print my
lady bug red!

--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 - Original Message -
 From: Aaron Reynolds
 Subject: Re: This is a manager?
 
 
  On Saturday, April 6, 2002, at 12:42  AM, Butch
 Black wrote:
 
   I have been told by my district manager to get
 more
   production out by making fewer color and density
 corrections.
 
  That's awful.  Did you ask them to reconcile that
 with their
 preaching
  of quality?
 
 Thats the reality of low cost photofinishing. We are
 mandated to
 use a 3 button rule. If the correction is going to
 be more than
 a total of 3 buttons, ferget it.
 It evens out, some of our operators follow a no
 correction
 printing scheme, some of us follow a make it as good
 as possible
 printing scheme.
 If you think the discount photofinishers are doing
 photographers
 a service, think again.
 
 William Robb
 -

__ 
Music, Movies, Sports, Games! http://entertainment.yahoo.ca
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Studio Band info

2002-04-07 Thread Aaron Reynolds

As promised, some Hoosier Daddy in the studio.  Pardon the pooched 
thumbnails, and sorry about the java...that's the price I gotta pay for 
a free drag-and-drop webpage.  ;)

http://homepage.mac.com/aaronreynolds/PhotoAlbum7.html

-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: equipment bashing update

2002-04-07 Thread William D. Sawyer

Tom,  I know the sound of expensive plastic hitting the pavement all too well.  Last 
month I was sitting in a restaurant with my brother-in-law, and had the PZ1-p w/24 f2 
sitting on the table. He was sitting with his ankle crossed over his knee, and as we 
got up, his foot hooked the camera strap, and sent the unit flying. Truly an awful 
sound.

It landed face down on the lens hood.  The body seems to have survived unscathed, and 
the only obvious damage to the lens are some scratches to the edge.  But there is a 
rattle that I'm not sure is just the loose autofocus, so I'm planning to send it to 
Pentax to be checked, though I may just use a local repair service.

BTW, I had the hotshoe break off my 500FTZ last summer, when the rig fell off the 
front seat of my car.  It cost $65 for a Pentax repair, not too bad, really.

I now carry an All-Risks policy on my newer equipment, thanks to some discussions here 
on the list.

The worst part is being without the equipment for 6 weeks or so.  Good luck...

 -Original Message-
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tom
  
 These days I use the MZ-S/28-70/2.8/AF500FTZ/Press-T for about 90% of 
 the reception shots. Sometimes I take that rig and stick it on a 
 tripod for some available light stuff, like the cake or centerpieces.
 
 Well, last night I thought the damned thing was attached to the head 
 as I went walking off. Was it? Noooagain, I've got an 
 airborne camera unit.
 
 It came down on the lens, except this time I had the hood attached - 
 the hood broke, but the lens was fine. Score one for cheap plastic 
 hoods.
 
 The flash didn't fare so well...the hot shoe broke. This is my 4th 
 broken flash in the last 9 months or so.
 
 Maybe I shouldn't be telling you guys this stuff...you'll never buy 
 any of my used gear!
 
 tv
 -
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: equipment bashing update

2002-04-07 Thread harald_nancy

Tom, 
It sounds like the MZ-S fared pretty well in the mishap.
Did it suffer any consequences after being airborne?
Nancy
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: New lens

2002-04-07 Thread Frits J. Wüthrich

Artur,

Are you sure you have the filter attached at the back? I had the same when I
thought to be smart and remove it to reduce any more glass then what is
really needed. In this case, it is really needed.

Frits Wüthrich


Artur Ledóchowski ASKED:
 Is your Zenitar also unable to focus on infinity?
 Mine is:( I have a recently-bought K-mount version and when wide
 open and focused on infinity, all distant elements look unsharp.
 Strange that when I use any
 aperture smaller than f8 and use DOF preview, those elements do
 look sharp. I test the first roll of film with this lens so I
 have no results so far but it seems to me that
 on small apertures the infinity is covered by DOF. Perhaps this
 will be even more advantageous - I suspect that the lens may be
 actually focused on the hiperfocal
 distance in such case. However, it seems to be no way to use
 large apertures (below f/8)
 Greetz
 Artur
 -
 While on Grandfather Mountain yesterday, I had an opportunity to
 play with
 my new Zenitar 16mm fisheye.
 Bill  KG4LOV
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: OT: Rolleicord focusing screen - question

2002-04-07 Thread Frantisek Vlcek

Sunday, April 07, 2002, 4:58:00 PM, Mike wrote:
MI With the recent discussion of Tessars/Xenars/Planars/whatnot, I guess some
MI folks here have quite a bit experience with TLRs.
MI Does anyone know how difficult is to change on on a 'cord Va (viewving hood
MI is nonremovable' -- held in place by a few screws). The original screen
MI sucks a lot -- the edges are almost impossible to see.

If it's similar to my Rolleiflex Standard (or Old Standard according
to other nomenclature), of about 1935 fame, the hood is held by four
screws on the sides. By removing these screws, you can lit the entire
hood, and reveal the screen underneath. Be careful not to dislodge and
drop it! The screen in my rollei rests on two metal spring clips (for
lack of better words) which press the screen against the hood, so the
focus correlation is maintained by pressing the screen up against the
hood. Thus the hood assembly is what correlates the focus (except adjusting the
focus at the lens/helicoid level). The belly side of the screen is the
corrugate plane of focus.

The good thing is, that way, it's hard to knock it out of focus
alignment, and you can safely remove it and clean the screen and
mirror ** which are often quite dirty. It might be the degradation of
the mirror coating which is adding substantially to the dark finder -
except installing a new mirror there is than much less to do.

The bad thing is, that way, any replacement focusing screen will have
to be exactly SAME thickness or focus correlation will not be
maintained. If the new screen is LESS thick, that's still perhaps
good, as you could use paper shims between the hood and the screen to
increase the thickness to the proper thickness, but if the new screen
is thicker, bad luck - focus would have to be adjusted for it.

Although, this is how it is in my Rolleiflex Standard, I do not know
other models that well to tell you what is in your Rolleicord.

**:(with some non-scratching technique!!! Practice on some busted
or cheap SLR mirror first! Also, have in mind, the mirrors of old
Rolleis and all old TLRs were silvered not aluminium, the silver is
apparently less durable and more prone to environmental degradation,
after all, my rollei is 70 years in the field working, more than many
people... I can send you my practice of cleaning the screen which I
used successfully on Yashica and Rollei mirrors, although a disclaimer
as usual)**

Hope this helps.

Good light,
   Frantisek Vlcek
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Vs: OT: Yashica MF lenses

2002-04-07 Thread Frantisek Vlcek

Sunday, April 07, 2002, 8:03:20 PM, Raimo wrote:
RK Russian (and Soviet) lenses are mostly copies of Zeiss designs.
RK All the best!
RK Raimo
RK Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho


Certainly not all. There are quite many of them which are genuine
inhouse designs IMHO. Also, many lenses from many manufacturers are
just derived from earlier lenses, as are the USSR (not copies,
derived). Like most primes, etc. It's the tweaking that makes a
perfect lens often not a completely new design. Most 50 primes are
very similar gaussian lenses, etc... The same for fabled 35/3.5 SMC
which is the simplest wideangle possible, a simple Tessar with large negative
element up front, completely same design as several cheapest 3rd party 35mm lenses
out there. It's the tweaking that makes it good. And in the USSR, the
Maksutov catadioptric design was made, too, which is among the best
for mirror lenses.

Well, I got on a little cardbox soap here ;-)

Good light,
   Frantisek Vlcek
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Dedicated flash for a P30T

2002-04-07 Thread Mat Maessen

I just bought a P30T, both as a second camera body, and a camera for 
pseudo-dummies for my girlfriend (full auto mode).
The Vivitar 560D flash unit that's kicking around here claims to be a 
fully dedicated flash for the camera. However, though it seems to work 
that way when the camera's set to apeture-priority, it doesn't seem to 
work in full auto mode.
Can anyone suggest a decent bounce flash that will work properly with 
this camera, even in full auto mode? If I can find a used AF280T, I 
might consider it, but the new ones are too much $$$ to justify.

-Mat
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: equipment bashing update

2002-04-07 Thread Frantisek Vlcek

And I thought *I* am the worst in handling cameras ;-)

I guess between you and Snowfield Bill's
'Bronica-that-didn't-fare-well-from-the-fifth-floor-window', I am
still far behind ;-)

Frantisek

(no,no, I am good. Don't be afraid to buy this **mint** **LN/NIB**
camera from me G)

P.S.: I was quite afraid about my LX, which I bought recently, at nice
price but it is cosmetically almost flawless. Knowing myself, I would
have liked more an user body, which I wouldn't be afraid to tote
around. Or is it the environment I shoot in? Concerts, clubs,...
occassional demonstration. I am sure my LX is anxiously looking forward to the
autumn Nato summit here in Prague ;-)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: equipment bashing update

2002-04-07 Thread Len Paris

Burn some film, eat some concrete.  How good can it get?  ;-)

Len
---

- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 12:07 PM
Subject: RE: equipment bashing update


 On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 18:54:44 +0200, £ukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
 I'm very sorry for you and your cameras.
 I guess they (cameras) must be pretty scared every time you
pick one
 to
 shoot ;)

 I think they're adrenaline junkies and like it - they know
they're
 going to burn some film!

 tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




The truth

2002-04-07 Thread Frits J. Wüthrich

Some one mentioned he was looking outside and thought the sky was grainy.
Here is even more information about grain and colour and so.
http://www.wuthrich.cc/explenation.jpg

Frits Wüthrich
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Submission to pug

2002-04-07 Thread William Kane

Get a new service provider?  ;-)

Fear not, he's on the list, I'm sure he's reading this, if not, he's reading my
follow up to your post, it's getting there.

Illinois Bill

HARRY BAUGHMAN wrote:

 This is the second time I have tried to e-mail the member who is taken care of
 the pug site. I get the e-mail back that it won't accept submissions or
 messages from msn.com.
 What do I do now?
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: The truth

2002-04-07 Thread ukasz Kacperczyk

I don't know about you guys, but believe him.
ukasz
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Submission to pug

2002-04-07 Thread Bob Poe

Right!
It won't accept my yahoo address either.  It seems to
be a security issue.  BG again?
Who knows?
Bob
--- HARRY BAUGHMAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This is the second time I have tried to e-mail the
 member who is taken care of
 the pug site. I get the e-mail back that it won't
 accept submissions or
 messages from msn.com.
 What do I do now?
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. 
 To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
 Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
 http://pug.komkon.org .
 


=
What boots up must come down.
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: Tartan Day, Washington, DC

2002-04-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Amita asked:
  Washington, DC (USA) today (Sunday):  I'll be performing at
  11:15 and 2:45 in the Music Tent with The Homespun Ceilidh Band.

 Glenn, that's so cool that you're in a piper's band. Do you play the
 pipes or the drums? 

Actually, The Homespun Ceilidh Band is a fiddle band, not a pipe
band.  I play guitar.  (Other instruments, too, but guitar in that
band.)  We're a nine-piece:  two fiddles, two bodhrans, hammered
dulcimer, a person who doubles recorder and viola da gamba, one
who doubles flute and bouzouki, one who doubles cittern and guitar,
and I switch off betwen 6-string and 12-string guitars.

They put the pipe bands at the other end of the site from the 
Music Tent -- the pipes are considered their own category.  ;-)
(Technically, in the UK, the pipes were legally classified as
instruments of war, not musical instruments, for quite some 
time.  More a matter of politics and ethnic suppression than
a musical judgement, as I understand it, but the law stayed on
the books a long time after it stopped being relevant.)

(BTW, there's a piper on our CD, playing shuttle pipes on a 
couple of sets.)

 I went to the Pipefest parade here in NY
 yesterday, and my friend and I decided we want to learn to play the
 drums. :)

Drums are fun.  Those modern marching snares are downright scary
though -- especially if you play them indoors.  Each strike is
like a rifle shot, and the heads are tensioned so tight they feel
solid.  Whew!  

I'm interested in an older style of snare drum, mostly 'cause I
also play early music and want something suitable for that.
I'll need to learn unmatched grip though -- so far I use matched
grip when I'm behind a drum set, but that doesn't work so well
for a drum hanging at your side.

 Hopefully got some good pictures of the parade (and of Sean Connery
 leading it), though nothing terribly creative...I'm still trying to
 get used to my new zoom lens.

Hope you got something good.  Also hoping Tom, who showed up for
our second set today, got some good stuff!  I didn't do much shooting
myself, having started the day already exhausted and becoming more
so from jumping around behind a guitar, but I did shoot some of the
highland dancers.  (Finished off a roll of PJ800 that was already
loaded in the ME, and shot a roll of Provia 100F in the Super Program, 
plus a roll of Fuji 100 in the Nishika 3D camera.)  I was trying to 
get the dancers with the Capitol dome in the background.

I tried to shoot some gulls overhead when the sun was low enough
to light their bellies, but as soon as I put the Long Glass on the
camera, they all vanished.  Mean birds!


Next weekend it's a wedding with The Beltway Early Music Band on
Saturday and Marching Through Time (military re-enactors from
Vikings through WWII, in Glen Dale, MD) with Thrir Venstri Foetr 
('Three Left Feet' -- renaissance dance and English country dance)
on Sunday; then the weekend after that it's The Homespun Ceilidh
Band at the WAMA Crosstown Jam in DC (19 April); then The Homespun
Ceilidh Band at the Southern Maryland Celtic Festival on the 27th.
My busy season has officially started!


And now I think I hear my bed calling me quite insistently.  #Zonk!#

-- Glenn
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Deal of the century!!!

2002-04-07 Thread Steve Larson

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1344623184


Remind me not to buy anything from these guys.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Deal of the century!!!

2002-04-07 Thread Pdgsurvey

Interesting.  Had the exact same lens, w/2x extender, on Ebay for a week and 
the best bid was $20.  Can't sell it for that, I think.  Anyway, auction is 
now closed.

Sounds exactly like my lens description.

Paul G.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Deal of the century!!!

2002-04-07 Thread William Robb

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Deal of the century!!!


 Interesting.  Had the exact same lens, w/2x extender, on Ebay
for a week and
 the best bid was $20.  Can't sell it for that, I think.
Anyway, auction is
 now closed.

 Sounds exactly like my lens description.

Looks just like the one I turned into a flower pot.

William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: New lens

2002-04-07 Thread gfen

On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Artur [ISO-8859-2] Ledóchowski wrote:
 Is your Zenitar also unable to focus on infinity?
 Mine is:( I have a recently-bought K-mount version and when wide open and focused on 
infinity, all distant elements look unsharp. Strange that when I use any

Mine works fine, however, I've heard you MUST have a filter, even if it
sonly the clear one, in the lens itself.

I've barely used mine to date, but with Bill's aquisition and mention, I
decided I would make a concerted effort to bring something out with it
today.

So I used only it and my 40A 1.4 today. The other benefit is that the
Zenitar is the only one I have any contrast filters for, and thus until
today I never used a red or yellow filter.

Lots of pictures taken, can't wait to see how they turned out.. now, if
only I knew how to OPEN a 35mm cartridge. In high school, we had reloaded
ones you just had to bang on a table. Hmm. :)

-- 
http://www.infotainment.org
 The destructive character is cheerful.  - Walter Benjamin
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




What a nice weekend!!

2002-04-07 Thread Steve Larson

Hi all,
 Went to Palm Springs this weekend and burned a lot of film. It was
so windy out there that little baby birdies were being blown out of
their nests. One was a baby hummingbird, got pics (hopefully good
ones) of him being fed by momma, the other was a fledgling Great
Horned Owl. I got pics of the owls parents too. The SMC Takumar
1000mm got a good workout, I felt like a National Geographic guy
this weekend, and loved every minute. Hope you all had a good
weekend too.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: This is a manager?

2002-04-07 Thread Butch Black

I pointed that out to him and his answer is that we are not a custom lab. He
then  said that he could get someone in doing twice the volume, print better
then me, be more managerial, and pay them less (I make about $21.5K/ yr US)
I'm about to the point that the next time he pulls that one I may just let
him come up with this fictitious super person.

On Saturday, April 6, 2002, at 12:42  AM, Butch Black wrote:

 I have been told by my district manager to get more
 production out by making fewer color and density corrections.

That's awful.  Did you ask them to reconcile that with their preaching
of quality?

- -Aaron

BUTCH

Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Using MZ-M with Non-Dedicated Flash

2002-04-07 Thread T Rittenhouse

Because when you use the flash on manual, it uses the full charge of the
condensers for each shot. That means it has to do a full recycle. On auto it
just uses part of the charge and only has to do a partial recharge.
Depending on the distance that can be very short or almost as long as on
manual.

Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto



- Original Message -
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: Using MZ-M with Non-Dedicated Flash


 Try new batteries, I have noticed that with the
 Achiever flash set to
 manual it slowed down my MZ-M. I do not know why but
 it does seem
 that the camera knows there is a flash there once a
 connection is made
 on the hot shoe and it tries to communicate, using a
 bit of power
 doing so. I have not had that problem with the battery
 pack fg.


 --- Jeffrey Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I've noticed a problem using my Vivitar 285HV on
  this camera that I don't
  seem to have using it with any of my older cameras.
  Using the flash, there
  seems to be a long time delay between the mirror
  moving up and the shutter
  actually firing.  When I remove the flash, the
  camera works normally, with
  no noticeable delay.
 
  Has anyone had a similar experience?  Can you
  explain why this happens?
 
  Thanks in advance.
 
  Jeff
  -
  This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
  To unsubscribe,
  go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
  Don't forget to
  visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
  http://pug.komkon.org .
 


 __
 Music, Movies, Sports, Games! http://entertainment.yahoo.ca
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: New lens

2002-04-07 Thread ukasz Kacperczyk

A simple bottleopener should do the job.
Lukasz
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: New lens

2002-04-07 Thread Butch Black

Perhaps it is like some large format wide angle lenses in that they are
actually designed to use the hyperfocal distance for distance focusing and
are noticeably less sharp if actually focused to infinity.

BUTCH

Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Deal of the century!!!

2002-04-07 Thread Steve Larson

I think I got $15 for mine on ebay, I felt very lucky, the guy bought it for
his mom. Camera shops around here would not take it for trade.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message - 
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: Deal of the century!!!


 - Original Message -
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Deal of the century!!!
 
 
  Interesting.  Had the exact same lens, w/2x extender, on Ebay
 for a week and
  the best bid was $20.  Can't sell it for that, I think.
 Anyway, auction is
  now closed.
 
  Sounds exactly like my lens description.
 
 Looks just like the one I turned into a flower pot.
 
 William Robb
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: Studio Band Info

2002-04-07 Thread Butch Black

Nice job.

BUTCH

Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: New lens

2002-04-07 Thread Mick Maguire

A beer bottle opener does the trick for opening film canisters if you
haven't got a leader extractor.

Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: New lens

2002-04-07 Thread Bill Owens

Out of curiosity, I took the clear filter off and, yes, focus was not as
good as with it.

Bill  KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


- Original Message -
From: Artur Ledóchowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: New lens


 Is your Zenitar also unable to focus on infinity?
 Mine is:( I have a recently-bought K-mount version and when wide open and
focused on infinity, all distant elements look unsharp. Strange that when I
use any
 aperture smaller than f8 and use DOF preview, those elements do look
sharp. I test the first roll of film with this lens so I have no results so
far but it seems to me that
 on small apertures the infinity is covered by DOF. Perhaps this will be
even more advantageous - I suspect that the lens may be actually focused on
the hiperfocal
 distance in such case. However, it seems to be no way to use large
apertures (below f/8)
 Greetz
 Artur
 -
 While on Grandfather Mountain yesterday, I had an opportunity to play
with
 my new Zenitar 16mm fisheye.
 Bill  KG4LOV



 --

 Okresl Swoje potrzeby - my znajdziemy oferte za Ciebie!
 [ http://oferty.onet.pl ]
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: New lens

2002-04-07 Thread Bill Owens

Check with your local minilab.  They will probably give you 2 or 3 inches of
the tape used to extract leaders from cassettes.  I plan to bring some to
the Grandfather Mountain Photo Weekend for those that may need some.

Bill  KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


- Original Message -
From: Mick Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 7:58 PM
Subject: RE: New lens


 A beer bottle opener does the trick for opening film canisters if you
 haven't got a leader extractor.

 Regards,
 /\/\ick...
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: Deal of the century!!!

2002-04-07 Thread Geoffgo

Why is that?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steve Larson
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 4:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Deal of the century!!!


http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1344623184


Remind me not to buy anything from these guys.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe, go
to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit
the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: What a nice weekend!!

2002-04-07 Thread Bill Owens

 Hope you all had a good
 weekend too.
 Steve Larson
 Redondo Beach, California

Not really.  I spent the weekend running other peoples' film through the
minilab.  Today was a killer.  Someone in senior management got the bright
idea of running a special.  Any size roll, 1 hour processing for $3.99
single prints and $4.99 double prints.  Ran 1136 prints today and only had
11 waste!

Bill  KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Deal of the century!!!

2002-04-07 Thread James Adams

Steve,
I have athe same lens in front of me, but much newer. In fact, I've got the
Vivitar 135/f2.8, and 200/f3.5 Pentax scew-mount lenses. They are both quite
nice. and the 135/f2.8 cost me about $30 CDN, and the 200/f3.5 $35 CDN, and
are like new.
James
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Deal of the century!!!

2002-04-07 Thread Steve Larson

Well, KEH has a bargain condition one for $12.00, which is probably
the same condition as the one on ebay, especially since it`s been
engraved. Like new specimens fetch about $30. The guy selling it
on ebay is asking $69.00, and he is a dealer/repair outfit, so they 
must know a little about pricing, it just wreaks gouging.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California


Geoffgo wrote:
 Why is that?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steve Larson
 Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 4:37 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Deal of the century!!!
 
 
 http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1344623184
 
 
 Remind me not to buy anything from these guys.
 Steve Larson
 Redondo Beach, California
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: What a nice weekend!!

2002-04-07 Thread Steve Larson

That`s a lot of prints! Think of the money you made though (trying to be
optimistic)!
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: What a nice weekend!!


  Hope you all had a good
  weekend too.
  Steve Larson
  Redondo Beach, California

 Not really.  I spent the weekend running other peoples' film through the
 minilab.  Today was a killer.  Someone in senior management got the bright
 idea of running a special.  Any size roll, 1 hour processing for $3.99
 single prints and $4.99 double prints.  Ran 1136 prints today and only had
 11 waste!

 Bill  KG4LOV
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: How unpleasant.........

2002-04-07 Thread Alan Chan

I think it's more like Pentax was trying to save a few bucks and forced 
their customers to purchase the original rear cap as accessories at some 
point in mid-90's. Somehow they realized that didn't work and then included 
the good old cap again.

regards,
Alan Chan


_
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: What a nice weekend!!

2002-04-07 Thread Bill Owens

Yeah, with the $3.99 special, 31 rolls of film came out to less than
$125.00, although my salary for the day was less than 1/2 that.

Bill  KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


- Original Message -
From: Steve Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: What a nice weekend!!


 That`s a lot of prints! Think of the money you made though (trying to be
 optimistic)!
 Steve Larson
 Redondo Beach, California
 - Original Message -
 From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 5:10 PM
 Subject: Re: What a nice weekend!!


   Hope you all had a good
   weekend too.
   Steve Larson
   Redondo Beach, California
 
  Not really.  I spent the weekend running other peoples' film through the
  minilab.  Today was a killer.  Someone in senior management got the
bright
  idea of running a special.  Any size roll, 1 hour processing for $3.99
  single prints and $4.99 double prints.  Ran 1136 prints today and only
had
  11 waste!
 
  Bill  KG4LOV
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  -
  This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
  go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
  visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Dedicated flash for a P30T

2002-04-07 Thread Alan Chan

I just bought a P30T, both as a second camera body, and a camera for
pseudo-dummies for my girlfriend (full auto mode).
The Vivitar 560D flash unit that's kicking around here claims to be a
fully dedicated flash for the camera. However, though it seems to work
that way when the camera's set to apeture-priority, it doesn't seem to
work in full auto mode.
Can anyone suggest a decent bounce flash that will work properly with
this camera, even in full auto mode? If I can find a used AF280T, I
might consider it, but the new ones are too much $$$ to justify.

AFAIK, all P30 bodies cannot do TTL flash.

regards,
Alan Chan


_
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: equipment bashing update

2002-04-07 Thread tom

On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 13:22:26 -0700, harald_nancy wrote:
Tom,
It sounds like the MZ-S fared pretty well in the mishap.
Did it suffer any consequences after being airborne?

Not as far as I can tell.

tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Deal of the century!!!

2002-04-07 Thread Paul Stenquist

I didn't post the message, but I would guess it's because they want $69
for a paperweight.
Paul

Geoffgo wrote:
 
 Why is that?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steve Larson
 Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 4:37 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Deal of the century!!!
 
 http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1344623184
 
 Remind me not to buy anything from these guys.
 Steve Larson
 Redondo Beach, California
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe, go
 to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit
 the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Need Advice: Photoshop vs. Corel PhotoPaint

2002-04-07 Thread Mark Cassino

I'm using both Photoshop 6.01 and Corel Photopaint, v10. I do a lot with my 
images in terms of digital analogs to traditional darkroom type adjustment 
- like adjusting contrast, dodging, burning, etc.

99% of what I do is in Corel. I really only use Photoshop for the final 
prep of files that are going out to printers or service bureaus.  Most 
preflight instructions I've seen are tailored to Photoshop.  I also use 
Photoshop for some plug ins that don't work on Corel, like Genuine Fractals 
2.0 (which I read works on Corel v9, but not 10.)

I've used Corel since v 3, skipping only 5 and 8 in the upgrade path. It's 
probably just what you are used to, but I like the ergonomics of Corel 
better. I've customized the tool bars and probably execute only 1 out of 
every 20 commands via the text menus. I haven't figured out how to do that 
with Photoshop, so I wind up clicking Filter / Sharpen / Unsharp Mask for 
example, instead of hitting the unsharp mask icon. What's nice about Corel 
is you can set up a task specific tool bar. My scanning bar starts with the 
icon for launching the twain driver, goes through icons for image 
adjustment, levels correction, clean up, resizing, sharpening, saving, and 
finally printing. I can go through the entire process - scan, prep, save, 
print - without having to go into menus.  It sounds trivial, but doing 
things with one click vs 2 or 3 is a huge ergonomic difference.

I'm only using both programs for prepping image scans for prints. When it 
comes to pure digital artwork - I don't know if either, or neither, is the 
better tool.

- MCC

.

At 11:42 AM 4/6/2002 -0700, you wrote:
I've been using Corel PhotoPaint 8, and find that I can do nearly
anything I have wanted to do (so far). I do find masks hard to work with
when the borders are critical. It also comes with a good assortment of
plug-ins.

The main things I work on with image-editing software concern color,
contrast, saturation, backgrounds, sharpening, gaussian blur, correcting
dust/scratches, repainting damaged areas, and masks. PhotoPaint seems to
do all of those fairly well, except mask edges.

My questions are to those who have used both: Is Photoshop worth the
much greater cost? Can it do mask edges more easily? And does it come
with the same range of included plug-ins (or do you have to buy those
separately)?

Thanks for the advice,

Joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

- - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino
Kalamazoo, MI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- - - - - - - - - -
Photos:
http://www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - 
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: What a nice weekend!!

2002-04-07 Thread Paul Stenquist

Sounds like a lot of fun. I envy you that 1000mm. One of these days. Let
us see some of those pics. Sounds like you got some good ones.
   Things were pretty gray here, so I didn't shoot much film. Went out
this morning while we had a bit of hazy bright and shot some trees and
rocks at a nearby river. But I did do a lot of printing. I shot a
beautiful young woman Friday and printed a bunch of 11x14 and a couple
16x20 last night and today. Here's a scan of one of the negs. It's Plus
X from the 6x7 through the 165/4. Light is from a 400AFT firing into a
soft shoulder reflector umbrella and a bank of windows. The scan is from
my Epson 1200 dogbreath scanner, so it's a little shaky. The lady is a
21 year old advertising art director, a huge talent and a very pretty girl.
http://home.earthlink.net/~pnstenquist/_uimages/stephanie2.jpg

Steve Larson wrote:
 
 Hi all,
  Went to Palm Springs this weekend and burned a lot of film. It was
 so windy out there that little baby birdies were being blown out of
 their nests. One was a baby hummingbird, got pics (hopefully good
 ones) of him being fed by momma, the other was a fledgling Great
 Horned Owl. I got pics of the owls parents too. The SMC Takumar
 1000mm got a good workout, I felt like a National Geographic guy
 this weekend, and loved every minute. Hope you all had a good
 weekend too.
 Steve Larson
 Redondo Beach, California
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Deal of the century!!!

2002-04-07 Thread Paul Stenquist

I shot with the 200/3.5 Vivitar for nearly 20 years and it served me
very well. It was a darn good lens, and I made a lot of money with it.
Many thousands of dollars in fact. But it's entertaining to make fun of
some of those old screw mount lenses. I gave mine to a newby
photographer, who is still getting a lot of use out of it.
Paul

James Adams wrote:
 
 Steve,
 I have athe same lens in front of me, but much newer. In fact, I've got the
 Vivitar 135/f2.8, and 200/f3.5 Pentax scew-mount lenses. They are both quite
 nice. and the 135/f2.8 cost me about $30 CDN, and the 200/f3.5 $35 CDN, and
 are like new.
 James
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Ugly bokeh from FA43/1.9

2002-04-07 Thread Collin Brendemuehl

The bokeh looks similar to Nikon bokeh.  With the compromises
made WRT barrel distortion in this design, this is the net result.

At least it's not as extreme as those old Nikon lenses.
They were really, really bad.

Collin

*
KC8TKA

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: RE: Leaf Shutters

2002-04-07 Thread Shel Belinkoff

According to the Kodak Professional Photoguide, as well as 
numerous sources on the 'net, including mailing lists that feature 
cameras with leaf shutters, high shutter speeds used in conjunction 
with smaller apertures produce slower effective shutter speeds, 
producing more exposure than the indicated shutter speed/f-stop 
combination.  This is caused, according to Kodak, by the geometry 
of the lens-shutter-diaphragm assembly combined with inertia of 
moving parts, and is not a manufacturing defect.

J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I havent noticed this with mine ( 90mm SMCT LS for 6X7 ) but I
seriously doubt that Pentax would design-in an exposure error
on what are professional products.
---
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: 43mm wide open comparison?

2002-04-07 Thread Paul Jones

I'd say so, i've never done any tests with my two 50/1.4s to see how much
the improve between 1.4 and 2.0.

Regards,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: 43mm wide open comparison?


 I have heard on the list a number of times that the 43mm is a bit soft
wide
 open. I am wondering how its performace at F2 compares to the FA35/2 at
2.0
 or
 any of the 50/1.4s at 1.4 or 2.0?

 No doubt the 50/1.4 is much softer than 43/1.9 at wide open.

 regards,
 Alan Chan


 _
 Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .